[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: US on PR offensive against Wikileaks as 92,000 Afghan war docs spill out
Source: Raw Story
URL Source: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0725/pr ... s-92000-afghan-war-docs-spill/
Published: Jul 25, 2010
Author: Agence France-Presse
Post Date: 2010-07-25 23:06:10 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 175
Comments: 13

US on PR offensive against Wikileaks as 92,000 Afghan war docs spill out

By Agence France-Presse Sunday, July 25th, 2010 -- 8:31 pm The White House denounced a massive leak of secret military files Sunday that allegedly describe how Pakistan's spy service aids the Afghan insurgency, but said the information was no surprise.

In all, some 92,000 documents were released by the web whistleblower Wikileaks, containing previously untold details of the Afghan war through Pentagon files and field reports spanning from 2004 to 2010.

According to the New York Times, one of the first three media outlets to publish reports on the leaks, they "suggest that Pakistan, an ostensible ally of the United States, allows representatives of its spy service to meet directly with the Taliban."

Describing the talks as "secret strategy sessions," the newspaper said they "organize networks of militant groups that fight against American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even hatch plots to assassinate Afghan leaders."

White House National Security Advisor James Jones issued a statement to reporters shortly before the documents were posted online, saying the leaks were "irresponsible" but would not impact US strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan. "The United States strongly condemns the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organizations which could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security," Jones said in his statement.

"These irresponsible leaks will not impact our ongoing commitment to deepen our partnerships with Afghanistan and Pakistan; to defeat our common enemies; and to support the aspirations of the Afghan and Pakistani people."

The New York Times said it, along with the Guardian newspaper in London and the German magazine Der Spiegel, had received the leaked material several weeks ago from Wikileaks, a secretive web organization that often publishes classified material.

The news organizations agreed to publish their reports, based on the files "used by desk officers in the Pentagon and troops in the field when they make operational plans," on Sunday when they were to be released on the Internet.

"Most of the reports are routine, even mundane, but many add insights, texture and context to a war that has been waged for nearly nine years," the Times said in a note to readers describing the leaks.

"Overall these documents amount to a real-time history of the war reported from one important vantage point -- that of the soldiers and officers actually doing the fighting and reconstruction."

The Times added that "much if the information -- raw intelligence and threat assessments gathered from the field in Afghanistan -- cannot be verified and likely comes from sources aligned with Afghan intelligence, which considers Pakistan an enemy, and paid informants.

Britain's Guardian newspaper said the files painted "a devastating portrait of the failing war in Afghanistan."

It listed a series of revelations including that a growing number of civilians were dying at the hands of international forces. It said the logs detailed 144 such incidents.

The Taliban were also causing increasing numbers of civilian casualties with their roadside bombing campaign, which the documents showed had killed more than 2,000 civilians, according to the paper.

The White House also issued to reporters a series of remarks made in the past by top officials expressing their concern about links between Pakistan spy services and militants in Afghanistan.

One was from Defense Secretary Robert Gates dated March 31, 2009: "The ISI's contacts with [extremist groups] are a real concern to us, and we have made these concerns known directly to the Pakistanis."

Jones, who did not address the veracity of the information contained in the leaks, said that the documents "reportedly cover a period of time from January 2004 to December 2009," the bulk of which time former president George W. Bush was in office.

He pointed out that President Barack Obama on December 1, 2009 "announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan, and increased focus on Al- Qaeda and Taliban safe-havens in Pakistan.

"This shift in strategy addressed challenges in Afghanistan that were the subject of an exhaustive policy review last fall," Jones said.

A US official who asked not to be named added: "I don't think anyone who follows this issue will find it surprising that there are concerns about ISI and safe havens in Pakistan," in reference to Pakistan's secretive Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency.

"In fact, we've said as much repeatedly and on the record," the official said, reiterating that most of the information preceded Obama's time in office.

"Some of the disconcerting things reported are exactly why the president ordered a three month policy review and a change in strategy," the official said, adding that "Wikileaks is not an objective news outlet but rather an organization that opposes US policy in Afghanistan."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

#3. To: abraxas, all (#0)

This information is available and very public. My 1st question is why ? Are we to believe that some obscure website is capable of thwarting every intelligence agency on earth ?

I'm leary of this sort of disclosure. (Aren't you ?)

noone222  posted on  2010-07-26   4:48:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: noone222 (#3)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-07-26   8:30:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Eric Stratton (#6)

These people are so terminally afflicted with notions that they're so important to the continued revolving of the earth that it's laughable.

Simplicity in life will reduce the stress imposed by those so terminally afflicted as you mentioned.

noone222  posted on  2010-07-26   9:18:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: noone222 (#7)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-07-26   9:20:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Eric Stratton (#8)

what's your point?

My point is that the establishment spends kazillions convincing us of our "needs" ... most of which are more like wants. All I'm saying is killing ones self to keep up with the Jones' can be stressful.

noone222  posted on  2010-07-26   10:26:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 9.

#11. To: noone222 (#9)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-07-26 11:55:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]