[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Consequences of Mild, Moderate & Severe Plagiarism

Plagiarism: 5 Potential Legal Consequences

When Philadelphia’s Foul-Mouthed Cop-Turned-Mayor Invented White Identity Politics

Trump Wanted to Pardon Assange and Snowden. Blocked by RINOs.

What The Pentagon Is Planning Against Trump Will Make Your Blood Run Cold Once Revealed

How Trump won the Amish vote in Pennsylvania

FEC Filings Show Kamala Harris Team Blew Funds On Hollywood Stars, Private Jets

Israel’s Third Lebanon War is underway: What you need to know

LEAK: First Behind-The-Scenes Photos Of Kamala After Getting DESTROYED By Trump | Guzzling Wine!🍷

Scott Ritter Says: Netanyahu's PAINFUL Stumble Pushes Tel Aviv Into Its WORST NIGHTMARE

These Are Trump's X-Men | Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Houthis (Yemen) Breached THAAD. Israel Given a Dud Defense!!

Yuma County Arizona Doubles Its Outstanding Votes Overnight They're Stealing the Race from Kari Lake

Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria

Trump and RFK created websites for the people to voice their opinion on people the government is hiring

Woke Georgia DA Deborah Gonzalez pummeled in re-election bid after refusing Laken Riley murder case

Trump has a choice: Obliterate Palestine or end the war

Rod Blagojevich: Kamala’s Corruption, & the Real Cause of the Democrat Party’s Spiral Into Insanity

Israel's Defense Shattered by Hezbollah's New Iranian Super Missiles | Prof. Mohammad Marandi

Trump Wins Arizona in Clean Sweep of Swing States in US Election

TikTok Harlots Pledge in Droves: No More Pussy For MAGA Fascists!

Colonel Douglas Macgregor:: Honoring Veteran's Day

Low-Wage Nations?

Trump to pull US out of Paris climate agreement NYT

Pixar And Disney Animator Bolhem Bouchiba Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison

Six C-17s, C-130s deploy US military assets to Northeastern Syria

SNL cast members unveil new "hot jacked" Trump character in MAGA-friendly cold open

Here's Why These Geopolitical And Financial Chokepoints Need Your Attention...

Former Army Chief Moshe Ya'alon Calls for Civil Disobedience to Protest Netanyahu Government

The Deep State against Trump


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Arizona: A “Revolutionary” Line in the Sand?
Source: CanadaFreePress.com
URL Source: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26124
Published: Aug 4, 2010
Author: Doug Hagmann
Post Date: 2010-08-04 10:10:35 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 1685
Comments: 144

Arizona: A “Revolutionary” Line in the Sand?
By Doug Hagmann
August 3, 2010

I believe that history will show that the passage of SB 1070 by Arizona, and the federal government’s lawsuit to stop its implementation will be regarded the first battle of the 21st century American Revolution. Although not a single shot was fired- yet, the battle lines have clearly been drawn. Never before in the modern history of our country have all of the elements been in place for a war between our government and the citizenry of the United States. We stand at a proverbial and historic flashpoint as Obama plans to use the foot soldiers created by “comprehensive immigration reform,” whether achieved by law or mandate, to implement his socialist agenda for America.

Transforming the United States into a socialist nation

While the process of transforming the America known by our parents and grandparents to a socialist colony has been in progress for a half-century at the hands of Marxists, Socialists and Progressives, the Obama administration has put the Balkanization of America and the polarization of its citizens along racial, political and ideological lines on the fast track. And at least for now, he’s got the backing of Congress to advance his agenda of radical change. That was never so evident than on May 20th when the dictator of a corrupt, third world country was given a sickening, treasonous standing ovation in the halls of Congress for attacking the proposed legislation of an American sovereign state to uphold the laws of our country.

Regardless of whatever legislative support he might currently enjoy, evidence has shown that he is actively considering a back door strategy that would circumvent the need for congressional approval. More importantly, it would also circumvent the need for approval from the citizens of the U.S. Once in place, the amnesty of millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. would create a formidable electoral force to keep the Progressives in power under the pretext of free elections. The talk of altruistic motives of immigration and the joys and benefits of multiculturalism is nothing more than a smokescreen for power and control on the path to transforming the United States into a socialist nation.

Hart-Celler Act, Chain Migration

To understand how we got to this point in our national history, the groundwork for the transformation of our country was laid in 1965 with the passage of the Hart-Celler Act, which was signed into law by then President Lyndon Johnson. As Mark Levin details in his best-selling book Liberty and Tyranny, that single piece of legislation, as part of the Great Society, laid “the foundation for radically altering the character of American society and the relationship of the governed to their government.” During the debate of the bill on the floor of the Senate, Levin noted that Senator Kennedy insisted that the ethnic mix of the U.S. would not be changed, nor would America be inundated with immigrants from any one country or area.” In his assessment of the debate, Mark Levin wrote “it is hard to believe that they were not intentionally deceiving the public.” Indeed.

That bill caused a significant change in immigration that essentially created the current situation in the U.S. It introduced “chain migration,” which radically altered the “historical basis for making immigration decisions.” As written by Mr. Levin, “The emphasis would no longer be on the preservation of American society and the consent of the governed; now aliens themselves would decide who comes to the United States through family reunification (emphasis mine). The act also eliminated national quotas for immigration, opening the floodgates for immigrants from Mexico, Central and South America.

Consider that as a result of the 1965 immigration reform and deliberate lack of immigration enforcement, nearly 1 in 3 immigrants living in the U.S. today is here illegally. Additionally, legal immigration increased from 2.5 million in the 1950’s to over 10 million in the 1990’s. In 2007, the immigrant population in the U.S. reached a record 37.9 million and today accounts for 1 in 8 of all U.S. residents. In contrast, immigrants accounted for 1 in 21 of all U.S. residents in 1970.

9 percent of the population of Mexico resides in the United States

According to a 2004 report by the Pew Hispanic Center and detailed in Liberty and Tyranny, roughly 9 percent of the population of Mexico resides in the United States. Fifty seven percent of all illegal immigrants are Mexican, and another 24 percent are from other Latin American countries. In less than 40 years, it is estimated that Hispanic school-aged children will comprise the majority of public school students in the U.S.

While many proponents of immigration argue that the immigrants are here to assimilate and contribute to the United States, a 2008 study by the Manhattan Institute determined that the current level of assimilation is at a record low. Perhaps this is most evident by the fact that more than 55 million individuals living in the U.S. speak a language other than English, including over 34 million who speak Spanish. It is evident that assimilation is not a priority. The establishment of ethnic conclaves within the U.S. is an example of the lack of desire to assimilate into the fabric of American society.

In addition to the social and cultural effects of immigration as a whole, illegal immigrants are being aided by our own government in transferring money out of the United States. In 2006, illegal aliens sent an estimated $45 billion from the U.S. to their countries of origin. Last year, thanks to the assistance of the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury, Mexicans alone living and working in the U.S. transferred between $21.9 and $25 billion to the Mexican economy. Under the program called Directo a Mexico, U.S. commercial banks enable illegal aliens to transfer money through the Federal Reserve’s own automated clearinghouse, which is linked to the Mexican central bank Banco de Mexico. The illegal alien is also given an ATM card that can be used in Mexican banks in the event of their deportation.

The outflow of U.S. dollars to Mexico

The outflow of U.S. dollars to Mexico is second only to Mexico’s oil industry in the amount of revenue produced. It should be no wonder, then, that the Mexican government has no interest in working with U.S. authorities to secure our border or to enforce our immigration laws. In fact, it is the ultimate goal of the global elite to erase our borders and implement a “North American Union” as a step to achieving global governance.

Illegal immigration is a big business, and not just for Mexico. It is estimated that $18-25 billion is spent by state governments on welfare programs to illegal aliens each year, and about $2.2 billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs for illegal aliens. And additional $2.5 billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. The drain on the American economy by individuals living illegally in the United States is a significant threat that will lead to our demise.

There should be no doubt that illegal aliens also pose a security risk to our country. First and foremost, they are living and working in this country illegally—contrary to the laws of the United States. And contrary to the Progressive party line, the proponents of multiculturalism, and civil rights and advocacy organizations that subjugate the rights of Americans to their own agendas, crimes committed by illegal aliens are statistically higher than legal immigrants or U.S. citizens. In 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a study it conducted of 55,322 incarcerated illegal aliens. The study population averaged 8 arrests each. Ninety seven percent were arrested more than once, and 26% had over 11 arrests each. Each illegal alien averaged 13 separate offenses and 24% of those offenses were for drug crimes. About 12% were for murder, robbery, assault and sexually related crimes, and 21% of offenses were immigration offenses. Other offenses included property related offenses, traffic violations, fraud and obstruction of justice.

Illegal aliens arrested for less serious crimes and released pending a hearing at a future date often fail to appear. According to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, there were 557,762 fugitive alien cases were listed as “unsolved” at the end of 2008. Furthermore, illegal immigrants with extensive criminal records and multiple deportations are often permitted to remain in the U.S. by activist judges who are sympathetic to their plight.

The rampant problem of illegal immigration can easily be solved not by creating new legislation or enacting a complex system of immigration reform. As we observed in the weeks leading up to the implementation of SB 1070 in Arizona as law, the mere threat of realistic enforcement was sufficient to cause an exodus of illegal aliens from that state. As illustrated by the incoherent ruling of a political hack legislating from the bench, Arizona’s attempt to secure their state was undermined in a crafty and carefully executed political ploy. It is no coincidence that the appeal process will extend beyond the November midterm elections. It is the political hubris of a socialist dictator imposing his agenda against the will of the majority of this country’s citizenry.

National Council of La Raza, John McCain, Hillary Clinton

The failure to effectively address the issue of illegal immigration is not limited to any one political party; many Republicans as well as a vast majority of Democrats are complicit in failing to secure America’s safety and sovereignty. Consider that the National Council of La Raza, the largest Hispanic advocacy group in the United States, honored Senator John McCain in 1999. During her presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton appointed a senior member of La Raza to her staff, and Obama appointed a La Raza leader as the director of the Office of Internal Affairs. Undoubtedly, this virulent pro-amnesty group enjoys a significant influence over public policy in American government. Funding of this group finds numerous foundations and individuals who espouse and promote a global ideology and “one world governance” over national sovereignty as key contributors.

Despite the above statistics, those who demand immigration enforcement and the rule of law are often labeled as racists and xenophobes. American cities and states like Arizona are reeling from the adverse financial and social effects of illegal immigration and unfettered legal immigration. They lack help from the federal government, which is more intent on creating an electoral majority to ensure the continuation of their power to facilitate the socialist makeover and takeover of the United States. Obama and his justice department are siding with criminals against the citizens of America. Arizona is attempting to restore order to a system of chaos created by the federal government. Instead of welcoming the help and choosing to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the Obama administration is imposing a socialist dictatorship and has drawn a line in the Arizona sand. The question is now whether that line becomes “Ground Zero” for this century’s American Revolution—a fight against the Balkanization of our country, and the eradication of our borders, our sovereignty and ultimately, our nation.

As noted by one Arizona Sheriff, “our own government has become our enemy.” The question is how, if and when law-abiding, patriotic American citizens will choose to engage that enemy. For the sake of our country, acceptance and acquiescence is not an option.

Copyright © Douglas Hagmann Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 133.

#10. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

the passage of SB 1070 by Arizona, and the federal government’s lawsuit to stop its implementation will be regarded the first battle of the 21st century American Revolution.

SB1070 is business as usual. That law does not require employers to check to see if the people they are hiring are legal or illegal. It does not provide for penalties to employers who hire illegals. Therefore, it has no real significance in keeping illegal immigrants out. If implemented it will result in selective petty harassment of a small minority of existing illegal immigrants in my state. The bill is emotional terrorism designed to support a federal immigration reform package that will bring in many millions of guest workers over a long period of time.

This is a Republican bill, sponsored by republicans, passed by repubican legislators and signed by a republican governor. It does not penalize employers for hiring illegals.

and it makes no distinction between people who have been here for a long time and those who come tomorrow.

Consider a fellow named Luis whom I met in March. He's 17 years old. He came where when he was 3. He speaks perfect American english. He graduated from an American high school. In his mind he is American. He has a wife and a child. and he is illegal. His wife is illegal, she's just like him, grew up here, but is illegal. Luis has had 3 encounters with police who asked him his legal status. The first 2 times he lied and said he was legal. The police believed him because of his perfect american english. The third time he was on a greyhound bus and it was federal ICE police who were interrogating every passenger. He chose not to lie this time. But he told the police that he had been here since age 3 and that he had a wife and child. The police did not arrest him out of sympathy. Should Luis be sent back to Mexico. Somewhere that he doesn't even know or remember?

There are huge numbers of people in Arizona who are like Luis. We can't send them home unless we let them stay here. This is their home. The funny thing is that our laws allow them to become legal if only they can afford to pay the legal fees. They can't.

SB1070 does not make any effort to stop new illegals from coming here to be hired. I know people who hire illegals even today.

I'm with Ronald Reagan. Let all the illegals who have held down a job or who have any roots here at all, such as time in an American school, let them stay here and become citizens. If they choose not to become citizens,then send them home. But let them have the chance to stay. They came here because the law allowed employers to hire them. Blame us for that, not them. and at the same time stop all new illegals from coming. How do you do that? You penalize the employers for hiring illegals. SB1070 does no such thing.

Here in Arizona there are many communities filled with illegals. There are many businesses who have valuable employees that are illegals. We're supposed to tear apart our society's fabric and do unjust things by kicking these people out? We're supposed to tell little children that they didn't want their daddies anyway and simply take that man away from his family. But we are supposed to simultaneously bring in guest workers who are like slaves and will be alienated from our society because they are like slaves. Such people who want such things are undesirables themselves.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   12:41:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Red Jones (#10)

Consider a fellow named Luis whom I met in March. He's 17 years old. He came where when he was 3. He speaks perfect American english. He graduated from an American high school. In his mind he is American. He has a wife and a child. and he is illegal.

Both Luis and his wife were given an education paid for by US taxpayers.

I would venture to bet we also paid for other entitlements through his and her duration in this nation.

Now AT 17 he has an anchor baby......no accident there I'm sure. And WE PAID for the birth of HIS child. WE paid for the formula and the diapers and the ongoing healthcare. This "poor" illegal surely isn't footing the bill to raise this kid. And you EXPECT us to foot that bill. If we refuse we will get fewer and fewer cases like Luis to consider.

Nobody forced Luis to have a child at 17. In fact, you want to reward irresponsibility. I didn't have children that the US taxpayers foot the bill for, so I don't believe I should pay for Luis and his offspring.

You want the lot of us to feel sorry for Luis and his illegal parents and his illegal status. Well, I feel that we've paid and provided enough. If he isn't on a path to citizenship by now, he NEVER will be. It's just not THAT important, as it wasn't for his parents. Why bother when all the goodies are available without citizenship?

abraxas  posted on  2010-08-04   14:11:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: abraxas (#14)

Both Luis and his wife were given an education paid for by US taxpayers.

where I live the local public schools are 90% mexican. Many of those children are themselves illegal or children of illegals. You take away those children and you are literally taking away a significant part of our community. I don't think responsible governments just export their people en masse like that.

And WE PAID for the birth of HIS child.

I'm under the impression that his parents worked and therefore would have paid taxes. Many people like to assert that illegals work for cash only. In my experience this is completely false. Few employers pay them cash. Most employers have them on the regular payroll which means they pay taxes. why do you want to take away our tax base? We are a struggling state in terms of money?

That fellow Luis himself worked, paid taxes.

Nobody forced Luis to have a child at 17.

The mexicans like to produce children and they start early in life. If you antagonize them, then you are dividing our country up and causing horrible grudges that will haunt us for many decades. They are becoming the majority in many locations whether you or I like it or not.

If he isn't on a path to citizenship by now, he NEVER will be

Luis told me that a lawyer told him that he could get papers to make him actually legal. But that the fee was way beyond his means. He'd like to be a citizen. This is his country.

Government's laws & policies should serve the people who are here. These illegal immigrants were allowed to come. They came. They sincerely contributed and became a part of our community. If government wants to serve the people, then it should serve these people. Government should not be used as a club to bash the people over the head. These people do not belong in Mexico, they belong here. They should be aggressively recruited to be citizens with full rights. In this way they will become loyal and good citizens. Republicans literally want to kick them out and replace them with guest workers. Guest workers are like slaves with no rights. It does not benefit us to have such people here. Let all the people who live here be free.

Remember the German Hessians who were mercenaries in service to the king of england during our revolution? They came here to fight against us. And yet well over half of them stayed and became Americans. that is what we need to do with the mexicans and other illegal immigrants. Another main priority should be to stop new illegals from coming. SB1070 makes no effort to stop new arrivals. Lots of illegals have decided to live here even though they can be sent to Mexico merely by a police encounter. They go years without speaking to a police officer. And a lot of the police officers won't even enforce that law. But when they live here under a murky legal status they will hold a deep grudge that will last for decades. I'm becoming the minority here, this does not help me. I wonder why my fellow Americans have abandoned me - it seems.

one of my mexican associates (Ivan) did have a police encounter about 3 weeks ago. He was sent back to Mexico. who knows what Ivan did to achieve the police encounter. But most of them have a steely determination to avoid police encounters and to simply deal with the police by being otherwise law-abiding and polite. and you know what the large majority of them will survive under SB1070 with that strategy. SB1070 is only emotional terrorism, it is not a serious effort to have a real effect.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   14:59:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Red Jones (#17) (Edited)

Government's laws & policies should serve the people who are here. These illegal immigrants were allowed to come. They came. They sincerely contributed and became a part of our community. If government wants to serve the people, then it should serve these people. Government should not be used as a club to bash the people over the head. These people do not belong in Mexico, they belong here. They should be aggressively recruited to be citizens with full rights. In this way they will become loyal and good citizens. Republicans literally want to kick them out and replace them with guest workers. Guest workers are like slaves with no rights. It does not benefit us to have such people here. Let all the people who live here be free.

Ideas like those are what is turning America into a $#it hole, Balkanized nation with 200-300 languages. Of course they belong in Mexico, they are effin TRESSPASSING! What part of that don't you get? If the government laws and policies should serve the people who are here and you include all the illegal aliens in that, what is your cutoff point? How many tens of millions of Chinese or Russians would be acceptable under your plan? How about people from Zimbabwe and Zaire or the Congo? Or is it only illegal alien Mexicans who get your sympathy?

If the illegal aliens actually want to be Americans--which I doubt very much--let them get in line behind people who have been trying to come in with visas and passports and some of whom have been in that line for years. You want to reward trespassers. What would you do if one of them broke into your house, invite him for dinner and to spend the night or whatever amount of time he wanted? If you wouldn't then why should any other American?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-04   15:04:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: James Deffenbach (#18)

If the illegal aliens actually want to be Americans--which I doubt very much--let them get in line behind people who have been trying to come in with visas and passports

James, I had a neighbor named Jesus who was 31 when he moved away and I lost track of him & his family. His wife named Josie was American Indian. Is that american enough for you? Her dad fought in the Vietnam war. They had 5 kids. I watched those kids grow up. This is their home. None of them were born in Mexico. That guy Jesus came here when he was 5 years old. And at age 30 he's still an illegal. He didn't want to go back to Mexico. English was the only language he spoke. I thought if you marry an American, then you automatically get to stay. I believe only if you have the money to pay can you do that. It is not automatic. He was illegal and he was married to an American Indian.

His children spoke all english, no spanish. But the local school indoctrinated the children that they were Mexican and tried to shame them into thinking they were mexican and speaking spanish. This balkanization is brought on by our own government policies and by our own fears of them. Imagine, children of an American Indian who say that they are Mexican and not American. the child told me that she was taught that at school.

Let's keep the people we have and make them americans. and lets close the door of high levels of immigration.

If you vote for these republicans, then you're voting for high levels of immigration. Just because it is legal doesn't mean it is good. In 2006 there was legislation considered in congress and not passed. The Heritage Foundation analyzed that legislation and said it would mean 100 million new immigrants by 2020. all legal. That was republican legislation. Many of those new immigrants would be crimped in their legal status and not really free. What good does that do anyone except employers who want slaves? Why are slave-owners respected?

I disagree with you that we should be bringing large numbers ofpeople in. Only small numbers and only for family reunification. None for employers. The same people so keen on bashing the illegals want guest workers for employers. I say lets use free labor only.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   16:33:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Red Jones (#42)

James, I had a neighbor named Jesus who was 31 when he moved away and I lost track of him & his family. His wife named Josie was American Indian. Is that american enough for you?

The American Indian? Sure, she is American enough. Your illegal alien? No. He is not an American at all. Just another criminal who jumped the line ahead of other people.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-04   19:47:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: James Deffenbach (#76)

Your illegal alien? No. He is not an American at all. Just another criminal who jumped the line ahead of other people.

he was 5 years old walking across the desert with his mom & dad. and you say he should've ran away from them and stayed in Mexico because of a law made in washington. 5-year olds moving to a new place el norte are not criminals. and when he came of school age he went to school. and as time went on he learned to speak english as his primary language because that is what his friends spoke. by the time he graduated from high school english was his main language. he spoke so little spanish he practically forgot how to speak it. when was he supposed to go home to mexico during this whole process to avoid being a criminal?

I guess I just don't blame the illegal immigrants for their crimes enough to think of them as being 'criminal' in a conventional sense. Technically he's a criminal. but no jury will convict a 5-year old for staying with his mom and dad. I tell you in all honesty that none of the illegal immigrants would be considered criminals to be jailed if a jury voted on their fate. a jury might vote to deport them, but not to jail them.

Like I told JT, people break the law every day. There's too many laws.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   20:33:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: Red Jones (#91)

Like I told JT, people break the law every day. There's too many laws.

Sure there are too many laws. I doubt you would get any argument about that from any sane person. But I think most Americans will argue with you that we don't need a bunch of people who think it is ok for them to just waltz across the border without going through the proper channels. If you think that is ok what makes the border jumpers you are defending better than the people who are trying to get in and doing it the way they're supposed to? I had to get a visa and passport when I traveled outside the US, so are the illegals you are taking up for better than me? And if so why?

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-04   20:46:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: James Deffenbach (#93)

If you think that is ok what makes the border jumpers you are defending better than the people who are trying to get in and doing it the way they're supposed to?

I don't think they're better. But they're here. they cut in line. but they got here. once here, it is hard to send them back. in part because they become a part of the community and you don't want to harm the community. In part because you have to catch them to send them back and after so much time goes by they become more a part of the community. They benefited by cutting in line. it doesn't make them better, but they still got that benefit of being here.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   21:32:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: Red Jones (#97)

Let me tell you about my community that's real cold in the winter. There are people who've lived with no heat from a utility company because they couldn't afford the bill. I personally know of 3 separate households and that's just the ones I know of. Because of illegals, it's hard to find work except through a temp agency. You're emotional pitches on behalf of those who have been pulling our country down to such straits are really not going over well with me.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-05   2:57:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: GreyLmist (#101)

You're emotional pitches

it should be 'your emotional pitches'.

the illegals are human beings. Many have been here for a long time, some over 20 years doing jobs. many have children here. they should be respected.

the illegals were invited here by the government that created a legal procedure for employers to hire them. Employers today are not penalized for hiring illegals. there is no serious talk among politicians to make laws causing employers to be penalized for hiring illegals. Instead many politicians want an endless stream of guest workers. Don't blame me for that situation.

Ever since 1986 when the government passed a law that allows employers to hire illegals and not be penalized for it I've advocated changing the laws to stop employers from hiring new illegals. I don't see how you could read what I wrote above without picking up on that.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-07   12:30:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: Red Jones (#106)

the illegals are human beings. Many have been here for a long time, some over 20 years doing jobs. many have children here. they should be respected.

...and deported in a polite respectful but highly efficient manner....

scrapper2  posted on  2010-08-07   12:32:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: scrapper2 (#107)

deported

that is just a fantasy that you have. Many politicians say they are going to turn the illegals into guest workers and they're going to create a pipeline of new guest workers for employers. People who talk like you frequently vote for such politicians.

only a small minority of the illegals are being sent back.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-07   12:38:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: Red Jones (#108)

only a small minority of the illegals are being sent back.

And you're happy that is the case and you voted for politicians who will ensure that unskilled free loading law breakers will stay in our nation taking free welfare, medical, educational benefits while our nation's econmy is nose diving under the weight of high unemployment rolls of US citizens and legal residents.

Nice.

scrapper2  posted on  2010-08-07   12:47:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: scrapper2 (#110)

you're psychotic.

it is a simple fact that few illegals are being sent back. I wasn't cheering over that fact. Someone else said that SB1070 would send people back and that I was unhappy over this. I was telling them that very very few are going to be sent back over SB1070 and very few are being sent back.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-07   13:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: Red Jones (#112)

you're psychotic.

My my, red, what bad manners you picked up while sojourning at the nest...

scrapper2  posted on  2010-08-07   13:16:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: scrapper2 (#113)

I can't help it if you're psychotic. you accuse me of things that are from your mind.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-07   13:19:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: All (#115)

this article at the top says that SB1070 in Arizona is somehow revolutionary. It is not, it is business as usual. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deceived. SB1070 is emotional terrorism and drama. It will hardly result in anybody deported who otherwise wouldn't have been deported. The vast majority of existing illegals will survive it. The politicians who say they're against illegals are against illegals. They want the illegals to be slaves. That is why they let the illegals come here in the first place. that is why the illegals are allowed to stay. the politicians are planning to turn these people into guest workers. Guest workers are the same as indentured servants. They're here to drive wages down and give the employers a comfortable position where they don't have to deal with labor. This new guest worker institution is going to be permanent. The condition that you despise is becoming permanent. and anybody who speaks against this you will oppose. because you are so deceived. and when anyone tries to straighten you out, you will complain. you'd rather have people lie to you.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-07   13:30:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: Red Jones (#117) (Edited)

I like a lot of your posts as you seem to understand the root cause of failure for the US (concerning illegal immigration) and so far I have not commented. But your ideas for addressing solutions is SPOT-ON as you have claimed that border security to eliminate the problems should be at the border and not upstream long after the issues manifest. In large part, I agree because it is better to back the illegals at the front door as opposed to long after they have been assimilated within society.

But, I have a few comments regarding your recent post:

this article at the top says that SB1070 in Arizona is somehow revolutionary. It is not

This is true. Missouri has had these forms of state laws in effect for years.

SB1070 is emotional terrorism and drama. It will hardly result in anybody deported who otherwise wouldn't have been deported. The vast majority of existing illegals will survive it.

Probably true. However, out of the 400,000 pre-existing illegals about 40,000+ have moved out of state, meaning the law SHOWS they are no longer wanted in AZ. I say BRAVO! and if CA would enact similar legislation ( which they have based on Proposition 87)..... however, in CA we have laws already on the books as MO does regarding illegals:

Below is a copy of section 834b of the California Penal Code that deals with EXISTING immigration law enforcement at the local level.

(a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws.

(b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the following: (1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status. (2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or leave the United States. (3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal status and provide any additional information that may be requested by any other public entity.

(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly prohibited.

The politicians who say they're against illegals are against illegals. They want the illegals to be slaves.

Not many want illegals removed from the US. Most want to work some kind of amnesty program which only ensures MORE illegals here.

That is why they let the illegals come here in the first place.

Cheap labor is the crime of capatalism out of control.

the politicians are planning to turn these people into guest workers. Guest workers are the same as indentured servants. They're here to drive wages down and give the employers a comfortable position where they don't have to deal with labor. This new guest worker institution is going to be permanent. The condition that you despise is becoming permanent.

It certainly appears that way. No one seems to have the courage to deal with the issue unlike Tom Tancredo.

I just want the nation to enforce already existing laws. And not look the other way. We are in some troubling times and illegals are not wanted in America .... of course, I have been involved with the MM for years and was on the AZ border to see the issues first hand. It is appalling by first hand rancher's discussions of what illegals do their personal property rights; which is a reflection of how a nation regards property rights as there is little enforcement.

edit: added hot link to EXISTING CA code.......

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-07   14:27:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: buckeroo (#120)

Tom Tancredo

Tom tancredo sponsored legislation whereby the US government would set targets for average wages in different work categories. he thinks that to make the US economy work we must be more competitive, to do this government must push wages down. Tancredo's legislation would have government giving employers work visas specifically for the targeted work categories, bringing people in our country to work in those fields until the wage targets are met.

In other words Tancredo favors unlimited new indentured servants brought to our country specifically to undermine us.

I suggest that people who think Tancredo is a good leader on this issue are horribly deceived. but such is the nature of our discussion on this issue and others. It is not an accident that we are so deceived.

consider the idiots who support this SB1070 in Arizona thinking it to be a law that will kick illegal immigrants out. That law only makes people upset. and the employers in Arizona are perfectly free to hire illegals. Take this JT guy, he reads a headline in the Washington Post and it says that SB1070 puts sanctions on employers for hiring illegals. let me explain again - SB1070 does not sanction employers in a serious manner. Employers in Arizona hire illegals every single day. they have no fear from the federal gov or the state gov to do that. and here's all these idiots who say they oppose illegal immigrants climbing on the bandwagon of politicians like tancredo and others who support SB1070. I don't go along with the dysfunctional approaches to illegal immigrants, so this idiot scrapper says I love to have a steady stream of illegals coming into this country. I tell him he's psychotic because he is, and christine lectures me that it is not psychotic to imagine things like that. Is this a dysfunctional group of people or what?

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-08   8:37:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#130. To: Red Jones (#125) (Edited)

Tom tancredo sponsored legislation whereby the US government would set targets for average wages in different work categories.

Please link that statement with some verifiable fact. I have NEVER heard of the US government setting wage standards for a given class of citizenship.

edit: here is HR4192 by Tancredo (it is the diametric opposite of what you said):

SUMMARY 11/15/2007--Introduced. Optimizing Visa Entry Rules and Demanding Uniform Enforcement Immigration Reform Act of 2007 or the OVERDUE Immigration Reform Act of 2007 - Revises worldwide immigration level and visa allotment provisions, including establishment of specified new nonimmigrant classifications. Provides citizenship or nationality at birth for a person born in the United States only if such child was born to parents, one of whom is: (1) a U.S. citizen or national; or (2) a lawful permanent resident alien. Authorizes the use of the military to help secure the borders. Provides for increases of immigration and border enforcement personnel. Suspends the visa waiver program. Provides criminal penalties and forfeiture for unlawful presence in the United States. Provides for listing of immigration violators in the National Crime Information Center Database. Increases civil and criminal penalties for document fraud, benefit fraud, and false citizenship claims. Sets forth an identification standard for federal benefits. Requires electronic fingerprinting for U.S. passports. Authorizes visa term compliance bonds. Establishes minimum birth certificate standards for federal recognition purposes. Provides for the establishment of electronic birth and death registration systems. Renames the basic employment verification pilot program as the Employment Authorization Status Instant Check or EASI Check system and makes such system permanent and mandatory on a phased-in basis. Increases civil and criminal penalties for employer hiring violations. Provides for temporary social security cards for non-immigrant aliens authorized to work in the United States. Directs the Commissioner of Social Security to notify: (1) a U.S. employer with one or more employees whose social security account number does not match the employee's name or date of birth in Social Security Administration (SSA) records; and (2) an individual whose earnings from two or more employers are being reported under the individual's social security account number. Prohibits social security credit for work performed while unlawfully present in the United States. Makes an individual who submits a federal income tax return that relies on an individual taxpayer identification number in lieu of a social security number ineligible for any tax credit or refund (including the earned income tax credit). Revises provisions respecting: (1) adjustment of status; and (2) temporary protected status. Prohibits federal assistance to a post-secondary educational institution determined to be providing benefits in violation of the provision restricting in-state tuition to aliens unlawfully in the United States. Declares that states and state and local law enforcement personnel have the inherent authority to apprehend, arrest, detain, or transfer to federal custody aliens in the United States in the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws. Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security, upon state request, to provide for the transfer of an illegal alien to federal custody and the reimbursement of related state costs. Authorizes assistance to Cameron University, Lawton, Oklahoma, for a demonstration project to assess the feasibility of establishing a nationwide e-learning training course to be used by state, local, and tribal law enforcement officers to enhance such officers' ability to assist federal immigration officers. Directs the Secretary, within two years, to complete the exit component of the entry and exit data system, (US-VISIT). Prohibits employer deduction from gross income of wages paid to unauthorized aliens. Eliminates: (1) federal reimbursement of emergency health services provided to undocumented aliens after FY2007; and (2) coverage of Mexicans with border crossing cards. Provides funding for eligible providers through FY2013.
Most of us on this website, enjoy FACTUAL and verifiable support of posts when that same support is used in a continuous opinion. Tancredo attempted legislation that limits illegals from many social/welfare programs. And even imposed military force on the border with Mexico to enforce immigration laws. SO, you will have to produce some FACT, now.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-08   10:44:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#131. To: buckeroo (#130)

sorry, I don't have a link for that on Tancredo. but I believe it to be true and I got that from an analysis of the law he proposed. Very often the people who act like our leaders are our enemies.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-08   11:15:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#132. To: Red Jones (#131)

but I believe it to be true

Just tell me what year he proposed the legislation, I will find it, just HR4192 which I hotlinked for you.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-08-08   11:20:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#133. To: buckeroo (#132)

I wish I knew exactly what year. It was 4-5 years ago. I read an analysis of his legislation and obviously that is where I got this impression.

You will also recall that there was immigration reform legislation under consideration I believe in 2006 where the Heritage Foundation analyzed the legislation and concluded that it would mean 100 million new legal immigrants prior to 2020. That legislation they analyzed was sponsored by republicans and supported by President Bush. My congressman, Jeff Flake, has always supported guest workers strongly. all the republicans in arizona support guest workers. and like I said the republicans in the state legislator even put forth legislation for a state guest worker program. JD Hayworth supports guest workers.

guest workers are the same as allowing illegal immigrants except that it will be legal and permanent. I don't understand my country-men who do not see a parallel between the guest workers that are coming and the indentured servants of the 1600s & 1700's. When I was in school they taught us that indentured servants were similar to slaves.

I cannot abide by my countrymen who say we need guest workers. and when I read on this web site people supporting the arizona republicans' SB1070 I have to feel that these people, my country-men, are horribly deceived.

The solution I've proposed is exactly 100% what Ronald Reagan wanted.

Jethro Tull says if I don't favor kicking out ALL illegals, then I support the situation where 30% of the people in our state prison are illegals. We have lots of mexican mafia related criminal activity in my state. I did not cause that. and if we respect the illegals who should be respected, then this does not mean that I favor criminals being in my state.

Ronald Reagan wanted to forgive all the illegals who have held a job, and let them all have a pathway to citizenship. Reagan also wanted to penalize employers who hired new illegal immigrants. Reagan never achieved this penalty to employers. I've explained over and over and over again - republican leaders in the US Senate would not allow such penalties into the legislation. that is why 25million or more illegals came since 1986. people in america are so stupid, they shout at each other over illegal immigration, but they don't even know (or care) about the traitors among our leaders who let them in.

But what I read was the law was sponsored by Tancredo himself. Why should you be surprised. all republicans are for guest workers. the anti-illegal immigrant movement in america is a joke because its leaders are pro-guest workers. either way - take jobs from americans and give it to foreigners.

what you all don't like about me is that I say a person who has been here for 10 years and held a job during that time is long overdue for being given permanent legal status here. where else we disagree is that I would like to stop new people from coming here. and the people here on this web site prefer ignorance and dysfunctionalism, to complain permanently without ever doing anything to stop the situation. that is my impression at least.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-08   15:11:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 133.

        There are no replies to Comment # 133.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 133.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]