[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The U.K. is F*CKED (Pub Owners are liable for speech of drunks) Cucumber Water Benefits + How to Make It How to Improve Cellular Health and Why ItÂ’s Important Natural Tinnitus Treatment Methods to Stop Ringing in the Ears 6 Ways To Improve Your Health using Structured Water Night Shift MD Melatonin (Over 50, You need it) Dude wearing a dress threatens people with a knife on the NYC subway “I REFUSE to Work!” – Woman BRAGS About Living Off Welfare and Section 8 BlackRock & Fidelity In Collusion With The UK Government? Earth Overshoot Day Is Coming Sooner And Sooner Why are cancer rates SKYROCKETING in pets and children? This is the Democrat Party: Idiot in Panda Suit Is Followed by Kamla Harris (Video) Gordon Chang: This is a WARNING SIGN about what's going on in China Know Them By Their Fruits. Their Whole Lives devoted to uncovering the Crimes of the Undeclared Empire He Asked ChatGPT One Question… Then It Got Disturbingly Prophetic Lefties, Illegals, & Minorities Are Finally Experiencing "Consequence Culture" US Bunker Buster's "Weak Spot" Revealed? China Finds Attack Tactic to ‘Stop’ Bomb That Hit Iran "This is an EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT" CIA MKULTRA Whistleblower sounding the alarm Burn Brown Fat With Food Cartels Moving to Canada For Fentanyl (And other reason) Bees Benefit from Mushrooms, You Could Too Top 11 SWAT Operations in History Inside 'Return to the Land': The group making a whites-only community in Arkansas Ana Kasparian: Epstein Cover-Up, Israel Strikes Gaza Church, & the Great American Political Shift McDonald's McHire AI Bot Just Exposed The Personal Data Of 64 McMillion People I think your EV is charged now. You can go ahead and unplug it. Gen-Z Can't Answer the Most Basic Questions - OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM IS A JOKE. Your car is spying on you, but here is how you can stop it. The Real Reason Why Brigitte Macron Is So Worried...(Candace Owens)

ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: World Net Daily has some BREAKING NEWS on ELIGIBILITY
Source: World Net Daily
URL Source: http://www.wnd.com/
Published: Jun 20, 2010
Author: WND
Post Date: 2010-06-20 21:27:55 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 6364
Comments: 175

www.wnd.com/

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 96.

#6. To: Itistoolate (#0)

As usual the WND fruitcakes miss the point.

The individual on the clip says explicitly at the end that Obama was a legal US citizen at the time of birth, and the objections to his Presidency are based on racial, ethnic, and cultural bigotry.

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-20   22:25:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The individual on the clip says explicitly at the end that Obama was a legal US citizen at the time of birth

He also said Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, a fact born out by Obama's refusal to produce a long-form birth certificate. Of course he can't produce that which doesn't exist. He is a fraud.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-06-20   22:27:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

born [sic] out by Obama's refusal to produce a long-form birth certificate

Being a legal US citizen from birth trumps producing documents satisfactory to k00ks.

Furthermore any alleged reasons for claimed absence of such k00kaccepted forms must themselves be proven - and not merely the products of conjecture by someone who can only say that he didn't personally see them himself.

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-20   23:30:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Being a legal US citizen from birth trumps producing documents satisfactory to k00ks.

You related to Badeye by any chance??

Yer comment is prima facie evidence of gross incompetence at argument.

That's like saying being an eye surgeon trumps "producing documents satisfactory to k00ks."

I don't care where you went to school or practiced before, you have to pass the boards in my state or you are not a specialist.

O-worshipers are lawless savages.

randge  posted on  2010-06-21   7:15:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Being a legal US citizen from birth trumps producing documents satisfactory to k00ks.

You related to Badeye by any chance??

Yer comment is prima facie evidence of gross incompetence at argument.

FACT: This video which purports to be an expose of Obama's non-citizenship status actually has its protagonist saying Obama was a US citizen and the opposition to his status comes from ethnic, racial, and cultural animus and not from any legal considerations.

FACT: I state several times above the totally unsubstantiated claims of spending $2 million, or any substantive amounts of money, to defeat these frivolous cases, are unsubstantiated pure k00k$hit.

FACT: I've never expressed substantive support of Obama because

(1) He has too many Israel-oriented people in high positions, and he allows them and Congress to push him in directions he and we should not be going at all,
(2) He does not lead, instead sits back and tries to fashion compromises between basically incompatible positions and world views, and
(3) He has not kept his explicit promises about taking actions like closing Guantanamo, ending torture and rendition, or killing innocents.

So since you can rebut none of the statements, you come out trying to link me to somebody else with an argument ad hominem

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-21   8:57:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Being a legal US citizen from birth trumps producing documents satisfactory to k00ks.

You related to Badeye by any chance??

Yer comment is prima facie evidence of gross incompetence at argument.

I'll yield to all the things you stipulate as "facts."

I'll also withdraw the ad hominem about Badeye.

But I stand by my statement that your first statement above is no sort of argument in this discussion at all.

I had to produce a long form to be naturalized. If I hadn't I would have been invited to take a hike.

randge  posted on  2010-06-21   17:07:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I do so love the way the BushO'bots argue. As far as I'm concerned they are "six of one half dozen of the other".

This commits two logical fallacies:

"Being a legal US citizen from birth trumps producing documents satisfactory to k00ks."

It is both an unsupported assertion of the form P therefore Q., it asserts something as true without factual support, and then uses itself to prove itself thus also making it a circular argument. Then just for good measure we get Argumentum Ad Hominem i.e., through the use of another fallacy Loaded Words i.e., "kOOks". So, that argument is totally fallacious and specious. Logically it is garbage and relies only on misdirection to catch the mentally lazy and unwary.

And a couple of references (first one uses FEC documents reproduced at the source):

Obama law tab up to $1.4 million Note the 1.4 Million to the Law Firm of Perkins Cole was as 10 Aug. 2009. The Meter is still running and two million is probably an under-estimate. Perkins Cole is the Law Firm which has represented Oh'bummer in all legal proceedings regarding the suppressed and hidden records.

Obama Scrubs the Web of All Birth Docs Many links and cross references in the article.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-06-21   19:25:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It is both an unsupported assertion of the form P therefore Q., it asserts something as true without factual support, and then uses itself to prove itself thus also making it a circular argument

Per American jurisprudence, it is you k00ks who need factual support for your charges.

Mother Jones: What's Obama's Birther Legal Bill

Tue Jan. 26, 2010 4:00 AM PST

Is President Barack Obama spending millions of dollars to hide the truth about his citizenship?

During Obama's 2008 run for the White House, his campaign and a host of other credible sources repeatedly debunked the conspiracy theory that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii, and was thus ineligible to serve as president. But this failed to quell the "birther" movement, whose acolytes have filed more than 60 civil lawsuits challenging the president's citizenship. None of these suits have gone anywhere in court. But birthers say that's because Obama has unleashed a phalanx of powerful lawyers to silence them—spending $1.7 million in the process, according to WorldNetDaily (WND), an enthusiastic online promoter of the birthers' cause.

Given the sheer number of cases, it seems plausible that the president and the government may have been forced to devote real resources to their defense. But in fact the opposite may be true: The birthers' own copious legal bungling could wind up costing them more than Obama will have to spend defending himself.

The birthers have peppered dozens of state and federal courts around the country with legal challenges—against the president and other government officials and organizations who had some role in allowing Obama's name to be placed on the ballot, including the Federal Election Commission, various state election officials, and the US Supreme Court. Some of the suits, particularly those filed by the movement's leading lady, California lawyer/dentist Orly Taitz, have been headlined by members of the military claiming they've been wrongfully made to serve in foreign wars by an illegitimate commander in chief. Most recently, birther attorneys have represented car dealers who charge that Obama is a phony president who lacked the authority to order a restructuring of Chrysler that they say cost them their businesses.

WorldNetDaily has noted that FEC filings show that Obama's presidential campaign has paid out more than $1.7 million since the election to the law firm of Perkins Coie. Until recently, that firm was home to Obama's campaign lawyer, and now White House counsel, Robert Bauer—the very same DC lawyer, says WND, who has defended Obama in many of the birther lawsuits. Ergo, WND concluded, Obama must be devoting that entire $1.7 million to crushing birthers in court.

This is a ridiculous claim: Even after an election is over a presidential campaign has plenty of need for lawyers as it winds down operations and meets campaign finance law requirements.

But WND's editors believe they have a smoking gun in a letter Bauer sent on April 3 to John David Hemenway, a DC lawyer representing retired Air Force Colonel Gregory Hollister in a suit against "Barry Soetoro…de facto President in posse." (Some birthers claim Obama is actually an Indonesian citizen who shares his last name with his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.)

The lawsuit claims that Hollister may be unable to perform his duty to uphold the Constitution if Obama called him out of retirement and ordered him to war, because Obama isn't a natural-born citizen. A US District Court judge dismissed the "frivolous" case and reprimanded the 83-year-old lawyer for filing it. Nonetheless, Hemenway appealed, prompting Bauer to send him a letter warning that Obama would seek sanctions if he pursued the matter.

WND and many of its readers apparently believe this letter proves that Obama has teams of expensive lawyers working round the clock to stomp out the suits and intimidate the underdog plaintiffs and their attorneys. The White House never responded to WND's questions about the legal fees, and Bauer didn't respond to Mother Jones. But the birthers' lawsuits don't exactly seem to be requiring Obama's lawyers— government or private—to burn the midnight oil.

Roger West, an assistant US attorney in the central district of California, represented the government in a lawsuit brought by Taitz on behalf of perennial presidential candidate Alan Keyes, asking the court to require that Obama prove he is a natural-born citizen. The case has dragged on for more than a year, mostly because Taitz, a graduate of an online, unaccredited law school, failed to serve the defendants. Judge David O. Carter dismissed the suit in October for a host of reasons, but Taitz has appealed. Yet West says that far from bleeding his office, Taitz and her co-counsel Gary Kreep have assembled such a weak case that he hasn't had to spend much time on it. "I filed one motion that didn't take too long, we've had two hearings and that's it," he says. "It's not like we've devoted some sort of task force to this."

Army Major Rebecca Ausprung handled two of the birther cases against the Department of the Army that disputed Obama's authority as commander in chief to order soldiers to war. Ausprung says she spent a few hours drafting motions and doing research, and she did have to make three short trips to Georgia from Arlington, Virginia. She prevailed in both cases. "The monetary cost to the government in defending these two cases was extremely minimal," she says.

Or consider a case filed by one of the most prolific birther litigants, Philip J. Berg, that went all the way up to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. In November the court dismissed the appeal and ordered Berg to pay the legal costs for the defendants, which included the Federal Election Commission. Here was the government's big chance to recoup its millions. But when the FEC submitted its bill, the grand total came to $20.40.

This doesn't include the cost of the time government lawyers spent writing briefs and appearing in court. Yet it's clear that as much of a nuisance as these suits are for the government, that's all they are: a nuisance.

In fact, the plaintiffs may be spending far more time and money on these cases than Obama or the government is, in part because of their failure to abide by basic court procedures. In one of the Georgia cases Ausprung handled, a federal judge sanctioned Taitz in October for $20,000 for, among other things, pursuing a case long after a judge had dismissed it and her own client had discharged her. Taitz has refused to pay the fine.

So far, judges have been remarkably tolerant of the birthers' shenanigans— despite being handed abundant opportunities to throw their petitions out of court. In one case, Taitz allegedly encouraged supporters to contact the judge by phone and mail to lobby for her cause—a glaring ethics violation that he chose to ignore. Another of her cases only went forward because the federal judge basically begged the defendants to let Taitz serve them—the first step in any lawsuit, but one that Taitz had neglected to take for about seven months. The judges' written opinions suggest that by giving the birthers' cases a full airing, they hope to put some of the most outrageous allegations to rest.

But not only have the birthers shown little gratitude to the judges who have indulged them, their court losses have also fueled the conspiracy theories that the judges had hoped to extinguish. Taitz accused US District Judge Clay Land of having improperly discussed one of her cases with Attorney General Eric Holder, and submitted a sworn eyewitness account describing a clandestine meeting in a Columbus, Georgia, coffee shop between the judge and a man with a "trim upper lip mustache, not large of stature and general olive complexion"—whom the source naturally assumed to be the attorney general. On the day in question, however, Holder was making a public appearance 2,000 miles away in Los Angeles. Expect the birthers' theories to become even more far-fetched as their legal endeavors continue to fail.

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-21   20:01:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Personally, I'll take the word of the mother of Barack's children over Mother Jones. I do believe that Michelle and Barack's grammy know a tad bit more about his birth and his birth certificate, which nary got a mention in that piece, then Mo Jones.

abraxas  posted on  2010-06-21   20:08:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Personally, I'll take the word of the mother of Barack's children over Mother Jones

Quote verbatim where your "mother of Barack's children" says he was born in Kenya.

No fluff about AIDS or LBGT or DADT. Just the words of where and when in Kenya his mother delivered him.

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-21   20:11:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Quote verbatim where your "mother of Barack's children" says he was born in Kenya.

No fluff about AIDS or LBGT or DADT. Just the words of where and when in Kenya his mother delivered him.

More diversions. Michelle said it--deal with it. His granny said it too. Even Barack has let the cat out of the bag while you whine and complain that there is NO reason to question his citizenship.

Just go up the thread and listen to Michelle yourself. I'm not your personal transcriber. The info. is right there.......it only takes one click for you to get your own "verbatim" quote.

abraxas  posted on  2010-06-21   20:16:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Just go up the thread and listen to Michelle yourself

She didn't say he was born in Kenya.

Take some English classes at your local adult eductation school - if you have one.

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-21   20:42:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

She didn't say he was born in Kenya.

lol.....what, no verbatim? Let me help you......."when we took our trip to Africa and visited HIS HOME COUNTRY IN KENYA".......... She says it's his "HOME COUNTRY" for crying out loud. How is it his home country if homey wasn't even born there?

What, prey tell, does "home country" mean to you?

abraxas  posted on  2010-06-21   21:10:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

lol.....what, no verbatim? Let me help you......."when we took our trip to Africa and visited HIS HOME COUNTRY IN KENYA".......... She says it's his "HOME COUNTRY" for crying out loud. How is it his home country if homey wasn't even born there?

What, prey tell, does "home country" mean to you?

Isn't it funny how the Obamabots tie themselves in knots trying to defend the indefensible?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-06-21   21:15:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What, prey [sic] tell, does "home country" mean to you?

Isn't it funny how the Obamabots tie themselves in knots trying to defend the indefensible

Isn't it funny how Birferk00ks twist and mis-translate an English phrase into whatever they want it to mean in their own pretend world where they rule all?

And since Michelle is approximately the same age as her husband, what makes you presume she has any direct knowledge of where her husband was actually born, when she can't even remember the details of her own birth and would have no way of being a witness to his?

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-21   21:29:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I think it's even funnier how people have to use cute little names like "Birferkooks" in order to malign people on the internet. A sure sign of Saul Alinsky if I ever saw one.

I don't have a dog in the hunt, but I see a pattern where this sort of thing is concerned. If there was no truth to the matter, the thing would die on the vine, just like the 9-11 folks saying it was an inside job.

Of course they've got cute names for those guys too that I'm sure you use when you go back to whatever office you get your marching orders from.

I used to like some of your posts but when I read misspelled names, and other faggoty crap meant to incense people, it screams out how badly you have already lost an argument that should have died out long ago.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2010-06-21   21:33:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

If there was no truth to the matter, the thing would die on the vine, just like the 9-11 folks saying it was an inside job

The only places where these rumors persist are anonymous sites. The conspiracy theories have been debunked hundreds of times over by hundreds of people and nobody cares except the preprogrammed CT's.

How badly you have already lost an argument that should have died out long ago.

The k00ks never address any specifics I bring out to rebut them. Because they can't.

Examples:

(1) McCain spent $1.5 million on his 2008 Presidential legal expenses. Obama spent $1.7. Why do the k00ks presume that all or even a major portion of Obama's $1.7 million is not for the same non-BC issues that McCain had to pay $1.5 million for?
(2) Why do experienced practicing lawyers explicitly state that drafting and filing motions to dismiss for lack of standing take minimal amounts of time and money, especially when they are swiftly honored by all judges, contrary to the k00kclaims that these junior attorney/law clerk tasks must have taken millions
(3) How much legal costs are incurred when cases never proceed to deposition, interrogatories, or discovery but are simply dismissed for lack of standing and/or evidence?
(4) How many individuals filing these BC conspiracy theories were either not in good standing with their State Bars or had histories of sanctions (start with Philip Berg),
(5) How many BC k00k cases were badly bungled by these incompetent plaintiffs who failed to follow basic procedures including proper service and not pressuring the public to try to influence the presiding bench, causing delays in the cases and plantiff rebukes from the bench
(6) What is the importance of the cardinal rule of American jurisprudence that accusations and charges must be backed by credible evidence indicating possession of information capable of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, to prevent them being dismissed for lack of credible evidence?

None of the k00ks has ever rebutted any of these points even partially. Instead they go on riffs and the same ad hominems and logical fallacies they attribute to others.

AGAviator  posted on  2010-06-21   22:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 96.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 96.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]