[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Consequences of Mild, Moderate & Severe Plagiarism

Plagiarism: 5 Potential Legal Consequences

When Philadelphia’s Foul-Mouthed Cop-Turned-Mayor Invented White Identity Politics

Trump Wanted to Pardon Assange and Snowden. Blocked by RINOs.

What The Pentagon Is Planning Against Trump Will Make Your Blood Run Cold Once Revealed

How Trump won the Amish vote in Pennsylvania

FEC Filings Show Kamala Harris Team Blew Funds On Hollywood Stars, Private Jets

Israel’s Third Lebanon War is underway: What you need to know

LEAK: First Behind-The-Scenes Photos Of Kamala After Getting DESTROYED By Trump | Guzzling Wine!🍷

Scott Ritter Says: Netanyahu's PAINFUL Stumble Pushes Tel Aviv Into Its WORST NIGHTMARE

These Are Trump's X-Men | Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Houthis (Yemen) Breached THAAD. Israel Given a Dud Defense!!

Yuma County Arizona Doubles Its Outstanding Votes Overnight They're Stealing the Race from Kari Lake

Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria

Trump and RFK created websites for the people to voice their opinion on people the government is hiring

Woke Georgia DA Deborah Gonzalez pummeled in re-election bid after refusing Laken Riley murder case

Trump has a choice: Obliterate Palestine or end the war

Rod Blagojevich: Kamala’s Corruption, & the Real Cause of the Democrat Party’s Spiral Into Insanity

Israel's Defense Shattered by Hezbollah's New Iranian Super Missiles | Prof. Mohammad Marandi

Trump Wins Arizona in Clean Sweep of Swing States in US Election

TikTok Harlots Pledge in Droves: No More Pussy For MAGA Fascists!

Colonel Douglas Macgregor:: Honoring Veteran's Day

Low-Wage Nations?

Trump to pull US out of Paris climate agreement NYT

Pixar And Disney Animator Bolhem Bouchiba Sentenced To 25 Years In Prison

Six C-17s, C-130s deploy US military assets to Northeastern Syria

SNL cast members unveil new "hot jacked" Trump character in MAGA-friendly cold open

Here's Why These Geopolitical And Financial Chokepoints Need Your Attention...

Former Army Chief Moshe Ya'alon Calls for Civil Disobedience to Protest Netanyahu Government

The Deep State against Trump


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Arizona: A “Revolutionary” Line in the Sand?
Source: CanadaFreePress.com
URL Source: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26124
Published: Aug 4, 2010
Author: Doug Hagmann
Post Date: 2010-08-04 10:10:35 by Eric Stratton
Keywords: None
Views: 1625
Comments: 144

Arizona: A “Revolutionary” Line in the Sand?
By Doug Hagmann
August 3, 2010

I believe that history will show that the passage of SB 1070 by Arizona, and the federal government’s lawsuit to stop its implementation will be regarded the first battle of the 21st century American Revolution. Although not a single shot was fired- yet, the battle lines have clearly been drawn. Never before in the modern history of our country have all of the elements been in place for a war between our government and the citizenry of the United States. We stand at a proverbial and historic flashpoint as Obama plans to use the foot soldiers created by “comprehensive immigration reform,” whether achieved by law or mandate, to implement his socialist agenda for America.

Transforming the United States into a socialist nation

While the process of transforming the America known by our parents and grandparents to a socialist colony has been in progress for a half-century at the hands of Marxists, Socialists and Progressives, the Obama administration has put the Balkanization of America and the polarization of its citizens along racial, political and ideological lines on the fast track. And at least for now, he’s got the backing of Congress to advance his agenda of radical change. That was never so evident than on May 20th when the dictator of a corrupt, third world country was given a sickening, treasonous standing ovation in the halls of Congress for attacking the proposed legislation of an American sovereign state to uphold the laws of our country.

Regardless of whatever legislative support he might currently enjoy, evidence has shown that he is actively considering a back door strategy that would circumvent the need for congressional approval. More importantly, it would also circumvent the need for approval from the citizens of the U.S. Once in place, the amnesty of millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. would create a formidable electoral force to keep the Progressives in power under the pretext of free elections. The talk of altruistic motives of immigration and the joys and benefits of multiculturalism is nothing more than a smokescreen for power and control on the path to transforming the United States into a socialist nation.

Hart-Celler Act, Chain Migration

To understand how we got to this point in our national history, the groundwork for the transformation of our country was laid in 1965 with the passage of the Hart-Celler Act, which was signed into law by then President Lyndon Johnson. As Mark Levin details in his best-selling book Liberty and Tyranny, that single piece of legislation, as part of the Great Society, laid “the foundation for radically altering the character of American society and the relationship of the governed to their government.” During the debate of the bill on the floor of the Senate, Levin noted that Senator Kennedy insisted that the ethnic mix of the U.S. would not be changed, nor would America be inundated with immigrants from any one country or area.” In his assessment of the debate, Mark Levin wrote “it is hard to believe that they were not intentionally deceiving the public.” Indeed.

That bill caused a significant change in immigration that essentially created the current situation in the U.S. It introduced “chain migration,” which radically altered the “historical basis for making immigration decisions.” As written by Mr. Levin, “The emphasis would no longer be on the preservation of American society and the consent of the governed; now aliens themselves would decide who comes to the United States through family reunification (emphasis mine). The act also eliminated national quotas for immigration, opening the floodgates for immigrants from Mexico, Central and South America.

Consider that as a result of the 1965 immigration reform and deliberate lack of immigration enforcement, nearly 1 in 3 immigrants living in the U.S. today is here illegally. Additionally, legal immigration increased from 2.5 million in the 1950’s to over 10 million in the 1990’s. In 2007, the immigrant population in the U.S. reached a record 37.9 million and today accounts for 1 in 8 of all U.S. residents. In contrast, immigrants accounted for 1 in 21 of all U.S. residents in 1970.

9 percent of the population of Mexico resides in the United States

According to a 2004 report by the Pew Hispanic Center and detailed in Liberty and Tyranny, roughly 9 percent of the population of Mexico resides in the United States. Fifty seven percent of all illegal immigrants are Mexican, and another 24 percent are from other Latin American countries. In less than 40 years, it is estimated that Hispanic school-aged children will comprise the majority of public school students in the U.S.

While many proponents of immigration argue that the immigrants are here to assimilate and contribute to the United States, a 2008 study by the Manhattan Institute determined that the current level of assimilation is at a record low. Perhaps this is most evident by the fact that more than 55 million individuals living in the U.S. speak a language other than English, including over 34 million who speak Spanish. It is evident that assimilation is not a priority. The establishment of ethnic conclaves within the U.S. is an example of the lack of desire to assimilate into the fabric of American society.

In addition to the social and cultural effects of immigration as a whole, illegal immigrants are being aided by our own government in transferring money out of the United States. In 2006, illegal aliens sent an estimated $45 billion from the U.S. to their countries of origin. Last year, thanks to the assistance of the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury, Mexicans alone living and working in the U.S. transferred between $21.9 and $25 billion to the Mexican economy. Under the program called Directo a Mexico, U.S. commercial banks enable illegal aliens to transfer money through the Federal Reserve’s own automated clearinghouse, which is linked to the Mexican central bank Banco de Mexico. The illegal alien is also given an ATM card that can be used in Mexican banks in the event of their deportation.

The outflow of U.S. dollars to Mexico

The outflow of U.S. dollars to Mexico is second only to Mexico’s oil industry in the amount of revenue produced. It should be no wonder, then, that the Mexican government has no interest in working with U.S. authorities to secure our border or to enforce our immigration laws. In fact, it is the ultimate goal of the global elite to erase our borders and implement a “North American Union” as a step to achieving global governance.

Illegal immigration is a big business, and not just for Mexico. It is estimated that $18-25 billion is spent by state governments on welfare programs to illegal aliens each year, and about $2.2 billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs for illegal aliens. And additional $2.5 billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. The drain on the American economy by individuals living illegally in the United States is a significant threat that will lead to our demise.

There should be no doubt that illegal aliens also pose a security risk to our country. First and foremost, they are living and working in this country illegally—contrary to the laws of the United States. And contrary to the Progressive party line, the proponents of multiculturalism, and civil rights and advocacy organizations that subjugate the rights of Americans to their own agendas, crimes committed by illegal aliens are statistically higher than legal immigrants or U.S. citizens. In 2005, the Government Accountability Office released a study it conducted of 55,322 incarcerated illegal aliens. The study population averaged 8 arrests each. Ninety seven percent were arrested more than once, and 26% had over 11 arrests each. Each illegal alien averaged 13 separate offenses and 24% of those offenses were for drug crimes. About 12% were for murder, robbery, assault and sexually related crimes, and 21% of offenses were immigration offenses. Other offenses included property related offenses, traffic violations, fraud and obstruction of justice.

Illegal aliens arrested for less serious crimes and released pending a hearing at a future date often fail to appear. According to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, there were 557,762 fugitive alien cases were listed as “unsolved” at the end of 2008. Furthermore, illegal immigrants with extensive criminal records and multiple deportations are often permitted to remain in the U.S. by activist judges who are sympathetic to their plight.

The rampant problem of illegal immigration can easily be solved not by creating new legislation or enacting a complex system of immigration reform. As we observed in the weeks leading up to the implementation of SB 1070 in Arizona as law, the mere threat of realistic enforcement was sufficient to cause an exodus of illegal aliens from that state. As illustrated by the incoherent ruling of a political hack legislating from the bench, Arizona’s attempt to secure their state was undermined in a crafty and carefully executed political ploy. It is no coincidence that the appeal process will extend beyond the November midterm elections. It is the political hubris of a socialist dictator imposing his agenda against the will of the majority of this country’s citizenry.

National Council of La Raza, John McCain, Hillary Clinton

The failure to effectively address the issue of illegal immigration is not limited to any one political party; many Republicans as well as a vast majority of Democrats are complicit in failing to secure America’s safety and sovereignty. Consider that the National Council of La Raza, the largest Hispanic advocacy group in the United States, honored Senator John McCain in 1999. During her presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton appointed a senior member of La Raza to her staff, and Obama appointed a La Raza leader as the director of the Office of Internal Affairs. Undoubtedly, this virulent pro-amnesty group enjoys a significant influence over public policy in American government. Funding of this group finds numerous foundations and individuals who espouse and promote a global ideology and “one world governance” over national sovereignty as key contributors.

Despite the above statistics, those who demand immigration enforcement and the rule of law are often labeled as racists and xenophobes. American cities and states like Arizona are reeling from the adverse financial and social effects of illegal immigration and unfettered legal immigration. They lack help from the federal government, which is more intent on creating an electoral majority to ensure the continuation of their power to facilitate the socialist makeover and takeover of the United States. Obama and his justice department are siding with criminals against the citizens of America. Arizona is attempting to restore order to a system of chaos created by the federal government. Instead of welcoming the help and choosing to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the Obama administration is imposing a socialist dictatorship and has drawn a line in the Arizona sand. The question is now whether that line becomes “Ground Zero” for this century’s American Revolution—a fight against the Balkanization of our country, and the eradication of our borders, our sovereignty and ultimately, our nation.

As noted by one Arizona Sheriff, “our own government has become our enemy.” The question is how, if and when law-abiding, patriotic American citizens will choose to engage that enemy. For the sake of our country, acceptance and acquiescence is not an option.

Copyright © Douglas Hagmann Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 95.

#10. To: Eric Stratton (#0)

the passage of SB 1070 by Arizona, and the federal government’s lawsuit to stop its implementation will be regarded the first battle of the 21st century American Revolution.

SB1070 is business as usual. That law does not require employers to check to see if the people they are hiring are legal or illegal. It does not provide for penalties to employers who hire illegals. Therefore, it has no real significance in keeping illegal immigrants out. If implemented it will result in selective petty harassment of a small minority of existing illegal immigrants in my state. The bill is emotional terrorism designed to support a federal immigration reform package that will bring in many millions of guest workers over a long period of time.

This is a Republican bill, sponsored by republicans, passed by repubican legislators and signed by a republican governor. It does not penalize employers for hiring illegals.

and it makes no distinction between people who have been here for a long time and those who come tomorrow.

Consider a fellow named Luis whom I met in March. He's 17 years old. He came where when he was 3. He speaks perfect American english. He graduated from an American high school. In his mind he is American. He has a wife and a child. and he is illegal. His wife is illegal, she's just like him, grew up here, but is illegal. Luis has had 3 encounters with police who asked him his legal status. The first 2 times he lied and said he was legal. The police believed him because of his perfect american english. The third time he was on a greyhound bus and it was federal ICE police who were interrogating every passenger. He chose not to lie this time. But he told the police that he had been here since age 3 and that he had a wife and child. The police did not arrest him out of sympathy. Should Luis be sent back to Mexico. Somewhere that he doesn't even know or remember?

There are huge numbers of people in Arizona who are like Luis. We can't send them home unless we let them stay here. This is their home. The funny thing is that our laws allow them to become legal if only they can afford to pay the legal fees. They can't.

SB1070 does not make any effort to stop new illegals from coming here to be hired. I know people who hire illegals even today.

I'm with Ronald Reagan. Let all the illegals who have held down a job or who have any roots here at all, such as time in an American school, let them stay here and become citizens. If they choose not to become citizens,then send them home. But let them have the chance to stay. They came here because the law allowed employers to hire them. Blame us for that, not them. and at the same time stop all new illegals from coming. How do you do that? You penalize the employers for hiring illegals. SB1070 does no such thing.

Here in Arizona there are many communities filled with illegals. There are many businesses who have valuable employees that are illegals. We're supposed to tear apart our society's fabric and do unjust things by kicking these people out? We're supposed to tell little children that they didn't want their daddies anyway and simply take that man away from his family. But we are supposed to simultaneously bring in guest workers who are like slaves and will be alienated from our society because they are like slaves. Such people who want such things are undesirables themselves.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   12:41:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Red Jones (#10)

Consider a fellow named Luis whom I met in March. He's 17 years old. He came where when he was 3. He speaks perfect American english. He graduated from an American high school. In his mind he is American. He has a wife and a child. and he is illegal.

Both Luis and his wife were given an education paid for by US taxpayers.

I would venture to bet we also paid for other entitlements through his and her duration in this nation.

Now AT 17 he has an anchor baby......no accident there I'm sure. And WE PAID for the birth of HIS child. WE paid for the formula and the diapers and the ongoing healthcare. This "poor" illegal surely isn't footing the bill to raise this kid. And you EXPECT us to foot that bill. If we refuse we will get fewer and fewer cases like Luis to consider.

Nobody forced Luis to have a child at 17. In fact, you want to reward irresponsibility. I didn't have children that the US taxpayers foot the bill for, so I don't believe I should pay for Luis and his offspring.

You want the lot of us to feel sorry for Luis and his illegal parents and his illegal status. Well, I feel that we've paid and provided enough. If he isn't on a path to citizenship by now, he NEVER will be. It's just not THAT important, as it wasn't for his parents. Why bother when all the goodies are available without citizenship?

abraxas  posted on  2010-08-04   14:11:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: abraxas (#14)

Both Luis and his wife were given an education paid for by US taxpayers.

where I live the local public schools are 90% mexican. Many of those children are themselves illegal or children of illegals. You take away those children and you are literally taking away a significant part of our community. I don't think responsible governments just export their people en masse like that.

And WE PAID for the birth of HIS child.

I'm under the impression that his parents worked and therefore would have paid taxes. Many people like to assert that illegals work for cash only. In my experience this is completely false. Few employers pay them cash. Most employers have them on the regular payroll which means they pay taxes. why do you want to take away our tax base? We are a struggling state in terms of money?

That fellow Luis himself worked, paid taxes.

Nobody forced Luis to have a child at 17.

The mexicans like to produce children and they start early in life. If you antagonize them, then you are dividing our country up and causing horrible grudges that will haunt us for many decades. They are becoming the majority in many locations whether you or I like it or not.

If he isn't on a path to citizenship by now, he NEVER will be

Luis told me that a lawyer told him that he could get papers to make him actually legal. But that the fee was way beyond his means. He'd like to be a citizen. This is his country.

Government's laws & policies should serve the people who are here. These illegal immigrants were allowed to come. They came. They sincerely contributed and became a part of our community. If government wants to serve the people, then it should serve these people. Government should not be used as a club to bash the people over the head. These people do not belong in Mexico, they belong here. They should be aggressively recruited to be citizens with full rights. In this way they will become loyal and good citizens. Republicans literally want to kick them out and replace them with guest workers. Guest workers are like slaves with no rights. It does not benefit us to have such people here. Let all the people who live here be free.

Remember the German Hessians who were mercenaries in service to the king of england during our revolution? They came here to fight against us. And yet well over half of them stayed and became Americans. that is what we need to do with the mexicans and other illegal immigrants. Another main priority should be to stop new illegals from coming. SB1070 makes no effort to stop new arrivals. Lots of illegals have decided to live here even though they can be sent to Mexico merely by a police encounter. They go years without speaking to a police officer. And a lot of the police officers won't even enforce that law. But when they live here under a murky legal status they will hold a deep grudge that will last for decades. I'm becoming the minority here, this does not help me. I wonder why my fellow Americans have abandoned me - it seems.

one of my mexican associates (Ivan) did have a police encounter about 3 weeks ago. He was sent back to Mexico. who knows what Ivan did to achieve the police encounter. But most of them have a steely determination to avoid police encounters and to simply deal with the police by being otherwise law-abiding and polite. and you know what the large majority of them will survive under SB1070 with that strategy. SB1070 is only emotional terrorism, it is not a serious effort to have a real effect.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   14:59:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Red Jones (#17) (Edited)

where I live the local public schools are 90% mexican. If you antagonize them, then you are dividing our country up and causing horrible grudges that will haunt us for many decades.

I'm under the impression that his parents worked and therefore would have paid taxes

The mexicans like to produce children and they start early in life

HUGE tax saving will come from deportation. If I ANTAGONIZE them? WHT?? I expect them to ABIDE BY THE LAWS as I AM SUPPOSED TO ABIDE BY THE LAWS. Who cares if they hold a grudge? Get over it. Sheesh, we have 20% of the Mexican population in this nation now, they need to go home and make Mexico livable.

If they paid taxes they did it on STOLEN SSC's. Somebody is a victim in THAT crime, not the illegals that's for sure. I call BS on your "impression" anyway. Stick with the facts.

Why don't you pay for the fees of Luis if you really do CARE so darn much? Why don't YOU personally do for him what he "cannot" do for himself? That would be much more productive that EXPECTING everybody else to pay for him and his kids and his citizenship. You can repay the state of AZ the $10K for the birth of his child while you are at it.

They would "produce" a lot less if they had to pay for the births and NOT the US citizens. I can't believe you support such lunacy. YOU pay for it if you think it's so great.

Yada, yada. These immigrants CAME AND MILKED THE SYSTEM by having dupes like you and me pay for their anchor babies and for their education and for their health care and for their welfare.

THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD SERVE ITS CITIZENS, not the US government. I don't expect Mexico to serve me, do you? That's more lunacy.

PS--If Luis loves this nation so much and wants citizenship SO MUCH, he can join the military and go fight wars for empire. Of course, YOU can pony up the fees and keep him out of harms way. Ivan could have done the same, or IF you really cared for Ivan you could have paid his way too.

YOU pay if that's what YOU believe, just quit expecting the lot of us to foot the bills.

abraxas  posted on  2010-08-04   15:53:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: abraxas (#30) (Edited)

These immigrants CAME AND MILKED THE SYSTEM

I hear stories that they milk the system. If that is true, then you must admit that system is available to them to milk. If they milk it, then I'll have a very limited amount of blame for them because they were allowed to do so. Point is - we have dysfunctionalism in our government, don't blame the mexicans for this.

do welfare agencies figure out who is a legal resident and who is not. I hear they don't even care. Why blame me for that situation? I didn't do it. The mexicans didn't do it either.

But I must take exception to you describing them this way. I am privileged to know illegal people who do extremely hard physical jobs in the hot sun and for very low wages. Those people I respect. Their employers who are normally white I do not respect. The politicians who refuse to sanction the employers I do not respect. The American citizens who are too stupid to figure out that the politicians will not sanction the employers I do not respect.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   17:28:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Red Jones (#50)

If that is true, then you must admit that system is available to them to milk

You find me ONE, just ONE anchor baby that the birth was paid for by the PARENTS and not the taxpayers. Just one in all these personal cases that you want to drag out to attempt to evoke sympathy from the lot of us.

Until then, just be honest about the MILKING going on. Yes, I want to change the system, not with some amnesty that REWARDS lawbreakers, but a system that STRIPS any freebies from ANY illegal. If they can't pay for anchor baby, then anchor baby isn't a citizen. That will reduce those numbers.

I know, how cruel to expect people WHO WANT CHILDREN to PAY FOR THEM.

I've never sucked off the welfare teat and I don't want to pay for illegals to suck off of it either. Nor do I wish to pretend they are all pius and wonderful while STEALING SS numbers from citizens, even children.

I am priviledged to know LEGAL immigrants. Of all the people in this land whom are against amnesty and this tripe you are pushing, the people who abided by the law and worked for citizenship are most vehmently AGAINST it. These people I RESPECT. You, on the other hand, DISRESPECT evey legal immigrant who has done what was necessary to attain citizenship LEGALLY.

abraxas  posted on  2010-08-04   17:42:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: abraxas (#52)

You find me ONE, just ONE anchor baby that the birth was paid for by the PARENTS and not the taxpayers.

abraxas !

all I know is that pregnant women go to the hospital or the doctor to get medical care. If they don't have private insurance, then a government insurance picks them up and pays. Or maybe in some cases the hospital pays and the cost is spread through all other fees to everyone.

Medical care is getting more and more difficult for us to pay for. and I do not think that either the democrats' open borders or the republicans' guest workers will help that situation. I think it is unfortunate that our government sets policy to drive wages down. I've advocated penalizing employers for hiring new illegal immigrants. That is a policy that would help to stop the downward slide in wages. I would want to advocate other such policies too. such as big changes in trade. we should produce goods and services ourselves and not import more than we can pay for with exports. We're building poverty for ourselves by importing much more than we can really pay for with exports and instead pay for those imports with new debt. This impoverishes us and makes health care much more difficult for many people to pay for.

I was very disappointed last year when Obama's health care reform bill did not make any attempt at all to lower the cost of medical care. Medical care is simply too expensive in this country. It is much more expensive here than anywhere else. Why? We should figure out why and make changes.

Mexico has much more affordable health care than we have. I read in the AZ Republic about how American retirees go down there and pay a very modest fee per year and get a lot of medical care for what they pay. And that medical program they spoke of was heavily subsidized by their government.

I read that a hip replacement in the US costs at least $100,000 and sometimes $125,000. But in New Zealand you get top quality care for the same thing and it only costs $30,000. and nowhere else in the world does it cost anywhere near what it costs here. In India it costs $12,000. Why is our system so expensive? I was very disappointed that Republicans didn't make this a theme. Nobody cared - at all. Don't blame the mexicans for our medical system being so extraordinarily expensive. In Mexico they don't have that problem.

I'm not joking, in the US the medical process & procedures are run to make them as expensive as possible. In America you'll go to the doctor three times to solve a problem and you'll have to set an appointment and wait for each time. while for the same problem in foreign countries you just walk in and before you leave they solved the problem for you - and the cost is a small fraction.

We have problems in our medical care industry, problems that greatly sand-bag our domestic industries who must compete with foreign competitors and yet almost nobody cares. Certainly democrats and republicans don't care.

Instead they all tell us that everything will be better if we put an expensive army on the border. It will not be better and we can't afford that expensive army. We need to figure out how to lower our costs now.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   18:46:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Red Jones (#65)

Instead they all tell us that everything will be better if we put an expensive army on the border. It will not be better and we can't afford that expensive army.

We have an expensive army already. What we can't afford is to have most of them overseas guarding the borders of Iraq and Bum***k Egypt and leaving our own border wide open. We could bring our troops home from all the countries they are deployed, and all at our expense, and put them where they could do some good. A big tall fence with an observation tower about every 300 yards or so with well-armed guards would solve a lot of the illegal immigration problem. Or, we could get the Mexicans to build a humongous rock wall and make sure that the last illegal was on the other side of it when they laid the last row of rocks.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-04   20:15:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: James Deffenbach (#86)

We have an expensive army already. What we can't afford is to have most of them overseas guarding the borders of Iraq and Bum***k Egypt

I can't argue with you there. the military spending is also insane.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-04   21:17:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 95.

        There are no replies to Comment # 95.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 95.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]