[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Miscellaneous See other Miscellaneous Articles Title: Proof that "Top Kill" Does Work To: yukon, Parrot With Speed Dial (#19) I DGAS what a nutless, gutless, spinelesss, chickenshit, non/un- American/possible draft dodger/canuckistani thinks about my country. Geez - Then why not just bozo him once and for all instead of turning the thread into a crapfest? Some of us DO care about those whose opinions you don't respect. liberator posted on 2010-07-23 17:12:41 ET Reply Trace Then why not just bozo And let the place be overrun by nutless, gutless slimeballs? To ignore posters like the bird would be similar to ignoring a festering sore. yukon posted on 2010-07-23 17:19:12 ET Reply Trace And let the place be overrun by nutless, gutless slimeballs? Who are YOU to define who are "nutless, gutless slimeballs"? This isn't you damn forum. You don't get to "approve" posters and subject matter. Back TF off, Yosemite Sam. liberator posted on 2010-07-23 17:37:40 ET Reply Trace Who are YOU to define who are "nutless, gutless slimeballs"? You don't get to "approve" posters and subject matter. If you a poster doesn't have the nuts and guts to address those of whom he/she/it posts about, it is generally agreed that those sniping posters are exactly how I described the bird. He's in the same category as crapweasel and RLKK. I'm not. I'm not censoring. I'm calling out the cowards. yukon posted on 2010-07-23 17:46:52 ET Reply Trace few people give much attention to the label of racist anymore, because it became a sinister joke. That's right; the new definition of "racist" is: he/she who speaks uncomfortable truths, even in matters completely unrelated to race. Tuco Ramirez II posted on 2010-07-23 18:46:18 ET Reply Trace Who are YOU to define who are "nutless, gutless slimeballs"? yukko the flaccid little clown, uses all kinds of words... which describe himself. It's called "projection." yukko the turd-blossom is either mentally deranged or grossly ignorant. In "yukko-talk," that means he's either crazy as a shitbug, or just stupid. Of the two, I think he's in the latter camp. Capitalist Eric posted on 2010-07-23 19:10:28 ET Reply Trace yukko The whineybot, nutless, gutless, spineless, chickenshit crapweasel displays his cowardice yet again! yukon posted on 2010-07-23 19:12:39 ET Reply Trace Who are YOU to define who are "nutless, gutless slimeballs"? This isn't you damn forum. You don't get to "approve" posters and subject matter. It's getting to be his forum now because I'm slowly withdrawing. I'm getting tired of coming here to be called insulting names. RLKK posted on 2010-07-24 0:43:11 ET Reply Trace It's getting to be his forum now because I'm slowly withdrawing. I'm getting tired of coming here to be called insulting names. Why don't you man up and address people to their face? yukon posted on 2010-07-24 0:47:15 ET Reply Trace It's getting to be his forum now because I'm slowly withdrawing. I'm getting tired of coming here to be called insulting names. Yukie? Calling posters names?? I hadn't noticed ;-) Seriously Yook - you've been crossing the line with the constant inane name-calling - you're totally out of control. Can't you merely make your point with those with whom you disagree, or toss a simple barb here and there? Why must you use the nuke-option and make everything personal? What's worse is that you've already driven excellent posters away - and diligently working on driving others away - including lurkers. That makes you a net-negative to this forum. LP is like any other family or community. Here's a NEWSFLASH: We're all not going to agree. Most of us are here to be informed, contribute, opine, relieve frustrations, have a few laughs, challenge and be challenged, and to share the camaraderie. You're here to ridicule and pummel. And to "win" the argument. Sometimes there is no "argument" to win. DIAL. IT. WAY. DOWN. That's the consensus here. liberator posted on 2010-07-24 12:38:12 ET Reply Trace Calling posters names?? There is posting etiquette that certain posters ignore. I'll call them on it everytime. If you or they don't like it, here's the solution: Stop posting like nutless cowards. yukon posted on 2010-07-24 18:22:49 ET Reply Trace There is posting etiquette that certain posters ignore. Wait a minute; YOU of ALL people are talking about "posting etiquette?" Where'd you learn yours? At howlin.com? Now I know you're detached from reality. I'll call them on it everytime. For sh*ts & giggles just what exactly is this etiquette others are breaking, and you aren't? If you or they don't like it, here's the solution: Stop posting like nutless cowards. No, I don't like your non-stop screeching like a roided-out banchee, and 90% of the posters at LP don't like it at all and are sick of it. You have crossed the line...ironically of forum "posting etiquette." The day you run your own forum, you can arbitrarily run posters out of town with your own "final solutions." Your undisciplined distemper is making a mockery of intellectual and civil discourse here and getting the better of you. If your goal is hoping that 90% of the posters bozo you, then you're real close to that reality. liberator posted on 2010-07-24 20:12:40 ET Reply Trace and 90% of the posters at LP Name them, bloviator! LOLAY! yukon posted on 2010-07-24 20:32:36 ET Reply Trace For sh*ts & giggles just what exactly is this etiquette others are breaking, and you aren't? Just exactly how dumb are you? yukon posted on 2010-07-24 20:34:01 ET Reply Trace To: liberator (#38) I wonder how Dubya Bush's Paraguayan compound is coming along? You mean he hasn't taken refuge yet? yukon posted on 2010-07-24 20:35:16 ET Reply Trace Democrats and Wall St-Goldman Sachs are all globalist internationalist that could not give a flip about borders or soverignty.. These Goldman Sachs people are imbedded in both parties and are the financing and banking wing of the Globalist that now run this country.Goldman is heavily involved in this whole Cap and Trade scam,micro banking and the Derivative scam that caused the so called financial meltdown. THE biggest revelation in our lifetime? You hit it on the screws: GOLDMAN SACHS AND BANKER RUN OUR COUNTRY. AND SET THE AGENDA. THEY DO NOT G.A.S ABOUT U.S. BORDERS. liberator posted on 2010-07-24 20:38:34 ET Reply Trace You're BOZO'D, Yukkie. Have a nice life. liberator posted on 2010-07-24 20:39:39 ET Reply Trace Typical of the CT "mentality". yukon posted on 2010-07-24 20:43:11 ET +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#4. To: Samuel Gray (#0)
It would be interesting to know the number of people yuklown has driven away from LP, lurkers and posters. It is truly amazing what an unabashed supporter of Israel is allowed to get away with. How fast do you think Fred Mertz or Leopold Stotch or any other non-Jew worshiping poster last if he posted as yuklown does? Not very long.
deleted
She definitely drove me away with her no Ron Paul articles bullshit and her banning people for posting pro-Ron Paul articles while allowing people to post anti-Ron Paul articles to their hearts content. She's a foul beast.
deleted
Yeah, she's real good at that. Another thing she does is ban people without telling them they are banned, or threatening to ban people publicly while actually banning them, making it look like the poster ran away with his/her tail between their legs. She's very dishonest in how she runs the site.
deleted
Don't you know that St. Sarah is the savior? Once she wins the presidency, her and the Republican Party are going to make things right again!!!! Why can't you see that? Why do you hate America Eric? LOL!
#15. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#14)
deleted
Not any more. The whole Saint Sarah thing is over now at LP, months back. Apparently, somewhere in the midst of endorsing Rand Paul and Juan McStain, Sarah burned through all the good will she had there with her biggest fans. I'd say the attitude there now is that they'll support her if she gets the 2012 nomination but she isn't their first pick. Maybe not their second pick either. I don't get this kind of political romance exactly, this insane puppy love for a new face then coolness (or even hatred) after a few months, when the honeymoon is over. I'm not as dramatic about these things as partisans are.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||