[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Flight 77 Cockpit Door Never Opened During 9/11 “Hijack”
Source: Rock Creek Free Press
URL Source: http://rockcreekfreepress.tumblr.com/post/285492999/flt77fdr
Published: Dec 15, 2009
Author: Sheila Casey
Post Date: 2010-07-14 02:07:35 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: Flight 77, 9/11, Black Box
Views: 28784
Comments: 913


Flight 77 Cockpit Door Never Opened During 9/11 “Hijack"


Flight Data Recorder By Sheila Casey / Rock Creek Free Press

Pilots for 9/11 Truth has reported that the data stream from the flight data recorder (FDR) for American Airlines flight 77, which allegedly struck the Pentagon on 9/11, shows that the cockpit door never opened during the entire 90 minute flight. The data was provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which has refused to comment.

The FDR is one of two “black boxes” in every commercial airliner, which are used after accidents to help determine the cause of a crash. One black box records flight data, the other records voice data (everything said in the cockpit during the flight). With those two sets of data, NTSB investigators can usually piece together the events that led to a crash. The status of the door to the cockpit is checked every four seconds throughout a flight and relayed as a simple 0 or 1, where 0=closed and 1=open, with approximately 1,300 door status checks performed during AA77’s 90 minute flight. Every one of those door status checks shows as a 0, indicating that the door to the cockpit never opened during the entire flight.

Accident investigators monitor the cockpit door with the FDR because it may yield clues to pilot error in a crash. The FDR begins recording once the pilots are in their seats and readying for takeoff, and the plane cannot take off unless the FDR is working.

The official story about flight 77 is that five Muslim terrorists brandishing box cutters forced their way into the cockpit and herded two pilots, four flight attendants and all the passengers to the back of the plane. This story came into being via Ted Olson, US Solicitor General, who told CNN — that he received two phone calls from his wife Barbara Olson, a passenger on the doomed flight. Ted Olson’s story changed several times. Sometimes he claimed that the calls from his wife were made from seat back phones, other times that she used her cell phone.

According to American Airlines customer service, the American Airlines maintenance manual for that aircraft, and American Airlines Captain Ralph Kolstad, seatback phones on 757s had been deactivated prior to 9/11/01. (They were later removed entirely, as they never worked well.)

Barbara Olson couldn’t have used a cell phone either: numerous 9/11 researchers, most notably David Ray Griffin, have pointed out that cell phones did not work on airplanes on 9/11. The speed and altitude of a commercial airliner both present overwhelming obstacles to a cell phone’s need to lock onto a cell tower and then hand off to another tower in a new location.

It was the FBI that revealed the evidence that decisively disproves Ted Olson’s story. In the Zacarias Moussaoui trial in 2006, the FBI presented a report on the cell phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. Their report on AA77 shows that there was only one phone call from Barbara Olson, but that it was an unconnected call lasting zero seconds. So Ted Olson either lied about receiving calls from his wife or was deceived into believing he received calls from her.

According to the UK Telegraph, Barbara Olson delayed her flight on 9/11 so that she could have breakfast with her husband on his birthday. That delay put her on the doomed flight. Ted Olson remarried in 2006 to tax attorney Lady Booth, whom he reportedly met the year after Barbara died.

There are numerous oddities and contradictions about AA77’s black boxes.

The government claims that the voice data recorder was damaged during the crash and that no usable data was retrieved from it. If true, this would be the first time in aviation history that a solid-state data recorder was destroyed during a crash.

While it was widely reported in the media that the FDR for AA77 was found at 4 am on September 14, 2001, the file containing the FDR data was dated over four hours earlier. In other words, we are asked to believe that the data from the FDR was downloaded prior to the FDR being found.

Researcher Aidan Monagahan has established that the NTSB does not have either serial or part numbers for the FDRs from AA77. The NTSB’s own handbook indicates that the part number and serial number of the FDR are required for data readout of the FDR. The NTSB did not have this information, giving us another reason to question how the FDR data was created.

Structural engineer Allyn Kilsheimer claimed that he personally found AA77’s black box on 9/11. But in the Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths, Kilsheimer is quoted as saying, “I stood on a pile of debris that we later found contained the black box 70;”

Kilsheimer’s story changes again in August 2007 in a piece done by the History Channel, “The 9/11 Conspiracies,” where he claims “I tripped over something; it was the black box.”

In earlier work, Pilots for 9/11 Truth (P4T) has determined that the same data set provided by the NTSB shows the plane too high to hit the Pentagon, based on an altimeter that uses air pressure to calibrate altitude.

As reported in the April 2009 Rock Creek Free Press, Citizen Investigation Team, citizen journalists from southern California, has collected evidence from 14 eyewitnesses that shows that the plane seen that morning near the Pentagon did not hit the building, but flew over it at the moment explosives detonated in the Pentagon, leading observers to conclude that the plane had crashed into the Pentagon.

Questions about what happened at the Pentagon have intrigued 9/11 researchers for years, beginning with photos from the alleged crash scene which do not show the wreckage of a plane.

This new evidence, showing that the cockpit door never opened during flight, is another nail in the coffin of the official story about flight 77. Clearly, if the cockpit door never opened, then hijackers did not storm the cockpit and herd the pilots to the back of the plane. The data, which originated from the government, does not support the government’s story.

Why would the government release data which contradicts its own version of events? It is possible they were just sloppy, or that they never anticipated that anyone would parse the data as carefully as Pilots for 9/11 Truth have. They may have also felt secure, that regardless of what damning revelations were contained in the FDR data, no mainstream media outlet would give them ink or air time, keeping the official story intact for the vast majority of Americans who receive their news from mainstream sources.

Rob Balsamo, founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, stated: “We have not located any independently verified data which confirms the government’s story. The FBI and NTSB refuse to comment.” Founded in August 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals from around the globe who are investigating the government’s claims about the attacks of 9/11.

Sheila Casey is a DC based journalist. Her work has appeared in The Denver Post, Reuters, Chicago Sun-Times, Dissident Voice and Common Dreams.


Poster Comment: Here's a link to the Pilots for 9/11 Truth articles on the matter. 9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE (1 image)

Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-325) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#326. To: FormerLurker (#322)

You believe in other impossible stories

Name them ... even if you can't link 'em.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:03:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#327. To: FormerLurker (#324)
(Edited)

I bet you and your goon squad would just that

Your silly little attempts to attack me instead of my post contents shows you for the mentally bankrupt denying forumtroll you are.

However even if you were to totally invalidate me, you wouldn't have advanced proof of your own silly cause in the slightest, with the result being you and your fellowk00ks would be in a "we don't really know what happened" scenario.

Get some mental help loser. Your brain needs to clear out all the garbage k00ksite word dump clutter it's holding onto.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work....Noam Chomsky

AGAviator  posted on  2010-07-15   19:07:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#328. To: Original_Intent (#323)

And all that despite the fact that the FBI does not list 911 on his "Most Wanted" Flyer. Imagine that. The FBI does not list 911 as one of Osama Ben Goldstein's great achievements. I think you should write them a stern letter and let them know rebuke them.

There. Fixed it.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   19:08:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#329. To: Original_Intent (#323)

I am greatly amused. You keep repeating over and over again that Osama Ben Forgotten was a scary scary bad man. Granted. He was a scary scary bad man who worked for the CIA as a Contract Agent.

Yes, OBL was not just a scary or bad man, he was the epitome of EVIL.

Now, just because someone works for the CIA (from time to time) doesn't mean that the CIA has any "brains." Have you heard about that Iranian nuclear scientist paid $5M by the CIA .... for publick knowledge? Yeah, the guy is going home to Iran, in a hero's welcome!

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:09:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#330. To: RickyJ (#325) (Edited)

If there is nothing in its way. But on 9/11 most of that 500,000 ton structure was in the way

Tell it to Eager.

He said because of 500,000 tons of inertia, there was no way for the WTC towers to go except down and into the building footprint.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work....Noam Chomsky

AGAviator  posted on  2010-07-15   19:10:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#331. To: buckeroo (#326) (Edited)

Name them ... even if you can't link 'em.

A) A skyscraper can FALL into its own footprint at near free fall velocity without using controlled explosives.
B) 19 mad arabs, who hated us for our freedoms, twarted all US intelligence agencies, plotted and executed simultaneous aerial attacks upon key US landmarks, including the hub of the US financial district in New York, and the hub of the US military in Washington DC, while evading US defenses for over an hour. Oh, and they also survived the crashes and are alive and well.
C) An inept student pilot who couldn't fly a single engine Cessna was able to commandeer and navigate a large heavy multi-engine commercial airliner, plotting a course from no specific point over Ohio to Washington DC at 35,000 feet, descend and turn the aircraft similar to a military fighter jet, fly the aircraft at treetop level for about a mile at over 400 mph, and defy the laws of physics and aerodynamics by bringing the aircraft down to 20 feet off the ground at 530 mph and impacting the Pentagon dead-on.

Did I miss anything?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   19:15:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#332. To: AGAviator (#330)

He said because of 500,000 tons of inertia, there was no way for the WTC towers to go except down and into the building footprint.

The 500,000 tons of inertia was RESISTING the falling section, genius.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   19:17:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#333. To: AGAviator (#327)

Get some mental help loser. Your brain needs to clear out all the garbage k00ksite word dump clutter it's holding onto.

It's obvious that you've pulled out all stops and are spewing the most idiotic bullshit there is on the net, where a 110 story building is nothing but a huge deck of cards waiting for the slightest breeze to make it all fall down.

Stop projecting your faults.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   19:20:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#334. To: FormerLurker (#331)

A) A skyscraper can FALL into its own footprint at near free fall velocity without using controlled explosives.

True.

B) 19 mad arabs, who hated us for our freedoms, twarted all US intelligence agencies, plotted and executed simultaneous aerial attacks upon key US landmarks, including the hub of the US financial district in New York, and the hub of the US military in Washington DC, while evading US defenses for over an hour. Oh, and they also survived the crashes and are alive and well.

False. These terrorists loved American freedoms. In fact, prior to 9/11 several were sited at titty bars, getting drunk and having all kinds of porno .... they were just like the good 'ol boys you may know. Never-the-less, they hated America because of support for Israel and the increasing problems in Palestine.

C) An inept student pilot who couldn't fly a single engine Cessna was able to commandeer and navigate a large heavy multi-engine commercial airliner, plotting a course from no specific point over Ohio to Washington DC at 35,000 feet, descend and turn the aircraft similar to a military fighter jet, fly the aircraft at treetop level for about a mile at over 400 mph, and defy the laws of physics and aerodynamics by bring the aircraft down to 20 feet off the ground at 530 mph and impact the Pentagon dead-on.

True.

Got anymore?

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:23:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#335. To: FormerLurker, AGAviator (#332) (Edited)

The 500,000 tons of inertia was RESISTING the falling section, genius.

But the structure, itself, was largely aire. You act as though it was a solid mass ball capable of going anywhere ... I assume you think it [edit: the towers] were teetering before the collisions and as a result of the collision it should have swayed in the vector of the impact.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:26:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#336. To: buckeroo (#334)

You are a piece of work buckeroo. Like I said, you more than likely believe in the Easter Bunny as well.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   19:28:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#337. To: buckeroo, Former Lurker, Original_Intent (#334)

C) An inept student pilot who couldn't fly a single engine Cessna was able to commandeer and navigate a large heavy multi-engine commercial airliner, plotting a course from no specific point over Ohio to Washington DC at 35,000 feet, descend and turn the aircraft similar to a military fighter jet, fly the aircraft at treetop level for about a mile at over 400 mph, and defy the laws of physics and aerodynamics by bring the aircraft down to 20 feet off the ground at 530 mph and impact the Pentagon dead-on.

True.

You really believe that? If you do then I think you have made the case that there is no reason for anyone to post anything to you more than a cartoon or a music video or something. Anyone who believes stupid $#it like that never uses their head.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   19:29:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#338. To: FormerLurker (#319)

How much money does he get from federal grants?

A lot. I don't have a number handy any more but likely most of his research is federally funded. MIT is notorious for its connections to CIA and if you look at Eager's picture he is about greasiest looking toad you ever saw.

Incidentally Mad Max the anonymous engineer who did the "How Hot Did The World Trade Center Get" analysis did one on Eager's propaganda piece that was aired on PBS's "NOVA" but it seems to have disappeared off of the net. I have spent the last half hour looking but it seems to have been "memory holed".

I did find his piece on the evidence for explosives: portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268827.shtml

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-07-15   19:36:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#339. To: James Deffenbach (#337)

You really believe that?

Yes I do.

GWBush and his immediate predecessor WClinton were informed through the daily briefings about increasing hostile operations evolving in the USA. In fact, there were numerous FBI reports from various field offices that supported the contentions to include the flight training prior to 9/11/01.

And yes, the Israeli Mossad had the same data and even their own original data. So what.... none of the assholes in our government did anything. They are too busy having a good time instead of doing their jobs.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:37:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#340. To: Original_Intent (#338)

A lot. I don't have a number handy any more but likely most of his research is federally funded.

If you can't support your own contentions with FACTS, don't bring up.

I don't have a number handy any more but likely...

You sound like a ridiculous political parrot, something the MSM is fantastick to present to the publick news.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:39:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#341. To: buckeroo (#339)

GWBush and his immediate predecessor WClinton were informed through the daily briefings about increasing hostile operations evolving in the USA. In fact, there were numerous FBI reports from various field offices that supported the contentions to include the flight training prior to 9/11/01.

None of which makes someone who is incapable---ineffincapable, buck!--of flying a CESSNA, capable of flying a heavy commercial airliner and fly them like an ace pilot in a stunt plane. The very idea is ridiculous beyond belief and anyone who would believe such a thing is beyond gullible and naive.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   19:43:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#342. To: James Deffenbach (#328)

I stand corrected. :-)

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-07-15   19:43:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#343. To: Original_Intent (#342)

LOL! See to it that it doesn't happen again and you can be let off with a warning.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   19:45:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#344. To: buckeroo (#340)

Eat me. Most of the research at MIT is federally funded. They are so tight with the FedGov that they might need a crowbar to separate them.

Grants, as such, are generally not available on the Internet. However, one can make inferences based on what one knows.

So, sue me.

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-07-15   19:46:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#345. To: James Deffenbach (#343)

I feel soooooooooo chastened. ;-(

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-07-15   19:47:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#346. To: buckeroo (#335) (Edited)

But the structure, itself, was largely aire. You act as though it was a solid mass ball capable of going anywhere ... I assume you think it was teetering before the collisions and as a result of the collision it should have swayed in the vector of the impact.

There was a ALSO a large air to mass ratio in the aircraft, where the aircraft should have folded up like a soda can when it hit the structure due to the inertia of the structure versus the inertia of the plane. An analogy is throwing an egg at a brick wall, the egg will lose everytime.

There were heavy steel columns running the entire vertical lengths of the towers, as well has a heavy steel core. The floors were made of steel and concrete. If anything, if the floors had "pancaked" the rest of the structure should have remained standing, or the outer walls falling apart outwards like an embrella, with the center core remaining in place.

You could say ANY building has more air than it has mass, yet how many other buildings fall into their own footprint if the upper section is damaged?

The towers were similar yet STRONGER than a hollow steel light pole (as they not only had a center core, but had reinforced concrete floors laterally between the inner core and outer shell), where just because you cut the top off with a saw, it doesn't make the bottom section fall down.

As far as sway, the towers ALWAYS swayed on the upper floors during heavy gusts of wind, and DID sway when impacted by the aircraft that morning.

Lightpoles ALSO sway in heavy winds, but if anything they fall OVER if the wind becomes too great, they don't crush themselves downwards into dust.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   19:48:26 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#347. To: Original_Intent, James Deffenbach (#345)

I feel soooooooooo chastened. ;-(


Name calling is juvenile.

farmfriend  posted on  2010-07-15   19:50:11 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#348. To: farmfriend, Original_Intent (#347)

Well, it was for his own good. He'll thank me one of these days.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   19:53:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#349. To: James Deffenbach, AGAviator (#341)

None of which makes someone who is incapable---ineffincapable, buck!--of flying a CESSNA, capable of flying a heavy commercial airliner and fly them like an ace pilot in a stunt plane. The very idea is ridiculous beyond belief and anyone who would believe such a thing is beyond gullible and naive.

But, Hanjour didn't fly it. He fucked upped whatever plan he had by attempting to control the craft; flying a craft as AGAviator has suggested means he could competently take-off and land the craft that he was trained for. I provided a link way up @post#171 that you can click on for both REAL and simulated animations of FLT77.

He couldn't hit .... and did minor damage when you consider what could have happened with a competent pilot at the helm.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   19:56:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#350. To: AGAviator (#330) (Edited)

Tell it to Eager.

I don't know who he is. Is he your boss?

I have studied this for a long time. I didn't reach my conclusion lightly cause I didn't want to believe it. But I can't ignore facts, I never have been able to. I don't need a so-called "expert" to tell me how physics work, I know it very well.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2010-07-15   19:57:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#351. To: Original_Intent (#344)

Most of the research at MIT is federally funded. They are so tight with the FedGov that they might need a crowbar to separate them.

And? Your earlier post @post#319 was some sort of idiotic blather that persuades me?

I don't have a number handy any more but likely...

ROTFL

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   20:00:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#352. To: buckeroo (#349)

But, Hanjour didn't fly it.

The gubmint said he did, didn't they? And you believe their story, right? Or are you schizo with several personalities, each of them believing a different thing depending on what day it is?

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   20:03:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#353. To: buckeroo (#349)

He couldn't hit .... and did minor damage when you consider what could have happened with a competent pilot at the helm.

Are you saying that Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon? SOMETHING did, and whatever it was hit it DEAD ON. However, not many, if ANY, professional pilots could have accomplished that with a 757 or any other large heavy aircraft.

You see, it's pretty much physically impossible to fly less than 60 feet off the ground with a 757 at over 400 mph due to ground effect, where we are to believe an inexperienced student pilot who couldn't fly a Cessna accomplished not only that, but he flew down to 20 feet off the ground at 530 mph.

IF a REAL terrorist had hijacked the plane over Washington, he wouldn't have flown down to the deck and flown it into the wall of the building, not only because it's impossible, but it would be MUCH easier and MUCH more effective to simply dive down into the ROOF of the Pentagon, spreading fuel over much if not all of the structure, and enveloping the entire building in flames.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   20:04:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#354. To: FormerLurker (#332)

The 500,000 tons of inertia was RESISTING the falling section, genius.

Tell it to Prof. Eager.

And not once the upper floors started moving past the point where the "tube inside a tube" design was unable to support the mass and the momentum of the pancaking higher floors.

You're working on an F minus.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work....Noam Chomsky

AGAviator  posted on  2010-07-15   20:05:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#355. To: James Deffenbach (#352)

The gubmint said he did, didn't they?

That is publick released knowdge of a "term" to simplify for the uneducated masses the challenge of being at the helm.

Of course, YOU believe Hanjour intentionally flew FLT77 into the side of the Pentagon, correct?

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   20:08:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#356. To: buckeroo, James Deffenbach, AGAviator, Original_Intent (#349)

But, Hanjour didn't fly it. He fucked upped whatever plan he had by attempting to control the craft

He flew it with military precision according to experienced air traffic controllers at Dulles International Airport.

In fact they said they thought it was one of our military aircraft protecting the skies of Washington by the way it flew.

Hani Hanjour and Flight 77's Unexplained Expert Maneuvers

Hani Hanjour: 9/11 Pilot Extraordinaire


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   20:09:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#357. To: buckeroo, turtle (#329) (Edited)

Have you heard about that Iranian nuclear scientist paid $5M by the CIA .... for publick knowledge? Yeah, the guy is going home to Iran, in a hero's welcome!

How about that supposed high level defector from al Queda by way of Jordan late 2009 who acted like he had so much intel, he got 7 CIA people into the same room where they all got killed in one attack?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work....Noam Chomsky

AGAviator  posted on  2010-07-15   20:10:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#358. To: FormerLurker (#353)

Are you saying that Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon?

Have you already forgotten the clip I provided on this thread @post#171? I think so.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   20:12:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#359. To: FormerLurker (#333) (Edited)

Stop projecting your faults.

Show me your proof of your theory, with specific facts, documentation, and independently corroboratable evidence.

Tearing alternative and more fact- based theories down with arm waving and selective quoting does not score any points on your behalf.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work....Noam Chomsky

AGAviator  posted on  2010-07-15   20:13:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#360. To: buckeroo (#355)

Of course, YOU believe Hanjour intentionally flew FLT77 into the side of the Pentagon, correct?

I don't believe that anyone who is not capable of flying a little Cessna is capable of performing stunt moves with a big commercial airliner, stunt moves that would take an experienced pilot and most likely a fighter plane to perform.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-07-15   20:13:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#361. To: AGAviator (#354)

And not once the upper floors started moving past the point where the "tube inside a tube" design was unable to support the mass and the momentum of the pancaking higher floors.

You're working on an F minus.

Where is the evidence of that happening? There is none.

IF there was structural degradation due to heat, it would NOT have been uniform, and the top of the tower would have sagged to one side, causing huge lateral forces to snap any weakened sections, then broken off, sliding downwards on an angle out away from the structure.

Your pal's pancake theory doesn't explain what happened to the steel core either, nor the outer steel columns. The entire steel core should have remained standing if some floors had pancaked, yet the steel core disintegrated into dust.

Besides, the pancake theory only works if the floors remained somewhat intact. The structure turned to dust as it collapsed, so there WAS no pancaking involved.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   20:16:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#362. To: FormerLurker (#356)

He flew it with military precision according to experienced air traffic controllers at Dulles International Airport.

Oh BS..... he had no such background to withstand the G forces other than shouting "ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!ALLAH! ALLAH!" all the way. He had no control of the plane .... I wager his co-terrorists shit their pants during that maneuver looking forward to their virgins in paradise.

And the passengers? They either died of a heart attack and/or shit their britches before impact.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   20:16:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#363. To: buckeroo (#358)

Have you already forgotten the clip I provided on this thread @post#171? I think so.

Haven't forgotten it, it simply represents the official explanation of what happened. Thing is, it's physically impossible for a 757 to behave like that at 530 mph due to ground effect.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   20:18:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#364. To: buckeroo (#362)

Oh BS..... he had no such background to withstand the G forces other than shouting

You are having fun here aren't you buck. You just like to act ridiculous and side with shillsters in order to get people riled up.

You are a laugh a minute.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-07-15   20:19:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#365. To: James Deffenbach (#360)

I don't believe that anyone who is not capable of flying a little Cessna is capable of performing stunt moves with a big commercial airliner, stunt moves that would take an experienced pilot and most likely a fighter plane to perform.

Hanjour did not competently steer the craft is the point. He was in over his head. The outcome is proof because if Hanjour was competent he WOULD HAVE HIT THE FUCKING WHITE HOUSE OR THE INNER SANCTUM OF THE PENTAGON... not perform some stunt maneuver on his way to Allah for you to talk about 9 years later.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-07-15   20:19:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#366. To: RickyJ, buckeroo (#350) (Edited)

to. I don't need a so-called "expert" to tell me how physics work, I know it very well.

Then refute the three physics points cited by Eager with specific references and calculations.

(1) All building floors were 95% air, so downward would be the preferred direction of any floor collapses,
(2) There is no 500,000 ton force sufficient to displace the center of gravity of a 500,000 ton structure over 100 feet off center to make the building fall outside of its footprint, and
(3) Gien the building 500,000 tons of inertia, and the absence of quickly reacting and massive forces operating in anything besides the downward direction, explain how the building could possibly to anywhere but into its uncluttered footprint.

QED.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the major consequences of the 9/11 movement has been to draw enormous amounts of energy and effort away from activism directed to real and ongoing crimes of state, and their institutional background, crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC would be, if there were any credibility to that thesis. That is, I suspect, why the 9/11 movement is treated far more tolerantly by centers of power than is the norm for serious critical and activist work....Noam Chomsky

AGAviator  posted on  2010-07-15   20:20:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (367 - 913) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]