[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy
Source: Ludwig von Mises Institute
URL Source: http://mises.org/store/Pearl-Harbor ... d-Fruits-of-Infamy-P10391.aspx
Published: Jul 17, 2010
Author: staff
Post Date: 2010-07-17 10:35:16 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 412
Comments: 40

A president faced an economic depression that wouldn't go away, and a deeply disgruntled electorate. Not for the first or last time, the option of entering a war seemed politically appealing. How badly did FDR want a war and to what lengths was he willing to go to get one? The questions have vexed historians for many decades.

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy by Percy Greaves, Jr. (1906-1984), published for the first time in 2010, blows the top off a 70-year cover-up, reporting for the first time on long-suppressed interviews, documents, and corroborated evidence.

The first section (the seeds) provides a detailed history of pre-war U.S.-Japan relations, thoroughly documenting the sources of rising tension. The second section (the fruits) shows that the attack on December 7, 1941 was neither unexpected nor unprovoked. Nor was it the reason that Franklin Roosevelt declared a war that resulted in massive human slaughter. Instead, in exhaustive detail, this book establishes that Pearl Harbor was permitted as a public relations measure to rally the public, shifting the blame from the White House, where it belonged, to the men on the ground who were unprepared for the attack.

For 70 years, Greaves's documents have been the primary source of revisionist scholarship on Pearl Harbor. These documents were prepared under his leadership as main counsel for the Republican minority on the Joint Congressional Committee that investigated Pearl Harbor from 1945 to 1946.

More than any other person, he was qualified to speak on this subject. He possessed encyclopedic knowledge and had access to research available to no one else. He conducted in-person, detailed, comprehensive interviews with all the main players at Pearl Harbor and many people in the security apparatus. The contents of these interviews are further corroborated by military records.

However, for many reasons, the documents were not published. He continued to work on this book for many years before his death in 1984. At that point, his wife Bettina Bien Greaves took up the project. The result is absolutely astonishing.

Much of Greaves’s research has never appeared in print—effectively suppressed for 70 years. Even the censored minority report did not include it all. But at long last, the fullness of this report is revealed. The result is this monumental book, completed and edited by Bettina Greaves and published by the Mises Institute. Pearl Harbor is a 937-page indictment of the Roosevelt administration, one that finally and devastatingly rips the lid off a case that has been shrouded in mystery for generations.

Because of the astonishing source material and thoroughness of the argument, Robert Stinnett, the leading authority on the topic and the author of Day of Deceit, calls Greaves's book "explosive!"

Indeed, it is. The author writes in a guarded tone, carefully backing up every statement with massive evidence, provided in a level of depth never before seen. The prevailing consensus is that the fault for Pearl Harbor attack belongs to General Walter Short and Admiral Husband Kimmel, while the major political and military figures in Washington should be completely exonerated.

Greaves turns this conventional wisdom on its head. "It is now apparent also that the president himself, even before the attack, had intended to order the U.S. armed forces to make a pre-emptive strike against the Japanese in the southwest Pacific in order to assist the British in southeast Asia. But the Japanese 'jumped the gun' on him by bombing Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941."

Greaves's conclusion is dramatic: "It must be said also that the evidence revealed in the course of the several investigations leads to the conclusion that the ultimate responsibility for the catastrophe inflicted on the U.S. Fleet at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, must rest on the shoulders of President Roosevelt.... It was thanks to Roosevelt’s decisions and actions that an unwarned, ill-equipped, and poorly prepared Fleet remained stationed far from the shores of the continental United States, at a base recognized by his military advisers as indefensible and vulnerable to attack.... Thus the attack on Pearl Harbor became FDR’s excuse, not his reason, for calling for the United States’s entry into World War II."

Greaves provides comprehensive coverage here on the history of U.S. and Japanese relations, the actions of the Roosevelt administration, the attack and the response on the ground, the investigations and cover-ups that began almost immediately and continue to this day. Today the "back-door-to-the-war" theory has become mainstream historiography, even if those who admit it say that the lies were necessary for the good of the country. That is a difficult opinion to maintain in the face of the fullness of the evidence against FDR.

It is a remarkable fact that Greaves, who later became a close confidant of Mises himself throughout the 1950s and 1960s, and who is known mainly for his monetary work, has left us an amazing revelation 70 years after the fact and 26 years after his own death. It is proof that the wheels of justice can grind slowly but also very finely.

“Percy Greaves was chief of the minority (Republican) research staff of the (1945-1946) Joint Congressional Committee to Investigate the Pearl Harbor Attack. He attended all its hearings, interviewed many Army, Navy, and Washington principals involved in the attack and in the investigations. He researched diplomatic documents, studied reports and accounts of the event published during the years that followed. This book is not about the attack itself. It is about never before presented pre-attack and post-attack events, from the Washington point of view. Without name-calling, innuendo, or slander, Greaves simply presents the pertinent, significant and relevant facts which led the Japanese to attack and the political administration to want to cover-up its involvement.” - Bettina Bien Greaves

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

#1. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)

In 1919, FDR was under secretary of the Navy. It was at that time that the War Dept. promulgated war Plan Orange.

The plan envisioned that Japan would one day move south in search for oil in the Dutch East Indies, and that US possessions would come under attack. Guam, Wake Philippines etc.

In the 1920s General Mitchell predicted the Pearl harbor attack, even the day of the week and the hour. Roosevelt brought it to fruition in his quest for war.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-17   11:00:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom (#1)

The plan envisioned that Japan would one day move south in search for oil in the Dutch East Indies, and that US possessions would come under attack. Guam, Wake Philippines etc.

Interesting. After becoming a full blown cynic on all things political and some historical events, which I must say has served me quite well on prognosticating outcomes, I started to question the "righteous" war with Japan. Without Japan invading and taking over Pearl Harbor it made no sense attacking it. And what was Japan thinking in attacking a large almost totally self sufficient country where the Japs had to import 90% of raw materials? Couldn't they see that would be a disaster in the long run and fighting a losing war? My thinking at this stage was Japan wanted the South Pacific but I couldn't figure out why. You mention oil and I also to some degree suspect land but if FDR was pushing Japan for a war why were they so stupid in taking the poisonous bait?

Bill Crowe  posted on  2010-07-18   2:40:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Bill Crowe (#5)

My thinking at this stage was Japan wanted the South Pacific but I couldn't figure out why. You mention oil and I also to some degree suspect land

Well Sir, your thinking was on the right track. An inquisitive mind coupled with a tad of cynicism always looks for the facts and the TRUTH.

If you care for history, it is all there, many people saw it coming and most importantly, WHY.

Around 1900, many countries of the world had blue water navies, ALL FIRED BY COAL. Most every country had coal so there was no problem of fuel, and then the unthinkable happened. Navies started switching to OIL and the countries with no oil were legion.

Great Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Japan, Italy HAD NO OIL. The United States was the worlds largest EXPORTER of oil. That was early 1900s and if one looks and digests, they can see the future.

That is how Plan Orange came about. The seeds of WW2 were sown before WW1. Japan was sitting on the sidelines at the beginning of WW1, the allies tried to win them over to their side, the Japanese price was all the German owned Islands of the western Pacific would be ceded to them when Germany was defeated.

That cost the allies nothing but cynics wondered why they wanted mostly worthless islands. The deal was made with the proviso that the Islands would never be militarized. Japan entered the war, it was soon over and they did nothing but were given the islands.

They at once starting building naval and air bases, southward from Japan towards the Dutch East Indies, an area producing much of the worlds oil.

Roosevelt was undersecretary of the Navy when this happened and war Plan Orange became solidified. The thinkers put it all down in black and white that in the near future, Japan would move south to secure oil for their own as the US was their only supplier, AND THAT THEY WERE AT OUR MERCY.

The rest is history.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-18   8:35:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Cynicom (#6)

Epiphany. Thanks for your impartation of your knowledge concisely written.

In reading about Plan Orange there was a little commentary that the Japanese were building better ships, weapons, etc and had a superior navy to the US's. That would help explain why they thought they could pull off grabbing the South Pacific for their own with the implication of keeping it. And like you said they were at our mercy and felt they had no choice but to fight. So they did.

Bill Crowe  posted on  2010-07-18   23:48:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Bill Crowe, Christine, Jethro Tull (#15)

A few days after Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt recalled MacArthur to active duty and made him CIC of military forces in the Philippines.

When MacArthur opened the latest version of Plan Orange, it said very plainly, "with an invasion of enemy forces, there will be NO relief of any kind forthcoming".

"Your mission is to resist as long as practicable".

What was MacArthur to tell the thousands of American and native forces???

Nothing,... thus to the last day before surrender the men thought the Navy would come any day to their rescue. Roosevelt and the government had written them off YEARS BEFORE.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-19   8:27:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Cynicom (#20)

What was MacArthur to tell the thousands of American and native forces???

The truth. The insidious erosion of the truth begins with questions like this one when the easy way out is a lie. All manner of evil is conceived and grows under a lie until like we have today where the lie is believed as truth. I'm speaking in general overall terms here but I figure you've gotten the same kind of looks I've gotten when I've told people FDR knew about the attack on Pearl ahead of time. We're KOOKS because we believe the truth because it was not told from the very beginning.

Bill Crowe  posted on  2010-07-19   22:50:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 29.

#30. To: Bill Crowe (#29)

The truth.

The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and ten months later we invaded North Africa.

Even back then, with limited access to the truth, we knew something was amiss. Our men were left to die on the vine in the Pacific and we invade Africa. One did not have to be too intelligent to discern that there was something we were not being told.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-07-19 23:25:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]