[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Resistance See other Resistance Articles Title: Food and Depopulation (Part 1 of 4) Tuesday, 08 June 2010 20:32 Written by Cassandra Anderson Rockefeller Family ludlow_massacre_of_april_20_1914_postcard-p239994290141481210qibm_400 The purpose of this article is to give a brief outline of how the elites, and the Rockefellers in particular, are using food as a weapon. Since the Rockefeller family came to power (especially after gaining a monopoly in 1914 with Standard Oil) they have manipulated our government into ruining our financial system by way of the Federal Reserve, energy through oil dependency and food with GMOs (Genetically Engineered Organisms). The intention is to rob us blind and kill us. It's time to wake up. The official name of this program is Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. It the overarching blueprint for depopulation and total control over America and the rest of the world. There is no question that Americans are targeted for depopulation: GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) food has saturated American farmlands. GMOs are dangerous and the proliferation of corn crops (used as sweetener, animal feed, processed food, etc) in America is shortening our life spans.(1) Our water is polluted, containing over 60,000 chemicals, most of which have never been tested for safety.(2) Our air is toxic, and the US is one of the most targeted areas for chemtrails.(3) This is just the tip of the iceberg, the things we know about. While Agenda 21 was introduced in 1992, the elite collectivists, lead by the Rockefellers, have been pushing population control on America and the world for generations. In 1992, this depopulation and control policy was modernized and given a name: Agenda 21, or the Agenda for the 21st century. The premise for depopulation and control is to preserve the environment. One would have to be an idiot to disregard environmental concerns, however, the solutions that Agenda 21 offers fail to address the real issues. The primary tools that Agenda 21 Sustainable Development uses are global warming lies, water shortages (like the man made drought in California, which also causes food shortages) and the Endangered Species Act (designed to take away private property, which is the base of wealth creation and freedom).(4) The focus of this article is revealing the link between the Rockefellers and their intended use of food as a weapon, which is more powerful than military domination and energy control. Food control goes hand in hand with population control. The eugenics (improvement of humans through selective breeding, often using brutal methods like genocide and forced sterilization) program of the Third Reich in Nazi Germany was revealed after WWII. Obviously, people did not have a high opinion of eugenics, so, according to William Engdahl (author of "Seeds of Destruction", the Rockefeller strategists shifted their profile to champion the causes of the environment, resource scarcity and overpopulation.(5) The policy of population control remained, despite the illusion of caring concern- which is simply marketing; the word eugenics has been renamed as "human genetics". This scheme for improving their image worked for them before with their "philanthropy" and tax-free foundations, after the Rockefellers became very unpopular following the Ludlow Massacre. The Ludlow Massacre took place at a Rockefeller owned coal mine in Colorado. The mines were notoriously unsafe, which caused many deaths and the workers were paid in scrip (currency substitute that is often credit), to be spent at the Rockefeller company stores. When the workers went on strike, they were evicted from their homes and lived with their families in tent cities. Then they were provoked through murder, machine gun spray, harassment, etc, in order to goad the workers into violence.(6) This was used as a pretext to get the National Guard involved; the state militia opened fire on the tent cities, resulting in up to 53 deaths, 13 of whom were women and children. So, the Rockefellers created a propaganda campaign to polish their tarnished image through tax exempt foundations. These foundations are hardly philanthropic; they are used to fund the destruction of America (please read this excellent transcript by G. Edward Griffin to discover the true nature of tax exempt foundations).(7) Why do you think Senator Jay Rockefeller(8) is pushing so hard to censor the Internet? Today, the Rockefellers use coercive population control tactics and food as a weapon through a front organization, CGIAR (Consultative Group on Agricultural Resources) as the Rockefellers are trying to distance themselves from public- just like the Rothschild clan has done. Engdahl reports that CGIAR operates under the umbrella of the UN World Bank, and its primary focus is the spread of GMO crops. CGIAR was created by the Rockefellers and the Ford Foundation, along with the UN World Bank in 1971 with $350 million dollars a year in funding. The Rockefeller's "Green Revolution", which was the implementation of new farming methods in developing countries, like Mexico, India and Asia, increased crop yields, but ended in disaster; the program lasted from the 1940's- 1970's.(9) The "Green Revolution", funded by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations and the US government, was a farming experiment with these results: * Hybrid rice was planted that is often sterile in subsequent generations Bill Gates wants to have a new "Gene Revolution" in Africa. Bill Gates has teamed with the Rockefellers, Monsanto and the government of Norway in the Doomsday Seed Vault, in which organic seed is stored for some anticipated world catastrophe.(10) The Rockefeller Brothers Fund created the ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications) and the Rockefeller Foundation is a major donor. The ISAAA is involved in promoting proprietary GMO seeds to developing countries. Its sponsors include Monsanto (USA), Dow AgroSciences (USA), Cargill (USA), Bayer CropScience (Germany), and a mysterious "Anonymous Donor "(USA), and US-AID of the State Department, per William Engdahl. It is worth mentioning that Robert Deitch's book, "Hemp: American History Revisited" explains that the Great Depression was not caused by the Wall Street stock market crash of '29, but by Prohibition (the 18th Amendment that prohibited alcohol from 1920 until it was repealed in 1933). Other businesses, besides the production of alcoholic beverages, that also used alcohol were ruined. Deitch claims that the big oil interests, like Rockefeller (Standard Oil) and Mellon (Gulf Oil) demonized alcohol, not on propagandized moral grounds, but to eliminate competition. The automobile industry was in its infancy and they wanted to corner the market on energy, so they devised a plan to knock out the competition of alcohol powered vehicles. Later, in 1937, after relentless lobbying, they did the same thing with hemp, and through deception and demonization of marijuana, hemp was outlawed. Hemp contains only miniscule trace amounts of THC (the active agent in marijuana), yet it is considered a 'controlled substance'. Hemp is a low maintenance plant that needs no pesticides or herbicides, and can produce oil, paper products, biodegradable plastics, medicine and textiles (it is also a super nutritious food). Because the Robber Barons (Rockefeller and Mellon- oil, DuPont- chemicals and Hearst- paper) were threatened, they joined together to outlaw hemp. Hemp was later needed during WWII, so its cultivation was allowed. Hemp was a threat to the Rockefellers not only because it produces oil, but also because Cannibis has uses as a medicine, thereby threatening their pharmaceutical drug monopoly. Nelson Rockefeller, as governor of New York, in 1973, established marijuana as a Schedule I narcotic drug, through the "Rockefeller Drug Laws" which had harsh penalties for the possession and sale of drugs (including marijuana) that could result in a sentence of 15 years to life. As other States followed suit, this was the genesis of America's abysmal 'War on Drugs'.(11) California was the first State to defy the federal government in de-criminalizing marijuana for medical use, through the 10th Amendment (States' rights). Fourteen other States have followed suit. California will be vote on marijuana legalization in November; this may pass because the government wants to tax it. Ironically, in 2006, a bill to allow hemp farming passed both houses of the California legislature, but collectivist Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the bill because he said that marijuana and hemp are indistinguishable under federal law. Hemp could go a long way toward saving California's bankrupt economy. Fifteen other States have introduced or enacted legislation to grow hemp, but they fear the federal Drug Enforcement Agency.(12) Interestingly, California will have an initiative on the ballot in November to legalize marijuana. This means that if it passes, anyone can smoke marijuana for any reason, as opposed to limiting it to medical marijuana use. This is important for 2 reasons; first, it would open the door for hemp cultivation for food, oil, natural plastics, paper, etc. The second reason this is important is because it would nullify the federal drug law, thus enforcing the Tenth Amendment for state sovereignty. Thanks to F. William Engdahl, author of "Seeds of Destruction" 1. http://www.theholisticoption.com...Corn_Documentary_219.aspx Links to 3 other articles in this series: http://www.morphcity.com/home/71...-depopulation-part-2-of-4 http://www.morphcity.com/home/73...-depopulation-part-3-of-4 http://www.morphcity.com/home/75...-depopulation-part-4-of-4
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
#2. To: FormerLurker, Kamala, Sykdrifter, mirage, Rotara, sizzlerguy, mininggold, gengis gandhi, Horse, noone222, TommyTheMadArtist, phant2000, freepatriot32, ghostdogtxn, buckeroo, Deacon Benjamin, wbales, Samuel Gray, Liberator, PaulCJ, Duckhunter, all (#0)
(((((Got Food? Pingggggggg!)))))
more accurately lack of food and depopulation
If it reaches that point, we will just dine a latin american until we reach where the elitists are hiding in South America.
Oh, they won't have to go to South America. Some of the lower tiers might, but the U.S. is riddled with tunnels and underground bases. If it gets too bad they'll just crawl into their holes and pull the hole in after them for 50 or a hundred years. The surface of the planet is nearing total ecological collapse. Many midwestern farmlands are becoming increasingly toxic from petrochemical based strip mine farming, and GMO pollution of food crops, while they will eventually revert to type, could make many common food crops toxic. The Right and Left have both been sold a bill of goods on environmental concerns. The Right that it is all hogwash and the left has been led down false trails such as Glowbull Warming. From what I ran into yesterday at least one estimate puts the contamination of potable water, largely from petrochemical farm runoff, in the U.S. at 70%. People are having their wells condemned as unsafe and some river estuary systems are so toxic that even the life that is able to continue is so toxic it is inedible. As it stands now it would take at least 100 years to return the environment to a stable and relatively clean state. At this point I am becoming convinced that much of the environmental degradation is intentional to accelerate the die off of "excess" population. Excess in terms of what the elites need for slaves that is.
deleted
I think that the earth is a lot more resilient than you realize. Oh, don't kid yourself. Yes, in the lonnnnnnnnng term it can reestablish an equilibrium condition, but in the short term we are looking at a level of toxicity inimical to life, food production, and survival. Yes the ecosystem is resilient but any system knocked out of its equilibrium state can, and usually does, produce unpredictable results. The line that the "everything is OK with the environment gobacktosleep" is just as much disinformation as is Glowbull Warming and Peak Oil. Those simply exist as diversions from the real problems of polluted waters, GMO McFuud, and increased mortality from marginal environmental degradation. Just as false is the line that the environment can absorb toxins forever with no affect on humanity. While we haven't reached the point of total collapse it is no consolation when you faced with the choice between marginally toxic food and no food. I recall one region in the old USSR, a heavy industrial area - I forget the name just off hand, where as result of the heavily contaminated environment the average male life expectancy was early 40's at the time of the USSR's collapse. Just the same as with polluted water versus no water. Look at what is going on in the gulf. If you don't trust the EPA and such there why should you trust the other party lyin' pronouncements? The environment cannot continue to absorb billions of tons of toxins annually with no effect. Already we have large and growing dead zones in all major oceans, ground water, which we rely upon for drinking, is becoming increasingly contaminated from toxic farming technology, and the degradation simply increases with each and every oil spill. In the Hanford Reach area of the Columbia river the ground water is radioactive from nuclear material production and the attendant waste. The waste containment vessels have rotted through and are leaking highly deadly toxins into the aquifer. A radioactive "plume" is working its way through the water table to the river and has likely already reached it, but the lying government will not talk about it. Like the gulf the advice is go swimming and eat the 6 legged 4 eyed fish. That leak was first made public 15 or so years ago and so has likely started trickling into the river. The Columbia, historically, has been one of the most productive breeder systems of edible fish on the continent. Many of the fish that live in the river year round are now so loaded with toxins as to be unhealthy to eat. The same applies to the Willamette another major river in the region which is heavily polluted in its lower range, before it runs into the Columbia, with agricultural runoff. I could go on siting other things, such as the lower Sacramento River in California which has selenium levels turning the lower estuary into toxic hazard zone, or the collapse of the population levels of Sea Run Cutthroat Trout which was a popular fishery here since my youth - until about ten years ago when the population collapsed suddenly to a level that resulted in fishing for them being closed on some rivers. The Oglalla Aquifer in the midwest is not only becoming contaminated, but is being pumped dry faster than it can replenish. Multiply all of these seemingly isolated events on a global scale and you ARE looking at true catastrophe with NO quick fix. Now the government is trying to push through Senate Bill S510 which would literally make it illegal to grow your own food, share that food, trade that food with other gardeners, and allow the feds to come in and tear out your illegal tomato garden.
Here's a short video interview of David Rothschild about Americans changing 1 light bulb as the carbon dioxide emissions equivalent of taking 800,000 cars off the road: David de Rothschild on NBC Today
I went to "twisty lightbulbs" for two reasons: 1. I was able get them cheap - $1 each. 2. They cut my electric bill. However, environmentally they are at best a wash because they use mercury vapor and are dumping toxic amounts of mercury into landfills.
There are no replies to Comment # 23. End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||