Title: David Duke says Rand Paul should grow some balls !!! (I agree) Source:
youtube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf0qJXG8IVM Published:May 26, 2010 Author:David Duke Post Date:2010-05-26 20:47:27 by noone222 Keywords:None Views:12709 Comments:72
Poster Comment:
Racist Rachel Madcow called Rand Paul a racist ... and she's a freaking zionazi !!!
The time for timid responses to derelicts like the racist Jew and lesbian freak of nature, Racist Madcow, are past.
The most racist group of people on planet earth are Jews that scream at us because we refuse to be bred out of existence, while they mandate that Jews only marry Jews.
Rand Paul appears like a deer caught in the headlights and too timid to tell that dyke bitch that she's the fucking racist if there is one on the program.
Well, it isn't like biting a tongue has ever helped an R before. The harpies will descend on him like flying monkeys once he surfaces. Just maybe a majority of the nation is waiting for a man to tell these leftist s'bags how we feel about the 1964 Civil Rights Act ( Rand nailed it) among other things. Just saying...
#61. To: Flintlock, Jethro Tull, all (#14)(Edited)
Rand needs to get elected....
And if that means biting his tongue, so be it.
This bothers me. I'm not picking on you, because a lot of people say things just like that, and I wonder of they know the ramifications of doing it.
The ends do not justify the means. That goes for so-called libertarians too. We bitch when other pols try and sneak in under the radar by playing word games, so don't play word games to try and steal the office.
Now, WHO is it that they are biting their tongues for?
It is being done for the benefit and support of those that have ruined this country. "Biting your tongue" equals "kissing their asses".
When politicians say what they mean and mean what they say, then they might start getting some respect. But that will never happen. They all tailor their messages to their audiences that they are speaking to at that time. Sometimes the messages change daily. Different audience, completely different message.
Why would anyone, like those posting here, even think about voting for someone that is too much of a pussy to say what he or she stands for?