[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Activism See other Activism Articles Title: A Tea Party to Nowhere The Tea Party phenomenon has attracted a good deal of both good and bad attention in the media. Though it would perhaps be a stretch to describe it as a movement in that it has only limited organization and focus, it does tap into a genuine disconnect between the American people and the federal government in Washington. Most Tea Partiers claim to want smaller and cheaper government, less interference from Washington in their daily lives, and fewer programs that are intended to socially re-engineer the nation. So far, so good, but then comes the huge failure to comprehend that is as wide as the Grand Canyon. Most also want a strong, assertive national defense and are supporters of an aggressive foreign and security policy. Tea Partiers have unfortunately been fed a line of hokum by politicians aided and abetted by the mainstream media. They fail to understand that it is precisely the interventionist defense and foreign policies that are driving the bad things they see in government. Fueling government growth is the fearmongering that has been artfully encouraged by Democrat and Republican alike. Fear of terrorists, fear of unruly foreigners, fear of the unknown. Fear that unless something is done and more money is spent, the United States will be destroyed by a nameless, faceless threat. The Tea Partiers should instead understand that terrorists will only tear down the United States if we Americans help them to do so. Irrational fear of a small group of men hiding in a cave in Asia is what drives larger government, the infringement of civil liberties, and more taxes and regulation. The United States is on a road that can only lead to ruin. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 in circumstances somewhat similar to the current American financial slide, a Russian politician joked that his country was somewhat like Upper Volta with nuclear armed ballistic missiles. At the time Upper Volta was the poorest country in the world and his point was that having the world's greatest missile force did not make up for having a wrecked economy. For the United States to continue its imperialist foreign policy, and there is every sign that it intends to do so, will eventually lead to economic and social collapse. So how can the Tea Party turn things around? It can only do so by realizing that the first thing that must be done to fix the government in Washington is for the United States to end its wars overseas and dramatically scale back on its international commitments. There is no good reason for Washington to serve as the world's policeman and many good reasons why it should cease and desist. from doing so. Reason number one should be that the US muscular foreign policy has actually been helping the terrorists achieve their objectives. In October 2004 Usama bin Laden said, referring to the economic damage the US economy has sustained in the wake of 9/11, "We are continuing in the same policy to make America bleed profusely to the point of bankruptcy." The numbers alone demonstrate that bin Laden has succeeded, far beyond his wildest imaginings. Iraq alone has cost $1 trillion and counting, 4400 Americans have died together with as many as 650,000 Iraqis. Afghanistan and Iraq continue to run a tab at $12 billion per month, with 1,086 more American dead in Afghanistan, and global war is expanding, not contracting, as the Obama Administration contemplates increased direct involvement in Yemen, Pakistan, and the Horn of Africa. US policies also propagate terrorism in the form of blowback. Every diplomat or intelligence officer understands that laws of physics apply in foreign affairs as much as they do in the natural sciences. When you get involved in a foreign country's internal affairs and take action against individuals or groups the action will result in a Newtonian "equal and opposite reaction." Push on one spot and something happens, sometimes half a world away. When a man attempts to blow up an SUV in Times Square or ignite a bomb in his underwear on board an airliner it is because the US is bombing and killing in places like Yemen and Pakistan. Stop one and you stop the other. As Ron Paul puts it, they are over here because we are over there. It's that simple. And when you put an end to the American empire you can stop writing a blank check every year for the Pentagon, you can stop borrowing money to fund the wars, and you can take sensible steps to reduce the size of government, making it again answerable to the people. As the memory of the overhyped terrorist threat fades, you can even begin to restore some of those civil liberties that have been stripped away by the Patriot Acts, the Military Commissions Act, and the assertion of state secrets privilege. Is it unimaginable that the Tea Parties might turn in that direction? Perhaps not, though much depends on the extent to which the Republican Party and people like Sarah Palin are able to co-opt the movement. If they do, the revolt will fizzle out and turn into George W. Bush revisited. What is needed is a resurgence of traditional conservatives and libertarians to make the case that it is precisely the disastrous foreign policy that is driving virtually everything that ails the United States today. This might be referred to as shifting the narrative, turning it away from the sense that there is an amorphous threat out there that has to be dealt with and towards an understanding that America's genuine security depends on a sane and cautious foreign policy that eschews meddling in other peoples' affairs. Copyright © 2010 Campaign for Liberty Philip M. Giraldi is a former CIA counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer who served 19 years overseas in Turkey, Italy, Germany, and Spain. He was Chief of Base in Barcelona from 1989 to 1992, was designated as senior Agency officer for support at the Olympic Games, and served as official liaison to the Spanish Security and Intelligence services. He has been designated by the General Accountability Office as an expert on the impact of illegal immigration on terrorism
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#1. To: AGAviator (#0)
That is so much hypocrisy given the rest of the worlds constant meddling of U.S. domestic affairs; from the stolen wealth of the U.S. population given away to the foreign groups in 'bailouts', to the invading criminals from mexico, to the Gulf oil spill that has destroyed the Gulf Coast of the U.S. and was caused by foreign groups (BP is own by the UK government and the rig was owned by a South Korea company, and the rig was located in international waters).
America's genuine security depends on a sane and cautious foreign policy that eschews meddling in other peoples' affairs. That is so much hypocrisy given the rest of the worlds constant meddling of U.S. domestic affairs; from the stolen wealth of the U.S. population given away to the foreign groups in 'bailouts', to the invading criminals from mexico, to the Gulf oil spill that has destroyed the Gulf Coast of the U.S. and was caused by foreign groups (BP is own by the UK government and the rig was owned by a South Korea company, and the rig was located in international waters). Unfortunately the most egregious instances of American meddling in the rest of the world are happening in the Middle East, which is not the source of any of the foreign interferences in the US that you cite.
Keep in mind the rulers of those same middle-eastern nations for decades pumped billions in cash into the U.S. 'enivromental' groups and U.S. congressional coffers to keep the U.S. from drill it's own oil and also prevented the U.S. from building new nuclear power plants. Like I said, these is so much hypocrisy on the other side of this.
No. Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan had nothing to do with any of those things even if they were done at all. Same with Lebanon, Yemen, Egypt and Somalia. How did a single one of any of these countries pump any significant money into US environmental and political treasuries?
2. How did a single one of any of these countries pump any significant money into US environmental and political treasuries? 1. I am talking about Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait to name a few. Interesting how you omitted those nations from your above list. 2. Third party middle men that handle the funneling of money.
1. I am talking about Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait to name a few Interesting how you omitted those nations from your above list. That's because the United States is not forcing its political will or military power onto Jordan, Saudi Arabia, or Kuwait. In fact, quite the opposite. These 3 countries buy military equipment and training from the US to use for their own purposes. Which means your premise that the US is butting in the Middle East as a response to the Middle East butting into the US is completely without basis. All the countries I mention: Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Yemen, and Egypt receive various forms of American aid except Iran. It makes zero sense to allege they are funneling money into America, third party or no third party, and then get foreign aid because they have insufficient resources to fund their own infrastructures.
That is because they are imposing their political will into OUR domestic policies. And that is where the hypocrisy of the situation is at
There are no replies to Comment # 14. End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||