[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MAHA MEME

noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G

Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple?

"The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy

Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards

Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence

DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General

Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’

Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does

Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here.

Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary

Lefties losing it: Trump’s YMCA dance goes viral

Elon Musk: "15 Products You'll Stop Buying After You Know What They're Made Of"

Walmart And Other Major Retailers Canceling Billions In Orders Amid Fears Of A Dark Winter Ahead

Joe and Jill Biden deliver final 'kick' against Kamala Harris on election day

Relative importance of carbon dioxide and water in the greenhouse effect: Does the tail wag the dog?

Fired FEMA Employee Speaks Out, Says It Was Not Isolated Incident: Colossal Event Of Avoidance

Judge Merchan Hands Trump Historic Victory Donald Receives Stay on Felony Conviction

PNut the Squirrel was marked for death and decapitation from the start as rabies test results are negative

Yemeni forces strike military base in Tel Aviv with hypersonic ballistic missile

SheÂ’s lying. The FEC shows the payment

Speaker Johnson Orders Entire Biden Administration to Preserve and Retain All Records and Documents

Boeing has given up on diversity.

Trump Targeting up to 100,000 Deep Staters for Absolute Exile From DC

FBI Execs Rush to Retire After Trump Victory Leaves Them Shell-Shocked.

Witness to Tragedy: Huge Financial Incentives Led Hospitals to Use COVID Treatments That Killed Patients

‘Knucklehead’: Tim Walz returns to Minnesota ‘defeated'

Study Confirms the Awesome Destructive Power of Sugar in Utero Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

Ukraine mobilizing mentally challenged and deaf people lawmaker

COL. Douglas Macgregor : Trump and Netanyahu At Crossroads


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Report: 1 in 15 kids in U.S. has illegal immigrant parent
Source: East Valley Tribune
URL Source: http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/ar ... 84-11df-9c10-001cc4c002e0.html
Published: Aug 11, 2010
Author: Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services
Post Date: 2010-08-11 21:07:27 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 1861
Comments: 119

Report: 1 in 15 kids in U.S. has illegal immigrant parent

Posted: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:52 pm | Updated: 5:47 pm, Wed Aug 11, 2010.

Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services | 2 comments

About one out of every 15 children in the United States was born to a family where at least one parent is in this country illegally, according to a new report Wednesday.

And four out of five of those 5.1 million children -- including 340,000 born in just 2008 -- are citizens because they were born in the United States, the Pew Hispanic Center concluded. That, according to some, makes them ``anchor babies'' for their illegal parents.

The figures, which the organization calculated based on 2009 U.S. Census Bureau estimates, are the best estimates to date of the scope of the issue which has resulted in calls to amend the U.S. Constitution to deny automatic citizenship to children solely by virtue of their birth within this country.

That percentage of children of illegal immigrant may be increasing.

The overall figure is about 6.8 percent of all children 17 and younger who have at least one illegal immigrant parent. But Pew Hispanic figures that 7.9 percent of all births during 2008 -- that 340,000 figure -- were offspring of "unauthorized'' immigrants.

Researchers peg the number of illegal immigrants in the United States at something slightly in excess of 4 percent of the total population.

"But because they are relatively young and have high birth rates, their children make up a much larger share of the newborn population and the child population in this country,'' the report states.

The report does not say how many of those 5.1 million children of illegal immigrants are in Arizona.

But Jeff Passel, the senior demographer at Pew Hispanic Center, pointed to an earlier study which concluded that Arizona has about 4.2 percent of the total illegal immigrants in the entire country.

Using that as a rough estimate, that translates to more than 214,000 children from birth through age 17 in the state where at least one parent is not here legally. And, based on the Pew figures nationwide, about 170,000 of these would be considered "anchor babies'' born in this country.

That also tracks with estimates in previous Pew reports which show that up to 110,000 children in Arizona public schools were born in this country into families where one or both parents are undocumented, with possibly 65,000 more school children who are themselves illegal immigrants.

The numbers will figure in the debate over the future of the 14th Amendment.

It states that children born or naturalized in the United States are citizens of both this country and the state where they reside. Courts have interpreted that to entitle citizenship to those born in the United States regardless of whether one or both parents had no legal right to be here.

Some foes, including Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, argue those rulings are flawed.

He noted that the amendment makes its provisions conditional on the children being "subject to the jurisdiction'' of this country. Pearce said courts, citing that language, concluded for years that did not entitle Native Americans to citizenship.

"There's no doubt where they were born,'' he said.

It was only after Congress specifically altered the law regarding citizenship for Indians that the situation changed.

Pearce is weighing whether to have Arizona bring a new challenge to those court rulings.

That would take the form of a state law denying birth certificates to children born in Arizona unless they could show at least one parent is in this country legally. That likely would provoke a lawsuit.

But Pearce said a simpler course would be to have the issue handled at the federal level.

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is pushing to amend the Constitution to spell out that mere birth within U.S. borders does not entitle someone to citizenship. That process, though, is cumbersome, requiring either a constitutional convention or ratification of any change approved by two-thirds of the U.S. House and Senate by three-fourths of all state legislatures.

Pearce, however, said that's not necessary.

"Congress could fix it tomorrow,'' he said. "All it needs is clarification.''

He pointed out that the 14th Amendment, which also deals with issues of voting rights and who can hold office, also spells out that Congress "shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.''

"So they put it in there in case there was some abuse, or something misunderstood,'' Pearce said.

Applicable language of 14th Amendment

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-79) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#80. To: mirage (#73)

a mirage is an illusion. Can't have a discussion with an illusion. the nature of your discussion indicates that there is no real discussion with you, it is a mirage.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-13   18:04:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Red Jones (#80)

Well so far I've proven you wrong on everything, so you're choosing to duck and ignore now.

Lawyers' tricks all.

In a real debate, resorting to insults signals surrender. I'm still waiting for your retraction and apology. I accept your surrender.

Somewhere, Jimmy Carter is laughing and saying, "Finally! I won't be the worst President ever!"

mirage  posted on  2010-08-13   18:29:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Red Jones (#77)

1. I sincerely hope that I am among the men who are tasked to fight against the invaders.

2. James told me we didn't owe them (Mexicans) anything. I answered him and told him what we owe them is respect.

1. Uh, why are you going to fight the invaders sometime in the future when you are welcoming them now? Sounds a bit schizophrenic to me.

2. We "owe respect" to people whose first act in coming to America is a crime against us? LOL! I think not. Respect is not given, it is earned. People who jump to the head of the line ahead of folks who have been standing in the line a long time get no respect from me.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-13   19:13:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Red Jones (#79)

If they have an emergency situation they should be able to call '911' and be treated like citizens. Their children should be welcomed in the schools.

Yeah, they should be able to call 911 or whatever its equivalent is IN MEXICO and be treated like a citizen. And their children should be welcomed in the schools IN MEXICO. It is not the duty of Americans to pay for every blessed thing illegal aliens want for goodness sakes.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-13   19:16:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: James Deffenbach (#83)

well I certainly appreciate your views. and I do not consider them to be illogical or unreasonable

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-13   19:24:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Red Jones, Jethro tull, James Deffenbacj, randge, All (#79)

we have an obligation to at least respect their presence.

Few Americans would agree with that view.

As an indicator of the illegals "desire" to assimilate and be Americans, legally, there have been many estimates of their "love" in case of war. All of the views I have read in the past agree that in wartime, there would be a FLOOD OF WOULD BE AMERICANS GOING SOUTH OF THE BORDER FOR SAFETY.

Indicator of Mexicans for one, showing loyalty to friends, was WW2, they declined to enter WW2 until Germany sent their oil tankers headed to America to the bottom.

They then entered the war, did NOTHING, took our aid, so the open hand is their national pastime.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-08-13   19:27:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Cynicom, 4 (#85) (Edited)

“Give me your tired, and your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to be free…
these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

"NOW SHOW ME YOUR STINKIN' PAPERS, JOSE, OR I'LL GIVE YOU AN ENEMA WITH A .38 SPECIAL. WHO ARE YOU TO MAKE A MOCKERY OF THOSE IMMIGRANTS WHO OBEY OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS"?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-08-13   19:53:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Cynicom (#85)

the open hand is their national pastime.

Droppin' trou and making anchors must be running it a close second.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-13   19:54:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: Jethro Tull (#86)

“Give me your tired, and your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to be free… these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

The legal way.

There were no handouts, they made it on their own.

In case of war and the beaners flood south, watch the very same Americans demand we respect their wishes to go "home" for safety.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-08-13   19:58:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: James Deffenbach, Jethjro tull, all (#87)

"Non-citizens

The Selective Service (and the draft) in the United States is not limited to citizens. Howard Stringer was drafted in 1965, six weeks after arriving from his native Britain.[82][83] Today, non-citizen males of appropriate age in the United States, who are permanent residents (holders of Green Cards), seasonal agricultural workers, refugees, parolees, asylees, and even illegal immigrants, are required to register with the Selective Service System.[84] Refusal to do so is grounds for denial of a future citizenship application." In addition, immigrants who seek to naturalize as citizens must, as part of the Oath of Citizenship, swear to the following:

... that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law;[85"

I wonder how many of our illegal little friends have bothered to register??????? Such laws are for Americans, not freeloaders looking for a handout.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-08-13   20:07:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Cynicom, 4 (#88)

The legal way.

Of course. To argue for anything else is to strike down a nation's capability to orderly allow immigration to ebb and flow as needed. All else is anarchy and adds an unsustainable tax burden on an already over taxed people. As for the businesses who hire illegals, I wouldn't hire them to remove as much as a weed from my lawn. How would I know the business hired illegals? I'd profile by first asking the business owner if he hired illegals and second by listening to the language of the workforce. I only hire English speakers as communication is important to satisfying the customer (me).

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-08-13   20:12:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Jethro Tull (#90)

Here in hills, the native trailer park, white trash, are not nice people because we have no tolerance for "outsiders". Therefore the beaners hustle thru the area, seldom lingering. They are smart enough to smell "bias" when they tarry too long.

Hey, we dont like others, others dont like us, so we are even, just leave us alone, AND STAY THE HELL IN MEXICO.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-08-13   20:22:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: Cynicom (#91)

We're bigoted, biased and could care less what others think or feel. The closest I've come to anything near a Mexican is watching Señor Wences do his act on the old Ed Sullivan show. Despite all the Diversity I've missed in my lifetime, I feel just peachy.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-08-13   20:34:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: All (#92)

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-13   21:21:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Red Jones (#77) (Edited)

I'm probably not going to have time this session to address all of your points but I'd like to start by referring you to Luke 4:25-27 for consideration on your spiritual perspective: King James Reference Bible - The Book of Luke, Chapter 4

In addition to those scriptures which tell of Jesus explaining that two major prophets were sent to help and heal Gentiles during famine and affliction, Jesus explained that His own people were the priority of His ministery. The Gentiles who came to Him for help, like the Centurion and the woman who beseeched Him for crumbs from the Master's table, received compassion and healing miracles too but from a distance during that time. Can you see the correlation to America's historical efforts in trying to help and heal the conditions of others, even to the point of overlooking and undermining the best interests of its own citizens, and the situation now where America must focus on helping its own because it is stumbling under the weight of what you and those you are lobbying for expect it to bear?

From Luke 4:23. And he said unto them, Ye will surely say unto me this proverb, Physician, heal thyself

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-14   5:02:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: Red Jones (#77)

we have lots of common practices that favor foreign born people in jobs. An economist did a study a few years ago and found that over a period of about 2 years he studied 91% of all new jobs in america went to foreign born people. I witnessed an employer in the construction industry decide not to even try to hire any americans for their work. I heard a part- owner of a trades contractor say that it was a waste of time, in justification of his decision to advertise for job openings in a spanish language radio station and hire 100% foreigners who are likely illegal. this happens every day. and it is OK according to the law.

My point is that america is not for the americans according to how things are done. and anybody who tries to say these things in public is told to shut up and if they persist they're said to be racists. We're a nation that doesn't even know how to stand up for our own national interest.

Don't blame me for that.

Everybody here has been trying to stand up for our own national interest and you have been calling that racist. America has been virtually landmined by foreign and domestic enemies of our Constitutional system to be destroyed and some people don't even realize that's what they are doing. Stop working for them and calling for the criminal invaders who have wronged us to be rewarded with "amnesty" for that again. As I said before: Been there, done that, bad idea. I am willing to support your call for businesses to be restricted from hiring illegals and even from employing any guest workers whenever employment of Americans here is below 100%. I don't think anyone here wouldn't support your stand for enforcement against businesses that aid and abet illegal invaders. There is a workable alliance for you on that issue. Stop pushing the envelope for more bad government to favor your illegal compadres. Complaining about bad government favoring foreigners while calling for more bad government to favor foreigners isn't helping the problem of bad government at all.

You asked me very sincerely to comment as to why arizona does not pass a law to punish the employers for this behavior. Please don't hold me responsible for the Arizona republicans. they don't work for me. I could just as easily say that we should boycott people from Illinois or otherwise hate them because Obama came from Illinois. and the Obama government pursues policies of war and torture which are abhorrent, therefore we should persecute Illinois. Is it really a person in Illinois' fault if the washington government does evil things. Its not my fault and not your fault either that the washington government does evil things.

You asked me to say why I thought it was America's job to provide jobs for mexicans. James told me we didn't owe them (Mexicans) anything. I answered him and told him what we owe them is respect. Especially if they live here and fit in as workers and community members. They came. They took the jobs. The employers did favor them.

I asked you to say something about NAFTA too. Please try to do that at your earliest convenience. Which Democrats there have tried to get such a law passed and which Republicans stopped it? How long have Republicans had that much influence there? The Governor before Brewer was a Democrat. "They came. They took the jobs. The employers did favor them." sounds like the equivalent of Israel's MO to "create facts on the ground" in defiance and violation of law and human rights that they believe should stay as they want because they say so. Illegal alien migrants do not have some "human right" to demand America adopt an Open Border policy for them.

Even though we were wronged by the institutions that rule our country and we feel a very deep grievance over that, we should still remember that we have an obligation to do the right thing. And we shouldn't want wrong done to these illegal immigrants who do live here. I know that some of you have told me you don't care about their children born here. I respect your feelings. But I'm not going to go tell some 8-year old kid that his life must be turned upside down because his mommy & daddy were on the wrong side of a policy dispute. and I won't say it is a just thing if my government does that. a little kid growing up in our community is a high priority. Our world should be ordered so that the kid has a good place to live. injustice that reigns down on us does not remove this simple obligation that we have.

Your next to last sentence sounds very close to a globalist pitch for a New World Order agenda. The illegal are not the wronged party, we are, and we are not having a "policy dispute". They are criminal invaders and you are disputing any deportation of them as such. Military families here move often -- out of country too. How many parent illegals within the recruitment age bracket have tried to become citizens by joining our military? When you see them, tell them to call 1-800-USA-ARMY. There's a path to citizenship that's been available to them for years. We have no obligation to give them any path to become Americans but there it is anyway. Not expecting any thanks from them for it, just less bellyaching.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-14   6:55:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: GreyLmist (#95) (Edited)

Excellent response.

I have posted here numerous times that by "our" law, illegals of age must also register for any possible draft. Do they??? Of course not. For obvious reasons they desire the fruit this country offers, just do NOT expect a law abiding citizen in return.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-08-14   8:41:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: GreyLmist (#95)

Everybody here has been trying to stand up for our own national interest and you have been calling that racist.

I have not intended to project the image that I call somebody a racist for standing up for the american national interest.

regarding the international trade treaties such as NAFTA - I think we should fashion a trade policy that favors our domestic economy. meaning, we should not have an overvalued currency that prevents us from exporting as much as we import. Trade can be profitable for a nation or not. we need to adjust trade policy so tat it is profitable from the point of view of our people. we should not be running massive trade deficits.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-14   13:06:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: Red Jones (#79)

I would get every single illegal immigrant sat down with a government agent in a room and tell them flat to their face that they have a choice. either they can sign a paper agreeing to become a US citizen within 'x' years and do all the things they must to become a US citizen, such as speak english, and renounce their other citizenship, or else they can go home - immediately.

Fact is, red, that we tried this once under Reagan.

It was the signal, not for a just for a flood of legalized residents, but for the deluge of illegals that we currently suffer from, and it came with the attendant cover that it provided for gangs, cartels, and all the just plain dangerous riff-raff that slid in with it.

You'll get no purchase with that kind of argument here, that's for sure, and not in the nation at large which has come to know the meaning of the aphorism, "Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, I'm a nickel-plated jackass.

There is no long form.

randge  posted on  2010-08-14   15:57:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: randge (#98)

Fact is, red, that we tried this once under Reagan.

if you want to be a stupid idiot, then I have no control over it. the facts are that employers today can hire illegal immigrants with no real penalty from the federal government. so it has never been tried. you are an idiot. and I am sick and tired of my dysfunctional fellow americans taking political views like that, spouting stupidity.

I can say 100 times or 1,000 times that it is still legal to this day for employers to hire all the illegal immigrants they want. and an idiot like you will correct me and tell me that we tried amnesty in 1986. it doesn't work.

in order to get 'it' to work you must combine amnesty with employer sanctions. we have never tried the employer sanctions part of the strategy. you are an idiot not to know this. especially after all the posts I put up telling you this.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-15   11:07:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: Red Jones (#99) (Edited)

I can say 100 times or 1,000 times that it is still legal to this day for employers to hire all the illegal immigrants they want.

Please, let's keep our feet on the ground. You know as well as I do that you can be fined up to two grand for each illegal you hire - more if you have previous violations. We have a malfeasant federal government that WILL NOT DO ITS JOB because it seeks to create just the kind of swamp of lawbreaking that we face. The PTB WANT you to break the law, and illegals and many employers are willing to break the law. I'll take "It is still legal to this day," to mean, "It is OK to get away with murder," because murder's what is being committed on the working and tax paying people of this country.

in order to get 'it' to work you must combine amnesty with employer sanctions

I dunno. I think the whole country is in a real foul mood right now and isn't of a mind to combine anything with anything else. Employer sanctions will do fine all by themselves, thank you.

There is no long form.

randge  posted on  2010-08-15   11:36:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: randge (#98)

"Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, I'm a nickel-plated jackass."

As Dubya so eloquently stated:

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-15   11:46:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: James Deffenbach (#101)

That was one of the most revealing moments of that sordid administration and presidency.

There is no long form.

randge  posted on  2010-08-15   11:53:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: randge (#100)

Please, let's keep our feet on the ground. You know as well as I do that you can be fined up to two grand for each illegal you hire

I shouldn't let my frustration cause me to be rude to you.

we were told that we'd use amnesty in combination with employer sanctions to change things. we did amnesty and the amnesty part worked because those people did generally become citizens. but we did not do the employer sanctions part.

I used to work for the largest stucco contractor in america. they would typically have about 7,000 employees. I wrote their software to manage their whole system including payroll and many other things. and so I had opportunity to speak to people running their systems. it was evident to me and to the people working there that a large portion of those 7,000 people were illegal immigrants. Even today I know people who hire illegal immigrants. they're put right into the payroll system. there is no fear of penalty at all.

maybe the law does make it a technical violation to hire an illegal immigrant. but there is no actual penalty levied on the employer in almost all cases. It is very difficult to trigger penalties, the penalties are also very light. many employers ignore the fact that it is illegal because, as I said, there are no real penalties for hiring illegals.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-15   14:21:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: randge (#100)

Employer sanctions will do fine all by themselves, thank you.

I'd be glad if they implemented real employer sanctions. they don't and nobody even introduces it into congress for consideration. these same politicians who don't allow employer sanctions tell us that a huge number of troops and a border fence will stop the illegals. this is surreal. sanctions of employers who hire illegals is the only way to generally stop them from coming. and that is the one thing that we have actually not done.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-15   14:24:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: Red Jones (#103)

Well, red, the laws are on the books as you must well know.

We want to know: "Why do the fedgov and its agent who are sworn to uphold the law shirk their oaths and responsibilities?"

Under federal law, it is illegal for any employer to hire, recruit or refer for a fee any alien not authorized to work in the United States. There are criminal and civil penalties associated with this conduct.

For first offenders, there is a $250-$2,000 fine per illegal employee.

For a second offense, the fine is $2,000-$5,000 per illegal employee.

For employers who have been convicted of hiring illegal immigrants more than twice, the fine can range from $3000-$10,000 per employee. If the employer demonstrates a pervasive pattern of knowingly employing illegal immigrants, he or she could face additional fines, and up to six months in jail.

Additionally, under the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) act, employers hiring illegal immigrants have been sued, resulting in large settlements. The lawfully documented workers of the Zirkle Fruit Company recently settled a class action lawsuit brought under RICO. The suit alleged that their employer knowingly hired undocumented workers, driving down their wages.

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/penalties-for-employers-hiring-illegal-immigrants.html

There is no long form.

randge  posted on  2010-08-15   21:41:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: randge (#105)

it is a technical violation of the law for employers to hire illegals. and the law may allow for penalties too. but the law also says that if the employer photo-copies the documents and the documents look real, then the employer is not punished for hiring that person. The law allows employers to conveniently not check to see if a person is legal or not. If the law required employers to check before hiring, and if the government actually reviews employees getting paychecks to see if they're legal or not and then gives out penalties to the employer, then we would have laws that would actually punish employers for hiring illegals. we don't have that now.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-16   13:30:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: randge (#102)

That was one of the most revealing moments of that sordid administration and presidency.

I think Cheney should have taken Dumbya hunting.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-08-16   13:43:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: Red Jones (#106)

it is a technical violation of the law for employers to hire illegals

It is a technical violation for me to flip the IRS off at the end of the quarter.

There is no long form.

randge  posted on  2010-08-16   13:52:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Cynicom (#96)

Excellent response.

I have posted here numerous times that by "our" law, illegals of age must also register for any possible draft. Do they??? Of course not. For obvious reasons they desire the fruit this country offers, just do NOT expect a law abiding citizen in return.

Thanks, Cyni. Good to see you onboard. :)

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-16   15:10:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: Red Jones (#97) (Edited)

regarding the international trade treaties such as NAFTA - I think we should fashion a trade policy that favors our domestic economy. meaning, we should not have an overvalued currency that prevents us from exporting as much as we import. Trade can be profitable for a nation or not. we need to adjust trade policy so tat it is profitable from the point of view of our people. we should not be running massive trade deficits.

Thanks for your NAFTA address but it says nothing about US businesses and jobs that moved to Mexico, nor Mexico's oil rich and not so poor economy that also has a booming tourist industry -- all of which point to the illegals trying to attack us as invaders, living off our doles while doing it and "working under the table" too.

Let's recap where we are in these negotiations:

I have compromised on the Repub/guest worker v. Dem/citizenship proposals by throwing out both of them.

You have been shown a path to citizenship for the illegals by joining our Military that has been available to them for years.

You have been offered a working alliance against the employers who hire illegals and guest workers.

What have you compromised? Nothing and you persist in claiming that amnesty has to be "combined with" enforcement against employers. No it doesn't have to be combined. Amnesty is not necessary at all. You have to realize that, while it wasn't nearly enough, a Republican administration did move against the illegal-hire business, Agriprocessors, to shut it down but the Democrat at the White House now is moving against Arizona rather than any employers of illegals. So you should quit trying to make this out as mostly a "Republican" problem and looking like you're blinkered.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-16   15:33:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: GreyLmist (#110)

but it says nothing about US businesses and jobs that moved to Mexico

you may not like my responses. but I did address your concern that businesses move to foreign countries by saying that the US dollar was systematically over-valued. an over-valued currency hurts badly our domestic economy. The US government has pursued a purposeful policy of setting the value of the US dollar artificially strong in exchange rates to other currencies. this has a long-term corrosive effect on our economy and people.

I said very clearly that I think our trade policies should be changed up so that we as a people benefit from trade, so that we export as much as we import.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-17   10:31:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: GreyLmist (#110)

a Republican administration did move against the illegal-hire business, Agriprocessors, to shut it down but the Democrat at the White House now is moving against Arizona rather than any employers of illegals. So you should quit trying to make this out as mostly a "Republican" problem and looking like you're blinkered.

the history on illegal immigrants is that in 1986 when immigration reform was under consideration in Washington US Senate leaders who were Republican decided that no legislation could be voted on if that legislation forced employers to confirm if a prospective employee was legal or not or if that legislation provided for punishment to employers for hiring illegals. I read it in the Wall Street Journal at the time. Ronald Reagan himself confirmed this in a speech broadcast on tv that I saw. The House of Representatives that year was dominated by democrats. They wanted to penalize employers for hiring illegals and force them to hire legals only. Ronald Reagan was with the House on that point. but by this time Reagan was in his 'senile' stage. People around him could influence him easily. He signed the legislation knowing full well that it would let huge numbers of illegals in the country. and he said so on national tv.

I live in arizona. This is a state dominated by republicans. they refuse to pass legislation to penalize employers for hiring illegals. these are facts. forgive me if I put blame where blame belongs.

There's an article in the AZ Republic today speaking about how easy it is for illegals to function in our economy. The idea that we are trying to keep them out is a complete myth. I'll post that article in a few minutes.

I'm not trying to be disagreeable with you. I don't like Republicans. Republicans are for guest workers. Republicans brought us the H1-b & L-1 visa programs. I strongly dislike all of these things.

don't make me laugh by saying republicans moved against businesses that hire illegals. It is an insult to me and you just don't realize it. Maybe if you lived in arizona and worked in the niches I've worked in, then maybe you'd agree with me.

the one segment of our economy where most americans do actually think mexican migrants should be able to work is in the agriculture sector. so it figures that the republicans would crack down on that sector. but let me explain this to you. There are american born american citizens working in agriculture and wishing like hell that the illegals were not allowed to compete with them for their jobs which hardly pay anything. and if their wages were doubled for picking the crops it would have a negligible impact on food prices.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-17   10:44:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: GreyLmist (#110)

but the Democrat at the White House now is moving against Arizona rather than any employers of illegals.

are you lost in the 2-party paradigm or what??? the Republicans of Arizona have not moved against employers for hiring illegals. they've actually taken no significant actions other than to engage in emotional terrorism by threatening the existence of the illegals without actually doing anything to hardly any of them. The 2 parties function together towards common goals.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-17   11:02:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: Red Jones (#111)

Me to you at Post #76: say something about why you think it's America's job to provide Mexicans with jobs and better living conditions, even though so many of our businesses have impoverished this country by moving to Mexico via NAFTA to do that for them and still Mexico feigns being too poor and/or deranged to provide for its own.

Me to you at Post #110 Thanks for your NAFTA address but it says nothing about US businesses and jobs that moved to Mexico, nor Mexico's oil rich and not so poor economy that also has a booming tourist industry -- all of which point to the illegals trying to attack us as invaders, living off our doles while doing it and "working under the table" too.

NAFTA in general isn't what I asked you to say something about but the issues quoted above -- and that's not even getting into businesses from other countries that have boosted Mexico's economy and jobs market by moving there -- like Asian textiles, for instance. Your evasion implies that, no matter how impoverished America has become and Mexico enriched by NAFTA, you're committed to pushing the meme that it's somehow America's reponsibility to provide Mexicans with jobs and better living conditions here. It isn't.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-17   17:17:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: Red Jones (#113)

are you lost in the 2-party paradigm or what???

That's funny, considering your prior post at # 112 and all the others where you've pointed to Republicans as the problem but never Democrats. If you want to claim now that, "The 2 parties function together towards common goals," I can agree with that, so what's your point about Republicans again? You want them to work towards a common goal of another amnesty for illegals and they want Democrats to work towards a common goal of documented guest workers instead without rewarding the illegal invaders with citizenship again for breaking our laws and undermining our economy? Persuades me that Democrats are on the wrong side of this issue.

I've done some research on Arizona's political demographics and it doesn't seem so heavily dominated by Republicans as you suggest. Your last Governor was a Democrat and didn't move against any employers hiring illegals. Neither has Dem. Obama but Rep. GWBush did move against Agriprocessors, whether you want to aknowledge that fact or not. I'm no Bush fan and it wasn't enough but it was more than your Democrats have done to penalize employers of illegals, as you claim to want. Your current Attorney General is a Democrat and 2 out of 5 Corporation Commissioners are Democrats. Perhaps the reason employers of illegals aren't being moved against there is because of the Democrat Attorney General and not the Republicans. Ever think of that?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-17   18:02:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: GreyLmist (#115)

the people who have been active on immigration policy in arizona have been republicans. we used to be a strong republican state, but with all the mexicans increasing their population we are becoming a democrat state. but currently the legislature and governor are both republican. about 2 years ago the state's republicans were excited over a guest worker program. They had received the federal government's permission to have a guest worker program just for our state. they were going to turn illegals into guest workers and they thought it was great. those are the same republicans behind SB1070. they are not our friends.

I don't see democrats embracing the solutions I've advocated and that were also advocated by Ronald Reagan. I see the democrats as just sitting back and letting the republicans do evil things on immigration, but they never seem to oppose the republicans in a way that will win. Obama says he rejects employer sanctions, that means he's all pro-illegal immigrant. that is the way the 2 parties are. One may lead on a particular issue, but the other follows. I think the democrats will be just dysfunctional enough on the illegal immigrant issue to let the republicans get their permanent stream of guest workers that they want so badly.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-08-17   18:20:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: Red Jones (#116) (Edited)

Here's a video you might be interested in that was posted recently at whatreallyhappened.com. For some reason it won't post here as a video, so you'll have to go to the YouTube site or the whatreallyhappened.com page for Aug. 14 to see it:

PERM Fake Job Ads defraud Americans to secure green cards for H-1b workers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=TCbFEgFajGU&feature=related

programmersguild | June 16, 2007

Immigration attorneys from Cohen & Grigsby explains how they assist employers in running classified ads with the goal of NOT finding any qualified applicants, and the steps they go through to disqualify even the most qualified Americans in order to secure green cards for H-1b workers. See what Bush and Congress really mean by a "shortage of skilled U.S. workers." Microsoft, Oracle, Hewlett-Packard, and thousands of other companies are running fake ads in Sunday newspapers across the country each week.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-17   18:51:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: Red Jones (#116)

the people who have been active on immigration policy in arizona have been republicans. we used to be a strong republican state, but with all the mexicans increasing their population we are becoming a democrat state.

If the Mexicans were entering the nation and becoming small government libertarians, the elite would build a wall, complete with a moat.

2big2fail  posted on  2010-08-17   19:26:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: Red Jones, Horse, All (#116)

The video I couldn't post here at #117 can be viewed at Horse's Aug 14 thread, 4um Title: PERM Fake Job Ads defraud Americans to secure green cards

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-08-20   16:42:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]