[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: Pentagon Attack Footage The Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack The Suppression of Video Footage of the Pentagon Attack It is striking that there is neither video footage nor any photographic evidence in the public domain showing a jetliner approaching or crashing into the Pentagon. As of May, 2006, the only video footage of the crash that has been released are clips from two Pentagon security cameras north of the crash site, one the source of 5 frames leaked in 2002. With the release of the two video clips, the Pentagon claims to have supplied all of the footage it has of the attack. Although the number and positions of security cameras monitoring the Pentagon is not public knowledge, it seems unlikely that only two security cameras captured the attack. Isn't it reasonable to assume that there were dozens, if not hundreds, of security cameras ringing the huge building that is the heart of the United States military establishment? Videos Outside the Pentagon Seized The Sheraton National Hotel may be the hotel from which the FBI seized a CCTV recording. Not only has the government refused to release footage that would clearly show how the Pentagon was attacked, it has also seized footage not belonging to the military. The FBI confiscated video recordings from several private businesses near the Pentagon in the immediate aftermath of the attack. Those recordings, if they still exist, might provide decisive evidence about the attack. * The FBI visited a hotel near the Pentagon to confiscate film from a security camera which some hotel employees had been watching in horror shortly after the attack. The FBI denied that the footage captured the attack. 1 * The FBI visited the Citgo gas station southwest of the Pentagon within minutes of the attack to confiscate film that may have captured the attack. According to Jose Velasquez, who was working at the gas station at the time of the attack, the station's security cameras would have captured the attack. 2 The NEXCOMM/CITGO gas station is just under the flightpath of the aircraft involved in the Pentagon attack. In addition it is likely there is other video footage that was either destroyed or is being withheld, given that the trajectory of the attack plane took it low over a large part of Arlington, Virginia. Lawsuits to Obtain Videos At least two plaintiffs have attempted to obtain videos seized by the FBI, using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The first, documented at Flight77.info, began with a request to the FBI in October of 2004. The second, undertaken by the Judicial Watch, Inc. began with a request to the Department of Defense (DOD) in December of 2004. Following is a timeline of the requests and subsequent lawsuits. Entries relating to the second case are distinguished with dates colored gray. * October 14, 2004: Scott A. Hodes, on behalf of his client Scott Bingham, sends a request to David Hardy of the FBI requesting any videos "that may have captured the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001". The request letter mentions videotapes from the Citgo Gas Station and the Sheraton National Hotel. (1) Video camera recordings obtained by federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from a Nexcomm/Citgo gas station in the vicinity of the Pentagon on or about September 11, 2001. (2) Pentagon security video camera recording(s) showing Flight 77 strike and/or hit and/or crash into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. (3) Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) video camera recording(s) obtained by any federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") and/or the VDOT "Smart Traffic Center" on or about September 11, 2001. References 1. Inside the Ring, The Gertz Files, 9/21/01 [cached] Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 83.
#50. To: Original_Intent (#0)
You're a lunatic. Almost 140 people saw a saw a plane crash into the Pentagon.
You're a lunatic. Almost 140 people saw a saw a plane crash into the Pentagon. Bzzzzzzzzzt! Wrong answer. 136 people reported a plane approaching the Pentagon. However, it has never been my contention that something did not hit the Pentagon. I do believe something did, however there is a strong possibility that it was not Flight 77 as advertised. The aerodynamics alone suggest that a 757, with wings unmodified, could not have made the alleged approach. However, I fall short of asserting a firm theory as I simply do not know, and I find the "Official Fairy Tale™" unconvincing because there are too many contrary datums. While much of it is circumstantial, which I freely admit, some of that circumstance is the suppression of information, the changing stories, and outright falsehoods told to try and sell the "Official Fairy Tale™". When someone tries to sell me a story with facts in conflict my first reaction is "wait just a minute". Do not presume to put words in my mouth.
deleted
#85. To: Eric Stratton (#83)
That, along with trying to SELL Hani Hanjoor SUPERPILOT when he was a known incompetent behind the stick, are two of the most glaring outpoints. That all of the videos except a few carefully selected snippets (one of which, the parking lot camera clip, looks like it could be a computer animation) have been suppressed, along with the gag order on the Air Traffic Controllers who watched the whole thing on their scopes, are BIG RED FLAGS. Paging Mr./Ms. Nostradumbass. Paging Mr./Ms. Nostradumbass! Paging Mr./Ms. Bloviator. Paging Mr./Ms. Bloviator.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||