[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Picking on the Racially Handicapped Randy Garver, a thoughtful commenter with an opposing perspective, pondered… One would think that putative “pro-freedom” organizations like the ACLU would have no valid reason not to support the inclusion of pro-European groups at any table where the NAACP, NCLR, AIM, etc are seated This is not a new line of thinking. Quite a few smart people have pursued this strategy. The NAAWP was founded by David Duke with the slogan, “Equal rights for all, special privileges for none” and Resisting Defamation defends “the diverse white American peoples” from defamation. Both can be understood as efforts to hoist our opponents on their own rhetorical petard, efforts to defeat them at their own game, to embrace multiculturalism’s surface argument and become another “minority” in our “pluralistic society”. The short answer is that you can’t win a fight if you’re playing by the enemy’s rules. The long answer requires a brief review of the White American psyche and the origins of its multicult psychosis. The long answer is that the dramatic shift in American values within one generation can be best understood as a simple inversion of deeply entrenched beliefs rather than a replacement of those beliefs with different ones. The White Supremacist and Christian nation of 1924 underwent a sort of “pseudomorphosis” into what only appears to be an overwhelmingly cosmic and secular regime. White Americans are still intrinsically White Supremacist and they’re still morally Christian, but both of these deeply held beliefs have been subverted, perverted, and inverted. They both remain standing, more or less, but upside-down. The thought of creating an “NAAWP” or worrying about “defamation” against us strikes the ordinary American as intuitively mean and stupid. This is because they’re not really viewing the world with the surface paradigm they present. They’re White Supremacists who are now compassionate toward the racially handicapped. To advocate for Whites seems as dishonorable to them as a gifted athlete signing up for the Special Olympics. It seems as mean-spirited as putting together a “sight club” that excludes blind people and advocates for the interests of people who can see clearly. Would these Americans sit back while tens of millions of Frenchmen or Russians spilled over our borders triumphantly, heralding their plans to culturally displace and genetically replace us? Of course not! We don’t perceive Russians as inferior. In fact, we daydream about nefarious Commies parachuting into our communities and forcing us to prove our heroism. There will never be a “Brown Dawn” sequel to Red Dawn. But to take on illegal immigrants? There’s no honor in that. To repel the Mexican invasion strikes the inverted supremacist as an act of cruelty against a cripple, equivalent to pushing a gimp’s wheelchair down a staircase. How could you possibly deport them when they’re trying so hard? Just give them a medal, already! The modern White American liberal is no more honest when he speaks of Blacks being “equal” than he is when he speaks of the mentally retarded being “special”. He regards the Black American as something less than human, requiring his assistance and defense. Their actions betray their genuine beliefs, as they’re perpetually oriented toward integration, inclusion, making sure that both a guy in a wheelchair and a guy who suffers from Blackness get to feel “included”. The idea that some Blacks truly prefer their own culture and honestly wish to separate from them does not compute. I believe the takeaway from this is that crudeness and “revulsionism” only plays into the opponent’s hand. It frames our entire movement in terms of the strong and superior picking on the weak and inferior. It’s probably better to do the opposite, playing up their competence. Instead of targeting the tiny Mestizo mowing their yard, target Mexico’s White elites who exploit those people as pawns in an ongoing effort to dominate the US. Instead of targeting the homeless Black guy, bring up Malcolm X, Barack Obama, and other Black men who are worthy opponents. Whites perceive it as dishonorable to defend themselves and look with disdain at what we’re doing as “picking on the racially handicapped”. Fortunately, the illusion is growing more and more untenable. Blacks are triumphantly running Whites out of South Africa altogether. Blacks dominate our executive branch and openly exploit their power to push their racial agenda. NAACP representatives openly brag about how they exploit their positions of power in government to favor Blacks over Whites. Their advocacy organizations surpass ours in wealth, power, and competence. As our death spiral accelerates, fewer and fewer White Americans will think of themselves as superior protectors of their racial inferiors and start thinking of themselves as a people, a cornered people, a cornered people surrounded by a hostile “rainbow coalition”. We need to become the credible and legitimate advocates they can turn to when they awaken.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
There are NO white advocacy organizations, none. European-Americans United is just a fan club at this point.
Pretty much. Keep in mind Matt doesn't like "exterminationists." I basically agree with this piece except the last paragraph, which I think is poison.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||