See other 9/11 Articles
Title: According to Flight Data Recorder data released by NTSB, the actual flight path of Flight 77 does not support the official Fairy Tale
Source:
Pilots for 9/11 Truth
URL Source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580#
Published: Jul 14, 2010
Author: Pilots for 9/11 Truth
Post Date: 2010-07-14 22:04:58 by Critter
Keywords: None
Views: 551
Comments: 11
Using data released by the NTSB, Pilots for 9/11 Truth demonstrate how flight 77 could not have hit the pentagon or the light poles. It was too high and on the wrong path. Watch the entire video, or fast forward to 39:00.
Poster Comment: This is for you AGAviator. You failed to respond to it posted as a comment so now you get to respond to it as a thread.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#2. To: Critter (#0)
Pentagon missile hoax: the "no Boeing" claims are not "9/11 truth" they discredit and distract from proven evidence of complicity Reasons for no-plane hoaxes: discredit the skeptics, alienate those inside-the-Beltway * discredit the skeptics with a straw man argument * redirect the skeptics into a false debate (no plane vs. no complicity) * protect the plotters from political / military insiders thinking that it was an inside job * the fake debate between no plane and no complicity gets the Bush regime off the hook * there is zero evidence for any of the "no plane" claims - hundreds of people saw Flight 77, none saw a cruise missile, Global Hawk robot plane, smaller plane or flying saucer piloted by giant lizards * the physical evidence shows that a large twin engine jet hit the nearly empty part of the Pentagon, the "Black Boxes" were found, cleanup crews found remains of the passengers, the "hole was too small" claim was a hoax * making 9/11 complicity dependent on the no-plane claim was a brilliant tactic to discredit the real evidence for people inside the Beltway, both for the majority who vote against Bush and the political / military elites (especially the military officers who saw the plane crash or the plane debris) * the material on this page and all of the websites that are linked here should finally extinguish the "no plane" hoax -- except for those who have staked their credibility on these claims and cannot admit a mistake, and those who intentionally promote the hoax. Every claim for the "no plane" hoaxes is refuted here or at a page linked from this page.
The witnesses fall into two groups; one group saw an aircraft fly towards the Pentagon from south of the Citgo station, whereas another group saw an aircraft fly north of the Citgo station. The official story places Flight 77 on the southern approach, wheras the damage is more consistent with the northerly approach. So something isn't quite right with the "official story".
#10. To: FormerLurker (#4)
The witnesses fall into two groups; one group saw an aircraft fly towards the Pentagon from south of the Citgo station, whereas another group saw an aircraft fly north of the Citgo station. The official story places Flight 77 on the southern approach, wheras the damage is more consistent with the northerly approach. So something isn't quite right with the "official story". like this, perhaps? 5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector Brief Description The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator. The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management. It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary. Capabilities * Precision projection of 3-D visual images into a selected area Enabling Technologies (MCTL) * 4.1.4, Image Processing (holographic displays) White Papers * Q, Special & Humanitarian Operations ============ I HEARD a plane coming from the south, seconds before I heard the explosion.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#2)
there is zero evidence for any of the "no plane" claims - hundreds of people saw Flight 77, none saw a cruise missile, Global Hawk robot plane, smaller plane or flying saucer piloted by giant lizards
Replies to Comment # 4. there is zero evidence for any of the "no plane" claims - hundreds of people saw Flight 77, none saw a cruise missile, Global Hawk robot plane, smaller plane or flying saucer piloted by giant lizards
* Supports PSYOP and strategic deception management
* Provides deception and cloaking against optical sensors
* 10.1, Lasers
* 10.2, Optics
* 10.3, Power Systems
* N, Strategic Attack
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.