[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: Heritage: Iran Announces Acquisition of S-300 Air Defense Systems Iran Announces Acquisition of S-300 Air Defense Systems According to Iran’s Fars news agency, Iran has obtained four S-300PT air-defense missile systems. Fars claimed that this report was first revealed last year by another news agency—one linked to Hezbollah—and that Iran never disputed the story. The report claimed that two of the four systems came from Belarus; details about the source of the other two systems were not provided and have not been reported elsewhere since the Fars claim. Belarus has denied any involvement in such a deal. In fact, the story begins well before last year. According to a report by Mark Harrington from February 2008 in Jane’s International Defence Review, Belarus and Iran were then finalizing a major arms deal, conceived at an exhibition in Minsk in May 2007 attended by Iranian President Ahmadinejad and other senior Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps leaders. Harrington’s sources enumerated many details. For instance, Iran was to purchase two surplus S-300PT (also known as SA-10 “Grumble”) systems, composed of two types of Fakel-class missiles, which had been recently deployed around Minsk. These were to be broken down and transported by air to Iran, covered as ordinary cargo, along with a full complement of spare parts and Belarussian training and maintenance personnel. In addition, at the time of Harrington’s report, Belarussian personnel had already completed the repair and upgrade of two other S-300PT systems already possessed by Iran since the late 1990s. Belarus’ asking price for the entire package totaled $140 million USD. All this was supposedly done without the knowledge of Russia, the original manufacturer. U.S. intelligence is aware of the threat of the emergence of Iranian S-300 systems. Another Jane’s report highlighted a November 2008 conference at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, titled “Iranian Surface-to-Air Missile Systems.” Though the content of that meeting is classified, one day of the conference was devoted to a case-by-case review of Iranian systems, which included a 45-minute session titled “SA-20 SAM Systems.” The SA-20 is a more modern, longer-range variant of the S-300 system. Its inclusion in a briefing otherwise focused on known Iranian systems is indicative of a belief—already present in 2008—that the advanced system was likely to soon become operational. The Heritage Foundation’s Ariel Cohen has explained that Iranian deployment of the S-300 system would be a “game-changer in the Middle East.” Iran’s existing air defense system is outdated and unable to defend against airstrikes targeting its nuclear facilities, but an Iranian-manned S-300 network could significantly restrict the West’s military options—even more than they already are. For example, Israel does not possess aircraft with stealth technology; the S-300 system was designed to defend against primarily conventional warplanes, and its possession by Iran could severely hamper Israel’s ability to strike effectively. Iran’s announcement creates more questions than answers. If Iran has obtained even the early SA-10 variant of the S-300 system, its air defense capabilities have evolved considerably almost overnight. If Iran obtains the more modern SA-20 variant, American contingency strike plans will surely become even more limited because of that system’s greatly enhanced range, survivability, and capability. However, the intelligence on this subject remains patchy, and in the past, Western planners have demonstrated a great capability to overwhelm Soviet- and Russian- made anti-aircraft missile systems. Nick Krueger is the Jordan Saunders Intern in the Young Leaders Program at the Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm. Poster Comment: This is the first story that has put some meat on the bones of this story. I'm giving it some credence on the basis of the fact that Heritage, as a big neocon megaphone, would be the last perhaps to bolster Iranian assertions or propaganda. If there is any truth to this story, it may be a "game changer" as suggested in this article. I have no love for imams or mullahs or what have you, but if this blunts Netanyahu's drive to bull us into his war, I'm going to sleep a little bit better at night.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: randge (#0)
Is that the same system that the Israelis blew buy when they did the hit on the North Korean nuke plant in Syria a few years back?
No. It's reputed to be superior to the Patriot system.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||