[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’ Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump 2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything) The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped. Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound) Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH... ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES Trump to send troops to Memphis Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out) Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter? What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!) Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas, Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World - Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon Newmont Pulls Out of Canada, Delists TSX Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Warning: Elites Plan to Make Humans Immortal in the Cloud The $7.9 Trillion Company You've Never Heard Of CCP's motivation for (the Korean) war was to grow its military: US-China-Russia relations

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Hypothetical. Palin Wins The Republican Nomination. Do you vote for her
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 10, 2010
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2010-07-10 20:40:24 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 3164
Comments: 121

Ok it is 2012. You aren't happy with Obama. Palin has won the republican nomination for president. It is election day. You are registered to vote. Do you pull the lever for Palin. Why or why not.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 82.

#25. To: A K A Stone (#0)

No, because a pres Palin will be no different from Obama.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-07-10   22:28:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No different? Come on you can't be serious.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-11   0:08:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I am serious.

What is the difference between Obama and Bush?

I'll grant you Bush wouldn't have pushed through the health care disaster bill, but other than that...

And I'll guarantee you that under a pres Palin, the health care bill won't be repealed. That's not how it works. Dems always continue whatever the R's started, and the R's return the favor. Look at the Iraq war, for example.

I remember when Bill Clinton declared "The era of big government is over". That was in 1994 after the R's retook control of the House and Senate.

And the gov has done nothing but swell since then.

No, Stone, Palin is not the remedy for the very sick country of the USA. If there's any medicine out there, Ron Paul is it.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-07-11   10:35:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No, Stone, Palin is not the remedy for the very sick country of the USA. If there's any medicine out there, Ron Paul is it.

My hypothetical was Palin wins the nomination. If she wins she would be the best chance for a tilt in the right direction.

I have no delusion that she will do everything right or that I wouldn't be disappointed with some of what she does. But there are so many things she is better then Obama on.

Obama is better then her or any previous president on NOTHING!

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-11   11:39:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

My hypothetical was Palin wins the nomination. If she wins she would be the best chance for a tilt in the right direction.

"Best chance"?

And if you had to bet on whether a pig or a cow would fly first, you might say the pig has the best chance since it's lighter.

You have to recognize that the system is very disfunctional. Any positive, meaningful change is going to require something severely different, and that's not Palin. In fact, what the country might need most of all is something that makes it clear to the masses that the system IS busted, and perpetually giving people hope of positive change is one way to delay the reckoning that must ultimately come. In that way, the more "hopeful" a candidate may appear, the worse it could be in the long run.

And the long run is what you should think about. As one libertarian talk show host once said, we should hope for the worst possible candidate to get elected to bring about the inevitable fall as soon as possible, so we can restart with people wiser for the experience.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-07-11   12:39:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And the long run is what you should think about. As one libertarian talk show host once said, we should hope for the worst possible candidate to get elected to bring about the inevitable fall as soon as possible, so we can restart with people wiser for the experience.

That is what happened in 2008. Now is the time to pick up the pieces and rebuild.

Also the supreme court. I didn't approve of Bushes nominees at the time. But in hindsight they turned out to be better then the dykes Owebama is offering up.

Palins picks to the court would be better.

Another reason is that a President becomes less accountable in a second term (no election to worry about) so they become more entrenched in their positions.

You wouldn't have that problem with Palin as she would want to be reelected.

We know for a fact that Obama sucks the big one. Palin or for that matter most any Republican nominee will have a chance to be better. And on domestic issues it isn't even close.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-11   12:44:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

That is what happened in 2008. Now is the time to pick up the pieces and rebuild.

Oh, pull-ease. Let me tell you, things need to get a LOT worse before people wise up. As an example, the "great" depression in the 30's didn't do it. In fact it made the ignorant sheeple make the government that was ultimately responsible for it bigger!

Maybe with the internet sharing info, that wouldn't happen again, but things need to get really bad first. Sorry, but Obama isn't bad enough. At least not that anyone can see yet. Maybe after the new tax reporting laws kick in making just about every $600 transaction reportable.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-07-11   13:02:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm not going to argue with you. I respect you and your views seem to be thought out most or all of the time.

I'm just saying that Palin would be an improvement over Obama. No doubt in my mind at all.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-07-11   13:05:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 82.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 82.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]