[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Obama’s Boys Call in Riot Cops on Tea Party Protestors (Chavez Would Be Proud)
Source: townhall.com
URL Source: http://townhall.com/columnists/Doug ... otestors_chavez_would_be_proud
Published: May 4, 2010
Author: Doug Giles
Post Date: 2010-05-04 07:44:58 by Eric Stratton
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 846
Comments: 86

Obama’s Boys Call in Riot Cops on Tea Party Protestors (Chavez Would Be Proud)
Doug Giles
Tuesday, May 04, 2010

Somebody help me here. What kind of ominous situation requires local law enforcement to dispatch their Darth Vader look-alike SWAT units to keep the peace or kick some criminal butt? I’m guessing it has to be a SNAFU’d type of thang that regular cops can’t handle which requires special weapons and tactics, correct?

The reason I’m asking this is because of the events of last week in which riot police were sent out to two different locales on two completely different types of crowds. One I understand, but the other has left me a little discombobulated and a tad discomfited.

The first mob that riot cops were called out for was the one in Phoenix comprised of thousands of out-of-control illegal Mexicans who were POed at the fact that Arizona finally wants to treat them like they’re illegal. Imagine that.

Yep, I get why the SWAT dudes from PPD rolled out for that melee. The mass of protesting Mexicans were out of whack, grabbing their crotches in defiance of our laws, smearing refried bean swastikas on government windows, flipping American patriots off, trashing and destroying property, and cursing in TexMex at the Arizonans who want our immigration laws upheld and who are sick of the costly mayhem these illegals have brought to their beautiful state.

Let’s see, what else did the criminal aliens do to solicit the Phoenix PD’s riot police presence? Man, I know there was something else they did. What was it? Come on, Doug, think man, think! Oh yeah, I remember: They pelted Phoenix’s finest with bottles and trash. Yeah, that was it. Oh, and of course the location of their protest was completely trashed after their ridiculous display of unrighteous outrage.

Hey, Julio … way to further endear Americans to your earthly plight, el stupido. I guess Phil Collins was right; it’s no fun being an illegal alien.

The other crowd that got SWAT called down on them last week was in Quincy, Illinois—a two-hundred member Tea Party that mainly consisted of peaceful, blue-haired old ladies in Depends singing “God Bless America” outside of the venue where His Highness was reading a teleprompter about how great he is and how he plans to further whiz on the Constitution.

Yep, in a scene right out of some B-grade Orwellian flick, the tamest and nicest little old nanas and middle-class couples had Quincy’s Robo-Cops dispatched on them to quell… the, uh … uh … orderly protest and … the … uh … um … patriotic singing and … er … the … the American flag waving. Boy does that make Quincy and BHO look bad, or what?

Y’know, what I have gathered from my SWAT friends down here in Miami and what I have watched throughout the years on TV and on the big screen is that the SWAT card only gets played when things are severely jacked up (as in the Phoenix fiasco), but it seems as if the insane-in-the-membrane element was missing a wee little bit from the quaint Quincy rally. But it got the same treatment as Phoenix. Now that’s weird.

Here are my questions: Did the Quincy tea partiers represent a high-risk op that regular officers couldn’t handle? That’s an option, even though that place looked like Barney Fife could have manned it without ever extracting his lone bullet from his left shirt pocket. Who knows?

Maybe Mr. Whipple had an underwear bomb and was going to light his junk on fire after Obama’s speech? Who can say? Maybe Mr. Rogers had secret hostages sequestered in the Dairy Queen freezer that Quincy SWAT was called in to extract. Or, maybe, just maybe, Grandma Moses posed a terror threat with those long-ass knitting needles she carts around and her high-speed electric wheel chair?

I know … it was the possibility that Floyd the barber would show up to that event secretly armed with his straight razor that required Quincy’s cops to send out an elite paramilitary tactical unit with assault weapons, stun grenades, high-end body armor, and armored vehicles! Gosh, maybe. Who knows? I hope that there was that type of over-the-top reasonable cause for Quincy’s cops to roll like that because if there wasn’t that little display of overt force is beginning to smack of Chavez’s Venez-frickin’-uela to me.

Lastly, if I were a cop and my superiors wanted me to put on stormtrooper gear and march against salt of the earth patriots like those in Quincy, Illinois, I’d tell them no, and if they didn’t like it then they could stick my pointy metal badge up their confused and chunky backside.

Click for Full Text! Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#1. To: All (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-05-04   7:52:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Eric Stratton (#1)

The article is about what Obama is doing, right now today. I don't think "neocons" come into play, really. The writer didn't seem to me to be a neocon in any fashion, but maybe I missed something. The "IF" statement about being a cop kind of tells me that he is not. He says he has SWAT friends, but then I have friends (and a few family members) who are/were cops (and soldiers, and Marines). That doesn't make somebody one thing or the other, politically.

It's ok to criticize Obama and his actions fully without having to reference the boogeymen from the last administration without any direct link to them. Dems were being just as stupid during Clinton's presidency, when they sent out thugs in tanks to burn down the buildings of religious people with them inside. If you want to get really butch, call out Clinton and his neo-liberal (progressive) folks who love to call out cops to kill honest people, I say. ;)

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-05-04   8:10:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SonOfLiberty (#2)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-05-04   8:31:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Eric Stratton (#3) (Edited)

The public's tolerance for that type of tyrannical behavior SOL, would be nonexistant if 9/11 (along with it's "aftermath") had never occurred!

Oh? So the Branch Davidians, their murder was avenged by millions of people? How about Weaver? Where were the millions lining up to protest SWAT when they executed his family with sniper rifles?

Fact is, the strong arm tactics with no counter-protests started in a large part with Clinton. Dubya certainly took advantage of the sentiment of apathy, no question, but let's not forget the inaction/apathy before his reign. It didn't "all start on 9/11". Far from it.

I know you to be brighter than this.

That's an invalid argument technique. It's saying "you're too smart to not agree with me", which means "if you disagree with me, you're not smart". Sorry, doesn't cut it. Especially since, as pointed out, Clinton (and King George I) got the nation nice and used to seeing SWAT/military outright murdering Americans on American soil and accomplished it without any real protest whatsoever besides a few of us wing-ding libertarians that were easily brushed aside.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-05-04   8:38:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: SonOfLiberty (#5)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-05-04   9:08:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Eric Stratton (#10)

The leap from the Branch Davidians to what's going on today would have been "too much, too soon."

Oh? Ok, so we have on the one hand a bunch of people doing no harm to anybody, who were murdered and burned alive by government on live television. On the other hand, the story we're discussing is a SWAT team showing up and doing nothing at a tea party-esque rally of old and middle class people. Yeah, I can see how the later is far worse than the former. *eyeroll*

Again, I never said it "all started on 9/11,"

LOL! Oh, I must have misread the part where you mentioned this:

Just remember, it was you and your ilk that sponsored the rise of this beast under Junior's guidance buddy! Can't likely bitch about it now, sorry!

Then again, if you spent as much time actually looking at 9/11 "evidence," perhaps you'd see things differently!

So the 9/11 you were talking about was...what exactly? 9/11/1943? Or what?

Now, and moving on, the public was given a reason for the Branch Davidian fiasco, Ruby Ridge was all but covered up in the media and justified as well, but a MAJORITY, that's a key/operative word for you there SOL, now is considered to be "the bad guy."

But that in no way counters my assertion that the strong arming of innocent normal Americans and the acceptance of it by most didn't start on 9/11. Do you see anybody out protesting the SWAT teams showing up at the blue hair convention? No? Why? Because, well, they're being molded to look like "the enemy". Just like the Davidians. And Weaver. And everybody else in history. There we go.

I don't mind trying to have an objective conversation, but if I'm going to be shagging all of your bullshit statements that you claim that I said, sorry, I ain't participating!

It was a civil discussion, you're the one injecting invective at this point where none was offered to you. Disagreements or different viewpoints being presented are not attacks. Relax.

9/11 and its fallout

9/11/1943? Just trying to clarify.

If you choose to view it differently, then I simply don't know what to say except that I did think that you were brighter, more astute, and had more vision than that.

That's another ad hominem "If you don't agree with me, you're dumb". If you wish to remain objective, it might help if you removed stuff like that. I've in no way attempted to ad hominem you, I'd appreciate the reciprocal please.

It should be noted that, for the record, I've already stated that I share your disdain of neocons. I've clearly stated countless times on the forum my hatred of the Patriot act, TSA and other Dubya constitutional violations. So this isn't the disagreement you seem to think that it is. My only point, was that you appear to want to turn every discussion about Jello Shot recipes into a discussion about vacuuming babies out of wombs.

In other words, sometimes it's ok to discuss the content of the article without yelling "Bush! 9/11! Patriot act!" Really, it is.

Jethro's points were far more on mark. This kind of treatment isn't a new thing, and the culture has been prepped for it since at least the 1970's. What they did to the Davidians, they're now doing to us, iow, making us slowly but surely "the enemies". It's a long, gradual process, the blame of which can be laid at many, many feet. Obama, actually, has not only not rescinded any of the Dubya violations, he's expanded them AND turned the tyrant's gaze inward towards a myriad of new abuses.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-05-04   9:28:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: SonOfLiberty (#16)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-05-04   9:40:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 18.

        There are no replies to Comment # 18.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]