[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade

Oktoberfest tightens security after a deadly knife attack in western Germany

Wild Walrus Just Wanted to Take A Summer Vacation Across Europe

[Video] 'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up

Police robot dodges a bullet, teargasses a man, and pins him to the ground during a standoff in Texas

Julian Assange EXPOSED

Howling mad! Fury as school allows pupil suffering from 'species dysphoria' to identify as a WOLF

"I Thank God": Heroic Woman Saves Arkansas Trooper From Attack By Drunk Illegal Alien

Taxpayers Left In The Dust On Policy For Trans Inmates In Minnesota


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: MEXICO - Vicente Fox has solution for drug cartels: "LEGALIZE DRUGS"
Source: Bloomberg
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010- ... on-as-way-to-end-violence.html
Published: Aug 10, 2010
Author: By Jonathan J. Levin and Jens Erik Gould
Post Date: 2010-08-10 11:26:55 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: SB1070
Views: 1089
Comments: 100

Mexico Ex-President Fox Calls for Drug Legalization

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox said his country should legalize the production and sale of drugs in order to curb rising cartel-related violence.

Legalizing narcotics would curtail funding to organized crime groups, who are using profits from the drug trade to consolidate power, Fox wrote yesterday on his personal website.

“Radical prohibition strategies have never worked,” Fox said. “The cost of the fight against organized crime, and in particular narcotics trafficking, has been enormous in our country.”

The drug war has killed 28,000 people in Mexico since late 2006, when President Felipe Calderon entered office vowing to take on the cartels, according to data from the government intelligence agency, known as CISEN. That’s keeping tourists away and limiting foreign direct investment, Fox said.

Fox said in a July 28 interview with Bloomberg Television that the U.S. as well as Mexico were responsible for the violence.

“What is happening is that this huge market of the United States in drug consumption, the largest in the world, is generating the weapons that are sold to Mexican cartels, and is generating the money that is laundered in the United States and brought to Mexico,” Fox said.

Arms Trafficking

More than 90 percent of weapons used in violent crimes in Mexico are brought in illegally from the U.S., according to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives.

President Barack Obama vowed during a visit to Mexico last year that the U.S. would take more aggressive steps to help the country battle drug cartels by urging the Senate to ratify a decade-old treaty on arms trafficking in Latin America.

Calderon, a member of Fox’s National Action Party, said last week that he was open to debate on the legalization issue, even as he said he was personally opposed to the idea because it represented a health risk to society.

Legalization measures have worked in other countries, which use new taxes on the products to finance addiction recovery programs, Fox said.

In 2009, Mexico decriminalized possession of small amounts of drugs including marijuana, cocaine and heroin.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 66.

#31. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

I'm with Fox on this one.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-08-10   22:05:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#31)

I'm surrounded

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2010-08-10   22:11:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#34)

Happy, don't you think it's the profit motive that keeps the drug traffick business going? Perhaps decriminalizing drugs might be a solution that would work to lower the abuse rather than increase it.

christine  posted on  2010-08-10   22:32:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: christine, all (#40) (Edited)

Happy, don't you think it's the profit motive that keeps the drug traffick business going? Perhaps decriminalizing drugs might be a solution that would work to lower the abuse rather than increase it.

Thank you!

If it wasn't for the profit motive, there would be no drug problem. The ones that buy it will buy it whether it's "illegal" to do so or not. But the ones that sell it care only for the money.

If it were up to me, I'd legalize it, and tax it, and put that money where no one could even touch it unless they were providing rehab.

I saw a program once where heroin addiction was cured in one hour. I don't remember the specifics other than it's done with one injection. Maybe your husband knows about this?

Evidently it's a rather hazardous thing to go through so they do it in hospitals. I'd build those hospitals.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-08-11   8:32:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: PSUSA (#57) (Edited)

If it were up to me, I'd legalize it, and tax it, and put that money where no one could even touch it unless they were providing rehab.

======================================================

IT?

Which ones would you legalize? What would be the cutoff age? 12?

I see nobody here has a clue on what an opium war can do. HINT: CHINA

This country is lethargic to the point of being brain dead.

NEXT: Use US troops to protect the opium fields of Afghanistan, and make sure to issue each one world wide a bag a day to smoke, just to keep them alert on the job.

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2010-08-11   8:58:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#62)

I can only assume then that you are against the notion of Constitutional governance and rule of law. Pity. We need more consistent types on our side. If you think violating rule of law and the Constitution is good for some things and not others, you're playing the same game as the neocons/progressives and the rest of the anti-freedom crowd.

Your signature line is amusing to me now. Clearly you don't care about the supreme law of the land, the Constitution, so the question of borders is moot. Why bother at all, eh, open them up. It's not like we have a country under your vision, really, lacking a strictly defined and adhered to Constitution.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-08-11   9:05:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: SonOfLiberty (#64)

I can only assume then that you are against the notion of Constitutional governance and rule of law. Pity.

=========================================

ASSuming has made an A$$ out of you then.

Suddenly, enforcing the law in this country has become AGAINST THE LAW!

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2010-08-11   9:09:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 66.

#68. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#66) (Edited)

ASSuming has made an A$$ out of you then.

Ad hominem. Invalid argument.

Suddenly, enforcing the law in this country has become AGAINST THE LAW!

If a "law" is unconstitutional and blatantly so, then it needs to be removed from the books. This is standard Federalist/anti-Federalist thought. Have you bothered to read the founding documents of this nation? Just curious.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-08-11 09:14:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 66.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]