See other Editorial Articles
Title: Empty Store Shelves Coming to America
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://inflation.us/videos.html
Published: Aug 7, 2010
Author: inflation.us
Post Date: 2010-08-07 03:03:31 by wakeup
Keywords: None
Views: 400
Comments: 21
Poster Comment: Everyone here has six months of water and food, right?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: wakeup (#0)
Rice and Beans.
I do have a berkey lite water filter and the mohawk river down the street. :) I live in the city of schenectady right now. Not a good place to be in a meltdown. When Giuliani cleaned out NYC most of the trash moved to cities like schenectady, so I am expecting LA type rioting when the shelves go empty. For that event, I have been stocking up on ammo and filling holes in my gun cabinet. One thought these videos triggered in me head was how do I safeguard my most important preparations, since I won't always be able to be here to guard them. I decided that my next step is going to be to build false walls into a couple of my closets with enough room to stash some food, a large gun and ammo supply, reloading stuff, water filter, junk US silver, etc. I'll leave a tiny portion out to satisfy looters. Using 3/4" plywood, I can make a convincing wall that won't be easily breachable. I'll paint it to match and hope that the spooks won't be smart enough to figure it out. :)
#2. To: wakeup (#0)
Everyone here has six months of water and food, right?
Waiting too late to oppose tyranny has always led to bloodshed.
Hair Extensions Five Towns Merrick Manhasset Roslyn Massapequa Amityville Wantagh Farmingdale East Meadow Long Island, NY
#3. To: ndcorup, critter, wakeup (#1)
over here you can find out all the reasons for America's woes
#4. To: wakeup (#0) (Edited)
IMO, the upcoming collapse of the Dollar will be the PERFECT CRISIS for the governments of the USA, Canada, and Mexico to MERGE their currencies into the Amero. Bush and Obama have engaged in record peacetime deficit spending; so too did Herbert Hoover and then Franklin Roosevelt (even though in the 1932 election campaign, FDR promised Americans a balanced budget). Bush and Obama approved massive federal interventions into the financial sector, at the behest of their respective Treasury secretaries. Believe it or not, in 1932 the allegedly “do-nothing” Herbert Hoover signed off on the creation of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC), which was given billions of dollars to prop up unsound financial institutions and make loans to state and local governments. And as with so many other elements of the New Deal, FDR took over and expanded the RFC that had been started under Hoover. In the past year, the government has seized control of more than half of the nation’s mortgages, it has taken over one of the world’s biggest insurers, it literally controls major car companies, and it is now telling financial institutions how much they can pay their top executives. On top of this, the feds are seeking vast new powers over the nation’s energy markets (through the House Waxman-Markey “Clean Energy and Security Act” and pending Kerry-Boxer companion bill in the Senate) and, of course, are trying to “reform” health care by creating expansive new government programs. For anyone who thinks free markets are generally more effective at coordinating resources and workers, these incredible assaults on the private sector from the central government surely must translate into a sputtering economy for years. Any one of the above initiatives would have placed a drag on a healthy economy. But to impose the entire package on an economy that is mired in the worst postwar recession, is a recipe for disaster. Conventional economic forecasts for government tax receipts are far too optimistic. The U.S. Treasury will need to issue far more debt in the coming years than most analysts now realize. Yet even the optimistic forecasts are sobering. For example, in March the Congressional Budget Office projected that the Obama administration’s budgetary plans would lead to a doubling of the federal debt as a share of the economy, from 41 percent of GDP in 2008 to 82 percent of GDP by 2019. The deficit for fiscal year 2009 (which ended Sept. 30) alone was $1.4 trillion. For reference, the entire federal budget was less than $1.4 trillion in the early years of the Clinton administration. Clearly the U.S. government will be incurring massive new debts in the years to come. The situation looks so grim that economist Jeffrey Hummel has predicted that the Treasury will default on its obligations, just as Russia defaulted on its bonds in 1998. But another scenario involves the Federal Reserve wiping out the real burden of the debt by writing checks out of thin air to buy up whatever notes the Treasury wants to issue. Many analysts are worried about Fed chairman Ben Bernanke’s actions during the financial crisis; Marc Faber is openly warning of “hyperinflation.” To understand what the fuss is about, consider some facts about our monetary and banking system. The United States has a fractional reserve banking system. When someone deposits $100 in a checking account, most of that money is lent out again to other bank customers. Only a fraction – typically around 10 percent – needs to be held “on reserve” to back up the $100 balance of the original depositor. A bank’s reserves can consist of either cash in the vault or deposits with the Federal Reserve itself. For example, suppose a given bank has customer checking accounts with a combined balance of $1 billion. Assuming a 10 percent reserve requirement, the bank needs $100 million in reserves. It can satisfy this legal requirement by keeping, say, $30 million in actual cash on hand in its vaults and putting $70 million on deposit in the bank’s account with the Fed. Normally, the Fed expands the money supply by engaging in “open market operations.” For example, the Fed might buy $1 billion worth of government bonds from a dealer in the private sector. The Fed adds the $1 billion in bonds to the asset side of its balance sheet, while its liabilities also increase by $1 billion. But Bernanke faces no real constraints on his purchasing decisions. When the Fed buys $1 billion in new bonds, it simply writes a $1 billion check on itself. There is no stockpile of money that gets drained because of the check; the recipient simply deposits the check in his own bank, and the bank in turn sees its reserves on deposit with the Fed go up by $1 billion. In principle, the Fed could write checks to buy every asset in America. Since the start of the present financial crisis, the Federal Reserve has implemented extraordinary programs to rescue large institutions from the horrible investments they made during the bubble years. Because of these programs, the Fed’s balance sheet more than doubled from September 2008 to the end of the year, as Bernanke acquired more than a trillion dollars in new holdings in just a few months. http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/data/credit_easing/index.cfm
Perfect.
===========================================
How Barack Obama is destroying the dollar – and perhaps ushering in the Amero
December 14th, 2009
by Bob Murphy, LewRockwell.com 
Will the Amero replace the US Dollar?
First under the Bush Administration and even more so under President Obama, the federal government has been seizing power and spending money as it hasn’t done since World War II. But as bold as the Executive Branch has been during this financial crisis, the innovations of Fed chairman Ben Bernanke have been literally unprecedented. Indeed, it is entirely plausible that before Obama leaves office, Americans will be using a new currency.
Monetary Catastrophe
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
#5. To: Critter (#2)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
#6. To: Itistoolate (#3)
S510 - Illegal To Grow, Share, Trade, Sell Homegrown Food
By Steve Green
8-6-10
S510 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-510, the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, may be the most dangerous bill in the history of the US. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-510
"If accepted [S 510] would preclude the public's right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God." It is similar to what India faced with imposition of the salt tax during British rule, only S 510 extends control over all food in the US, violating the fundamental human right to food." ~ Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower.
Monsanto says it has no interest in the bill and would not benefit from it, but Monsanto's Michael Taylor who gave us rBGH and unregulated genetically modified (GM) organisms, appears to have designed it and is waiting as an appointed Food Czar to the FDA (a position unapproved by Congress) to administer the agency it would create without judicial review if it passes.
S 510 would give Monsanto unlimited power over all US seed, food supplements, food AND FARMING.
History
In the 1990s, Bill Clinton introduced HACCP (Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Points) purportedly to deal with contamination in the meat industry. Clinton's HACCP delighted the offending corporate (World Trade Organization "WTO") meat packers since it allowed them to inspect themselves, eliminated thousands of local food processors (with no history of contamination), and centralized meat into their control. Monsanto promoted HACCP.
In 2008, Hillary Clinton, urged a powerful centralized food safety agency as part of her campaign for president. Her advisor was Mark Penn, CEO of Burson Marsteller*, a giant PR firm representing Monsanto. Clinton lost, but Clinton friends such as Rosa DeLauro, whose husband's firm lists Monsanto as a progressive client and globalization as an area of expertise, introduced early versions of S 510.
S 510 fails on moral, social, economic, political, constitutional, and human survival grounds.
1. It puts all US food and all US farms under Homeland Security and the Department of Defense, in the event of contamination or an ill-defined emergency. It resembles the Kissinger Plan.
2. It would end US sovereignty over its own food supply by insisting on compliance with the WTO, thus threatening national security. It would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Instead, S 510 says:
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.
Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.
3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into "the United States." Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, "entry of food into the US" covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and "entering into" it by virtue of being produced.
4. It imposes Codex Alimentarius on the US, a global system of control over food. It allows the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the WTO to take control of every food on earth and remove access to natural food supplements. Its bizarre history and its expected impact in limiting access to adequate nutrition (while mandating GM food, GM animals, pesticides, hormones, irradiation of food, etc.) threatens all safe and organic food and health itself, since the world knows now it needs vitamins to survive, not just to treat illnesses.
5. It would remove the right to clean, store and thus own seed in the US, putting control of seeds in the hands of Monsanto and other multinationals, threatening US security. See Seeds How to criminalize them, for more details.
6. It includes NAIS, an animal traceability program that threatens all small farmers and ranchers raising animals. The UN is participating through the WHO, FAO, WTO, and World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) in allowing mass slaughter of even heritage breeds of animals and without proof of disease. Biodiversity in farm animals is being wiped out to substitute genetically engineered animals on which corporations hold patents. Animal diseases can be falsely declared. S 510 includes the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), despite its corrupt involvement in the H1N1 scandal, which is now said to have been concocted by the corporations.
7. It extends a failed and destructive HACCP to all food, thus threatening to do to all local food production and farming what HACCP did to meat production put it in corporate hands and worsen food safety.
8. It deconstructs what is left of the American economy. It takes agriculture and food, which are the cornerstone of all economies, out of the hands of the citizenry, and puts them under the total control of multinational corporations influencing the UN, WHO, FAO and WTO, with HHS, and CDC, acting as agents, with Homeland Security as the enforcer. The chance to rebuild the economy based on farming, ranching, gardens, food production, natural health, and all the jobs, tools and connected occupations would be eliminated.
9. It would allow the government to mandate antibiotics, hormones, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and GMOs. This would industrialize every farm in the US, eliminate local organic farming, greatly increase global warming from increased use of oil- based products and long-distance delivery of foods, and make food even more unsafe. The five items listed the Five Pillars of Food Safety are precisely the items in the food supply which are the primary source of its danger.
10. It uses food crimes as the entry into police state power and control. The bill postpones defining all the regulations to be imposed; postpones defining crimes to be punished, postpones defining penalties to be applied. It removes fundamental constitutional protections from all citizens in the country, making them subject to a corporate tribunal with unlimited power and penalties, and without judicial review.
For further information, watch these videos
Food Laws Forcing people to globalize?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PwqUQ_HIlg&feature=related Corporate Rule?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXoJHG-er7A&feature=related Reclaiming Economies?
http://www.rense.com/general91/dehe.htm
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
#7. To: Eric Stratton (#5)
You can get a Berkey for a hundred if you buy it with a load of eFoodsdirect.
OneDollarDVDProject.com
New DVDs: Sheriff Mack, Meltup and Fluoride.
#8. To: wakeup (#7)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
#9. To: Eric Stratton (#8)
http://www.efoodsdirect.com/products_accessories.html http://www.readymaderesources.com/cart/index.php?act=viewCat&catId=145
#10. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#4)
No, it will be the perfect excuse for the U.S. military to launch a coup in the U.S. In Mexico, it will be an excuse for the drug cartels to seize complete control of Mexico. And Canada, I am not sure what will happen there.
IMO, the upcoming collapse of the Dollar will be the PERFECT CRISIS for the governments of the USA, Canada, and Mexico to MERGE their currencies into the Amero.
#11. To: PaulCJ (#10)
Why bother? What is more important, the fact, or the appearance?
In Mexico, it will be an excuse for the drug cartels to seize complete control of Mexico.
he who wants bread is the servant of the man that will feed him, if a man thus feeds a whole people, they are under his control.
#12. To: PaulCJ (#10)
No, it will be the perfect excuse for the U.S. military to launch a coup in the U.S. Against who? The Democrats? Republicans? Federal Reserve? CIA? Who will they be fighting and who will they be loyal to? I am asking you since you seem to know alot about the military.
God is always good!
#13. To: ratcat (#9)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
#14. To: RickyJ, PaulCJ (#12)
Already, each US Reserve unit has a 'sister' unit somewhere in the EEU (Europe). Those UN troops are increasingly being indoctrinated into the internal workings of the US Military ON U.S. soil (annual training). These troops will eventually used to 'help' control rioting and 'insurrections' in the US when the bottom falls out of the WORLD economy. The current economic crisis will disintegrate into a need for martial law, which will spiral down into totalitarianism. Just look at the events and overwhelming changes that have taken place already in the US in the past 12 years if you don't believe these things are the eventuality. Unless Americans can regain control of their own government SOON, this WILL happen.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
#15. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#6) (Edited)
Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party. 3. It would allow the government, under Maritime Law, to define the introduction of any food into commerce (even direct sales between individuals) as smuggling into "the United States." Since under that law, the US is a corporate entity and not a location, "entry of food into the US" covers food produced anywhere within the land mass of this country and "entering into" it by virtue of being produced. how do they figure that, since in their own words "the United States" is NOT a land mass, but a corporation.... a fiction, a figment of someone's imagination? (even direct sales between individuals) "Individuals" aren't people....they are "persons" or "corporations" created by the fraudulent 14th Amendment of "the United States". These agreements between fictions created by man do not, in reality, apply to the men and women created by God who have separated themselves from the fiction. If "government" wants to keep food from entering the gullets of the fictions they have created, it appears they have the "legal" [not "lawful"] right to do so, but not to do the same with God's creation who know who they are and have taken steps to serve notice of the same. If it takes a bloody war to affirm that, well, maybe that is where we are headed. From the commercialredemption website: "ALL CRIME IS COMMERCIAL 27 CFR 72.11 Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime. fixed i hope
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
#16. To: Eric Stratton (#13)
Not really. We have one (since Y2k) and have never used it. We have a well, so as long as we can get water out of it (even if we have to bail it out with a bucket), we won't really need the Berkey. I guess you have to consider your likely water source and how dirty/contaminated it might be, ie: rain water, pond water, etc. Some pre-filtration (with coffee filters/cheesecloth) might be required to get the big particles out and then the water can be dumped into the Berkey to do the rest. The Berkeys with the light are cool looking but I don't know how practical. Best wishes (to us all).
Have you got a recommendation as to which system?
#17. To: wakeup (#0)
Great videos! Thanks for posting them.
#18. To: ratcat (#16)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
#19. To: Eric Stratton, 4 (#13)
We use the Stainless Steel Imperial Berkey and the KDF 55 shower filter, which I last ordered from thewaterexchange.net who have all sorts of filtration devices and applications. You can taste the purity of Berkey filtered water and see the clarity in the ice cubes. Austin's water has some sort of pink sludge (as seen in the toilet bowls) consisting of God-only-knows what sort of crap. I choose not to ingest it, or give it to the hounds to drink.
#20. To: Lod (#19)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
#21. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#14)
2. Those UN troops are increasingly being indoctrinated into the internal workings of the US Military ON U.S. soil (annual training). 3. These troops will eventually used to 'help' control rioting and 'insurrections' in the US when the bottom falls out of the WORLD economy. 4. The current economic crisis will disintegrate into a need for martial law, which will spiral down into totalitarianism. 1. Already some European nations are moving away from the Euro and back to their national currencies. 2. Which will probably make the military shift to support the people. 3. Remember the quote, a gun behind every blade of grass. 4. In reality, the depression is sparking revolutions across the world.
1. Already, each US Reserve unit has a 'sister' unit somewhere in the EEU (Europe).
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest