See other 9/11 Articles
Title: New 9/11 3D Analysis Suggests Top Secret Device Hit World Trade Center
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/0 ... device-hit-world-trade-center/
Published: Aug 12, 2010
Author: Johnny Punish
Post Date: 2010-08-21 05:36:30 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 9324
Comments: 111
New 9/11 3D Analysis Suggests Top Secret Device Hit World Trade Center
Poster Comment: Credit to Itistoolate
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.
#1. To: wudidiz (#0)
Disclaimer: Veterans Today does NOT endorse the conclusions in the video posted below. The post merely presents the questions and asks for readers to participate. Almost 10 years on, with no clear explanation why Building 7 collapsed after not being hit by anything but underground media scrutiny, we all seem to feel that something does NOT fit. 9/11 just does NOT pass the smell test. In fact it stinks. Almost 10 years, we are still engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Neo-Con wars of the first decade are still with us crawling their way into history books. Whether the video analysis below is true or not, we have so many questions ie… Oh heck, watch this video and comment on the analysis below….
So that's what did it. LOL! Hmm, I think I will be a "Non-Commissioned Investigator" and see what screwball "theory" I can come up with. It will involve naked women, UFOs, Bigfoot, green paint, and a fly swatter. .
how strange! you somehow forgot to give your explanation of the object that was filmed. the object without wings or fuselage. probably just an oversight on your part. go ahead now, and provide your theory on what it was. i'm sure you have it all thought out.
you somehow forgot to give your explanation of the object that was filmed. the object without wings or fuselage. probably just an oversight on your part. go ahead now, and provide your theory on what it was. i'm sure you have it all thought out. Don't bug him, he's a busy man. Watch a 20 minute video? I don't think so. Think of all the niggers you could hate in 20 minutes.
And what is that supposed to mean? Is that some kind of canuckistani joke? You know what the problem with you people (canuckistanis) is, you're smug. You're smug with zero experience, and you have zero reason to be smug or arrogant about anything.
And what is that supposed to mean? Did you watch the video? It's 22 minutes long. Watch the whole thing then I'll tell you what I meant.
I watched this video again for the fourth time. Fascinating. It seems certain there were no planes hit the WTC. It's obvious the tv video was faked. Absolutely no doubt. Just when I thought I knew everything....
I would be careful in drawing a conclusion. As was pointed out this could simply be another computer generated video to further confuse and discredit. You could make a video of Bozo the Clown flying into the towers with the right equipment and budget.
OI, the videos of planes hitting the towers were faked. It's completely obvious. I watched this video 4 times. What hit the towers weren't airliners. I know you can't watch this video, but here's an image to illustrate only 1 of the points: Same camera shot, same distance, same angle, same time (notice smoke cloud), different background. The picture on the left had no airliner in it. The faked one on the right did. Where did the background go? Why was there no plane in the original video? (Only on NBC)
Interesting to say the least. Nevertheless, while it does strongly suggest the video was edited that is really all it proves.
deleted
Ditto. Double ditto on the wings doing no damage at the PentaCON. Not to mention that the plane would have had to take out a hell of a lot more than a mere five light poles to cruise at that low speed into the building........without harming the AMAZING, ASTOUNDING PENTALAWN!!
#56. To: abraxas (#51)
(Edited)
Isn't it amazing how no wings of the alleged planes at the WTC folded on impact with all those steel beams so close together there? An Official Conspiracy theorist chalks that up to aluminum alloy having a higher tensile strength than structural steel and to Depleted Uranium reinforcing the nosecone and wings. Another explained that the strongest part of a planes wings are the shoulders because they have to support the engines. I guess they want us to think the alleged plane at the Pentagon was nosecone reinforced enough to act like a cruise missle but not reinforced enough to keep the wings outstretched and the engines supported like at the WTC. /s
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAnalysis by Non-Commissioned Investigator Shows Plane Footage Doctored Up to Hide Clandestine Remote Controlled Anti-Gravity Ball Hitting World Trade Center Building 2
Yesterday Richard D. Hall posted his new 3-D video analysis of 9/11 showing that a top secret anti-gravity vehicle that hit World Trade Center Building 2.
#6. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, WTF is this shit??? (#1)
Analysis by Non-Commissioned Investigator Shows Plane Footage Doctored Up to Hide Clandestine Remote Controlled Anti-Gravity Ball Hitting World Trade Center Building 2
#7. To: PSUSA (#6)
#14. To: gengis gandhi (#7)
how strange!
#21. To: wudidiz (#14)
Think of all the niggers you could hate in 20 minutes.
#24. To: Flintlock (#21)
Think of all the niggers you could hate in 20 minutes.
"Watch the video, Flintlock."
#25. To: Original_Intent, christine, FormerLurker, TwentyTwelve, James Deffenbach, Itistoolate, noone222, Eric Stratton, HOUNDDAWG, gengis gandhi, GreyLmist, abraxas, All, *9-11*, *Black Ops - Psyops* (#24)
#29. To: wudidiz (#25)
#31. To: Original_Intent, Eric Stratton, gengis gandhi (#29)
I would be careful in drawing a conclusion.
#32. To: wudidiz (#31)
#34. To: Original_Intent (#32)
#41. To: wudidiz (#34)
(Edited)
#51. To: Eric Stratton (#41)
I agree, that "noseout" thing is ridiculous and I never really gave it much thought before
Replies to Comment # 51. on the wings doing no damage at the PentaCON
End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.