[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
History See other History Articles Title: Islam’s Achievement Gap Muslims represent 25 percent of the planets populationmore than 1 billion, according to About Encyclopedia.com; some say more. Now, how many Muslims have been Nobel Prize winners for science? Just two: Ahmed Zewail in 1999 for chemistry and Abdus Salam in 1979 for physics. For those keeping score, which apparently does not include the apparently, thats two prize winners in more than a billion Muslims. But even using Islamic metrics, the achievements of the Muslim world seem dubious at best. The Islamic Development Bank (IDB), founded to foster economic development in its 57 member countries, released a major study in 2008 showing just how far behind Islamic countries lagged behind the developed world. The study stated that while Education forms the basis for developing innovation, science and technology . . . according to the UN only six Islamic countries fall in the high human development index (HDI), 22 in the medium, as a many as 23 in low HDI category. The lowest-ranking Islamic country ranks 173rd in a list if 178 countries. The study went on to note: The entire Muslim world constituting one-fifth of humanity, contributes barely 1,000 research articles out of 100,000 science books and 2,000,000 research articles published annually. While the West has an average of 3,000 science PhDs per million of its inhabitants, the number of IDB member countries is so dismally small that not even the statistics are available. . .nbsp;. The 57 predominately Muslim countries have about 23 percent of the worlds population, but less than 1 percent of its scientists who generate less than 5 percent of its science and make barely 1 percent of the worlds original research discoveries each year. Although notable for its sober look at the Muslim worlds dearth of recent achievement, the IDB study did repeat the stock claim Islam once led the world in scientific endeavor. The deficiency in Muslim science and technology is particularly intriguing, given that Muslims were world leaders in science and technology a millennium ago, the study lamented. {snip} The evidence suggests otherwise. Some scholars conclude that Islamic countries largely failed in developing modern science. According to a paper published by Global Politician, Middle Eastern individuals primarily using the Arabic language included Arabs, Iranians, Christians, Jews, and others who were in the forefront of scientific advance . . . not necessarily Arab Muslims. Similarly, Toby E. Huff, chancellor professor of policy studies at University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, and author of studies in the rise of science, has written that Islamic science was almost totally dependent upon translations, frequently made by non-Muslims of the achievements of pre-Islamic cultures, Greeks, Egyptians, Indians, etc. Moreover, a striking number of Muslim thinkers were Persians who owed more of their pre-Islamic heritage than they did to Islam. {snip} David Storobik, editor of Global Politician, the journal of international politics, said it is an historical fact that the scientific revolution happened in Europe, not India, China, or the Middle East. There was also nothing quite like the medieval university in the Roman Empire. Whatever existed of real science in Roman times was almost entirely of Greek Origin. The medieval University then represented a real innovation. {snip} In the fall of 2009, Saudi Arabia launched a new graduate university for the sciences, the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. But lest President Obama and the usual enthusiasts claim that this move represents Islams return to a tradition of achievement, its worth nothing that the schools $10 billion endowmentthe sixth largest in the world.came from the United States.
Poster Comment: I am not politically correct at all. Islam is not a religion for white people. It's for the genetically simple-minded: Arabs and blacks. "a historical fact that the scientific revolution happened in Europe" Europeans and their descendents in American created/discovered 97% of everything in the world.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Turtle (#0)
Perhaps you think the Nobel committees have been biased. It could be. But the simple fact is that the entire Muslim world is behind the times with the hard sciences. Even their medieval scientific achievements turn out to be technology worked up in non-Muslims cultures that the Muslims subsequently conquered (like algebra from India). With the last decade one of the important imams was still preaching that the earth was flat - and that anyone who said otherwise was an enemy of Islam who could be murdered and robbed with impunity! The tiny country of Israel reports genuine medical advances and breakthroughs at a rate of about four a year. When's the last time you heard of a significant medical discovery from any of the 22 Muslim countries? And the same question about most of the other hard sciences...
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|