See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Half million US casualties from Iraq and Afghan wars
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 1, 2010
Author: Alexandra Sandels
Post Date: 2010-07-01 04:36:56 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 108
Comments: 8
e: LA Times: U.S. Iraq and Afghanistan War Casualties Top 500,000 Source: Veterans for Common Sense from Los Angeles Times URL Source: www.veteransforcommonsense.o ... ecurity/1788-alexandra-sandels Published: Jun 24, 2010 Author: Alexandra Sandels American Casualties 500,000 When Injuries and Illnesses are Included June 24, 2010, Los Angeles, CA (Los Angeles Times) - Here's an eye-popping number: A blogger and writer claims American military casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan now exceed 500,000. That's if you count certain injuries and diseases including mental illness that he alleges the Department of Defense doesn't include in its official combat-related casualty toll in an effort to soften U.S. military losses in the wars and win funding for them from the Congress. VCS Note: Internal VA reports obtained by VCS confirm LA Times article: Consequences of Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, as of June 24, 2010 * 537,099: U.S. Veteran Patients Treated at VA * 489,369: U.S. Veteran Disability Claims Filed Against VA For example, cases of traumatic brain injury and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD, as a result of serving in Iraq and Afghanistan are excluded from the official list of casualties. "Under this scheme, chronic injuries and many acute internal injuries such as hearing impairment, back injuries, mild traumatic brain injuries, mental health problems and a host of diseases suffered by personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan are usually not counted as being war-related regardless of how debilitating they are," writes Matthew Nasuti in an article published on the Afghan news site and media organization Kabul Press. "They are either generally lumped into the category of 'non-hostile wounded' or simply not counted at all." Masuti is a former Air Force captain and Los Angeles deputy city attorney who worked for the State Department in Iraq for a spell. He's now a critic of the U.S. efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The writer claims that 95% of injured soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen were not reported as casualties due to what he refers to as the Pentagon's "fudging the numbers" in a bid to win funding from American lawmakers to finance the wars. "Wounded in action is narrowly defined to essentially be an injury directly caused by an adversary," he writes. "So called 'friendly fire' injuries and deaths would apparently not be counted. The emphasis is on acute injuries caused by enemy munitions which pierce or penetrate." He cites sources such as the Department of Veterans Affairs, the New England Journal of Medicine and the Navy to conclude that the more than 170,000 U.S. soldiers suffer from hearing damage, the 130,000 or more cases of milder brain injuries, and the 200,000 troops suffering from mental problems are left out of the casualty count. If they were to be included in the Pentagon's official numbers of 5,500 troop deaths and 38,000 injuries, the total American military casualty toll in Iraq and Afghanistan would amount to well over 500,000. And it doesn't end there. The 500,000 tally would increase significantly if one also added to the count what Nasuti claims are around 30,000 cases of serious disease and hundreds of accident injuries and suicides, among many other types of disease and injury-related military casualties. Skeptics would maybe argue that a soldier suffering from a gastrointestinal disease from having eaten bad meals in Iraq and Afghanistan and minor roadway accident injuries do not belong in the tally along with troops who have been killed in ambushes with insurgents. But Natusi writes that it's important not to leave these types of injuries out in order to show the real image of the war and its effects on U.S. troops. Not only do the aforementioned injuries deserve to be formally recognized as casualties as a sign of respect for the soldiers serving in the battlefield, but leaving them out of the count distorts the overall toll, the writer concludes. "These casualties are real and are a direct result of fighting two wars," he writes. "The soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen who have suffered these combat injuries deserve to be recognized and the American people deserve a proper accounting of the mounting costs of their two seemingly endless wars. That accounting begins with an honest casualty count." Veterans for Common Sense 900 2nd Street, NE Suite 216 Washington, DC 20003 (202) 558-4553 Tatarewicz: What a waste. And all because a bunch of Zionist criminals have decided to steal land from Palestinians rather than buy it as laws universally require.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
"These casualties are real and are a direct result of fighting two wars," he writes. "The soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen who have suffered these combat injuries deserve to be recognized and the American people deserve a proper accounting of the mounting costs of their two seemingly endless wars. That accounting begins with an honest casualty count." Two things I would like to add to this article. 1st off, Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that constant wars depleted a nations best and brightest male stock ... and I believe he's right about that observation. 2ndly, the people must support these returning soldiers, especially with respect to injuries suffered during their service, otherwise the government will turn them against their own people at some point by telling them no one cares about you except Uncle Sambo. I recall being informed by a T.I. (D.I. for Marines) that he was my mama and my daddy back in 1969.
YOU only count when it's census or TAX time" ... don't you find it ironic that the census bureau says they rely upon the Constitution for their authority and pays their help in UNCONSTITUTIONAL FRNs ... bend over and lick the hand that beats you !
Bush, Obama, Cheney, Clinton, and all the other f*cks who had anything to do with this cluster f*ck need to be made into casualties.
These numbers do not include any of the contractors or support personnel over there, which could conceivably double the true casualty count.
My nephew, Adam, is one of these. I imagine $1,000,000 has been spent on him since an IED smashed his Stryker two years ago. He officially retired May22, and he will be on the dole till he dies. Think he is now twentytwo. And for what greater good was this?
"Satan / Cheney in "08" Exactly. Any of the offical numbers can be doubled to achieve the real amount of pain.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" Someone needs to tell me exactly what I'm supposed to be celebrating this coming Sunday. Thanks.
Smugglers, Traitors and Tax Evaders. Has a certain rhyme and rythm to it, kinda like gypsies, tramps and thieves. Have a happy 4th !! I'm putting rack of lamb on the grill and steaming crab legs with my sexy librarian girlfreind, who is 19 years my junior. She says she's going to give me more lush and less sush, and likes to do it between the stacks..lol
we haven't had an update on Adam for some time. how's he doing physically and emotionally?
Not only do the aforementioned injuries deserve to be formally recognized as casualties as a sign of respect for the soldiers serving in the battlefield, but leaving them out of the count distorts the overall toll, the writer concludes.
#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#3. To: Lysander_Spooner, 4 (#2)
#4. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#5. To: Lod (#3)
#6. To: tom007, 4 (#5)
#7. To: Lod (#6)
#8. To: tom007 (#4)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest