[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: US Mint Fails to Reduce Numismatic Gold Coin Prices in Opposition to Published Policy
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://news.coinupdate.com/us-mint- ... ismatic-gold-coin-prices-0295/
Published: May 27, 2010
Author: By Michael Zielinski
Post Date: 2010-06-07 22:14:43 by DeaconBenjamin
Keywords: None
Views: 45
Comments: 1

On January 12, 2009, the United States Mint adopted a pricing policy which allows them to adjust prices for their numismatic gold and platinum products as often as weekly in response to changes in precious metals prices. Today, the US Mint broke with their policy and failed to reduce prices for available gold coins.

Prior to adopting the new policy, the Mint had been required to publish notice of any pricing changes for numismatic products in the Federal Register. This repricing process could take several weeks, during which products were temporarily unavailable for sale. The new policy was formulated after a particularly volatile year for precious metals prices, which had resulted in the prolonged suspension of numerous gold and platinum numismatic products. The change in policy was presented as a way to improve transparency, agility, and customer service.

Under the new policy, the average price of gold and platinum are calculated each Wednesday based on the London Fix prices from the previous Thursday AM through the current Wednesday AM. This average price is applied to a schedule which lists product prices across different price ranges set at $50 intervals for gold and $100 intervals for platinum. If the weekly average price moves into a higher or lower range, products prices are increased or decreased on Thursdays at 10:00 AM ET. The pricing policy as published in the Federal Register can be found here.

Note that this policy applies to numismatic gold and platinum products, not bullion products, which are sold through the US Mint's authorized purchaser network.

Until now the Mint has followed the pricing policy, making the necessary price adjustments, either higher or lower. The price changes have typically been implemented on Wednesday mornings, rather than Thursday as stated in the policy.

This week, the Mint failed to adjust prices lower, as provided in the policy. The average price of gold for the period was $1,190.39, as calculated from the following London Fix prices.

Thurs AM, May 20 1,187.25
Thurs PM, May 20 1,192.00
Fri AM, May 21 1,183.50
Fri PM, May 21 1,179.75
Mon AM, May 24 1,183.75
Mon PM, May 24 1,187.00
Tue AM, May 25 1,189.50
Tue PM, May 25 1,198.25
Wed AM, May 26 1,212.50

Prices for available numismatic gold products remained at levels based an average price of gold within the $1,200 to $1,249.99 pricing range. These prices actually represent the highest levels on record for numismatic gold products, following a price increase on May 12, 2010.

Currently available precious metal products include the First Spouse Gold Coins featuring Letitia Tyler, Julia Tyler, Sarah Polk, Margaret Taylor, and Abigail Fillmore. These coins each contain one-half ounce of 24 karat gold. The proof versions of these coins are priced at $779 each and the uncirculated versions are priced at $766 each.

Prices should have been reduced to $754 for proof coins and $741 for uncirculated coins.

The United States Mint did not provide any explanation to its customers regarding the break with policy. Requests for an explanation remain unanswered, although the US Mint has confirmed that prices will not be lowered this week.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

US Mint Responds on Numismatic Gold Coin Pricing Policy

By Michael Zielinski on May 31st, 2010

Last week it seemed that the United States Mint should have reduced the prices for available numismatic gold coins based on a reading of their pricing policy. A notification published in the Federal Register documented a specific procedure by which the average of London Fix prices for a specified period would drive pricing changes. Applying this procedure would have resulted in a price decrease for the available First Spouse Gold Coins.

A response from the US Mint has revealed that there is more to the pricing policy than published in the Federal Register. There are additional criteria defined within an internal policy that can override the published policy. Until now, these additional criteria had not been provided or revealed to the public.

For more than a year, price changes have always followed the calculated average of the nine fix prices mentioned in the published policy. So apparently, this week was the first time that the internal policy guided the pricing determination.

The statement provided by the Mint follows:

On January 12, 2009, the United States Mint adopted a pricing policy which allows them to adjust prices for their numismatic gold and platinum products in order to mitigate the effect of the fluctuating prices of precious metals. The new policy was adopted to ensure that the United States Mint is able to recover all costs associated with gold and platinum products, while keeping changes in prices to a minimum. The new methodology is based primarily on the London Fix weekly average (using the nine fixes beginning Thursday morning and ending with the following Wednesday morning fix).

An internal policy defines the additional criteria that are used to determine price changes. These criteria use the Wednesday PM fix to determine the trend with the intention of minimizing changes to prices. Thus, if the average is above the existing range, but the Wednesday PM fix is in the existing range, prices will not be raised. Similarly, if the average is below the existing range and the Wednesday PM fix is still in the range, prices will not drop. Additional criteria based on the Wednesday PM fix address changes of more than one range, as well as spikes in the market, which could cause the average to be above the existing range, while the Wednesday PM fix is below the existing range, or vice-versa.

During the week that ended with the AM fix of May 26, 2010, the weekly average fell below the range that was in effect on that date. However, the Wednesday PM fix was within the range currently in effect, so the prices were not dropped.

When the new pricing policy was first introduced, the United States Mint Deputy Director stated, "Transparency, agility, and customer service are the catalysts for our new pricing method." Having an unrevealed internal policy which can override the published policy doesn't seem consistent with the claim of transparency.

Going forward, collectors who have been calculating the weekly average precious metals prices to aid in purchasing decisions will have another factor to consider.

he who wants bread is the servant of the man that will feed him, if a man thus feeds a whole people, they are under his control.

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2010-06-07   22:16:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]