Missouri and Virginia have their own Arizona SB 1070 immigration laws
July 5, 4:16 PM · Gil Guignat - Phoenix Conservative Examiner
There is something very confusing here about all the fuss of Arizona's SB 1070 immigration law.
First one of our contributors M.K. brought to our attention that Missouri has had the same law for five years now but M.K. also tells us that Virginia has also had the same immigration law for three years. In Virginia if a police officer stops someone for any crime it is mandatory that the officer check immigration status automatically.
As you can see in the below video there have been very little problems with the effects of the law.
Since the law has been implemented in Virginia here are some of the positive results: a 38% reduction in violent crimes, fewer uninsured illegals giving birth, a drop in English as second language enrollment, and 80%of citizens favor law.
We keep asking why Arizona is not allowed to have its immigration laws, when we now know that Missouri and Virginia have had their identical immigration laws for 3 to 5 years now ? Why is Arizona going to get sued in hopes of preventing the state from implementing its immigration law when Missouri and Virginia have had identical laws for years. How very odd indeed!
Why is Arizona going to get sued in hopes of preventing the state from implementing its immigration law when Missouri and Virginia have had identical laws for years. How very odd indeed!
Arizona is a border state: it's the point-of-entry for millions of illegal mexicons every year. The second that Texas attempted to implement it's own version of SB1070 (it won't happen) the FedGov would be crying about Texas, too.
Arizona could and should demand the return of all state National guard units and materiel the federal government currently enjoys the use of for the defense of their border with beanerco.
Arizona could and should demand the return of all state National guard units and materiel the federal government currently enjoys the use of for the defense of their border with beanerco.
======================================
FYI, George Bush, with the stroke of a pen, took away the State authority of the Governor over each state national guard and relegated it to the authority of the president.
Basically, governors are now nothing more than a pretty hood ornament when it comes to authority over the national guard.
who granted bush an authority which he can not have? even if congress granted him that authority it is meaningless as they have no such authority or the ability to bestow such authority. why isn't baalzabush in Milosevic's old cell?
who granted bush an authority which he can not have? even if congress granted him that authority it is meaningless as they have no such authority or the ability to bestow such authority.