See other 9/11 Articles
Title: WT7 Possible Explanation
Source:
libertysflame.com
URL Source: http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=11240
Published: Jul 17, 2010
Author: rupertmja1
Post Date: 2010-07-17 01:41:13 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 357
Comments: 8
# rupertmja1 Or, maybe theŒ79; plane that crashed en-route was headed elsewhere, meaning, maybe there was/is another building out there laced with TNT. A lot of hypothetical, but we do live in crazy times do we not. As far as I can see, no one has come up with this theory. Does no one think like me? Think about this. WTC7 fell in the afternoon. If it was dynamited, and it certainly seems so to me, why/ My theory is that the plane that crashed in a field ... think ... it crashed en route ... so ... en route to where. Methinks WTC7. If it hit WTC7 it too could have been blown up in the morning on schedule along with WTC1 and 2. But it wasn't hit - which must haveŒ79; given the 'planners' a big dilemma of leaving a building full of TNT out there.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Flt. 93 was headed in the opposite direction and was most likely shot down.
According to this picture, it looks like it may have been heading to New York, no?
No, in your picture it looks like it was heading for DC which is what the government tells us. It was supposed to hit the White House.
#7. To: farmfriend (#4)
deleted
I don't know what happened for sure. I thought it was a pretty good theory. Because what is the purpose of emploding wt7 later in the day. I see no logical reason for that.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Original_Intent, A K A Stone, farmfriend (#1)
#4. To: wudidiz, Original_Intent, A K A Stone, No (#3)
it looks like it may have been heading to New York, no?
Replies to Comment # 4.
#8. To: farmfriend (#4)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.