See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Are you in the US military?
Source:
var
URL Source: http://var
Published: Apr 6, 2010
Author: anon
Post Date: 2010-04-06 06:25:26 by bluegrass
Keywords: None
Views: 585
Comments: 45
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#25. To: bluegrass and all others who agree (#0)
Take time to look at the ad and identify who you see. All are kids, enlisted peons, grunts and, by the way, there aren't any rich kids in the advertisement. In addition, there are no generals or admirals shown, who, along with our elected officials in D.C., are the ones responsible for policy making. While you all point your fingers at the welfare recipients, remember, they are risking their "worthless lives" for $26,000 a year!!! I suggest you take a few minutes to seriously consider what has been posted here. If you don't recognize it as being the work of the far left, then I understand why the socialists have gained so much in such a short time. I signed up on this website with the understanding that it was a "conservative forum". This thread and the following posts to it tell me that is either not the case, or those participating are too stupid to know what they are looking at. Before I sign off, however, let me point out that all the positive events and opportunities coming from this republic were paid for by many, many lives of those in the military. For all of you to write such thoughtless and senseless vomit is not only disappointing, but a perfect example of the dramatic success of the tactics of those on the left. By the way ... while all you bastards are keeping yourselves busy complaining, name calling and acting cowardly, those volunteer "welfare troops" are all that keep us from having a draft that would include your kids, your grandchildren, et al. I'll bet your damned tunes would change if and when that happens.
The time for military worship in America is over. Our military is now a liability, financially and otherwise. If anyone was offended by the graphic at the top of the page, too bad. "There are instruments so dangerous to the rights of the nation and which place them so totally at the mercy of their governors that those governors, whether legislative or executive, should be restrained from keeping such instruments on foot but in well-defined cases. Such an instrument is a standing army." -Thomas Jefferson
I'm not worshipping the military, bluegrass, nor do I think they're all faultless. I'm just not under the illusion, like those who detest them so are, that we don't need them anymore. I see vultures who want them all dead at the hands of others as not much different than the alleged "murderous" they are sanctimoniously decrying except that they are more like the demented image of Israel and its cohorts calling for others to kill their enemies for them. Why is it only in America, which has so much to lose without military protection, that the guards are slammed -- even by heads of state like Albright -- as not productive enough if they are doing their jobs so well that the nation is at peace and also slammed as a total liability in times of war? I don't know of any other nation that is so extremely inimical to its own protectors no matter what they do or not. Communists are probably cheering, "Way to go! Keep up the good work for us," but not me.
There are no replies to Comment # 30. End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestFirst ... the freaking "advertisement" on this thread and, second, all the unintelligent responses thereafter.
#28. To: Phant2000, GreyLmist, Cynicom, christine, Jethro Tull (#25)
#30. To: bluegrass (#28)
Replies to Comment # 30.