[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Parting Company
Source: townhall.com
URL Source: http://townhall.com/columnists/Walt ... ams/2010/04/07/parting_company
Published: Apr 7, 2010
Author: Walter E. Williams
Post Date: 2010-04-07 07:25:59 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 706
Comments: 55

Parting Company
Walter E. Williams
Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Here's the question asked in my September 2000 column titled "It's Time To Part Company": "If one group of people prefers government control and management of people's lives and another prefers liberty and a desire to be left alone, should they be required to fight, antagonize one another, risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences or should they be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways?"

The problem that our nation faces is very much like a marriage where one partner has broken, and has no intention of keeping, the marital vows. Of course, the marriage can remain intact and one party tries to impose his will on the other and engage in the deviousness of one-upsmanship. Rather than submission by one party or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.

I believe we are nearing a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage, where vows are broken, our human rights protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them. The Democrat-controlled Washington is simply an escalation of a process that has been in full stride for at least two decades. There is no evidence that Americans who are responsible for and support constitutional abrogation have any intention of mending their ways.

You say, "Williams, what do you mean by constitutional abrogation?" Let's look at just some of the magnitude of the violations. Article I, Section 8 of our Constitution lists the activities for which Congress is authorized to tax and spend. Nowhere on that list is authority for Congress to tax and spend for: prescription drugs, Social Security, public education, farm subsidies, bank and business bailouts, food stamps and other activities that represent roughly two-thirds of the federal budget. Neither is there authority for congressional mandates to the states and people about how they may use their land, the speed at which they can drive, whether a library has wheelchair ramps and the gallons of water used per toilet flush. The list of congressional violations of both the letter and spirit of the Constitution is virtually without end. Our derelict Supreme Court has given Congress sanction to do anything upon which they can muster a majority vote.

James Madison, the acknowledged father of the Constitution, explained in Federalist Paper No. 45: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. ... The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State."

Americans who wish to live free have several options. We can submit to those who have constitutional contempt and want to run our lives. We can resist, fight and risk bloodshed and death in an attempt to force America's tyrants to respect our liberties and human rights. We can seek a peaceful resolution of our irreconcilable differences by separating. Some independence movements, such as our 1776 war with England and our 1861 War Between the States, have been violent, but they need not be. In 1905, Norway seceded from Sweden; Panama seceded from Columbia (1903), and West Virginia from Virginia (1863). Nonetheless, violent secession can lead to great friendships. England is probably our greatest ally.

The bottom-line question for all of us is: Should we part company or continue trying to forcibly impose our wills on one another? My preference is a restoration of the constitutional values of limited government that made us a great nation.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

The Democrat-controlled Washington is simply an escalation of a process that has been in full stride for at least two decades.

I guess that Democrats and Republicans alike are now simply called Democrats. /s

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#2. To: Eric Stratton (#0) (Edited)

Our derelict Supreme Court has given Congress sanction to do anything upon which they can muster a majority vote.

Well, except regulate the amount of money corporations can spend to inluence our elections. (ref: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commision)

Otherwise, another great article by Williams -- except I think we should stop calling the UnConstitutional control freaks "Americans". They have already essentially seceeded from America's real system of government and should have to change their name instead of masquerading as us and trying to make us liable for their debts and wrongful actions.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-04-07   7:52:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: GreyLmist (#2)

Otherwise, another great article by Williams -- except I think we should stop calling the UnConstitutional control freaks "Americans". They have already essentially seceeded from America's real system of government and should have to change their name instead of masquerading as us and trying to make us liable for their debts and wrongful actions.

I'm with you on this. But we have to call them something...lets see. Hmmmmm,,, I've got it! We'll call them traitors!! Hows that suit ya?

phantom patriot  posted on  2010-04-07   11:00:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: phantom patriot (#12)

I like "occupying forces" more than anything else. They're clearly not of American thought or philosophy. They are the enemy, and the enemy in your capitol is an occupying force.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-07   11:02:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: SonOfLiberty (#13)

I like "occupying forces" more than anything else. They're clearly not of American thought or philosophy. They are the enemy, and the enemy in your capitol is an occupying force.

I'm easy, I can roll anyway you want on this. But they claim to be Americans. This is why I lean toward traitor.Just one humble opinion in a sea of many.

phantom patriot  posted on  2010-04-07   11:10:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: phantom patriot (#15)

I like "occupying forces" more than anything else. They're clearly not of SonOfLiberty: American thought or philosophy. They are the enemy, and the enemy in your capitol is an occupying force.

phantom patriot: I'm easy, I can roll anyway you want on this. But they claim to be Americans. This is why I lean toward traitor.Just one humble opinion in a sea of many.

Traitorous occupying forces should do until they pick a name for themselves besides American. The quicker they do that the better for them so they can stop accumulating more and more traitorous charges against them.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-04-08   22:13:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: GreyLmist (#21) (Edited)

Traitorous occupying forces should do until they pick a name for themselves

i guess it would be best to surrender to israel and be done with it.

the american media could propagandize americans to support israel, we could ship billions of dollars to israel every year, and ship more billions to israel's enemies so they wont attack israel.

we can surrender control of the american congress to israel, and we can send our armies to the middle east to protect israel.

we can concentrate on grabbing enough oil so we can continue to protect israel, and we can start wars on pipeline routes that would have given our energy rivals access to persian gulf energy... a situation that's intolerable since that energy would allow those rivals to resist israeli american benevolent global hegemony.

.

oh, wait...

groundresonance  posted on  2010-04-08   22:31:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: groundresonance (#22) (Edited)

oh, wait...

Glad you snapped out of that nightmare before I had to find a picture of water to throw on you.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-04-08   22:52:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

#26. To: GreyLmist (#25) (Edited)

a pitcure of water

that sounds not-so-pretty-good.

in the meantime, are you agreed that the most immediate problem is our alliance with israel, and zionist control of our media and congress?

or are you unwilling to acknowledge that those unnamed "traitorous occupying forces" you're so concerned about are not really so nameless, after all?

groundresonance  posted on  2010-04-08 22:57:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]