Title: Shoonra, Obama Sycophant, I am Calling you Out Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jul 23, 2010 Author:me Post Date:2010-07-23 09:29:58 by James Deffenbach Keywords:None Views:1482 Comments:74
In a post to SOL yesterday (with a ping to Shoonra), I said:
He's so in love with the government and (apparently) Obama that he still believes Obama was born in Hawaii despite four videos posted to him on the same thread about that. In those four videos you have three people who should know saying that he was born in Kenya--his wife, his grandmother and the Kenyan ambassador. And in another one Bill Richardson, talking in Spanish to what was probably a crowd of illegal aliens from Mexico, described Obama as an "immigrant." How much more proof do people need?
So how about it, Shoonra? Do you want to be forever known as someone who can't see past his ideology and accept the truth about someone who has "the right letter" after his name? For those who may have missed it, here are the four videos I mentioned and which I posted to Shoonra before, all on the same thread in the same post.
Extremely racist. Outside the Deep South there were many interracial marriages.
S. Ann Dunham married Barack Obama [Sr.] on Feb. 2, 1961. The President was born 6 months later.
The President's mother was no slacker. She earned a Ph.D. in anthropology.
So the statement is false about bastard, Communist, and whore.
So what's left? "Miscegenated"? He never pretended otherwise.
BTW, there have been, in the last 3 years, about a dozen court cases, most in federal courts and a few in state courts, challenging Obama's citizenship in some way. They have ALL failed. ALL of them. Without exception. Even if the judge was appointed by Republicans.
Michelle Obama said it once. She never said he was born in Kenya. She undoubtedly meant it was the home of his ancestors. I know of a lot of people born in the US who talk about their "homeland" of Ireland or someplace. In any case, Michelle was not a witness to his birth, so her statement has little or no evidentiary weight.
I personally contacted the Hawaii Dept of Health. The so-called "short form" that Obama posted in 2008 is the ONLY replacement birth certificate being made available to anyone born in Hawaii. Obama himself could not get a more detailed form of his b/c without suing the Dept of Health in court. Under Hawaii law, that one form that Obama made public is legally as satisfactory as evidence as the original 1961 doctor's report of the birth.
Now those bogus Kenyans birth certificates: Obviously someone other than Obama was able to get them, so how come Orly Taitz had to use someone's amateurish photographs of the documents instead of getting a birth certificate for Obama herself? Simple answer: Those pretended Kenya documents are fake (they've been shown to be a different format from real Kenya birth certificates) and therefore the Kenya Ministry of Health isn't going to issue them.
Anyone who wants to call Ann Dunham Obama a Communist or a whore is cordially invited, by me, to do so right in the President's face. A bloody nose would probably be a valuable learning experience.
I simply look at it from the circumstantial pattern. It is not just the Birth Certificate that has been suppressed, but every major record from College Admissions, to Financial Aid, housing etc., .... And then there are the allegations that he has had multiple SSNs. People don't move to suppress records that prove their innocence.
Further, while admittedly inconclusive, there are also the allegations that the COLB that was posted on line was itself a Photoshop job.
So, there is plenty of smoke. Large clouds of it even.
I notice that you and your friends are getting desperate. Having dropped the attacks on Obama's mama, the focus is now on a bundle of documents covered (in EVERYBODY's case) by privacy laws enacted in the last half-century.
Perhaps someone will show me the law that says that Obama MUST make public all his school and college records. Perhaps that someone will explain why that same law didn't apply to dimbulbs like Dubya and Palin.
Perhaps someone will show me the law that says that Obama MUST make public all his school and college records. Perhaps that someone will explain why that same law didn't apply to dimbulbs like Dubya and Palin.
For one there are no questions about the legitimacy of Duhbya nor "the Tits that Walk".
Further, they have not moved to bury, sequester, suppress, and hide any and every major record that would shed light. Again, innocent people seek to present the records that prove their innocence, the guilty seek to hide the records that prove their guilt. Despite your attempts to confuse the issues this is not rocket science - either he is legitimate, a natural born citizen as defined in the Constitution and Statute, or he is not. It is not a matter of being "a little bit pregnant" or "kinda' dead". Either he is or is not.
I found the statements by the State of Hawaii to be most illuminating in that not once did they say they have a birth certificate on file for him they instead substituted the term "vital records" thus avoiding the possibility of later being charged as making a false representation in an official capacity. I am sure they do have "vital records" on Barack Barry Soetoro-Obama, but do they have an original Birth Certificate? A COLB is not a substitute for an original Birth Certificate issued by the State of Hawaii anywhere except Hawaii.
And then there is the matter of his mysterious transfer to Columbia and the interesting datum that he shows up in no yearbooks, belonged to no student groups involving his major, in fact absolutely nothing to indicate he was there except a public comment by a known CIA connected individual who claims to have known him during that period. So, you have "1" witness of suspect authenticity to attest to his actually attending Columbia. I find that most interesting.
So, as I said before, there are large clouds of smoke.
Methinks, that given his desire not to spend the rest of his natural life in prison he will not run for a second term as there WILL be challenges to his candidacy in all 50 States, and he will not produce the records that prove his guilt.
Excellent post. Sun Yat Sen, who was born in China, had a "birth certificate" like Obama's. It doesn't prove anything, certainly does not prove Obama was born in Hawaii.
.
. Sun Yat-sen was born on 12 November 1866 to a Hakka family in the village of Cuiheng, Xiangshan (later Zhongshan) county, Guangzhou prefecture, Guangdong province (26 km or 16 miles north of Macau), in the Empire of the Great Qing of China.
I don't know how far it was from where he was actually born to Hawaii but the fact is that he was not born in Hawaii. Proving that, at one time at least, anyone could get one of those no matter where they were born.
Excellent post. Sun Yat Sen, who was born in China, had a "birth certificate" like Obama's. It doesn't prove anything, certainly does not prove Obama was born in Hawaii.
Thanks. The O'bots know better and that is why they are so strident and shrill on the matter. For them it is not a matter of principle but a matter of politics and their desire to have a U.S.S.A.. I see little difference, ethically and morally, between the Bushbots and Obots. Both are allergic to the truth when it runs contrary to their political dogma. It says something about their character and trustworthiness.
I see little difference, ethically and morally, between the Bushbots and Obots. Both are allergic to the truth when it runs contrary to their political dogma. It says something about their character and trustworthiness.
Dead on center. There is no difference. Some of them like communists/socialists with R's and some with D's. They get fixated on that R and D when, in reality, the majority of them should have a C or F with their name (communist or fascist). I think the tarball is a mixture of the worst of both.
They get fixated on that R and D when, in reality, the majority of them should have a C or F with their name (communist or fascist). I think the tarball is a mixture of the worst of both.
Dead on. At this point "Republican" and "Democrat" are merely brand names that tell you only what brand of product you are buying and say nothing about its quality beyond the marketing hype. And most of the marketing hype amounts to false advertising. The one thing we can count on is that most of them are corrupt regardless of brand name, and the Soetoro character is merely the spokesman for the powers that put him in office. He decides nothing of substance, sets new records for parties, chain smokes, and has his faggot lover and family dog following closely behind in his own plane (Airforce 3?) everywhere he goes - at taxpayer expense. (I feel sorry for the dog.)
I feel sorry for the dog too. But you know, all that proves that Obama is exactly what Chris Rock would call him--unless he wouldn't call him that because he's allegedly "the president." And that's a nigger. And one with a sense of entitlement, that the world "owes" him something. Not a decent black man with good values, a nigger. Don't get me wrong, there are white people who would do that too (fly the dog at other people's expense and on a third plane) and they are wiggers or white trash. Niggers are black trash, wiggers are white trash and they're all useless.
Since this thread has degenerated into racist name-calling, I am leaving you wankers to throw your feces at each other.
However, a few parting facts: the director of the Hawaii Dept of Health and the (Republican) Governor of Hawaii have both attested that Obama's b/c is the real thing. The form that Obama has made public is the one and only form that any Hawaiian can now get as a replacement b/c. Anything more requires a court order.
Obama was a student at Columbia College, the undergrad division of Columbia University. Therefore he is not listed in the Columbia University yearbook which is exclusively for the grad students (masters & doctorates) - you won't find B.A. candidates there. However, he was mentioned at the time in a Columbia College publication.
For those that were paying attention in the last election it should have been clear to them that there is but ONE party, the ruling elite party.
When the Eisenhowers, Nixons and Kennedys all were lined up to support and extol the merits of Obumski as President, there should have been some spark of interest.
There should have been questions asked, such as, how could any of the horrible Nixon clan be accepted.
Not a murmur. What hypocrisy. and the masses saw nothing.