Title: Shoonra, Obama Sycophant, I am Calling you Out Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jul 23, 2010 Author:me Post Date:2010-07-23 09:29:58 by James Deffenbach Keywords:None Views:2114 Comments:74
In a post to SOL yesterday (with a ping to Shoonra), I said:
He's so in love with the government and (apparently) Obama that he still believes Obama was born in Hawaii despite four videos posted to him on the same thread about that. In those four videos you have three people who should know saying that he was born in Kenya--his wife, his grandmother and the Kenyan ambassador. And in another one Bill Richardson, talking in Spanish to what was probably a crowd of illegal aliens from Mexico, described Obama as an "immigrant." How much more proof do people need?
So how about it, Shoonra? Do you want to be forever known as someone who can't see past his ideology and accept the truth about someone who has "the right letter" after his name? For those who may have missed it, here are the four videos I mentioned and which I posted to Shoonra before, all on the same thread in the same post.
The US House of Representatives, which is, in a way, the final authority on disputed elections, adopted a resolution earlier this year which expressly says that Obama was born in Hawaii. The Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, recognizes him as the lawfully elected President, so do both Houses of Congress, so does the military.
Being a birther is generally regarded as being less evolved than a flat earther.
The US House of Representatives, which is, in a way, the final authority on disputed elections, adopted a resolution earlier this year which expressly says that Obama was born in Hawaii. The Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, recognizes him as the lawfully elected President, so do both Houses of Congress, so does the military.
So, a resolution is senior to the truth?
In what jurisdiction does that apply?
Being a birther is generally regarded as being less evolved than a flat earther.
Being a propagandist who must rely on Argumentum Ad Hominem to try to score a point is generally indicative of someone able to walk under a snake's belly wearing a Top Hat.
The Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, recognizes him as the lawfully elected President,
Supreme Court????
Now there is a real laffer. The same people that for one hundred years said segregation was legal.
The same people that are so ethical, they are appointed via the bribery route.
The same people that snuck into the White House to tell a President what their "decisions" were going to be.
The same people that investigated Roosevelt and the Pearl Harbor debacle for a whole thirty days and found him totally innocent.
The Supreme Court, nine shyster lawyers with a death grip on power. They have been a disgraceful group, no better than the corrupt politicians that put them in office.