See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Profiling On Steriods
Source:
The New American
URL Source: http://www.thenewamerican.com/index ... nus/4008-profiling-on-steroids
Published: Jul 12, 2010
Author: John F. McManus
Post Date: 2010-07-14 15:07:58 by X-15
Ping List: *Destroying the Middle Class* Subscribe to *Destroying the Middle Class*
Keywords: None
Views: 96
Comments: 5
As a guest on a radio talkshow, I was asked for my view about SB 1070, the Arizona law featured in headlines across the nation. I said that I approved what the Arizonans had done because the federal government wasn’t doing its job and the people were simply demanding relief from the flood of illegal immigrants who had poured into their state. Talkshow co-host number one was aghast. Asked why, she swiftly offered, “It’s profiling!” Though I could have correctly countered that it isn’t profiling, I decided on this occasion to take a different tack. “So you don’t like profiling?” I said. “Not at all,” came the reply. “Then you must be opposed to affirmative action, which is profiling on steroids.” Dead silence ensued, interrupted a moment later by co-host number two who offered, “That’s a great argument.” Naming the radio personalities isn’t necessary. The point about profiling having caused co-host number one some deep embarrassment, the program moved on to another topic. Affirmative action is nothing without profiling. It has been enforced by government decrees for decades. In the upside-down world in which we live, it’s perhaps not surprising to know that the practice grew from a 1964 law whose wording emphatically barred the practice. That’s right; the 1964 Civil Rights Act specifically forbade relying on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin when hiring. Henceforth, employers covered by the act (meaning most throughout the nation) were forbidden to discriminate in any of these manners when hiring, promoting, etc. One of the act’s most outspoken promoters, Minnesota’s Senator Hubert Humphrey, offered to “start eating the pages one after another” if anyone could show that an employer would have to hire on the basis of skin color, national origin, etc. But here’s what happened: The act spawned creation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a federal agency given power to interpret the law, encourage compliance, and bring charges against an employer deemed to be in violation. One year later, President Johnson issued Executive Order 11246 mandating the very opposite of what the 1964 act had forbidden. Now, employers were forced to consider the very human attributes they were forbidden to note one year earlier. A madhouse had been erected. Affirmative action, merely talked about for several years, was now law. Its legacy has emphatically heightened race consciousness all across the nation. And Senator Humphrey never ate any of the act’s pages. There’s no doubt that some of the opponents of the 1964 law took their stand because of personal prejudice regarding race. But others, Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater for one, rightly opposed the measure claiming that the federal government had no constitutional authorization to establish hiring practices for an employer. He, too, was called a racist, and any hope to defeat the act died amidst widespread focus on charges of racism. Once enacted, the federal government became a legal force in the workplace on behalf of affirmative action, turning on its head the principle that the law must be colorblind and threatening punishment for anyone who refused to comply. The madness extended to hiring and promotion practices in police and fire departments, colleges and universities, and anywhere else federal dollars have paved the way for federal controls. In time, there wasn’t even a need to show dependence on federal dollars in order to dictate to employers whom they could hire and promote. In 1978, Californian Allan Bakke found himself denied entrance to the University of California Medical School, while 16 less-qualified applicants won admission courtesy of an affirmative action program. Bakke sued and his case went all the way to the Supreme Court, where the justices demonstrated their cowardice by ruling in Bakke’s favor (he could now go to the medical school) but refusing to void affirmative action. Racial bitterness continued to grow. Later Supreme Court decisions saw Justices White and Rehnquist fasten the term “racial quotas” to the practice. Even their objections weren’t enough to stop it. Affirmative action has also spawned a form of schizophrenia. It has government agencies, educational institutions, and various other employers who are beholden to federal dollars placing completely contradictory claims within their hiring advertisements. The ads read, “We are an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer/ We Believe in Affirmative Action.” There’s nothing “equal” about employment when affirmative action is in vogue. Finally, it must be stressed that Arizona’s SB 1070 doesn’t call for “profiling” any more than numerous already-existing federal and state law-enforcement practices. Under the Arizona law, law-enforcement officials are required to make a reasonable effort (e.g., asking for an ID that would satisfy the law such as an Arizona driver’s license) to determine the immigration status of illegal-alien suspects during “lawful contacts.” That’s not profiling; it’s common sense. Real profiling, the kind featured by affirmative action with all the injustice and bitterness it has brought, continues apace. It should be abolished.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: X-15 (#0)
Bingo! Just excellent.
this article was so good, it gave me a boner.
__________________________________ I told one of my friends, many years ago, that Affirmative Action means "white men need not apply." He found out the hard way it was true He got a MA in Econ, applied for a job at the local community college, and was beaten out by a woman. He didn't mind, until he sat in her case and found she didn't have a firm grasp of the material. So he checked out her background and found she had less experience that him. He was on the verge of suing. He finally got two part-times jobs at two community colleges and taught for seven years. He was never offered a full-time position. One went to an incompetent African, whose students forever afterward avoided his classes and asked my friend if he was teaching those particular classes. He finally quit after those seven years and dropped out of the Ph.D. program, realizing his chances of getting hired except part-time at community colleges were nil. Now multiply this story by a million times and that's Affirmative Action.
St. Ausgustine on the State: "It was a criminal band that achieved legitimacy not by renouncing aggression, but rather by attaining impunity."
hahahahaha
hmmm...i mention my boner and she starts laughing. never a good sign...
__________________________________
#2. To: X-15 (#0)
________________________________
#3. To: X-15 (#0)
#4. To: gengis gandhi (#2)
#5. To: christine (#4)
________________________________
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest