[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: A Danish Scientist breaks the 9/11 culture of silence A Danish Scientist breaks the 9/11 culture of silence July 27, 2010 posted by Dr. Ashraf Ezzat · 49 Comments Share Many don’t know about tower 7, it collapsed in 6.5 seconds. It’s routine to look for thermite after fire, FBI didn’t. World trade center collapse is masterpiece demolition. WTC7, it collapsed in 6.5 seconds. “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times; it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness; it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity; it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness; it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair; we had everything before us, we had nothing before us; we were all going directly to Heaven, we were all going the other way.” - Charles Dickens, A Tale of two cities. …. on the morning of September 11, 2001, a great tragedy befell the city of new York, millions around the world watched- live- on their TV screens the tragic collapse of the world trade center twin towers in new York, and almost nine years has passed away, but still something seems amiss, we still feel as if we haven’t seen the end of this, as if we haven’t watched the true story yet. We stand confused, divided by two stories, an official story that is growing feebler and more naïve, and a conspiracy theory that is getting stronger and more persuasive with every passing day. Two contradicting and competing stories, of how and who did the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the city of New York, in what looks like the tale of two different cities. The official story Nine Years after Terror Attacks and the Public Still Doubts the 9/11 ‘Official Story’ Who brought down the Twin Towers? A bunch of crazy Arabs, members of “Al Qaeda”, a fundamentalist group that no one has ever heard of before, that’s who. This is the final cut of the official story of 9/11. At eleven o’clock, on the morning of September 11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) and the Pentagon. This assertion was made prior to the conduct of an in-depth criminal investigation. The speedy and clumsy indictment of Al Qaeda, made the Bush administration looked guilty of knowing in advance that attacks were planned on or around Sept. 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act. So, according to the official scenario, Mohammed Atta and his fellow Arab supermen managed to evade detection by the mightiest intelligence agency in the whole world until the day they emblazoned their vengeance across the sky and pulled off the biggest terrorist attack in US history. In the wake of 9/11, the public opinion and civil society had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda. They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an impoverished country of 30 million people. The more distance in time from the actual event, the odder such a scenario seems. Almost nine years to the day, the official account of 9/11 seems more vague –and inadequate – than ever. By keeping this official theory intact and credible, the 9/11 remains the pretext and justification for waging a war without borders. Only through this perspective the official story of 9/11 could make sense to a bewildered public. That, at least, is the official story. As to what the real story is – well; only science and time will tell. The conspiracy theory 9/11 conspiracy theories allege that the September 11 attacks in 2001 were either intentionally allowed to happen or were a false flag operation orchestrated by an organization with elements inside the United States government.[1] A poll taken in 2006 by Scripps Howard and Ohio University showed that, “More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.”[2] The most prominent theory is that the collapse of the World Trade Center and 7 World Trade Center were the result of a controlled demolition rather than structural weakening due to fire. However, in short, and according to Anton Vodvarka, Lt. FDNY , a retired firefighter who was on duty on the morning of September 11, he says, the official explanation of the events of that day are not only insufficient, they are fantastic and cannot bear rational examination. We are asked to believe that on that day three structural steel buildings, which have never before in history collapsed because of fire, fell neatly into their basements at the speed of gravity, their concrete reduced to dust. We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel. Trade Tower #7 by itself is the “smoking gun”. Not hit by an aircraft, with only a few relatively small fires, it came down in a classic crimp and implosion, going straight into its basement, something only very precise demolition can accomplish, which takes days if not weeks to prepare. The 9-11 Commission didn’t even mention it, and F.E.M.A. actually stated they DIDN’T KNOW WHY IT COLLAPSED AND LEFT IT AT THAT. But only scientists couldn’t leave it at this, they had to delve into this 9/11 affair and investigate it scientifically. With their critical minds, however, they will not be deterred, and will certainly home in on the many discrepancies and holes in the official version of events, as well as the central implausibility of the whole affair. The scientific theory Niels Harrit is an Associate Professor at the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen. He wrote a feature article printed in the Danish Newspaper, “Information”, on 31 March 2007. It was titled “the seventh tower”. In his article he questions the 9/11 commission report regarding the alleged causes behind the collapse of the world trade center (WTC) towers especially the tower 7. And he elaborates on the subject as follows. Prof.Neills Harrit The seventh tower When tall buildings are exposed to extreme earthquakes, they tip over as they fall. If there is enough room, they sometimes tip right onto their sides. WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don’t have to be a woodcutter to grasp this. It therefore wasn’t damage to the foundations that caused WTC7 to collapse. In the final FEMA report, WTC7 is hardly mentioned. They note that there were fires in the building, but do not attempt to explain the collapse. It is now more clear than ever that a culture of silence surrounds the science of 9/11 which proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down in a way totally different from the one submitted in the official story. Do the simple math, there were only two planes, but three skyscrapers collapsed. We are not asking ‘why’, Neils Harrit continues. This is no conspiracy theory. There is no burden of proof on us. Some extremely simple observations have been made, and we want to hear an official explanation that is consistent with elementary physics and chemistry, and common sense. WTC7 collapsed 7 hours after the twin towers. When you see a 47- storey tower, 186 meter high, collapse in 6.5 seconds, and if you are a scientist, you think “ what?”…I had to watch it again and again, I hit the button ten times, and my jaw dropped lower and lower. There was no visible reason why it should collapse in that way, straight down in 6.5 seconds. I had no rest since that day. Explosives in World Trade Center Neils Harrit has been hosted in a Danish TV interview to discuss his scientific theory of how WTC towers collapsed. On the interview he responded by affirming that the two airplanes- impacts did not cause the towers to collapse. And according to a newly published scientific article, researchers found Nano-Thermite explosive in the rubble of WTC collapsed buildings, that couldn’t have come from the planes. They believe large amounts of explosives were placed in the buildings in advance, Neil Harrits and eight other researchers conclude in this article that it was Nano-Thermite that caused these buildings to collapse. Thermite itself dates back to 1893, it is a mixture of aluminum and rust- powder which react to create intense heat, this reaction produces iron heated at 2500c Neils Harrit believe the intense heat melted the building’s steel support structure and caused the buildings to collapse like a house of cards. Hundreds of thousands of people around the world, this is something unstoppable, have long suspected that the three buildings were demolished. This has been crystal clear. Our research is the last nail of the coffin, says Neils Harrit. Neils Harrit`s conclusion I think there is only one conspiracy theory worth mentioning, the one involving the 19 Arab hijackers.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#2. To: tom007 (#0)
I think there is only one conspiracy theory worth mentioning, the one involving the 19 Arab hijackers. Yeah, that's the dumbest one of all.
#4. To: James Deffenbach (#2)
Ignore Thread is such a wonderful feature here.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||