See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: We Refuse!
Source:
Tenth Amendment Center
URL Source: http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/18/we-refuse/
Published: Apr 18, 2010
Author: Michael Boldin, founder of the Tenth Ame
Post Date: 2010-04-23 06:01:12 by GreyLmist
Keywords: Constitution, Rights, Tenth Amendment Center
Views: 170
Comments: 11
The following is based off a speech given at the Palm Desert Tax Day Tea Party on April 15, 2010 There are a few core beliefs that guide me in everything I do as the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center Rights are not “granted” to us by the government – they are ours by our very nature, by our birthright. ALL just political authority is derived from the people – and government exists solely with our consent! We the people of the several states created the federal government – not the other way around! The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people to the federal government in the Constitution – and nothing more. The People of each State have the sole and exclusive right and power to govern themselves in all areas not delegated to their government. A Government without limits is a tyranny! When Congress enacts laws and regulations that are not made in Pursuance of the powers enumerated in the Constitution, the People are not bound to obey them. These seven items are about sovereignty, which is something we hear about quite a bit lately – but few really understand. Sovereignty is defined as “final authority.” All through history, this final authority was in the hands of just one or two people – a king, a queen, or even just a small cabal of elites at the top of the food chain. But the founders and ratifiers gave us something unique in history – a first, really. They created a system where the average people – you and I – held final authority. We the people are sovereign. We the people hold final authority. We the people are in charge. And, they the government work for us! The Tenth Amendment codifies in law this principle of popular sovereignty – that “We the People” of the several states created the federal government to be our agent for certain, enumerated purposes – and nothing more. But unfortunately, that’s not how things have been working, and very little that the government does is actually authorized by the constitution. And, this is a problem that didn’t just start in January 2009 – it’s been going on a long, long time. Question – What do we do about it? Do we call and email our representatives in Congress and ask them to limit their own power? Do we march on D.C. and demand that the government limit its own power? Do we sue them in their own courts and ask their judges to limit their power? Do we vote the bums out in 2010, or 2012 – and ask new politicians to limit their own power? Thomas Jefferson and James Madison both warned us that if the federal government ever became the sole and exclusive arbiter of the extent of its own powers – that power would endlessly grow…regardless of elections, separation of powers, courts, or other vaunted parts of our system. Guess what – they were right. For a hundred years, we the people have been suing, and marching, and lobbying, and voting the bums out – but yet…year in and year out, government continues to grow and your liberty continues to diminish – and it doesn’t matter who is the president, or what political party controls congress – the growth of power in the federal government never stops. The problem we face today is not about personalities or political parties – it’s about power. Until we address the absolute fact that the federal government has too much power, things will never change. Question – What do we do about it? Jefferson and Madison gave us the answer. In response to the unconstitutional attacks on liberty that were the Alien and Sedition Acts, they secretly authored the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798. Here are a few excerpts that really define exactly how things are supposed to work when two or more branches of the federal government conspire against the constitution and your liberty. the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force. where powers are assumed [by the federal government] which have not been delegated [by the Constitution], a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy So while it might be important to call, petition, demand, march, sue and vote bums out, because they’re all bums, there’s much more we’re supposed to do. When the federal government violates your rights, you’re not supposed to wait four years for new politicians in the hope that they’ll fix it. You’re not supposed to wait two, or four, or more years for some black-robed judge to pronounce that they’ve violated your rights. You are supposed to resist those violations of your liberty as they happen – and it is your state’s solemn duty to do the same. NEW MOVEMENT While such a task might seem daunting, it’s something that’s already happening today, and has been growing in recent years too. In 2007, one state rep in Maine introduced a non-binding resolution opposing the REAL ID Act. In 2008, one state rep in Oklahoma introduced a simple non-binding resolution reaffirming the Constitution as defined by the 10th amendment,. In 2009, one state rep in Montana introduced a bill to nullify some federal gun laws and regulations. In 2009, one state rep in Arizona introduced a state constitutional amendment to effectively ban a national health care plan in that state. These simple, single acts by courageous people have grown into a state-level resistance to unconstitutional federal acts the likes this country has possibly never seen. Already a dozen states have passed 10th amendment resolutions reaffirming the Constitution as the founders and ratifiers gave us. 25 states have passed laws and resolutions nullifying the Real ID act – stopping it dead in its tracks in most of the country. 7 states have passed Firearms Freedom Acts – nullifying some federal gun laws and regulations in their states. 14 states have now passed laws nullifying unconstitutional federal laws on marijuana 3 states have already passed Health Care Freedom Acts to ban federal health care mandates in their states. Other states are considering nullification laws on cap and trade, the misuse of state national guard troops, monetary policy and much more. Here at the Tenth Amendment Center we have released model legislation for you to give to your state reps to demand that they stand with you and refuse to comply with unconstitutional acts from Washington D.C. Our latest? The Federal Health Care Nullification Act. This Act is not over 1000 pages. It’s not 500 pages. It’s not a dozen, or even two. It’s one single page to nullify now. Here’s a majority of what it says: The Legislature of the State of _______________ declares that the federal law known as the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” signed by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, is not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violates its true meaning and intent as given by the Founders and Ratifiers, and is hereby declared to be invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, is specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state. And it adds some much-needed ‘teeth’ too: Any official, agent, or employee of the United States government or any employee of a corporation providing services to the United States government that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of this act shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction must be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or a term of imprisonment not exceeding five (5) years, or both. They want to fine us or put us in jail for not buying insurance from some corporation. What’s next – fining us for not buying a Chevy? Well, it’s time that we turn this thing around – and in the federal health care nullification act – we fine THEM for violating our rights! While this may seem difficult to accomplish – or even insurmountable – if we do nothing, or if we even do the same things we’ve been doing, we’re doomed to failure. But if we do what’s right, we will succeed! Samuel Adams put it best: “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.” Question: What do we do about it? Step one is to sign on in support the Federal Health Care Nullification Act. WeRefuse.com is a new website (and the only one that I’m aware of) dedicated solely to nullifying national health care on a state level. Join us in our first goal of 100,000 to stop national health care “laws” today! Let’s make this work and then we can use it as a model for every other constitutional violation coming out of D.C. Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center Copyright © 2010 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: GreyLmist, 4 (#0)
Petition signed.
Hi GreyLmist, I've corresponded with Mr. Boldin in the past in Re the Tenth Amendment and the "complete lack of relationship" to the purported 14th Amendment citizens. Mr. Boldin was absolutely clueless to the subject matter: Federal civil rights laws are found mainly in Title 42, Chapter 21 entitled “Civil Rights”. The most often cited statute within Chapter 21 is 42 U.S.C. 1983. To wit: TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > Sec. 1983. Sec. 1983. - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person [not “man” or “woman”, but “person”] who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia The first thing to notice about the above, is that they use the word “person” instead of “man or woman”. They are talking about a legal fiction that is actually a corporate, juristic, commercial, non-natural entity called a “citizen” or a “resident”. This “person” is completely subject to federal jurisdiction. You will find out later that the status of being either a “citizen” or “resident” is not a status you want to have under federal law, because that is how you become a “taxpayer”! They also use the word “State”, which we know from 4 U.S.C. §110(d) means a federal State, which is a territory or possession of the United States. States of the Union do NOT fit this category, TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 1 > SUBCHAPTER I > §27 §27. Definitions The terms “State” and “States,” as used in this chapter, shall be held to include the District of Columbia The above statutes were written to REPLACE the Constitution, not to supplement it, and the reason they were written at all is because the Constitution does NOT apply on federal “territory” or property, according to the Supreme Court in Downes v. Bidwell. Yours in Observing Useful Idiots (14th citizens) Not a Party to the Original Contract (U.S. Constitution), P.H.
In effect, it’s (The Holacaust Inc.) become like a grotesque doll wielded by witch doctors, used to keep individuals from asking too many questions, from thinking for themselves and stepping out of line.
Do we march on D.C. and demand that the government limit its own power? Do we sue them in their own courts and ask their judges to limit their power? Do we vote the bums out in 2010, or 2012 – and ask new politicians to limit their own power? America is screwed unless we fire the whole herd in D.C., and the herd ain't going anywhere except back to the feeding trough.
_________________________________________________________________________ deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
Same here. Glad you linked it. :)
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
They've branded themselves as defectors and secessionists from our Constitutional system so We the People of it shouldn't have to feed them any taxes. We could start billing them with interest for their thievery and trespasses.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Hi, PatrickHenery. I'm so glad to see you here. I tried to flag you some time ago for legal advice on abolishing the Wall Street Slave Market. Here's a link to the thread with printouts of the issue referenced at post #8 and the consultation request at post #15. If you can be of any help on that here or there, that would be grand: UPDATED: Connecting the dots on Obama’s Council of Governors Fighting the Subversion of Our People's Sovereignty By Jim Hightower February 24, 2010 "Creators" -- As you've probably heard, corporations are now "people" — humanoids that are equivalent to you and me. [sic] Since the 13th Amendment bans slavery, which is the ownership of a person, the newly born corporate "persons" cannot legally be bought and sold. Thus Wall Street — now a slave market — must be shut down! >>> Dear Patriotic and LegalEagle Sir, Could you please give us some advice on how we could convene a court of Constitutionalists to shut down the Wall Street Slave Market? Hoping to see you and your words of wisdom here soon. Respectfully, GreyLmist, Wall Street Slavery Abolitionist
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
Musical Video: Don't Tread on US song by Gianluca Zanna @ freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=117776 and @ www.youtube.com/watch? v=zFKzbN_0WLw Excerpt from the YouTube site (italics mine): Our answer to your 1984 it is 1776!
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "You've got to put right and wrong above legal and illegal. Because when tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty; and it is not rebellion at all, it is submission to the higher law that our government is in rebellion to. We're not the rebels, they're the rebels."
#2. To: All (#1)
#3. To: GreyLmist (#0)
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center
#4. To: GreyLmist (#0)
Do we call and email our representatives in Congress and ask them to limit their own power?
Obama is the miscegenated bastard of a white communist whore. True story.
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#5. To: X-15 (#4)
#6. To: Lod (#2)
Petition signed.
#7. To: Eric Stratton, X-15 (#5)
when "fired," they continue to enjoy taxpayer personal funding, and simply go from one federal trough to the next. There are several, the pig sty/farm is large and well stocked with food provided by us.
#8. To: PatrickHenry (#3)
#9. To: GreyLmist (#7)
#10. To: Eric Stratton (#9)
the winds of change.
#11. To: GreyLmist (#10)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest