[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Resistance See other Resistance Articles Title: Women as [White Nationalist] Allies Women Are Our Allies A frequent complaint among traditionalist White political activists is the under-representation of female involvement in pro-White campaigning. Certainly, one factor favoring male interest in this political endeavor is the fear that a world run by White radical traditionalists would deny women economic autonomy, relegating them to the traditional roles of mother and housewife. And to a large degree women can be forgiven for being nervous, because, not only is this caricature perpetuated by the establishment culture, but one sees little in the literature associated with White Nationalism that does anything other than substantiate the caricature: invectives against butch feminist excess are twinned with lamentations at the plummeting White birthrate and a longing for the pre-feminist social order. When one considers that many women today view the older order as stupefying, mummifying, and (where marriages were loveless or abusive) a serotonin suppressor, it is not surprising that they regard the White Nationalist proposition as a backward step into a dark age of subaltern womanhood. We can legitimately argue about how liberal feminism may have contributed to lowering the social standing of stay-at-home mothers; about how the economic structure of modern society may be discouraging family creation; and about how women who would rather stay at home raising their children are perhaps being forced into the labor market, and put under overwhelming time pressure, in order to make ends meet. Yet, it seems to me that if the preservation of European culture in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand is to benefit from greater female involvement, both the discourse and campaign materials aiming to further this cause would need to demonstrate exactly how the lives of White women in general would improve in a post-liberal Western world. Doing so would not only make the face of this cause more attractive, would not only make it appealing to twice as many people, but it would also deprive the enemy of talent — the talent of the highly intelligent and very capable White women who, for lack of knowing better and a viable alternative, currently choose either to join, or at least not to challenge, the enemies of European civilization. The argument needs to be made that it is not just that we “don’t mind” if women work, but that we actually respect and admire women who — and indeed want them to — exercise and cultivate their talents, wherever these may take them. It needs to be emphasized that we do not differ from the feminists in our attitudes towards female employment: we differ from them in our attitudes towards female unemployment. For feminists, marriage is oppression, and stay-at-home motherhood slavery; for us the former is a partnership between two complementary parties, and the latter — if done by choice — a meritorious enterprise for which there is no equiparable substitute. The presence of visibly powerful women is probably more consistent with traditional European societies than the caricature perpetuated by modern feminist sociopathy: particularly in North Western European societies women have enjoyed higher social status than their counterparts in Asia. Indeed, in many Asian societies, particularly those under the heel of Islam, women live in silent servitude, virtually erased by the veil, legal and economic exclusion, marital abuse, and domestic confinement. It follows, then, that highlighting female visibility and power, however ironic this might seem given the critiques of feminism emanating from the Right, needs to be a core element in any campaign for the preservation of European culture. It follows also that any such campaign needs to highlight how White/European women will be better off in a society that is distinctly European in character. This is not incompatible with male strength and dominance, or with femininity. My experience has shown that, in fact, even the most assertive, strong-willed women admire and respect assertive, masculine men; these women seem generally contemptuous of the neurotic, effeminate, whining, unmasculine (White) losers they so often see in modern American cinema and television. Interestingly, my experience has also shown that at least some such women, who seem to cluster on the higher IQ percentiles, are naturally feminine, indeed deeply romantic, but have felt compelled to adopt traditionally male survival strategies due to the growing scarcity of worthy mates. They are products of feminism only in a negative sense, for they are indicative of the depression of male status caused by feminist excess, not of the elevation of female status that followed the industrial revolution. (Admittedly, other processes besides feminism have contributed to the displacement of masculinity among White males.) The degree to which the Europeanness of our societies is an important and valuable asset finds its most dramatic proof in the treatment women receive in many non-European cultures. Earlier I mentioned the civic erasure of women in not a few Islamic societies; yet this seems tame in comparison to some of the forms of suppression and abuse practiced in parts of Africa and South Asia. In the former we find various forms of genital mutilation, attached to notions of pre-marital chastity. In the latter we find acid attacks — not as rare acts of psychopathy, as in the relatively recent case of former model Katie Piper — but as common results of family disputes and female rejection. Many of those immigrating to Europe come from regions of the world where women suffer from low social status, little or no real civic recognition, and a type or a level of abuse that until recent decades was rare or unknown in our part of the world. Combined with the long-term decline in Europe’s indigenous population, the net effect is a convergence between culture and demographic composition, and between our culture and the culture in the immigrant population’s countries of origin. In the United Kingdom, we are increasingly seeing this reflected in the statute books: female genital cutting was once unheard of in this country; but by 1985, after decades of Commonwealth immigration, the practice had become common enough to warrant legislation criminalizing its practice. In a multicultural context this type of negative legislation easily goes in tandem with a positive (and sometimes conflicting) counterpart. Already we have witnessed the principal leader of the Church of England and the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales expressing their willingness to accommodate Sharia Law as a ‘supplementary’ or ‘alternative’ jurisdiction or form of dispute resolution. Viewed in against this backdrop, developing an acute preoccupation with preserving the Europeanness of our societies, and the doubly negative impact of its loss on women, should make perfect sense among Western women today. It does not — at least yet — because presently the pervading belief in the mainstream of culture is that Europe’s complexion will remain predominantly White, despite Third World immigration; and that Europe’s character will remain predominantly European, even if immigration results in a dramatic change in complexion. One worries that by the time events disprove this belief, the transformation will have gone past the point of no return. And it is quite possible that, by the time traditional European culture is replaced by a mish-mash of African, South Asian, and Islamic components, no one, except a vestigial White minority, will be surprised or even care about it. This is because by that point the dominant ideology will legitimize the direction of cultural change as a reflection of the attitudes, worldview, and sensibilities of the dominant non-White majority. Demography is destiny, as they say. Should nothing be done, within the lifetime of individuals born this century White Western women could well find themselves in a situation comparable to that of their less fortunate analogues in the Third World. In other words, the trend towards ever-greater equality, now apparently unstoppable, could undergo a reversal, ironically not despite the drive towards equality, but because of it, as it is the ideology of egalitarianism that is promoting the multiculturalization of our seats of government. (We have already seen Muslims reach ministerial positions in the United Kingdom.) We can easily conceive a scenario where the ideology of egalitarianism is co-opted by ethnic minorities in their struggle for power; and where the ideology is jettisoned — if not necessarily in theory, certainly in practice — by one of these minorities as soon as it becomes the majority and gains political hegemony. Reversals of this nature begin gradually, under the surface, initially unnoticed by most because they are eclipsed by the dominant ideological trend and the general noise of everyday life; but once the conditions are in place, and the necessary critical mass has been achieved, the transition can occur rather suddenly — this pattern of reversal is evident in the history of the fall of the Roman Empire in 5th century, and we saw it repeated during the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe only two decades ago. With non-White births amounting to anywhere between 40 to 90% in many parts of the country — which happen also to be the most populous — the demographic critical mass could be reached within a generation or two. I am 40, so this means I am likely to witness it at an age when I will not be strong. A cogent articulation of White Nationalism would from this perspective be the best guarantor of the social, economic, and civic freedoms enjoyed generally by women in the contemporary West. Thus, it is perhaps the absence of adequate information, rather than the absence of power advantages, that are preventing White women from taking their own side. It would be a mistake to neglect half of our constituency because of the cartoonish hostility and adversarial atmosphere engendered by sociopathic feminism; doing so would play into the enemy’s hands, for the rainbow coalition thrives on our divisions. Graphically and prominently emphasizing our conception of women as our allies and partners, as complementary to ourselves, rather than as competitors or opponents, as the feminists have done, would be of great service to any movement with ambitions of saving the West.
Poster Comment: I'm not the first person to notice this, but it is not possible for a woman have a career and a family, unless the children are given to care-takers, almost always are pre-schoolers. This is exactly what Communists wanted -- children essentially raised in commonn by the State. And of course there care-takers are not supposed to be well-paid. I always notice these pre-school places when I drive by. At least one of them is a national chain. I've met women in their 40s and 50s, unmarried and childless, who claim they are in this condition because men won't accept their careers. I do wonder about that. I know a women who is 27 and unmarried and childless. She has complained about it to me exactly once: "In a better world I'm be married and taking care of my husband and children."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Turtle (#0)
My mother waited until my brother and I were in grade school before resuming her career as a Home Economics teacher. It worked out well.
It worked out well. I understand your point, but this means companies are not going to hire women in the first place if they believe they are going to get married and leave. Workers can be very expensive. "Sorry, I know you spend about $50,000 on all my training and stuff, but I'm leaving to have a kid...say, can you hold my job for me when -- if -- I come back in six years?"
“How many Sex and the City fans have funneled all their maternal instincts into their Chinese bulldog without even noticing their ovaries have expired?”
A seminary professor was vacationing with his wife in Gatlinburg , TN. One morning, they were eating breakfast at a little restaurant, hoping to enjoy a quiet, family meal. While they were waiting for their food, they noticed a distinguished looking, white-haired man moving from table to table, visiting with the guests. The professor leaned over and whispered to his wife, 'I hope he doesn't come over here.' But sure enough, the man did come over to their table. 'Where are you folks from?' he asked in a friendly voice. ' Oklahoma ,' they answered. 'Great to have you here in Tennessee ,' the stranger said.. 'What do you do for a living?' 'I teach at a seminary,' he replied. 'Oh, so you teach preachers how to preach, do you? Well, I've got a really great story for you.' And with that, the gentleman pulled up a chair and sat down at the table with the couple. The professor groaned and thought to himself, 'Great .. Just what I need ....another preacher story!' The man started, 'See that mountain over there? (pointing out the restaurant window). Not far from the base of that mountain, there was a boy born to an unwed mother. He had a hard time growing up, because every place he went, he was always asked the same question, 'Hey boy, Who's your daddy?' Whether he was at school, in the grocery store or drug store, people would ask the same question, 'Who's your daddy?' He would hide at recess and lunch time from other students. He would avoid going in to stores because that question hurt him so bad. 'When he was about 12 years old, a new preacher came to his church. He would always go in late and slip out early to avoid hearing the question, 'Who's your daddy?' But one day, the new preacher said the benediction so fast that he got caught and had to walk out with the crowd. Just about the time he got to the back door, the new preacher, not knowing anything about him, put his hand on his shoulder and asked him, 'Son, who's your daddy?' The whole church got deathly quiet. He could feel every eye in the church looking at him Now everyone would finally know the answer to the question, 'Who's your daddy?' 'This new preacher, though, sensed the situation around him and using discernment that only the Holy Spirit could give, said the following to that scared little boy.. 'Wait a minute! I know who you are! I see the family resemblance now, You are a child of God.' With that he patted the boy on his shoulder and said, 'Boy, you've got a great inheritance. Go and claim it.' 'With that, the boy smiled for the first time in a long time and walked out the door a changed person. He was never the same again. Whenever anybody asked him, 'Who's your Daddy?' he'd just tell them , 'I'm a Child of God..'' The distinguished gentleman got up from the table and said, 'Isn't that a great story?' The professor responded that it really was a great story! As the man turned to leave, he said, 'You know, if that new preacher hadn't told me that I was one of God's children, I probably never would have amounted to anything!' And he walked away. The seminary professor and his wife were stunned.. He called the waitress over & asked her, 'Do you know who that man was -- the one who just left that was sitting at our table?' The waitress grinned and said, 'Of course. Everybody here knows him. That's Ben Hooper. He's governor of Tennessee!' Who's your Daddy? Someone in your life today needs a reminder that they're one of God's children! 'The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of God stands forever.' ~~Isaiah YOU'RE ONE OF GOD'S CHILDREN!!! HAVE A GREAT DAY!
Great story. Thank's for posting it. P.S. My maternal Grandmother was a Tennessee Hill Woman. I think all women from Tennessee sound absolutely elegant.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
That was from a life long friend. It sounded so amazing that I checked it out before posting - it's true.
A man chases a woman until she catches him.
“Ask any Indian nation how it preserves itself. It isn’t by letting anyone and everyone claim to be Indian. There are exceptions, but they are not the rule.” -- Eric Holder
Alex likes black metal "music". Alex's novel Mister, like Orwell's 1984, is great government propaganda. Alex's doesn't know what a white woman is, no more than he knows what a white man is.
“Ask any Indian nation how it preserves itself. It isn’t by letting anyone and everyone claim to be Indian. There are exceptions, but they are not the rule.” -- Eric Holder
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||