[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: Pentagon Attack Footage The Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack The Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack It is striking that there is neither video footage nor any photographic evidence in the public domain showing a jetliner approaching or crashing into the Pentagon. As of May, 2006, the only video footage of the crash that has been released are clips from two Pentagon security cameras north of the crash site, one the source of 5 frames leaked in 2002. With the release of the two video clips, the Pentagon claims to have supplied all of the footage it has of the attack. Although the number and positions of security cameras monitoring the Pentagon is not public knowledge, it seems unlikely that only two security cameras captured the attack. Isn't it reasonable to assume that there were dozens, if not hundreds, of security cameras ringing the huge building that is the heart of the United States military establishment? Videos Outside the Pentagon Seized The Sheraton National Hotel may be the hotel from which the FBI seized a CCTV recording. Not only has the government refused to release footage that would clearly show how the Pentagon was attacked, it has also seized footage not belonging to the military. The FBI confiscated video recordings from several private businesses near the Pentagon in the immediate aftermath of the attack. Those recordings, if they still exist, might provide decisive evidence about the attack. * The FBI visited a hotel near the Pentagon to confiscate film from a security camera which some hotel employees had been watching in horror shortly after the attack. The FBI denied that the footage captured the attack. 1 * The FBI visited the Citgo gas station southwest of the Pentagon within minutes of the attack to confiscate film that may have captured the attack. According to Jose Velasquez, who was working at the gas station at the time of the attack, the station's security cameras would have captured the attack. 2 The NEXCOMM/CITGO gas station is just under the flightpath of the aircraft involved in the Pentagon attack. In addition it is likely there is other video footage that was either destroyed or is being withheld, given that the trajectory of the attack plane took it low over a large part of Arlington, Virginia. Lawsuits to Obtain Videos At least two plaintiffs have attempted to obtain videos seized by the FBI, using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The first, documented at Flight77.info, began with a request to the FBI in October of 2004. The second, undertaken by the Judicial Watch, Inc. began with a request to the Department of Defense (DOD) in December of 2004. Following is a timeline of the requests and subsequent lawsuits. Entries relating to the second case are distinguished with dates colored gray. * October 14, 2004: Scott A. Hodes, on behalf of his client Scott Bingham, sends a request to David Hardy of the FBI requesting any videos "that may have captured the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001". The request letter mentions videotapes from the Citgo Gas Station and the Sheraton National Hotel. (1) Video camera recordings obtained by federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from a Nexcomm/Citgo gas station in the vicinity of the Pentagon on or about September 11, 2001. (2) Pentagon security video camera recording(s) showing Flight 77 strike and/or hit and/or crash into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. (3) Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) video camera recording(s) obtained by any federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") and/or the VDOT "Smart Traffic Center" on or about September 11, 2001. References 1. Inside the Ring, The Gertz Files, 9/21/01 [cached] Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 70.
#49. To: Original_Intent (#0)
Flight77.info 1. Inside the Ring, The Gertz Files, 9/21/01 [cached] All links working now.
GREAT! Again, that is old data. Any new data to support the the thread's thesis? No?
All links working now. GREAT! Again, that is old data. Any new data to support the the thread's thesis? No? Nine years later, all systems go! As they say, better late than never.
The issue of this thread is there is this GRAND COVER-UP by the US Government when it is holding data for criminal investigations or for actual litigation. I don't understand the perception at all. To the best of my knowledge ALL material has been released back to the original owners of that material. It is another thread debunked as far as I am concerned. This thread uses old, useless and tired spin-cycles to produce something fresh. O_I has proven that he can't produce anything of value to support his conspiracy theory.
You mean declaring himself as "erudite," and making statements "you're just a jealous anti-intellectual who feels inferior when confronted by someone whose command of the language vastly exceeds your own" aren't acceptable proof of Fight 77 being teleported to the Bahamas? Man, where's Yogi "Who'd a thunk it" Berra when you need him for a pithy quote?
He has declared himself an intellectual yet, he is the epitome of a pseudo-intellectual as he can't grasp a concept while throwing around polysyllables to pretend a concept. At least he aspires to be an intellectual.... given time, he may achieve a new level of awareness about himself and his own surroundings.
Help is on the way!!! Send us 200 words of text in need of distillation, either as a URL or in the body of an eMail, and we'll turn it around for you within 24 hours. Free. Here's something new - Less Text at a Discount ™. We're surrounded by blatant logorrhea* and its cousin syllabrrhea**. TV carries some choice examples: Until now. After years of research, our team of highly-qualified and experienced linguists, lexicographers, thesauristas and analog programmers has developed two tools to cut down on excessive word and syllable usage - the LQI (TM) and the SQI (TM). Here's how they work. A block of text is reduced to its minimal meaning. The original is then assigned two numbers, a "Logorrhea Quotient Index" and a "Syllabrrhea Quotient Index". These are ratios of the number of words and syllables compared to the irreducible minimum of words consistent with meaning Adjustments are then made to the minimum consistent with style and "voice". The objective is that revised copy is expressed as a number as close to 1 as possible. Here's an example:
Too funney. That post is awesome... with a bit of luck, O_I will take a peek.
There are no replies to Comment # 70. End Trace Mode for Comment # 70.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||