See other 9/11 Articles
Title: New 9/11 3D Analysis Suggests Top Secret Device Hit World Trade Center
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/0 ... device-hit-world-trade-center/
Published: Aug 12, 2010
Author: Johnny Punish
Post Date: 2010-08-21 05:36:30 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 9327
Comments: 111
New 9/11 3D Analysis Suggests Top Secret Device Hit World Trade Center
Poster Comment: Credit to Itistoolate
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 55.
#1. To: wudidiz (#0)
Disclaimer: Veterans Today does NOT endorse the conclusions in the video posted below. The post merely presents the questions and asks for readers to participate. Almost 10 years on, with no clear explanation why Building 7 collapsed after not being hit by anything but underground media scrutiny, we all seem to feel that something does NOT fit. 9/11 just does NOT pass the smell test. In fact it stinks. Almost 10 years, we are still engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Neo-Con wars of the first decade are still with us crawling their way into history books. Whether the video analysis below is true or not, we have so many questions ie… Oh heck, watch this video and comment on the analysis below….
So that's what did it. LOL! Hmm, I think I will be a "Non-Commissioned Investigator" and see what screwball "theory" I can come up with. It will involve naked women, UFOs, Bigfoot, green paint, and a fly swatter. .
how strange! you somehow forgot to give your explanation of the object that was filmed. the object without wings or fuselage. probably just an oversight on your part. go ahead now, and provide your theory on what it was. i'm sure you have it all thought out.
you somehow forgot to give your explanation of the object that was filmed. the object without wings or fuselage. probably just an oversight on your part. go ahead now, and provide your theory on what it was. i'm sure you have it all thought out. Don't bug him, he's a busy man. Watch a 20 minute video? I don't think so. Think of all the niggers you could hate in 20 minutes.
And what is that supposed to mean? Is that some kind of canuckistani joke? You know what the problem with you people (canuckistanis) is, you're smug. You're smug with zero experience, and you have zero reason to be smug or arrogant about anything.
And what is that supposed to mean? Did you watch the video? It's 22 minutes long. Watch the whole thing then I'll tell you what I meant.
lol........what a great gif!!
Nice to see you here.
Mr. Walter says in this interview that he heard the roar of the engines of the plane over head and looked up to see, quite clearly, the AA logo of American Airlines on the side of the jet. Then he says that the plane dove and increased speed toward the Pentagon. Well, if that is the case, then he must have seen the plane a mile or so out because according to the FAA and Norad, that plane was flying low for quite a ways before it struck the Pentagon. How did he hear the “roar of the engines” so far out? Then he adds the new story-line that he saw the wings of the plane fold back into the body of the jet when it hit. Look at the pictures from the only release 5 frames of the actual video from the attack. How did someone “see” the wings “fold back against the plane” in that millisecond of impact that was obscured by the fireball? He couldn’t have. It’s impossible. But even more telling than all of this… His original interview with CNN on the day of the attacks. “I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon,” eyewitness Mike Walter said of the plane that hit the military complex. “Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards,” he said. Nothing about the wings folding back. Nothing about the AA logo. In fact, he said it was like a “cruise missile with wings“. Now here he is, pawning off the latest story from the administration that the wings “folded in” and that explains why the wings didn’t break off and they didn’t leave an outline of a plane in the side of the Pentagon, like what happened at the Trade Center. Mike Walters is a pathetic liar. He is lying about a terrorist attack on U.S. soil which claimed thousands of lives. In the interest of national security, he should be held for questioning. _________________________________ It would greatly improve his credibility if he produced the list of CIA assets in the media and showed us that he's not on it. Also, Walter is obviously not his given name, and....well, you know the rest......
Here's another press liar at the link you posted who should be held for questioning, Jamie McIntyre, CNN Senior Pentagon Correspondent: The Pentagon 9/11/2001: CNN - Evidence Tampering
There are no replies to Comment # 55. End Trace Mode for Comment # 55.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAnalysis by Non-Commissioned Investigator Shows Plane Footage Doctored Up to Hide Clandestine Remote Controlled Anti-Gravity Ball Hitting World Trade Center Building 2
Yesterday Richard D. Hall posted his new 3-D video analysis of 9/11 showing that a top secret anti-gravity vehicle that hit World Trade Center Building 2.
#6. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, WTF is this shit??? (#1)
Analysis by Non-Commissioned Investigator Shows Plane Footage Doctored Up to Hide Clandestine Remote Controlled Anti-Gravity Ball Hitting World Trade Center Building 2
#7. To: PSUSA (#6)
#14. To: gengis gandhi (#7)
how strange!
#21. To: wudidiz (#14)
Think of all the niggers you could hate in 20 minutes.
#24. To: Flintlock (#21)
Think of all the niggers you could hate in 20 minutes.
"Watch the video, Flintlock."
#50. To: wudidiz (#24)
#53. To: abraxas (#50)
#54. To: wudidiz, abraxas, PSUSA (#53)
#55. To: HOUNDDAWG, wudidiz, all (#54)
(Edited)
Mike Walters is a pathetic liar. He is lying about a terrorist attack on U.S. soil which claimed thousands of lives. In the interest of national security, he should be held for questioning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=W1yERU2TeUI&feature=player_related
Replies to Comment # 55.