This video said nothing about that. Not one single solitary thing.
No, the video does not, but the BILL does. The video is the first of many selling the "need" for the people to comply prior to the three year deadline.
The bill sucks. But don't make up things that aren't there.
Who's making anything up? This text caught my attention--
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.”
Next step, no Obama care for those who do not sign up for the registry and take the class II device. Are you really so naive that you don't see that next step from the language above? This language is stage one, Stevie Wonder could see that.
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.”
I know, I've read this all before.
To me, it means what it says. It's the device that is to be registered, not the people. And there is no "next step".
It has nothing to do with being "naive". It has everything to do with just reading and understanding what it says.
If you're looking for a bill that mandates chipping the population, you need to look elsewhere. This isn't even the slippery slope that could be used later to get people used to the idea of being chipped by more direct means.
There are enough things in this bill that suck. You are being intentionally distracted into looking into things that aren't even there. Concentrate on what actually is there.
This "health care reform" bill is not about health care. It's about control.
Agreed.
But I reiterate, this bill says nothing about being chipped. It creates a registry of devices.
Actually, I'm surprised that a registry didn't already exist.
I'm not worried about chipping. I know that people will start killing if they try it. They won't dare. It is on par with arms confiscation. Same deal. Trying it is suicidal.
But that is neither here nor there. The bill simply says nothing about chipping. Some people read into it what they want to see, and they base it all on what has been done in the past, both real AND imagined, and the facts be damned.
I also am not willing to acquiesce to the notion that "it's not in there" w/o carefully scrutinizing exactly what is within the 2,000 pages of that damnable piece o shit. And there's no way on earth that I'm going to waste my time doing that.
Great!
But don't depend on what someone else says about it without checking out that persons allegations for yourself by checking what he says vs. what the bill actually says.
People are playing games with this, and it's not necessary. Not only is it not necessary, it makes them look stupid to people they are trying to convince something is there, when it is not there.
Dude, did you take your dense pills this a.m. or what?
My mom always said I was a "hard headed Dutchman".
But when there are news stories about how great it is that people will get RFID'd, for "medical/health" purposes only of course because people such as yourself know better than apparently our FedGov has nothing like this planned otherwise, not to mention ads advocating similar by the very fucking companies that are creating the technology to do so, then it's "in play."
News stories? Maybe a few. So what? You can hardly claim it's some kind of organized campaign to get people chipped.
How about some of the big tech dB companies? They have the capability.
Capability? Sure. Just because they are capable of something doesn't mean they are doing it.
Otherwise, if PSID is trading at $2 in the fall it will have been impressive. I'm talking reality, not stocks. Stocks are manipulated.
I dont know much about stocks or the market. But I do know that if this was in the bill, their stock would not be trading at a little over 1 FRN. No way. You cannot manipulate that.
Not really the proper perspective. How many of us "shouted fire" at 9/11? Did any heed? No. Was there a threat? Yes. What happened? The house burned down at the hands of arsonists. (FedGov)
But it is the proper perspective. If someone says one thing, and the facts do not back him or her up, then it is to be disregarded. You can get pulled into a million different directions if you follow these false trails. And this is a false trail.
AFA 9/11 goes, IIRC Cooper specifically predicted it. Right or wrong? I never listened to him and am going off of what I heard. Maybe I heard wrong.
OK. Tell me how many other internet "predictions" given by others did not come to pass?
Granted, no one's yelled "fire" yet mind you. The smart person avoids the situation altogether via vigilance.
Vigilance is commendable. Disregarding facts is not commendable. There is nothing in this bill re: chipping. Period. End of discussion. If there was something to it, it would have been exposed by now, and not just people reading something into this that just isn't there.
But aren't you the one that wants to be proactive? Vigilance is reactive. We're all watching and waiting.