Title: SHOCKING VIDEO Glenn Beck Uses Vicks To Cry On Cue Source:
You Tube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8CELJn_wlY Published:Aug 31, 2010 Author:Unknown (Not Fox News) Post Date:2010-08-31 09:56:44 by TwentyTwelve Keywords:Glenn Beck is a phony, Fox News deception, Beck is a fake Views:1772 Comments:70
Glen Beck is a phony!
Artificial tears used on stage
Beck sitting on a stool in make up room saying “I think I am going to need more tears”
Next the make up artist places Vicks unders Becks’s eyes to make them tear. Beck says “My eyes are getting used to it (Vicks).
Glenn Beck is being characterized by the establishment as the leader of the freedom movement and yet a closer analysis of his ideology reveals that Beck is nothing more than a fake revolutionary who has supported and is pushing policies that are diametrically opposed to those embraced by true constitutionalists.
Beck and Fox News have hijacked the patriot movement and are leading conservatives and libertarians down a meaningless partisan rabbit hole in a clear attempt to neutralize genuine opposition to the big government agenda of the Obama administration.
Ok, I'll bite - for WHOM??
Should be ovious...he's a globalist shill.
"Certainly, on several issues Beck jives with populist sentiment, but on all the major fronts – war, the patriot act, warrantless spying, the bailout, and new taxes, he is nothing more than a shill for big government."
"Beck has also been aggressively pushing for new taxes in order to pay for the bailout that he supported."
"On December 4, he appeared on fellow neo-con Bill O’Reilly’s show to promote a 2 percent VAT tax to be adopted that would go directly to pay down the national debt."
"While lending support to the Tea Party movement out of one side of his mouth, out of the other Beck is promoting the exact thing they are protesting against – more taxes."
Beck and Fox News have hijacked the patriot movement and are leading conservatives and libertarians down a meaningless partisan rabbit hole in a clear attempt to neutralize genuine opposition to the big government agenda of the Obama administration.
Ok, I'll bite - for WHOM??
Should be ovious...he's a globalist shill.
HUH??
Beck has taken on 0bama and his Commie cadre head-on, taken on the criminal Federal Reserve, exposed Wilsonian globalism, been a contrarian pundit - and yet he's characterized by you and others (and Alex Jones) as not only part of the problem, but a puppet and gubmint shill?? Chyeah, right.
It's sour grapes, jealousy, and a crummy stab in the dark. Oh, and it's cute how Beck is targeted because regards Ron Paul as a phony.
During his Monday September 22 2008 TV broadcast, Beck expressed his vehement support for the bailout, stating, “The $700 billion dollars that you’re hearing about now is not only I believe necessary, it is also not nearly enough.” However, as soon as Bush left office and Obama picked up the baton and continued the same financial policy, he changed his tune and routinely attacked the bailout as an example of how socialism was taking over America.
The bailout was bad news for America under Bush just as it is under Obama, both were merely performing a transfer of wealth from America to offshore banks and giving the Federal Reserve total dictatorial control over the economy, but Beck only opposed it when Bush was out of office, proving that his opinions are not wedded to right or wrong, but to which puppet is in the White House.
A host of mainline conservative talking heads opposed the banker bailout, as did the majority of the American people, but Beck went on television and publicly supported it. This is irreconcilable with Beck being “a libertarian at heart” as he claims.
In addition, Beck aggressively attacked Ron Paul and his supporters during the election campaign when it looked like the Texan Congressman might have a real chance of winning the nomination. Beck implied that Ron Paul supporters were domestic terrorists and should be dealt with by the U.S. Army, but later tried to side with Ron Paul supporters when the infamous and discredited MIAC report echoed his own talking point that people who support Ron Paul were dangerous.
The smear came during a November 2007 show when Beck was on CNN. Alongside ex-Marxist David Horowitz, Beck demonized Ron Paul supporters, libertarians and the anti-war left as terrorist sympathizers and inferred that the U.S. military should be used to silence them, parroting a talking point that traces back to a September 2006 White House directive. When asked about the issue, Ron Paul dismissed Beck as “pretty discourteous” and a “demagogue”.
Beck has also worked with government propagandists Popular Mechanics in an effort to “debunk” the existence of internment camps in America. Beck’s hit piece consisted of setting up a straw man argument while ignoring the manifestly provable evidence that such facilities exist and that they are admittedly being prepared to house citizens during times of civil unrest.
Beck has ceaselessly attacked 9/11 truthers as dangerous extremists, echoing precisely talking points put out by Obama information czar Cass Sunstein. Just last week Beck said on his nationally syndicated radio show that there are 9/11 truth activists in the White House and they threaten the life of Obama. The fact that Beck is repeating White House talking points to demonize political adversaries of the administration proves that his image as an anti-establishment guru is a manufactured fraud.
During his Monday September 22 2008 TV broadcast, Beck expressed his vehement support for the bailout, stating, “The $700 billion dollars that you’re hearing about now is not only I believe necessary, it is also not nearly enough.” However, as soon as Bush left office and Obama picked up the baton and continued the same financial policy, he changed his tune and routinely attacked the bailout as an example of how socialism was taking over America.
TARP was framed as an "emergency" in Sept. 2008 by economists, and by January 2009 many components were broken down and discovered to be packaged goodies for banks. Dinging Beck for that doesn't work for me.
In addition, Beck aggressively attacked Ron Paul and his supporters during the election campaign when it looked like the Texan Congressman might have a real chance of winning the nomination. Beck implied that Ron Paul supporters were domestic terrorists and should be dealt by the US Army...
Firstly, had some good ideas and views, but he N-E-V-E-R had a chance of winning the Presidential nomination. Get real. Secondly, "implied" RP supporters were "terrorists"? I don't know how legit that charge is, but some Paul supporters ARE moonbat-loony.
Beck has ceaselessly attacked 9/11 truthers as dangerous extremists, echoing precisely talking points put out by Obama information czar Cass Sunstein. Just last week Beck said on his nationally syndicated radio show that there are 9/11 truth activists in the White House and they threaten the life of Obama.
I disagree with Beck in this regard. He ain't perfect.
But I suspect more of Beck's followers would fit into that category. Especially given all the police state $#it he actively supports (like the Patriot Act). No actual patriot supports anything like that. Nor do they support having troops scattered all over the world being used by the UN or using our soldiers in "wars" which have not been declared by Congress. There's a LOT of reasons why I don't support Beck. As for your claim that Beck isn't perfect, I don't believe anyone here thought he was.
Actually, he doesn't support the Patriot Act any longer. He's stated such explicitly many times the last few years. He says he did initially, and he assumed it would sunset and go away, but it hasn't and he sees it now as a dupe pulled on us all and a severe danger to liberty.
or do they support having troops scattered all over the world being used by the UN or using our soldiers in "wars" which have not been declared by Congress.
The last 6-8 months or so, he's changed his tune on that as well. Again, clearly stated that we shouldn't have troops everywhere, but he doesn't think that they can all be brought home immediately next week without causing huge disruptions in the world. Not a perfect view, but he has changed it significantly to be certain.
As I've stated on other posts, he seems to be going through an intellectual transformation from neocon to actual libertarian. He's clearly not completed that transformation, but he is on the way from everything I'm hearing him say.
Well, if he ever actually makes it to real libertarian and figures out that there is nothing wrong with "truthers" (that he mocks--what does he prefer, liars?) I might pay some attention to him. It would be good if he took off the blinders and maybe he will. As I have seen you state, none of us came into the world knowing what we know after years of study and trial and error. Or words to that effect anyway. If I know someone is actually trying I will cut them some slack but when someone badmouths people just because they don't swallow the government's fairy tale about 9/11 hook, line and sinker, I take that into account.