[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade

Oktoberfest tightens security after a deadly knife attack in western Germany

Wild Walrus Just Wanted to Take A Summer Vacation Across Europe

[Video] 'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up

Police robot dodges a bullet, teargasses a man, and pins him to the ground during a standoff in Texas

Julian Assange EXPOSED


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Studies show more evidence of water on moon, Mars
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-47638120100412
Published: Apr 13, 2010
Author: Reuters
Post Date: 2010-04-13 02:42:24 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 127
Comments: 11

Studies show more evidence of water on moon, Mars Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:42am IST Email | Print | Share | Single Page [-] Text [+] WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ice deposits at least 6 feet (2 metres) thick can be found in some small craters on the moon, researchers reported on Monday in one of two studies showing more evidence of water on the moon and Mars.

The second study suggested that ice has recently melted and re-frozen on Mars, widening some of the characteristic gullies on its surface.

The two studies add to the political and scientific debate about how best to explore our solar system and the universe -- with missions that include human crews, or experiments using robots and remote surveys.

The administration of President Barack Obama last month said it would cancel the Constellation program to return astronauts to the moon by 2020 after a review found the $108 billion program was underfunded and already off-track to meet most of its goals.

Obama's plan is to contract with private companies to do some of the work needed to investigate Mars, as well as asteroids, using robots, remote sensors and perhaps some astronauts.

In one of the two studies released on Monday, Paul Spudis of the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston and colleagues analyzed measurements from India's Chandrayaan spacecraft to find evidence of thick ice deposits in some permanently shaded craters on the moon.

"As the moon has been bombarded with water-bearing objects such as comets and meteorites and implanted with solar wind hydrogen over geological time, some of this material must have made its way into these cold, dark areas," they wrote in Geophysical Research Letters.

They measure something called circular polarization ratio to show either the surface there is unusually rough, or there are between 6 and 10 feet (2 and 3 metres) of ice there.

The second study showed that 6-foot (2-metre) wide gully on Mars had become nearly 400 feet (120 metres) longer over two years. Continued...

Dennis Reiss of the Institute for Planetology at Westfalische Wilhelms- Universitat in Munster, Germany, and colleagues said the best explanation is the melting of small amounts of water ice.

Photographs show dark patches in the gully, as well as some smaller, new channels, they reported in the same journal. It may get warm enough at the surface to melt water on Mars, they added.

In September, several teams reported clear evidence of water, likely frozen, on the desert surfaces of both the moon and Mars and researchers have also seen it snow on Mars.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#1. To: gengis gandhi (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-04-13   4:03:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Eric Stratton (#1)

The methodology to look for water doesn't have a lot to do with photography. Apples and oranges.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-13   8:01:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: SonOfLiberty (#5)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-04-13   8:32:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Eric Stratton (#6)

Yes, I realize that, but it costs money, lots of it no doubt. And my point is who cares if there's water on the moon or Mars. I mean do you really think it's relevant? IDK

I suspect that people interested in sending humans would care. Now that said, the chances of us getting off of this rock, at this point in history, are pretty close to nil. Governments are eating all of us from the inside out in ways that tyrants of past ages could only dream about. There's simply no economic way to get us to Mars now, privately or through government. Damn shame too, because the one place where freedom always has a foothold is on frontiers. Now there are no more frontiers left and they'll be damned if they let us off this rock to find more.

It can't possibly cost very much, relatively speaking of course, to send up an unmanned vehicle/orbiter, that would snap some shots of "where we were on the mooon," and return or transmit them back. Really, it's gotta be chump change for NASA and would put many theories to rest.

They probably don't give two shits, one way or the other, about "theories". That would explain it the easiest I'd think.

from the crude rocket technology that we supposedly sent men to the moon with, doncha think.

It wasn't that crude. In fact, the technology of the time seemed to address all the issues required to get off earth and into space pretty well. Rockets are utterly simple. Life support, well, we had that worked out with submarines. Radiation shielding, not terribly complex once you know what to shield against. It is not some kind of Herculean task of unimaginable scale that is beyond the grasp of mankind. But it certainly wasn't crude, it was quite elegant in its simplicity (in my view).

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-13   8:42:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: SonOfLiberty (#7)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-04-13   8:57:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#9. To: Eric Stratton (#8)

Again, I think you kinda leap-frogged my point. We said the same thing about the moon, which is obviously much closer, and to which "we've been before." Yet, all of a sudden, once technology went exponential, our desire (and need) seems to have vaporized. Why.

Why does any government boondoggle fizzle? Who knows? Looking for reason and logic in government decisions is like looking for ice on the sun. They don't act rationally, pretty much 100% of the time. No large organization tends to act rationally if you ask me. I mean, goodness, Gilligan's Island was canceled while it held the number 1 spot in ratings. WTF?

In this day and age of cynicism and anger towards Government particularly, they should. I guess they figure it's already under control and in the Win column for them. Poor assumption?

I really don't think that the "haven't been there" crowd is that big of a percentage for them to even bother to give the thought a sidelong glance. No offense, but if you have a very very very small chirping minority that don't even raise to the level of credible with Ma and Pa down at the corner store, you're pretty much safe to assume (as a government) that you can ignore that minority with impunity.

Contrasted with what exists today it was crude.

Not really, no. Most technology today that we use in most things is little more than bells and whistles laden 19th century tech. Computers and nano/nuclear/laser to the contrary of course. The rest, especially things like rockets and hostile environment life support, are old old ideas with centuries of practice and implementation behind them.

The radiation shielding was a joke, I think literally a joke.

If it was a joke the electronics in satellites that have been floating overhead for decades would have shorted out after launch. Electronics are far more sensitive to this kind of thing than we are (short term I mean, long term life forms take it in the shorts from cancer). I suspect that we both agree that there are satellites overhead, many of them quite old.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-04-13 09:18:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]