[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: Is The Gulf Oil Spill The False Flag We've Been Expecting? The question I want to present for discussion and thought is: Is the gulf oil spill an intentional event? My thought process runs something like this: Another 911 fake terror event would not, at this time, work. Such an event might actually spark an open revolution, and it would have to be on a scale large enough to eclipse 911 in order to have enough impact to shock people into numbness again. As well it would have to be flawless this time as the 911 event has been so thoroughly shown to have been an inside job that they, the Banksters and their flunkies, dare leave no fingerprints this time. I note that "Halliburton" (as well as BP - British Petroleum), a known operation of the NWO cabal, had been "working" on the rig at the time the blowout and fire happened. From what I have read one of the things they were servicing is the mechanism to shut the flow off in case of emergency. The "failsafe" did not work and is unresponsive, allegedly, to any attempt to trigger it. Also surfacing is the picture of the aluminum heli-pad with a hole burned in it. It is unlikely that an oil fire would do that. However, Magnesium does burn hot enough. At this point in time, according to "leaked" reports, the "gusher", under tons of pressure, could increase in volume. We already have a slick the size of New Jersey. There is high likelihood that this spill will have a global impact affecting shorelines around the planet. One of the results is likely contamination, and decimation, of fish and seafood stocks. This will, in turn, have an impact on the global food supply resulting in famine in some areas, decreased economic activity, and increased death rates among shoreline communities (and indirectly in areas away from the shoreline which dependent upon the seafood industry either for food or economically). Another impact is on the global oil/energy supply which will result in less supply and higher prices. This in turn affects agriculture and food prices. It also affects the ability to bring crops to market. In turn this will affect industrial production and related jobs. An environmental catastrophe of this magnitude will have a rippling affect throughout the globe and seems "tailor made" for those pushing a politically based enviromentally apocalyptic agenda. Thus, given the participants in this disaster, I am floating the question: Was it an accident or by design? At this point I draw no conclusions, and am making no assertion that it was intentional, merely that the players and consequences make it worthy of a closer examination. It could simply have been an "accident". Then again it seems plausible that it might not have been an "accident".
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
#18. To: Original_Intent (#0)
the whole thing looks suspicious to me.
Agreed. However, we have to be careful in jumping to conclusions. It could have just been what the cover story says - maintenance short cutting which resulted in a catastrophe.
There are no replies to Comment # 21. End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||