See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: The year is 2012 - Ronald Reagan assesses our circumstances after almost four years with Barack Obama in the oval office.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 1, 2010
Author: RR
Post Date: 2010-04-01 10:32:18 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 2024
Comments: 226
The year is 2012 - Ronald Reagan assesses our circumstances after almost four years with Barack Obama in the oval office.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-35) not displayed.
.
.
.
#36. To: christine (#34)
Addendum: I can see by the uneven thread count that she's still posting. FYI, you're back on bozo groundresonance. I'll leave it to christine to deal with you, if she so chooses.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
there are over two and a half million returns on a google search of israel US attack iran... you cant acknowledge that, so you have to hide behind christine's skirts. what a man!
Hold on there. Don't you sense that some of your comments are irresponsible? You can't go shooting anything or anyone because you have some deep seated concept that isn't explained. On several threads, you have made points about some revolution or method to defend yourself against the government. But, there have been no actual targets or direction for those same ideas. I can't put words into groundresonance's posts, but all the guy is asking for is what is the target; in his opinion, Israel has created this fantastick government in the first place. I have yet to see an inkling of your ideas.... other than "you are out to get them when they come to get you." Who are "they" anyway? The US government comprised of about 25M employees?
sol refuses to acknowledge israel's part in getting us into these wars. that is a sign of my instability. good enough a. You could have had the decency to ping SonOfLiberty when you allege he refused to do something. b. I take offense at your twisting my words from post #30. You seem to have a bad habit of abusing/disrespecting other posters' free speech rights. I say what I mean and I mean what I say and I don't appreciate your mis-stating what I said previously.
That's right, you can't. Which is why I only advocate peaceful non-compliance, and that's always been the only thing I've advocated. I've stated that we need to start disobeying their unconstitutional laws and urging others to do so. Nothing more, nothing less. Sure there have. If you disobey an unconstitutional law, you are necessarily targetting that law and its enforcement mechanism. If I disobey a jaywalking law, who is the "target" or "direction"? This is basic logic buck. You're certainly trying. Instead of putting words into her mouth however, how about noticing that she's falsely claiming I'm advocating things that would get me arrested immediately on violence concerns alone? You seem to be quite selective in your reading. You've had it explained to you ad nauseum at this point, especially if you've been lurking, and if you see "you are out to get them when they come for you" then you're not reading closely enough. In any event, my complaint about her need to commit some pretty dangerous libel is the issue at this point. If you want an Israel obsession thread, you should start a new topic on a new thread.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
do you appreciate the fact that israel is trying to drag us into another war? do you appreciate the fact that sol refuses to acknowledge that fact? do you appreciate the fact that sol is demonstrating his manliness by hiding behind christine's skirts?
if you're attemping to stir up trouble to distract from israel's part in this fiasco, maybe, if you got the right connections, you've got a certain amount of immunity.
wouldnt be the first time, would it, that the most radical member of a terrorist group turns out to be an employee of the government...
do you appreciate the fact that sol refuses to acknowledge that fact? do you appreciate the fact that sol is demonstrating his manliness by hiding behind christine's skirts? I appreciate the fact that christine has provided a political discussion forum dedicated to free speech rights, that allows all posters, including SonOfLiberty and you and me, the right to post comments to all or none of any thread discussions, to respond to all or none of the posters here. What I don't appreciate is someone like you haranguing another poster for ignoring you. What I don't appreciate is your character assassination of Son Of Liberty. What I don't appreciate is your twisting the words of other posters, including mine, to bolster your hidden agenda. What I don't appreciate is a poster like you forcing me to contemplate the idea of using the bozo feature of this forum, something I have never used before based on principle. Is that enough detail for you regarding what I appreciate and what I don't appreciate?
are you willling to admit that israel is trying to drag us into another war? are you willing to admit that sol is unwilling to acknowledge that fact? are you willing to admit that sol, in the face of overwhelming evidence of israel's efforts to expand the wars, must appeal to the site administration for protection, because he cant defend himself?
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
are you willing to admit that sol is unwilling to acknowledge that fact? are you willing to admit that sol, in the face of overwhelming evidence of israel's efforts to expand the wars, must appeal to the site administration for protection, because he cant defend himself? You're such babbling, out-of-control, irrational gnat, that you've almost convinced me to put a sizable check donation in the mail to AIPAC, because whatever political position you stand for, your nuttiness has made me realize that the only sane thing to do is to position myself with the opposing side.
so... you cant admit to israel pushing for more wars. the next most logical thing to do is ad hominem attacks. good enough
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
That has to be the most uniquely funny retort I've ever seen handed to a troll on the forum. :) Well done!
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
yup... very well done. in fact, it's so well done that we can almost overlook the fact that there 's no there there. it's just like oakland. meanwhile, israel wants us to attack iran.
LOL!
I don't see any "character assassination" ... all I see are ignored questions.
That's because she's been put back on bozo. If you were actually reading my full posts, you'd know that. And if you were reading her posts with something approaching an objective eye instead of with personal bias, you'd note that she's constantly claiming that I'm advocating violent actions against very dangerous people, which I clearly am not and have never done. If you're aiming to join her on the bozo list, then that's your call. You should have enough integrity to not commit lies of omission just because you have a pet topic that some loon is screeching about in-between large tracts of her own bellicose libel.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
this is probably a fairly constructive conversation... we're beginning to choose up sides, i guess... sol and his manly army of zionists can shoot anyone who wants to educate americans and defend america from israel, and the rest of us can continue our attempts to educate americans about israel's intent to expand the wars. seems to me that something drastic has to happen pretty soon, or knowledge of israel's role in these wars is gonna get out of control. i guess that accounts for sol's desperation.
Why do you think anyone is about to shoot you? Here is what is normal speculation for non-compliance to laws in America, once you are targeted: increased fines and penalties, deprived of property and eventual jail time. No one is going to shoot you other than some mother-fucker from a street gang that thinks you are a racist or because you have a few bucks to steal because you live in that same neighborhood. Your rationalization escapes me. I don't understand you.
Oh my, so sorry to hear about your poor vision, buck. Please let me help you acquire clearer insight. Why don't you cast your eyes on ground's inflammatory accusations/attempts to impune Son Of Liberty's character in the following posts on this thread alone, I might add: #5 #12 #16 #19 #22 #28 #37 #41 #42 #43
maybe sol would have a better chance of redeeming his character if he'd own up to the facts.
OK.... I am going to round up the remarcks from several threads that SoL has posted with an obvious flair of being a drama queen. In addition, I shall show ground's questions which are similar to mine although I don't ask those questions in same format. Give me an hour. I shall be back, pal.
That's because you haven't truly read my posts with an eye towards understanding I suspect. Non compliance doesn't mean just throwing away the forms, and I've went over what my intents are countless times. I'm not going to belabor this, you're the only one I know of who "doesn't understand" what I'm saying, besides the rather disturbed person you've chosen to tether your boat to on this thread.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
I notice that you have once again chosen to ignore ground's character assassination being pointed out to you, as if it wasn't happening. This is what happens with obsession. Once you find a comrade in arms, the faults of your chosen ally become invisible, so long as the obsession is addressed. In any event, I've answered to the extent that I felt was appropriate to the question being asked, at the time it was initially asked. Any more of a request for "more answer!" is nothing but trying to lead me by the nose into making blanket insults against entire ethnic groups. I'm not going to do that buck, it is not in my nature to hate ethnic groups, and you know it. If you don't like it, tough shit. Are we clear now?
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
any rational american will be disturbed when they find out why we're in these wars in the middle east. you, on the other hand, are convinced that you can create your own version of reality by denying israel's influence. so, you've got to do your best to obscure israel's role in this catastrophe. you're failing.
Give me an hour. I shall be back, pal. Do what you want with your time, "pal," but just so you know I'm not interested what SOL and ground have said to one another on other threads on other occasions. The only reason I involved myself in this matter was because of what ground and SLO posted ON THIS THREAD ALONE. What troubled me was how ground tried to impune SLO's character by associating words and images with SLO that SLO did not say on THIS THREAD. In fact, ground subsequently tried to do the same thing to me - twisting my words - after I came to SLO's defense ie. when I cautioned ground about how abusive/disrespectful it is to purposely mis-state what others posters have actually said.
and neither of you can admit to israel's role in this fiasco. why is that?
I enjoy your passion of individual characteristic spirit. Man, I love you to the maximum. But, you go over the deep end, attempting to display the same passion. And when you are questioned with realistic questions about your own concepts and ideas, you don't reply. And when you are questioned, you ignore. I think you owe not ground one iota of response but this whole channel at 4um. The scenario about moving the bar towards you being SHOT by some government agent is silly. You have to stop it. Now, is a damned good time.
Then, as a publick admission: you don't care about the issues being brought forward on this thread.
if israeli newspapers can admit to israel's role in these wars, why cant you? if a jewish american like jim lobe can admit to israel's role in this mess, why cant you? What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family — an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for generations. Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the “neo” prefix) who advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a close strategic alliance with Israel."
While I have her on bozo, I wonder at the wisdom of her posting countless posts on threads accusing me of advocating violence for "authorities" to see. Since I normally don't see her posts to deny them, I suspect that this could potentially cause some serious and real life consequences for me for things I've never done. groundresonance is a good one for the clown filter. It was designed for folks like that. Been on mine a long time and I don't figure I have missed a thing. I wouldn't worry much about him/her accusing me of anything if I were you. Cops come and take one look at that blithering blatherskite and would probably haul him/her off to the dungeon.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. yup. that'd be the solution to all your problems, wouldnt it? you guys are great at mouthing platitudes, but you're piss-poor when it comes to living up to them
I don't owe groundresonance anything. When somebody posts things that could get me arrested on suspicion alone, I owe her nothing but the middle finger. My take on Israel remains what it always has been. The U.S. should cut all entangling alliances (of which Israel is a major factor and thus should be cut) and cut all foreign aid (to all countries, including Israel). I also don't believe that foreign money should be allowed in American politics, so that would exclude Israel as well as all other nations. It's a full exclusion policy, and it always has been. If that's not enough to satisfy the bellicose one you've aligned yourself with, or you, then you're wanting more than a simple statement of principle, you're wanting slurs against a full ethnic group. Again, ain't gonna happen. This has been said, by me, at least once on this thread and a BAJILLION TIMES on others on this and other forums where you've seen me post. Owe? Please. The reason she's on bozo has been explained to you, now to ad nauseum. It had nothing to do with her question and everything to do with her word twisting on other threads and her character assassination on this one. I owe no apology for that either. Not at all. Or are you stating that there are no civilian shootings for non-compliance in historical totalitarian nations? Silly? Hardly. It's a "what if" scenario, you seem to think I'm drawing an inevitable conclusion. If I say "or not" which I believe I have, it means it's a scenario. Don't presume to dictate my actions please. I'll do as I will at my own leisure, your approval or permission is not required.
MapQuest really needs to start their directions on #5. Pretty sure I know how to get out of my neighborhood.
You don't even know what you are talking about, Willis. Never a creative idea from yourself permitting some sort of personal dignity.
why is that? Because I can properly identify rational debate about Israel, and you are irrational, and I have zero interest in being engaged in a discussion with you and subsequently associated with your nutty outlook on the matter. Capiche? P.S. As I recall SOL has already given his reason for ignoring your tedious questions about Israel earlier on this thread, which you have, for unknown reasons, chosen to ignore.
if i'm irrational, so is the israeli newspaper, haaret z... and so is the jewish american writer, jim lobe. so you guys are reduced to namecalling, because you have no other ammo. too bad. you're losing.
What I don't appreciate is your character assassination of Son Of Liberty. What I don't appreciate is your twisting the words of other posters, including mine, to bolster your hidden agenda. What I don't appreciate is a poster like you forcing me to contemplate the idea of using the bozo feature of this forum, something I have never used before based on principle. Is that enough detail for you regarding what I appreciate and what I don't appreciate? Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Comments (77 - 226) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#37. To: SonOfLiberty (#36)
(Edited)
I'll leave it to christine to deal with you, if she so chooses.
#38. To: SonOfLiberty (#34)
Beware the man without a passion in his soul, buck.
#39. To: groundresonance, SonOfLiberty, christine (#33)
(Edited)
oh.
#40. To: buckeroo (#38)
You can't go shooting anything or anyone because you have some deep seated concept that isn't explained.
On several threads, you have made points about some revolution
or method to defend yourself against the government. But, there have been no actual targets or direction for those same ideas.
I can't put words into groundresonance's posts, but all the guy is asking for is what is the target;
I have yet to see an inkling of your ideas.... other than "you are out to get them when they come to get you."
#41. To: scrapper2 (#39)
I don't appreciate
#42. To: SonOfLiberty (#40)
I'm advocating things that would get me arrested immediately on violence concerns alone?
#43. To: SonOfLiberty (#40)
#44. To: groundresonance, SonOfLiberty, christine (#41)
(Edited)
do you appreciate the fact that israel is trying to drag us into another war?
#45. To: scrapper2 (#44)
(Edited)
Is that enough detail for you regarding what I appreciate and what I don't appreciate?
#46. To: Flintlock (#31)
#47. To: SonOfLiberty (#18)
#48. To: groundresonance, SonOfLiberty, All (#45)
are you willling to admit that israel is trying to drag us into another war?
#49. To: scrapper2 (#48)
(Edited)
babbling, out-of-control, irrational gnat
#50. To: scrapper2 (#48)
#51. To: scrapper2 (#48)
You're such babbling, out-of-control, irrational gnat, that you've almost convinced me to put a sizable check donation in the mail to AIPAC, because whatever political position you stand for, your nuttiness has made me realize that the only sane thing to do is to position myself with the opposing side.
#52. To: SonOfLiberty (#51)
(Edited)
Well done!
#53. To: groundresonance (#49)
you cant admit to israel pushing for more wars.
#54. To: scrapper2, groundresonance, SonofLiberty (#44)
What I don't appreciate is your character assassination of Son Of Liberty.
#55. To: buckeroo (#54)
#56. To: buckeroo (#54)
#57. To: SonOfLiberty (#55)
(Edited)
#58. To: SonOfLiberty (#34)
Since my chosen path now is non-compliance, assuming that I am unable to anticipate their moves at a given point in time, it may well come down to them shooting me.
#59. To: buckeroo, groundresonance, SonofLiberty (#54)
I don't see any "character assassination" ... all I see are ignored questions.
#60. To: scrapper2 (#59)
Son Of Liberty's character
#61. To: scrapper2 (#59)
Oh my, so sorry to hear about your poor vision, buck.
#62. To: buckeroo (#58)
Your rationalization escapes me. I don't understand you.
#63. To: buckeroo, scapper2 (#61)
#64. To: SonOfLiberty (#62)
(Edited)
rather disturbed
#65. To: buckeroo, groundresonance, SonofLiberty (#61)
OK.... I am going to round up the remarcks from several threads that SoL has posted with an obvious flair of being a drama queen. In addition, I shall show ground's questions which are similar to mine although I don't ask those questions in same format.
#66. To: scrapper2 (#65)
(Edited)
I came to SLO's defense
#67. To: SonOfLiberty (#63)
I notice that you have once again chosen to ignore ground's character assassination being pointed out to you, as if it wasn't happening.
#68. To: scrapper2 (#65)
Do what you want with your time, "pal," but just so you know I'm not interested what SOL and ground have said to one another on other threads on other occasions.
#69. To: scrapper2 (#65)
"In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town: the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history."
"Contrary to appearances, the neoconservatives do not represent a political movement, but a small, exclusive club with incestuous familial and personal connections.
#70. To: SonOfLiberty (#13)
I looked at this thread before logging in and see that "groundresonance" is continually accusing me of advocating illegal acts of violence that could get me arrested, which I have never, ever once advocated (I only advocate peaceful non-compliance, as I'm sure everybody is probably tired of hearing me say over and over). She is also stalking me from thread to thread I notice.
Lord Acton
#71. To: James Deffenbach (#70)
Cops come and take one look at that blithering blatherskite and would probably haul him/her off to the dungeon.
#72. To: buckeroo (#67)
The scenario about moving the bar towards you being SHOT by some government agent is silly.
You have to stop it. Now, is a damned good time.
#73. To: James Deffenbach (#70)
groundresonance is a good one for the clown filter.
#74. To: groundresonance (#66)
and neither of you can admit to israel's role in this fiasco.
#75. To: scrapper2 (#74)
(Edited)
Because I can properly identify rational debate about Israel, and you are irrational
#76. To: scrapper2, Son Of Liberty (#44)
What I don't appreciate is someone like you haranguing another poster for ignoring you.
Lord Acton
.
.
.