See other Resistance Articles
Title: Why Nashville Had No Looters during the recent flooding
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 1, 2010
Author: prisonofficer
Post Date: 2010-06-01 02:01:17 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 590
Comments: 46
Why Nashville Had No Looters during the recent flooding By the way I DO NOT condone drinking and the handling of weapons! For those of you who know me out there know that to be the truth. Ride hard you can rest when you die
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a
pretty and well preserved body but rather to skid in broadside thoroughly
used up totally worn out and loudly proclaiming man what a ride!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
#10. To: Itistoolate (#0)
No doubt this lovely photo has been scanned into BATFE database and the photo ID program is noting location and using face-recognition to identify weapons and persons. For permanent reference. I think people should be a little more paranoid about identifying themselves and their weapons. Photos like this could bite your butt years down the road.
I think the opposite. We need to stop being so damned scared of being "identified" and all of us, every last one of us, show our faces when we say "come get some". We outnumber the thugs 80 to 1, we have the real firepower, and the real power. As long as they continue to scare us into hiding, we'll never know it though. 80+ million gun owners suddenly said "screw you, here I am, a gun owner, whatchagonnadoaboutit" and the idea of "identifying for later use" becomes moot. We need to make *them* scared to show their faces, not the other way around. I say, carry those guns on your hips proudly and urge others to do so. A right that you're afraid to exercise is a right you no longer possess.
I think people should be aware. Even more so if they have sniper rifles, automatic weapons (or those that are easily converted to full-auto), etc. This kind of stuff can bite your ass in a family court dispute in a divorce or child custody fight. It can affect your employability. I'm not sure why people feel the need to publish everything about themselves on this interweb thing. Quite often, it is contrary to their own interests.
Even more so if they have sniper rifles, automatic weapons (or those that are easily converted to full-auto), etc. This kind of stuff can bite your ass in a family court dispute in a divorce or child custody fight. It can affect your employability. I'm not sure why people feel the need to publish everything about themselves on this interweb thing. Quite often, it is contrary to their own interests. What I have or don't have is not a matter of anyone's business but mine. I do not belong to any of the identity theft clubs like Fazed Book, or Twit. People need to learn to read the fine print - they claim ownership to any personal information you upload and the right to do with it as they will. I had a neighbor where I lived last who kept a bloody arsenal - which I did not know for years until he knew me well enough to know I could be trusted, then he pulled away the bookcase which was the door to the hidden room. I'm sure there are many with more but he had about 10 rifles racked up along with a collection of assorted pistols of varying vintage and power.
Then you know a sensible person. Hopefully, he has been discreet throughout. It's fairly difficult to do these days as so many organizations collect and trade information now. People need to realize that it's the blowhards and showoffs that will get rounded up first or flimsy excuses will used to seize their weapons or intimidate them. Look at that picture again. Since 50% of marriages end in divorce, how hard would it be to get two ex-wives of the men pictured to make charges against them as being somehow "threatening" and get their right to carry revoked? And after those two got their weapons seized and they got run through the courts, how willing would the rest be to do anything? Totalitarian regimes have devoted much effort to analyzing social habits and various records to determine the political reliability of ordinary citizens.
And definitely ours has been busy at it - and not just the recent stuff like "no-fly lists" with 3 year old children on them but as far back as the late 40's early 50's when CIA Psychiatrists first began their experimentation on mind control etc., ... Our ruling elites are very much interested in controlling the populace - "all the better to liquidate you my dear".
There are no replies to Comment # 37. End Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#12. To: TooConservative (#10)
#17. To: SonOfLiberty (#12)
We outnumber the thugs 80 to 1, we have the real firepower, and the real power. As long as they continue to scare us into hiding, we'll never know it though. 80+ million gun owners suddenly said "screw you, here I am, a gun owner, whatchagonnadoaboutit" and the idea of "identifying for later use" becomes moot. We need to make *them* scared to show their faces, not the other way around.
#30. To: TooConservative (#17)
I think people should be aware.
#35. To: Original_Intent (#30)
I had a neighbor where I lived last who kept a bloody arsenal - which I did not know for years until he knew me well enough to know I could be trusted, then he pulled away the bookcase which was the door to the hidden room. I'm sure there are many with more but he had about 10 rifles racked up along with a collection of assorted pistols of varying vintage and power.
#37. To: TooConservative (#35)
Totalitarian regimes have devoted much effort to analyzing social habits and various records to determine the political reliability of ordinary citizens.
Replies to Comment # 37.