See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Agenda 21....You are dead....
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 15, 2008
Author: Henry Lamb
Post Date: 2010-08-06 01:37:14 by wudidiz
Keywords: None
Views: 146
Comments: 4
.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#2. To: wudidiz (#0)
The revealing story of a rancher and the national debt. ... http://www.ashevilletribune.com/archives/hage1.html The Banker's Manifesto and Sustainable Development. The Banker's Manifesto ties in with U.S. Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st ... "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; ... www.afn.org/~govern/safe.html Sustainable Development: The Root of All Our Problems Sustainable Development: The Root of All Our Problems Many Americans appear to be awakening from their slumber of apathy as government forces are making their move for total control of our lives. Massive TEA Party protests on April 15th, followed by more than 1000 again on Independence Day, show a growing movement of concerned, dedicated Americans. But there is a major component missing from those protests. There is a nearly universal lack of understanding of the issue of Sustainable Development and the dangers it poses to our liberty. Consequently, that issue is being left out of the protests. Meanwhile, as thousands attend the TEA Parties and protest the Federal Reserve, taxes, and out of control federal government, inside their local city halls, international forces are busy turning the communities into little soviets. I have been traveling the nation over the past few months sounding the alarm that we cannot win this battle to restore our Republic if we don’t understand that what we face is not a bunch of random issues – but a complete agenda of control – Sustainable Development. (Read my Spokane speech here Part1, Part2) Cap N Trade, global warming, population control, gun control, open borders and illegal immigration, higher taxes, higher gas prices, refusal to drill American oil, education restructuring, international IDs, natural health supplement control, food control, farming “reform,” control of private property, NAIS and UN Global Governance are all part of the Sustainable Development/Agenda 21 blueprint. To that end, I am focusing this entire issue on Sustainable Development to give activists all the ammunition they need to fight back. I am also including a list of more than 500 cities that are currently enacting Sustainable Development policies. If this is happening in your town (and it is), I urge you to challenge your local city council and mayor to stop these polices. The battles now must be fought on the local level. Remove Sustainable Development from every community and policies out of the federal government will be neutralized. And only then can we be on our way to restoring the American Republic. -------- Tom DeWeese Sustainable Development: The Root of All Our Problems In his book, Earth in the Balance, Al Gore warned that a “wrenching transformation” must take place to lead America away from the “horrors of the Industrial Revolution.” The process to do that is called Sustainable Development and its’ roots can be traced back to a UN policy document called Agenda 21, adopted at the UN’s Earth Summit in 1992. Sustainable Development calls for changing the very infrastructure of the nation, away from private ownership and control of property to nothing short of central planning of the entire economy – often referred to as top-down control. Truly, Sustainable Development is designed to change our way of life. In short, it’s all about wealth redistribution. Your wealth into a green rat hole. During the Cold War, communists tried to get us to surrender our liberties and way of life for the wisdom of Karl Marx. Americans didn’t buy it. But now, they have taken the same clap trap and wrapped it all in a nice green blanket, scaring us with horror stories about the human destruction of the environment – and so we are now throwing our liberties on the bon fire like a good old fashioned book burning—all in the name of protecting the planet. It sounds so friendly. So meaningful. So urgent. But, the devastation to our liberty and way of life is the same as if Lenin ordered it. We now have a new language invading our government at all levels. Old words with new meanings fill government policy papers. The typical city council meeting discusses “community development,” “historic preservation,” and “partnerships” between the city and private business. Civic leaders organize community meetings run by “facilitators,” as they outline a “vision” for the town, enforced by “consensus.” No need for debate when you have consensus! People of great importance testify before congressional committees of the dire need for “social justice.” Free trade, social justice, consensus, global truth, partnerships, preservation, stakeholders, land use, environmental protection, development, diversity, visioning, open space, heritage, comprehensive planning, critical thinking, and community service are all part of our new language. What are they really talking about? What mental pictures come to mind when those words are used? George Orwell realized that those who control language and manipulate key phrases can control policy. The language is being changed and manipulated to quietly implement a very destructive policy. Whenever you see or hear these words, know that, in every case, they are defining one thing - the implementation of Sustainable Development. Rather than good management of resources, Sustainable Development has come to mean denied use and resources locked away from human hands. In short, it has become a code word for an entire economic and social agenda. I have spent most of the past 12 years studying every facet of this new political agenda which is fast becoming a revolution—touching every aspect of our businesses, our public education system, our private property, our families and our individual lives. Interestingly, it is not a Republican or Democrat issue. It’s not liberal or conservative. It is being implemented on a purely bipartisan basis. It is now the official policy of the United States, put in force by literally every department of the government. It is the official policy of every state government, and nearly every city, town and county in the nation. But, I warn you, accepting the perception that Sustainable Development is simply good environmental stewardship is a serious and dangerous mistake. So what is Sustainable Development? The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like governance by making nature the central organizing principle for our economy and society. To achieve this, Sustainablist policy focuses on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control. Keep in mind that America is the only country in the world based on the ideals of private property. But, private property is incompatible with the collectivist premise of Sustainable Development. If you doubt that, then consider this quote from the report of the 1976 UN’s Habitat I conference which said: “Land …cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore, contributes to social injustice.” According to Sustainablist doctrine, It is a social injustice for some to have prosperity if others do not. It is a social injustice to keep our borders closed. It is a social injustice for some to be bosses and others to be merely workers. Social justice is a major premise of Sustainable Development. Another word for social justice, by the way, is Socialism. Karl Marx was the first to coin the phrase “social justice.” Some officials try to pretend that Sustainable Development is just a local effort to protect the environment—just your local leaders putting together a local vision for the community. Then ask your local officials how it is possible that the exact language and tactics for implementation of Sustainable Development are being used in nearly every city around the globe from Lewiston, Maine to Singapore. Local indeed. Sustainable Development is the process by which America is being reorganized around a central principle of state collectivism using the environment as bait. The best way to understand what Sustainable Development actually is can be found by discovering what is NOT sustainable. According to the UN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report, items for our everyday lives that are NOT sustainable include: Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment (capitalism, free markets). Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the UN’s Rio Earth Summit in 1992 said, “…Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” Are you starting to see the pattern behind Cap and Trade, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and all of those commercials you’re forced to watch about the righteousness of Going Green? They are all part of the enforcement if Sustainable Development. And one of the most destructive tools they use to force it on us is something called the “precautionary principle.” That means that any activities that might threaten human health or the environment should be stopped—even if no clear cause and effect relationship has been established – and even if the potential threat is largely theoretical. That makes it easy for any activist group to issue warnings by news release or questionable report and have those warnings quickly turned into public policy – just in case. Many are now finding non-elected regional governments and governing councils enforcing policy and regulations. As these policies are implemented, locally-elected officials are actually losing power and decision-making ability in their own communities. Most decisions are now being made behind the scenes in non-elected “sustainability councils” armed with truckloads of federal regulations, guidelines, and grant money. The Three Es According to its authors, the objective of Sustainable Development is to integrate economic, social, and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity. The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like governance by making Nature the central organizing principle for our economy and society. As such, every societal decision would first be questioned as to how it might effect the environment. To achieve this, Sustainablist policy focuses on three components; land use, education, and population control and reduction. The Sustainable Development logo used in most literature on the subject contains three connecting circles labeled Social Equity; Economic Prosperity; and Ecological Integrity (known commonly as the 3 Es). Social Equity As stated, Sustainable Development’s Social Equity plank is based on a demand for “social justice.” Today, the phrase is used throughout Sustainablist literature. The Sustainablist system is based on the principle that individuals must give up selfish wants for the needs of the common good, or the “community.” How does this differ from Communism? This is the same policy behind the push to eliminate our nation’s borders to allow the “migration” of those from other nations into the United States to share our individually-created wealth and our taxpayers-paid government social programs. Say the Sustainablists, “Justice and efficiency go hand in hand.” “Borders,” they say, “are unjust.” Under the Sustainablist system, private property is an evil that is used simply to create wealth for a few. So too, is business ownership. Instead, “every worker/person will be a direct capital owner.” Property and businesses are to be kept in the name of the owner, keeping them responsible for taxes and other expenses, however control is in the hands of the “community.” That policy is right out of the Socialist handbook. Economic Prosperity Sustainable Development’s economic policy is based on one overriding premise: that the wealth of the world was made at the expense of the poor. It dictates that, if the conditions of the poor are to be improved, wealth must first be taken from the rich. Consequently, Sustainable Development’s economic policy is based not on private enterprise but on public/private partnerships. In order to give themselves an advantage over competition, some businesses—particularly large corporations – now find a great advantage in dealing directly with government, actively lobbying for legislation that will inundate smaller companies with regulations that they cannot possibly comply with or even keep up with. This government/big corporation back-scratching has always been a dangerous practice because economic power should be a positive check on government power, and vise versa. If the two should ever become combined, control of such massive power can lead only to tyranny. One of the best examples of this was the Italian model in the first half of the Twentieth Century under Mussolini’s Fascism. Together, select business leaders who have agreed to help government impose Sustainablist green positions in their business policies, and officials at all levels of government are indeed merging the power of the economy with the force of government in Public/Private Partnerships on the local, state and federal levels. As a result, Sustainable Development policy is redefining free trade to mean centralized global trade “freely” crossing (or eliminating) national borders. It definitely does not mean people and companies trading freely with each other. Its real effect is to redistribute American manufacturing, wealth, and jobs out of our borders and to lock away American natural resources. After the regulations have been put in place, literally destroying whole industries, new “green” industries created with federal grants bring newfound wealth to the “partners.” This is what Sustainablists refer to as economic prosperity. Ecological Integrity “Nature has an integral set of different values (cultural, spiritual and material) where humans are one strand in nature’s web and all living creatures are considered equal. Therefore the natural way is the right way and human activities should be molded along nature’s rhythms.” from the UN’s Biodiversity Treaty presented at the 1992 UN Earth Summit. This quote lays down the ground rules for the entire Sustainable Development agenda. It says humans are nothing special – just one strand in the nature of things or, put another way, humans are simply biological resources. Sustainablist policy is to oversee any issue in which man interacts with nature –which, of course, is literally everything. And because the environment always comes first, there must be great restrictions over private property ownership and control. This is necessary, Sustainablists say, because humans only defile nature. Under Sustainable Development there can be no concern over individual rights – as we must all sacrifice for the sake of the environment. Individual human wants, needs, and desires are to be conformed to the views and dictates of social planners. The UN’s Commission on Global Governance said in its 1995 report: “Human activity…combined with unprecedented increases in human numbers…are impinging on the planet’s basic life support system. Action must be taken now to control the human activities that produce these risks” Under Sustainable Development there can be no limited government, as advocated by our Founding Fathers, because, we are told, the real or perceived environmental crisis is too great. Maurice Strong, Chairman of the 1992 UN Earth Summit said: “A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally-damaging consumption patterns. The shift will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations.” The politically based environmental movement provides Sustainablists camouflage as they work to transform the American systems of government, justice, and economics. It is a masterful mixture of socialism (with its top down control of the tools of the economy) and fascism (where property is owned in name only – with no control). Sustainable Development is the worst of both the left and the right. It is not liberal, nor is it conservative. It is a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to mankind. ....... MORE http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=124702 ======================== The "London" Connection Prince Charles the Sustainable Prince Synopsis of Prince Charles the Sustainable Prince by Joan M. Veon Paragraphs of Key Importance Book Cover Introduction However, our look cannot only deal with the man, but must deal with his politics, an empowered United Nations and empowered multinational corporations. The politics of the Prince, specifically the environmental philosophy, are enshrouded in "sustainable development" which is a merger between communism and capitalism. This merger then necessitates a new form of governance through public- private partnerships. The picture is complete when one considers both the empowered United Nations (which the Royal family directs) and empowered multinational corporations (which Charles influences through the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum. When all of these are placed into operation through public-private partnerships, all of society, as we know it, will change. We must understand each of these in order to know the "day and hour." Chapter 1 - The Rhodes Legacy Of particular interest with regard to the Milner (Kindergarten) Group was how the world would be ruled once under the British Empire. According to Quigley, "They feared the British Empire might fall into the same difficulty and destroy British idealism and British liberties by the tyranny necessary to hold on to a reluctant Empire. And any effort to hold an empire by tyranny they regarded as doomed to failure .... the Group feared that all culture and civilization would go down to destruction because of our inability to construct some kind of political unit larger than the national state, just as Greek culture and civilization in the fourth century B.C. went down to destruction because of the Greeks' inability to construct some kind of political unit larger than the city-state. This was the fear that had animated Rhodes, and it was the same fear that was driving the Milner Group to transform the British Empire into a Commonwealth of Nations and then place that system within a League of Nations" The United Nations became the successor to the League of Nations in 1945. While there are a number of major differences between the two organizations, the biggest difference was an empowered United Nations. The decisions of the League [of Nations] Council were essentially recommendations, whereas "the decisions of the [United Nations] Security Council are legally binding upon the Members of the United Nations." Chapter 3 - Philosophical Components of the Agenda (1) Public-Private Partnerships What is "public-private partnership?" Public-private partnership is just what it says it is. First, it is a business arrangement, sealed by an agreement or in some cases, a handshake. The terms of the partnership will vary, according to partners and objectives. Second, the parties in the partnership are public and private entities. Public entities refer to government -- -local, country, state, federal or global agencies. Private refers to non governmental groups such as foundations, nonprofit groups, corporations, and individuals. For example, foundations could include the Ford, the Rockefeller, or the local "good-works" foundation; nonprofits could refer to non governmental organizations like The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum, The Nature Conservancy, The Sierra Club, World Wildlife Federation, Planned Parenthood, NOW, etc.; and corporations could be any corporation from a small one to a multinational like Exxon, Johnson Wax, 3M, Black and Decker, or Giant Foods. Lastly, individuals could be any person -- such as a businessman, rancher, or dentist. A public-private partnership will always have as its goal a business-making venture that requires some form of "governance." The question is, since the players will vary in experience and wealth, who has the most power? We know from life itself that whoever has the most money has the power. For example, when a public-private partnership is comprised of governments, such as the County Department of Environmental Initiatives, the State Department of Environmental Resources; a number of private entities, like a Land Trust (foundation) and The Nature Conservancy (nonprofit); along with a corporation such as Black and Decker, the players with the most money control the partnership. In this case, it would be The Nature Conservancy, with assets of over $1B, and Black and Decker Corporation, with a capitalization of $1.6B. Representative government loses. Pubic-private partnerships were "unveiled" in June 1996 at the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II, held in Istanbul. In an interview I conducted with Dr. Wally N'Dow, Secretary- General of the Habitat II conference, he said, "We have got to a point where we cannot not partner with the private sector, as governments, as the civil society, as NGO's, but also as people active in international development such as the UN. That is what Istanbul tried to convey." In a follow-up interview with Dr. Noel Brown, former Director of the United Nations Environment Programme and currently Special Advisor to the Group of 77, he said of public-private partnerships, "I believe that the future of the UN will rest on effective partnering with the private sector -- with business and industry. But I also believe that the environment and the environmental community must also rethink its mission and redefine its role as we enter the phase of globalization and as we are on the threshold of the twenty-first century." While this concept may appear to be new, public-private partnerships have been used for the last twenty years in America as a method of providing financing to low-income families. HUD and its Office of Community Planning and Development has used public-private partnerships to create affordable housing since 1990. In addition, Maryland, Oregon, and Minnesota have implemented state-level public-private partnerships. It should be noted that as public-private partnerships continue to rise in the United States, our Constitution is being eroded as a result of the shift in power. It should be noted that as public-private partnerships continue to rise in the United States, our Constitution is being eroded as a result of the shift in power. The key to governance in the twenty-first century is the partnership between business, the private sector, and government. (2) Gaia - The Philosophical Shift As mentioned, the first United Nations environmental conference was held in 1972 with the second one, the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED), held twenty years later. UNCED, also called the "Earth Summit," was an unveiling of the philosophical shift from the Judeo-Christian world view to Gaia. The Programme of Action, called Agenda 21, is 297 pages long, and a second related document, Global Biodiversity Assessment, is over 1,100 pages long. Together these documents contain an agenda that can only be called evil, as the implementation of the action items will turn freedom into bondage and life into misery as all of what we know today will be replaced with a planned electronic society in which our only value will be to produce. This is the agenda Prince Charles is facilitating. In feudalistic times only the king and nobility owned land and had freedom. So, too, under United Nations rule, feudalistic times will return and the lights of freedom will go out. Charles has nothing to lose and the world to gain. Chapter 4 - Sustainable Development Let me provide for you my own paraphrased definition of sustainable development, which I think is simpler to understand and embraces all of their points: The world has too many people and if we do not reduce the number of people on planet Earth, they will use up all of the earth's resources so that future generations will be left without any resources. The United Nations is the best global body to monitor and manage and preserve the resources of the planet. The Philosophy of Sustainable Development Where does this concept come from? Before I went to the June 1996 UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II) in Istanbul, I was trying to figure out just where sustainable development came from. The number of people serving on the World Commission on Environment and Development who were Communist, Marxist or Socialist provided my first clue. In thinking about that, it occurred to me that this philosophy is not in our Constitution. I then looked in a constitution opposite of ours, the constitution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1977). I found my answer in Chapter 2, Article 18, which states, In the interests of the present and future generations, the necessary steps are taken in the USSR to protect and make scientific, rational use of the land and its mineral and water resources, and the plant and animal kingdoms to preserve the purity of air and water, ensure reproduction of natural wealth, and improve the human environment." In the executive summary of the book Business as Partners in Development Creating Wealth for Countries, Companies and Communities, the authors write, "In most cases, the debate is no longer about extreme alternatives -- about communism versus capitalism, the free market versus state control, democracy versus dictatorship -- but about finding common good." The Result of Sustainable Development This same interconnectedness can be seen in the merging of environment, economics and social issues into one. This is another aspect of the public-private partnership concept. As the environmental ideology permeates all aspects of life, it takes on a spiritual dimension that mirrors the Gaia philosophy, which is paganism. When the three become one through partnership, they form a philosophical approach that will change representative government in America. As the precepts of the Constitution are eliminated through new (UN policy guided) legislation, the power of the Constitution is eroded and in its place are public-private partnerships, which run parallel to representative government and form the new governance for the twenty-first century. This is a new twist to the concept of world government that most people visualize, and is the key to understanding how important is the Prince of Wales and the corporations to which he is providing leadership. Chapter 5 - Public-Private Partnerships and Governance are ONE It is on the global level that a number of key concepts and philosophies come together. Charles has adopted a very radical environmental agenda that calls for a planned society, using the environment and sustainable development as the reason for the change in governance (government) and freedoms. Public-private partnerships are the modus operandi to effect this change. The definition of governance by the UNDP (Chapter 4) is that public-private partnerships and governance (government) are one. In other words, sustainable development equals governance equals public-private partnerships equals ONE (government). We will be controlled on the local from the global through public-private partnerships. Quote from James Gustave Speth: Just as important, we look forward to a growing role in supporting the involvement and participation of NGOs and civil society organizations, including private business, in forging partnerships of many types -- partnerships [public-private] that are an integral part of the web of global governance and the glue that holds our troubled world together. (emphasis added) Chapter 6 - The Empowerment of the United Nations In order to understand the power which Charles has, we must look at the increased strength of both the United Nations and transnational corporations. It is not enough to state "Charles is powerful," one must explain how he is powerful in order to understand the magnitude of the day and the hour. Not only is the Rhodes legacy complete through the United Nations, but the apex of the global governmental structure is being revealed through his actions and activities. The Global (UN) to the Local Connection Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke, a Rhodes Scholar, was on the presidential delegation along with two other mayors from the United States. I asked him what his presence meant. He replied in part, "Well, what I have tried to do here is to let other members of the delegation and those from around the world know how important this conference is to mayors in the United States. We just wanted people to know how important this conference is. It is the beginning of a new era with local government officials being listened to in the development of UN documents and we see this as kind of the wave of the future." Just as local chamber of commerce chapters receive direction from the International Chamber of Commerce, so too, are mayors receiving direction from the global UN level. Chapter 6 - Multinational Corporations The following is a message from Dr. David C. Korten, president of the PDC Forum. The following are excerpts from his Internet message: On June 24, 1997, the CEOs of 10 TNCs [transnational corporations] met over lunch at the United Nations with the UN leadership and a number of senior government officials to chart a formalization of corporate involvement in the affairs of the United Nations. I attended the lunch. I found it a shattering experience for it revealed a seamless alliance between the public and private sectors aligned behind the consolidation of corporate rule over the global economy .... Chapter 7 - Fascism and the Empowerment of Corporations Many multinational and transnational corporations have assets and sales in excess of the value of most small and midsize countries. As if this power were not enough, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in Paris is lobbying to pass the Multilateral Agreement on Investments (MAI), which would give corporations unlimited rights in any country that signs the agreement. In the words of Tony Clarke, Director of the Polaris Institute in Canada, "The MAI is designed to establish a whole new set of global rules for investments that will grant transnational corporations the unrestricted 'right' and 'freedom' to buy, sell and move their operations whenever and wherever they want around the world, unfettered by government intervention or regulation. In short the MAI seeks to empower transnational corporations .... by restrict[ing] .... what national governments can and cannot do." I think the best definition of fascism, which basically points to everything the Prince of Wales believes and is doing, is: "Fascism adheres to the 'philosopher-king' belief that only one class -- which is by birth, education or social standing -- is capable of understanding what is best for the whole community and of putting it into practice." Chapter 8 - The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum is an educational charity with close to 50 multinational corporations from the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan, and several other countries on its executive directorate. The U.S. corporations who work very closely with the prince include: 3M, American Express, TRW, Coca-Cola, SmithKline Beecham, ARCO, CIGNA, DHL Worldwide Express, Levi Strauss & Company, The Perot Group, and U.S. WEST International. Additional partners are the American Chamber of Commerce, American Hotel & Motel Association, The Atlanta Project, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, The City of Charleston, the Ford Foundation, the Kellog Foundation, Eli Lilly, the New York City Housing Partnership, the Office of Ronald Reagan, the Soros Foundation, Texaco, Tufts University, Turner Broadcasting, USAID, and Warnaco, to name a few. The Forum is accountable to a board and council made up of the international CEOs and directors from the above listed principal supporters and funded by its members with programmes funded by other sponsors, international development agencies, and foundations. It works with the World Bank Group, United Nations agencies, the European Commission, Overseas Development Agencies, and a number of bilateral agencies from the UK, Japan, and North America. "The mission of the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum (PWBLF) is to promote continuous improvement in the practice of good corporate citizenship and sustainable development internationally, as a natural part of successful business operations. It aims to work with members and partners to: 1. Demonstrate that business has an essential and creative role to play in the prosperity of local communities as partners in development, particularly in economies in transition; The PWBLF operates in 26 countries and concentrates on post-Communist countries and developing economies. It has held 26 high-level international meetings in 18 countries involving 5,000 corporate, government, and non governmental leaders. Chapter 9 Charles -- The Hidden Prince In an interview that Prince Charles gave on BBC's "Newsnight" program in 1994, "he expressed his devotion to his work for Britain and the Commonwealth. He said, 'so much I try to do is behind the scenes. So it is difficult for people to understand how all the things fit together.' He also asserted that there is a common theme to all his projects and insisted they will turn out to be for the long term good." Charles -- The Defender of Faith As a result of my personal study and in light of the above, I have come to believe that when the United States ratified the United Nations Charter, we and the other countries of the world who were not part of Britain's Commonwealth reverted back under British rule through the United Nations organizational structure. Therefore, the fulfillment of the Rhodes Trust is complete. King Charles III There has been much speculation with regard to when Charles will become king. I surmise that he does not need a throne, for he already has one. The environmental agenda via sustainable development, and public-private partnerships with the world's largest and strongest multinational corporations, many of which have cash flows and assets exceeding that of most countries, provide Charles his throne. It appears that he rules behind the scenes, encouraging, expanding, pushing, and strengthening the agenda of the United Nations, partnering with the World Bank and other global agencies, all of which are advancing world government, a philosophy with which he is not uncomfortable. After all, there have been many kings, popes, and world leaders who have tried to attain it. http://www.womensgroup.org/APPENDIX.html ==================== British Israel: The Hidden Hand Behind the 'The Kingdom of God on Earth' [what Cornwallis told George Washington would be the 'divine kingdom'..."which is the British Empire overseen by the Grand Architect of Freemasonry..."] The Union Jack by Helen Peters (July 24, 2005) ... British Israel Uses Christian Fundamentalist Evangelicals to Promote the "Kingdom of God on Earth' Scheme to Deliver Up A One World Society-Both Feudal and Fascist By Ken Adachi | http://Educate-Yourself.org "British Israel" is a term used by Helen Peters in her 1970 book The Union Jack, to describe the manipulative efforts of elite British oligarchs to create a one world feudal society-controlled by British oligarchs of course - by first creating the state of Israel (the 1917 Balfour Declaration), and then using Christian fundamentalists to promote the idea that Christ will physically return to Earth and will rule a "Kingdom of God on Earth' for a thousand years (the 'Millennium') from His throne in -you guessed it-Jerusalem. The only problem is, after those million upon millions of 'Christian' fundamentalists passively give up their constitutional liberties, their country's sovereignty, and their freedom in the mistaken belief that the Apocalypse/Armageddon and End Times scenario is an inevitable 'prophecy' from God that must take place before we can be delivered into the happy world of the New Millennium, they will finally discover that they've been delivered into a satanic, feudal slave society that will no longer tolerate any talk of Christ or Christianity- assuming they are still alive to enjoy the 'Kingdom of God on Earth'.........." http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2005/08aug/... [not the complete URL] "The City" of London Isaiah 5:8 Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth! ... bible.cc/isaiah/5-8.htm Micah 2:2 And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away: so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage. bible.cc/micah/2-2.htm Habakkuk 2:4 Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith. 5Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, he is a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and is as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto him all nations, and heapeth unto him all people: 6Shall not all these take up a parable against him, and a taunting proverb against him, and say, Woe to him that increaseth that which is not his! how long? and to him that ladeth himself with thick clay! 7Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that shall vex thee, and thou shalt be for booties unto them? 8Because thou hast spoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall spoil thee; because of men's blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein. 9Woe to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house, that he may set his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the power of evil! ....... . bible.cc/habakkuk/2-5.htm / http://autismtreatmentnow.com/Secret_Banker%27s_Manual.pdf / bible.cc/micah/4-13.htm Psalm 83:4,12/Galatians 3:16-29; Psalm 2. For afore the harvest, when the bud is perfect, and the sour grape is ripening in the flower, he shall both cut off the sprigs with pruning hooks, and take away and cut down the branches. bible.cc/isaiah/18-5.htm
Chapter 1 - The Rhodes Legacy Of particular interest with regard to the Milner (Kindergarten) Group was how the world would be ruled once under the British Empire. According to Quigley, "They feared the British Empire might fall into the same difficulty and destroy British idealism and British liberties by the tyranny necessary to hold on to a reluctant Empire. And any effort to hold an empire by tyranny they regarded as doomed to failure .... the Group feared that all culture and civilization would go down to destruction because of our inability to construct some kind of political unit larger than the national state, just as Greek culture and civilization in the fourth century B.C. went down to destruction because of the Greeks' inability to construct some kind of political unit larger than the city-state. This was the fear that had animated Rhodes, and it was the same fear that was driving the Milner Group to transform the British Empire into a Commonwealth of Nations and then place that system within a League of Nations" The United Nations became the successor to the League of Nations in 1945. While there are a number of major differences between the two organizations, the biggest difference was an empowered United Nations. The decisions of the League [of Nations] Council were essentially recommendations, whereas "the decisions of the [United Nations] Security Council are legally binding upon the Members of the United Nations." This is the essence of the Illuminati religion called "British-Israel". THIS is the hidden hand behind it all. The city-state "nation" of THE CITY of London is the "nation" God is talking about in Genesis 15:13-14 (Galatians 3:16,17...29) that has afflicted Christian America for over 400 years (The United States Is Still a British Colony, Extorting Taxes For the Crown): Genesis 15:13 12And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him. 13And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; 14And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. ["great substance" see Micah 4:13 and Top Secret Banker's Manual by Tom Schauf http://autismtreatmentnow.com/Secret_Banker%27s_Manual.pdf ] Galatians 3:17 What I am saying is this: the Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. (NASB ©1995) Galatians 3:16Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ...... 29And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. http://kingjbible.com/galatians/3.htm Romans 4:13 For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith. Romans 9:8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants. 1 Corinthians 3:23 and you belong to Christ; and Christ belongs to God. Galatians 3:18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. Galatians 4:28 And you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise. (NASB ©1995) =========== "BRITISH-ISRAEL" contends that Britain is the "company of nations" God talked about in the Bible, that would rule over the world. From their world view: Ephraim and the Throne of David - The British-Israel-World Federation ... "...When Jacob returned to Bethel God told him that his name was to be changed to Israel because as the LORD said “I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins” (Genesis 35:11). The first thing to really take note of is that the Lord says “I am God Almighty” He is putting His very name, I am, on the line when we consider the level at which He is committing the honour of His Word of promise – when He declares that Jacob would become Israel (ruling with God or prince with God) and in so doing would develop into a great company of nations. Now it is a fact that ancient Israel never became such a company of nations. But a people called British, or Brith-ish (two Hebrew words) meaning “covenant man,” did become such a company or Commonwealth of nations. God is not talking about a company of churches, but a company of nations. If theologians spiritualise this mighty, mighty promise, coming from the Lord God of Israel, then they do great violence to the meaning of God’s declared Word – a very serious thing to do. The vision of the Kingdom of God upon Earth is the predominant theme of Scripture. The Bible is really a history book of a people called and set apart for service according to his great Purpose. They have been and still are a remnant in the Earth, constituting today only around ten percent of the world’s population – a tithe......" www.britishisrael.co.uk/showart.php?id=36 From a traditional Christian standpoint: A Little "Identity" Crisis~ British Israelism "....British-Israelism, which held that the British were the descendants of the lost tribes of Israel. The doctrine of British-Israelism and the Lost Ten Tribes was intended to forge a political alliance between the British monarchy and the Jews of Amsterdam, through a merger of the Arthurian Imperial tradition with Cabalistic interpretations of the Hebrew scriptures…. “To forge ties between Jewish merchants and British Imperialists, John Dee created the concept of British-Israel, which gave the British and the Jews a common racial identity, and invoked biblical prophecy to show the inevitable triumph of British Imperialism: the British, as Abraham's seed, were to inherit the earth. Dee also introduced the Jewish Cabala to the British ruling class and its interlocking network of European royal dynasties. All this set the stage for the later absorption of European Jewish merchants and bankers into British society…In essence, the dissemination of the British-Israel doctrine was an intelligence coup carried out by the British Monarchy.” 62. It is from this thinking, which correlates with J.H. Allen’s writings, comes the propagation of the idea that the British Crown is of the Davidic Line. Hence, those who are spreading that idea are also disseminating British Israelism, deliberately or not. A telephone conversation April 7, to John Hagee Ministries revealed that, while having been charismatic, they now refer to themselves as "Info-Revival". Their church has been organized with a governmental leadership of 12 and the congregation is divided into twelve tribes. They now teach that the "Chosen people" are Israelites and all Christians must be Israelites, therefore each must become part of one of the Israeli tribes. According to the Hagee Ministry representative, those failing to adhere to one of the 12 tribes gets prayed over until they desire to belong. They do not consider themselves to be a Messianic congregation. Next Section: The British Israel /Christian Identity Connection Previous Section: The Cecil Rhodes Connection....." BTW, the kings of Abraham's loins are Christians in Revelation 5:9-10, not the Druids sitting in palaces in Europe. Revelation 5:9And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; 10And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth. Revelation 5 - The Lion, the Lamb, and the Scroll - Title Deed to Planet Earth?....God’s will, his final settlement of the affairs of the universe.” (Barclay) This is based on the idea that customarily, under Roman law, wills were sealed with seven seals, The City of London, British Monarchy, AntiChrist...a tremendous website covering the British Monarchy at al [I haven't scratched the surface yet, so I won't vouch for all of it, but it is well worth taking a look]. Excerpt: "The Merovingian Kings, their supposed Holy Bloodline (and their true progenitor), have a rich and twisted history all their own, yet is directly connected to the supposed findings of the Templars in that they are the connective link between the Christ lineage and European Royalty, which is believed to include the Hapsburgs, Plantagenets, and Stuarts, among others. According to this latest revived heresy developed with a very specific purpose and timeframe yet to play out, Jesus did not die on the cross and rise from the dead becoming mankind's Salvation, instead it is claimed He had sex with Mary Magdalene, survived the Roman crucifixion, and lived to father at least one, or a number of Divine children, the firstborn said to be a son named Judah or Merovee, a name later given to the first Merovingian King in France (447 to 458 AD) while others believe the child was actually a daughter, given the name of Sarah (or Tamar, which became the name of an ultra-secretive organization whose task it was to protect future Merovingian descendants). Regardless of the supposed names, titles, and endless genealogies, an entire race of enlightened Christ-like beings each leading to the next in succession in some Messianic Dynasty has supposedly passed down through the ages toward a final One who would rule in the name of Christ, albeit, in the stead (instead) of Christ. This could only be Anti-Christ. The same who take these fanciful claims of Christ having 'holy' children who twist it into historical fact also say these "truths" were kept hidden from the rest of the world, having been suppressed by the Catholic Church and revealed only by the original Knights Templar who then passed these shocking revelations on to an underground stream of alchemists, astrologers, cabalists, necromancers, and elite Royal families through various secret societies such as the main inheritors of the Templarian secrets, the Freemasons. The fact that this information is becoming known and falsely tauted as the Bloodline of Christ to this generation indicates the time of the Merovingian Antichrist revealing is near. The British Royal Family's own links to this supposed Bloodline and history is damning in of itself (as it turns out to be a lineage dating back to Cain, and not Christ at all) passing through the Merovingian Kings of France and into Scotland where it became known as the House of Stuart, of which Princess Diana is descended from and becomes her more legitimate trace to this Bloodline of the Holy Grail which is why, as it is believed, she was selected by the British Royal Family* for the most infamous of arranged marriages. To the Occult mind, she literally was the Holy Grail, the receptor of Christ's Blood, the embodiment of the Divine Feminine, and her womb would bring forth a powerful King into the world who provides the many curative powers attributed to the Grail for the healing of a wounded world. With certain guidance from their 'spirit masters' over a span of six millennia, secret societies such as the modern Knights Templar and others each have their role as protector to the ancient lineage, as Guardians of the Holy Grail, unseen hands throughout the ages carrying out the will of one who made it. As such, this Bloodline was always to find its way down thru history, thru the vanquishing of ancient advanced civilizations, thru the rise and fall of great empires, thru violent crusades and times of inquisition right into our own modern age and into its intended final recipient, who according to the Occult texts, seems much more to be an Antichrist figure than anything even remotely resembling Jesus Christ. Might it be therefore that this Bloodline, being "the secret of all ancient secret societies," is currently being made public and purposefully released into the mainstream of society as a way to lay a foundation for further "secrets" to come, to deceive the masses? Have you ever noticed that all of these same secrets go at great strides to denegrate the Divinity of Christ, while promoting a questionable lineage that is actually connected to the coming Antichrist? *See Article 'Occult Freemasonry in London's Buckingham Palace' Through the ages, the secret of the "Holy lineage" has gone by many names, strange metaphors, and Occult symbols with those possessing it believing themselves to be true and rightful heirs of Jerusalem, they being the true Kingdom of [their] God on earth and gods of a Divine Monarchy whose right it is to rule the world. Heresy at best as some might attribute, yet it is their own elitist belief and prophecy in a soon revealed King from the lineage of King David, of Anglo-Messianic descent which arises to preside over all the world at a time he's needed most, that is most intriguing. So the current British Royal Family sought out a young Virgin, not for the love that many, including Diana herself, were at first deceived with, yet the seedy marriage arrangement was devised for one purpose only, for the Merovingian ancestry Diana held, knowing the firstborn child produced would be an heir to the Merovingian-Grail lineage and therefore rightful heir to the Throne of David. However, what is seen by them to be another incarnation of the Christ must give way to the far more ancient warnings in Scripture which speak of an earthly King that arises in the place of Christ, instead of Christ, who is perceived to have all the credentials to make himself the World Messiah yet who is the Antichrist. Scriptures refer to this one as the last Evil King and Beast who together with his Prophet, shall deceive the nations and Israel into a covenant made not with peace and security, yet with death and hell. What else should we know in advance to this obvious DaVinci Code disinformation campaign currently running which is actually serving to educate and outright deceive the world about a supposed Bloodline from Christ taking us? Where is all of this "evidence" of a Merovingian King in line to the British Throne having rights to be called Israel's Messiah leading us? The hidden heirs to the Knights Templar devised a method to pass on their sacred knowledge; a system that eventually developed into Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism and the Invisable College, which later transmuted into the Royal Society in England. Rosslyn: Guardian of the Secrets of the Holy Grail p. 126 I read all night, fascinated. I literally couldn't put the DaVinci Code down. By morning, when I had finished the book, I wanted to know what was true. As soon as my local bookstore opened I was there rummaging through scores of books that had been mentioned or alluded to: Holy Blood Holy Grail, The Templar Revelation, the Gnostic Gospels, Nag Hammadi Library, and many more. I discovered to my surprise that there were dozens of recent books about Mary Magdalene, Goddess culture, the sacred feminine. I found shelves full of Occult books on Templar traditions, secret societies, and several places mentioned that I had never heard of before. Secrets of the Code p. xv The Spirit speaketh expressly that in the End Times many shall depart from the Faith and instead listen to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons. There shall be false prophets and teachers who shall bring forth damnable heresies denying that Jesus Christ is Lord. And many shall follow their destructive teaching; by reason of whom they shall speak evil of Christ [therefore] Make certain that they teach no other Gospel, neither give heed to legends and endless genealogies. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, and they shall turn away their ears from the Truth and instead shall be turned unto vain legends. And now ye know what withholdeth [Antichrist] until he is revealed in his time. For the Mystery of Iniquity doth already work until He be taken out of the way and then shall that Wicked One be revealed, whose coming is the work of Satan with all power, signs and lying wonders......" Antichrist Identity King Arthur Prince William 666 Clinton Ortiz Antichrist Bible Code Prophecy Mayan Calendar Survive Doomsday 2012 Comet World War Iran Nuclear Israel War Jewish Messiah Moshiach Secret Satanic Bloodline New Age Antichrist Armageddon Lucifer Angel Magic Kabbalah Occult Jewish Antichrist Knights Templar Freemason Illuminati Antichrist Moshiach Conspiracy Third Temple Holy Grail Celtic Druid England Rosslyn Chapel Nostradamus Antichrist Mabus UK Antichrist Alien Clone Christ Reptilian Satan Zionist Antichrist Mashiach Avalon Moshiach Antichrist Just trying to connect a few more dots and wake people up, particularly Christians, who have been horribly blindsided, to rise up and do their part: http://kingjbible.com/isaiah/52.htm p.s. "the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider." ....and they will hopefully understand their only hope is in Jesus, and we are ALL heirs to the world, BUT ONLY THROUGH HIM. It will be HIS way, or the highway. Take it or leave it. Psalm 2:12. One final OUTSTANDING article on The City: One World Earth Corporation: "....In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world. ..." One World Earth Corporation: Part IV POLITICAL ECONOMIC PLAN STRATEGY Basically the plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire productive capacity of each country throughout the world into a series of great “State-owned” departments, which would then be “corporatized”, then “privatized” to City of London Corporation International banks and corporations, which they control. Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with most of the land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways, communications, media, roads, electricity, energy, food, water, waste management, housing, farms, commercial property, schools, hospitals, police, social welfare, Inland Revenue etc. transferred into statutory corporations, companies or land trusts which indirectly would be owned by City of London banks. The “peasants” would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and small assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main assets of each country would be owned by their multi – national corporations and banks. In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world. Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole world would eventually be transferred into a Communist “United Nations” World Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country would be “regionalized” and ruled through “Regional Councils” through a United Nations dictatorship called a “Parliamentary Assembly” which would be just another name for a Soviet style “Central Committee” and all independent, sovereign, national governments would be totally abolished. As the result of the P.E.P. Plan originally formulated in 1932, right now every country’s “State assets” (owned in trust by the State on behalf of the people) are being frantically “privatized” by City of London-controlled banks and corporations primarily under the directions of two leading Fabian Socialist writers Sir Roger Douglas and John Redwood. Sir Roger Douglas’s book “Unfinished Business” and John Redwood’s book “Public Enterprise in Crisis” are the primary handbooks being used by central and local government finance ministers and officers all around the world to sell off each nation’s “family silver” and State assets with the more “sensitive” public assets being transferred into Fascist-type Public-Private Partnerships (PPP’s) which are designed to make the public masses and peasantry “think” that they have some degree of control when in reality they have none as the real ownership of the assets are held by the City of London banks and corporations who fund them. Until relatively recently, John Redwood was head of N. M. Rothschild & Sons London global Overseas Privatization Unit that is coordinating the entire global privatization process. Sir Roger has been contracted as a consultant by City of London Banks, the World Bank and others to advise on national privatization programs as well. Fabian Society “Regionalization” of the World through UN and EU Control of Regional and City Councils. All of the countries in the world currently are being “regionalized”. Presently, for example, the whole of the United States is being “regionalized” and the EU Committee of the Regions, based in Brussels, is “regionalizing” every country in the European Union. As the result of this radical “regionalization” process, Britain has now already been effectively abolished, having been divided up into 9 separate regions of the EU, plus Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This cunning process, which is being “gradually” implemented to destroy the power of the central national government in each country, is commonly referred to as “Devolution” by the Queen and Fabian Society. Unlike the rest of the autonomous regions in the UK which, like most of the other regions in the EU that have become virtually powerless through their representation in the European Parliament which is now only a “talking shop”, the City of London Corporation as a separate region by itself within the Union – now rules the European Union. This is because all of the Commissioners are appointed (not elected) to the European Commission by City of London-controlled business leaders and bankers in their respective countries. Right now throughout the UK all city councils and regional councils are dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent’s properties, while at the same time they are quickly expanding their debt levels for unaffordable capital works programs via loans from City of London banks which policies are deliberately intended to prepare for the councils’ “privatization” whilst transferring the local government in each country to “regional councils” which ultimately will become or be controlled by “Regional Parliamentary Assemblies,” identical to the old structure in the former Soviet Union which first regionalized then abolished the national governments before they set up their republican socialist police state. ************************************ “These individuals and organizations must be tripped up with every step, cut off at every turn, exposed with every opportunity, and thwarted in every action taken: the Bank Of International Settlements (BIS), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Club Of Rome, The Committee Of 300, the Central ‘Intelligence’ Agency (CIA), the Council On Foreign Relations, The Tri-Lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Groups, the ‘Federal’ Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service(s), Goldman Sachs, Israel and the Israeli lobby, the Vatican, the City of London, Brussels, the United Nations, the Israeli Mossad, and the primary chosen mouthpiece of the beast, the Associated Press (AP).” __________________________________________________________________ NOTE: This editor took the liberty of partitioning this paper for ease of referencing. Permissions granted by John Christian: “This ‘paper’ is written in the public interest, and may be freely reprinted or republished, in full or in part, for profit or not, by whomsoever wished to use it. Copyright John Christian April 2006.” anticorruptionsociety.com...arth-corporation-part-iv/ Back to full article anticorruptionsociety.com.../the-city-world-conquest/ or here: The City of London & the Fabian Society: History & Current Plans “We are at present working discreetly, but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of the world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands.” Arnold Toynbee...... "....British PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior's globalist "war on terror" is a classic Fabian Socialist strategy. The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887 and included the statement: "The Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism the abolition of private property etc." (Of course this does not apply to the elect oligarchy at the top who end up owning the lot!). Fabian Socialism is a "mixture" of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and Communism all bundled together. However, it is much more deadly because it is much more clever and subtle. Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in defense of Bolshevism. It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New Civilization. In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US Senate Committee on the judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M. Bogolepov, a former Red Army officer stated that the entire text had been prepared by himself in the Soviet Foreign Office. Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the Fabian Society (commissioned by author/playwright co-founder George Bernard Shaw) today (now archived) is a "wolf in sheep's clothing."....." www.gnosticliberationfron...of_london__the_fabian.htm Note the cross and the wolf in sheep's clothing. Matthew 15:7 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. http://bible.cc/matthew/7-15.htm Note the dragon. http://greatreddragon.com and http://greatreddragon.com/toc.htm I hope it's clear where Agenda 21 is coming from... http://www.lordmayorsshow.org/visitors/history/gogmagog / http://bible.cc/ezekiel/39-6.htm
#4. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#3)
06/20/06 Chapter 5. 1. Fourth Era - Devourings of Money Power, in the United States 06/20/06 Chapter 6. 1. Fourth Era - Devourings of Money Power, in the United States [continued] 06/22/06 Chapter 7. 1. Devourings of Money Power, in the United States [continued] ====================== also: http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg...ouis-t-mcfadden-1932.html Isaiah 62:8The LORD hath sworn by his right hand, and by the arm of his strength, Surely I will no more give thy corn to be meat for thine enemies; and the sons of the stranger shall not drink thy wine, for the which thou hast laboured: 9But they that have gathered it shall eat it, and praise the LORD; and they that have brought it together shall drink it in the courts of my holiness. 4Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate: but thou shalt be called Hephzibah, and thy land Beulah: for the LORD delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married. 5For as a young man marrieth a virgin, so shall thy sons marry thee: and as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee. http://kingjbible.com/isaiah/62.htm / kingjbible.com/revelation/21.htm
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
« on: August 07, 2009, 12:38:00 AM »
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13459
By Tom Deweese Friday, August 7, 2009
Synopsis of. Prince Charles the Sustainable Prince. by Joan M. Veon ....
2. Raise awareness of the value of corporate responsibility in international business practice;
3. Encourage partnership action between business and communities as an effective means of promoting sustainable economic development."
#3. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#2)
(Edited)
http://www.enduringword.com/commentaries/6605.htm
Replies to Comment # 3. Note the dragon. http://greatreddragon.com and http://greatreddragon.com/toc.htm
2. The Money Power Has Kept Our Currency Constricted
3. The Crash of 1837
4. The Crash of 1857
5. The Money Power Devoured Our Commercial Marine
6. The Money Power Destroyed Our New York Merchants
7. The Money Power Devoured our Railroads
8. Jay Gould an Agent for British Capitalists
9. Cornelius Vanderbilt an Agent of the Money Power
10. Thomas A. Scott, an Agent of the Money Power
11. Colis P. Huntington, an Agent of the Money Power
12. John W. Garrett, an Agent of the Money Power
2. The Money Power Devours our Oil Industry
3. The Money Power Devours Chicago
4. The Money Power Crushes All Our Industries, By Inducing The Crash of 1873
5. The Money Kings Devour Our New England Mills
6. The Money Power Devoured Our Iron Industry
7. The Money Power Has Devoured The Cotton Trade
8. The Money Power Has Devoured The Wheat and Grain Trade
9. The Money Power Has Devoured The Live Stock Trade In Cattle
10. The Money Power Has Devoured the Trade in Hogs, Pork and Bacon
11. The Money Kings Devoured the Dressed Beef Traffic
12. The Money Power has Devoured our Whiskey Trade
13. The Money Power Has Devoured Our Export Trade
14. The Money Power Devours Our Currency
Industries Now Being Devoured by the Money Power
2. The Money Power Is Crushing Our Coal Mines
3. The Money Power Is Devouring Our Gold and Silver Mines
4. The Money Power Is Devouring Our Lumber Trade
5. The Money Power Is Devouring Our Flour Manufactures
6. The Money Power Is Devouring The Cattle Ranches Of The Western Plains
7. The Money Power Is Devouring All Branches
Of Production And Trade In Our Country
8. The Money Power Is Devouring the Retail Trade
9. The Money Power Is Devouring our Farms
1. Farms Mortgaged
2. Land Loan Agencies
3. The Money Power Is Crushing The Farmers
4. The Money Power Has Broken Down the Wheat Market
5. The Money Power Broke Down the Cotton Market
6. Boards of Trade Are Instruments Controlled At Will
7. The Money Power Determined To Have The Farms
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.