See other Resistance Articles
Title: Explosive New Evidence Shows Ruling of Arizona Judge (Susan Bolton) Illegal
Source:
libertysflame.com
URL Source: http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=11797&Disp=4#C4
Published: Aug 2, 2010
Author: Anthony G. Martin
Post Date: 2010-08-02 07:29:31 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 344
Comments: 21
Explosive New Evidence Shows Ruling of Arizona Judge (Susan Bolton) Illegal In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal. (Daniel Bayer/CBS News via Getty Images). The inept U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder. The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part, "Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face. "Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction." In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state. This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue. Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case. The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be accessed at the link above. In a related development, another explosive discovery was made by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America. From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican border. This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston. The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government, including waging war in its self-defense. This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the federal government with a vengeance. Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Bookmark Ignore Thread Edit Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest #1. To: All (#0) "Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction." "In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state. This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue. Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
You can thank Murron for finding this one.
You can thank GreyLmist for posting it here several hours ago with the correct web link and the correct publish date. Sweet Jesus, you're a fucking moron.
Although I'd love for this to have been rejected by the flack in a black robe, strict adherence to the Constitution is meaningless. Witness the Kenyan as president.
Folder: Inbox FUCK YOU WORM!
That is great! Someone telling the "judges" they have "no standing" after all of them have denied private citizens the right to contest the Birth Certificate issue for the same reason. LOL!
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. FUCK YOU JEW MURDERER PIECE OF SHIT. http://www.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5000
FUCK YOU JEW MURDERER PIECE OF SHIT. Too stupid to even post a decent link for people. Such a pathetic little jew- fellator you are.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
I would like to see them sitting on top of a cactus with hard spines about six inches long.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
Sheriff says the govt is the enemy http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=11802&Disp=0
Right he is, and we here have been saying it for years. Let others try and pray this evil away - there isn't a soul reading this that doesn't know how this has to end. Some simply haven't the cajones to say so.
Folder: Inbox Subject: Re: Florida church’s ‘Burn a Koran Day’ brings Islamist threats You may hate me. But I don't hate you. Here is a good resource. (some bullshit link) Stone is a double barreled douchebag
WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
Who exactly would want to fuck a moron, anyway?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Hope it didn't take him too long to figure that out.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. Thanks for the flag and sourcing, Esso.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The Constitution is a piece of paper. The federal reserve will do as it pleases as it has been doing since it was started in 1913. Until it is ended there will be no chance of a prosperous USA again.
God is always good!
#2. To: A K A Stone, GreyLmist (#1)
(Edited)
You can thank Murron for finding this one.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#4. To: All (#2)
Date: August 2 7:47:24 AM
From: A K A Stone
To: Esso
Subject: Re: Explosive New Evidence Shows Ruling of Arizona Judge (Susan Bolton) Illegal
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#5. To: A K A Stone (#0)
This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#6. To: Esso (#4)
#7. To: A K A Stone (#6)
FUCK YOU JEW MURDERER PIECE OF SHIT. http://www.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5000
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#0)
#9. To: A K A Stone (#1)
#10. To: Esso (#2)
#11. To: James Deffenbach (#5)
#12. To: Eric Stratton (#11)
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#13. To: James Deffenbach (#12)
#14. To: James Deffenbach (#12)
#15. To: Jethro Tull, Rotara (#3)
#16. To: TwentyTwelve (#15)
#17. To: Esso (#4)
Date: August 2 2:35:25 AM
From: A K A Stone
To: Flintlock
___________________________________________________________
#18. To: Esso (#2)
fucking moron.
#19. To: A K A Stone (#14)
Sheriff says the govt is the enemy
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#20. To: Esso (#2)
#21. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest