[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9-11 Coordinated By Cheney Says Wayne Madsen
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://rense.com/general90/911chen.htm
Published: May 1, 2010
Author: wm
Post Date: 2010-05-01 07:19:36 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 1219
Comments: 29

9-11 Coordinated By Cheney Says Wayne Madsen

By Wayne Madsen WayneMadsenReport.com 4-30-10

The super-classified network that served as command and control for the 9/11 false flag attack on America

Multiple U.S. intelligence sources have reported to WMR that a super-classified network with only some 70 terminals in select U.S. government locations handled the parallel command-and-control activities that permitted the 9/11 terrorist attacks to be successful.

The "above top secret" network bears the acronym "PDAS." WMR has not yet discovered what the acronym stands for, however, the system is limited to only a few hundred people with Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) Special Access Program (SAP) need-to-know access, in addition to the President and Vice President.

On September 11, 2001, PDAS was used to convey the information from the Air Force Chief of Staff to the White House, CIA, and other select agencies that the Air Force had successfully intercepted and downed a target over Pennsylvania. It is believed that the "target" in question was United flight 93, although there is no confirmation that the aircraft was in fact the one downed by Air Force interceptors.

The Air Force Chief of Staff on 9/11 was General John Jumper, who had become the top Air Force commander on September 6, 2001, just five days before the 9/11 attacks.

There is also reason to believe that the PDAS terminal at the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) at the White House was used to coordinate the activities related to the aerial attack on the Pentagon. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta claimed Vice President Dick Cheney was present at the PEOC at 9:25 am on the morning of 9/11, before the alleged impact of American Airlines flight 77 on the building.

Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission that Cheney was aware of special orders concerning a plane heading toward Washington. Mineta said: "During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice Presidentthe plane is 50 miles outthe plane is 30 miles out.and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president 'do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary?"

PDAS terminals are reportedly located at the White House, on board Air Force One, the Pentagon, CIA headquarters, the National Security Agency, the Boeing E- 4 Advanced Airborne Command Post that was seen flying over Washington, DC on 9/11 after the attacks, the Defense Intelligence Agency at Bolling Air Force Base in Washington, DC, and the Raven Rock Mountain Complex in Pennsylvania where Cheney hid out after the 9/11 attacks.

Mineta later followed up with reporters and stated "When I overheard something about 'the orders still stand' and so, what I thought of was that they had already made the decision to shoot something down."

It now appears that PDAS was used by Cheney to implement on the morning of 9/11 a new policy issued on June 1, 2001 that provided for a "stand down" protocol that replaced a long-standing shootdown order for hijacked and suspected hijacked planes. The new order transferred the authority to shoot down aircraft from Pentagon and NORAD military commanders to the President, Vice President, or Secretary of Defense. http://rense.com/general90/911chen.htm

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#1. To: gengis gandhi (#0)

I have never seen any proof that any planes were highjacked. People assume that because that is what the media stated. What flew into the twin towers could have been military planes and there is some evidence they were. Certainly the Pentegon was not hit by a passenger plane.

DWornock  posted on  2010-05-01   7:30:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: DWornock (#1)

The Pentagon was hit by a passenger plane. The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and widespread 9/11 hoax. It was probably set up before the event since government agents seized surveillance camera videos within minutes of the crash (which is evidence for foreknowledge, but not for “no plane”). It is extremely unlikely that the conspirators who allowed (and assisted) 9/11 would not have taken care to create misdirecting hoaxes before the "attack," since they are very aware that large segments of the population would have suspicions about the events and therefore they would "need" to disrupt skeptical inquiry with red herrings, hoaxes, false dichotomies, etc.

This hoax is based on misrepresentation of photos taken shortly after the crash, ignoring of physical evidence and documented reports from hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw the plane. There is NO credible, verifiable evidence in support of ANY of the many and varied "theories" pretending that a plane did not crash into the Pentagon, and therefore, 9/11 was an inside job.

It was first floated in early October 2001 by French author Thierry Meyssan and US War Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Monsieur Meyssan started a webpage that suggested a plane did not hit the Pentagon on October 7, and Rumsfeld gave an interview to Parade magazine on October 12 where he said a "missile" hit the Pentagon. That "missile" quote was then used by many no plane advocates as part of the campaign to draw attention to this claim. Meyssan went on to create the "Hunt the Boeing" website and then published two books "The Horrifying Fraud" (published in English as "9/11 The Big Lie") and Pentagate. These books have been translated into a total of 28 languages, which ensures that they are the dominant version of the claim suggesting complicity or conspiracy that is seen around the world.

www.oilempire.us/state.html#rumsfeld

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2010-05-01   11:48:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#7)

There is NO credible, verifiable evidence in support of ANY of the many and varied "theories" pretending that a plane [or an alien spaceship, Russian satellite, semi-truck, or meteor] did not crash into the Pentagon, and therefore, 9/11 was an inside job.

Of course not since you don't prove a negative. The following is far more logical:

Since there is NO credible,verifiable evidence in support of any of the theories pretending that a pasenger plane did crash into the Pentagon, it is not logical to assume that one did. Most of the evidence points to it being a missle and therefore that is the most logical conclusion.

DWornock  posted on  2010-05-01   12:47:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: DWornock (#13)

Of course not since you don't prove a negative.

Yes, Dwornock, you can prove a negative. It's rather simple. For one thing, a real, actual law of logic is a negative, namely the law of non-contradiction. This law states that that a proposition cannot be both true and not true. Nothing is both true and false.

In fact, ‘you can’t prove a negative’ is a negative. So, using logic, if you could prove it true, it wouldn’t be true!

Not only that, but any claim can be expressed as a negative, thanks to the rule of double negation.

Source: Dr. Hales

abraxas  posted on  2010-05-01   13:08:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: abraxas (#16)

Yes, Dwornock, you can prove a negative. It's rather simple. For one thing, a real, actual law of logic is a negative, namely the law of non-contradiction. This law states that that a proposition cannot be both true and not true. Nothing is both true and false.

In fact, ‘you can’t prove a negative’ is a negative. So, using logic, if you could prove it true, it wouldn’t be true!

Not only that, but any claim can be expressed as a negative, thanks to the rule of double negation.

Source: Dr.

All that is an interesting example of attempting to make an argument that sounds plausible. However, it doesn't change the fact that you cannot prove a negative.

DWornock  posted on  2010-05-03   7:17:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: DWornock (#20)

All that is an interesting example of attempting to make an argument that sounds plausible. However, it doesn't change the fact that you cannot prove a negative.

lol........then you will have a hell of a time proving this negative: YOU CANNOT PROVE A NEGATIVE. Note the NOT in that statement, Dwornock.

Don't you see that you have no argument because you are claiming that YOUR negative statement is TRUE and PLAUSABLE. Yet, you are claiming that negative cannot be proven. Calling it a "fact" doesn't change that......logic alone negates any notion of "fact" within the often repeated "you can't prove a negative claim" which, by the way, has been proven to be false. (refer to my initial post for proof)

abraxas  posted on  2010-05-03   19:51:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

        There are no replies to Comment # 25.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]