See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Killtown: Why Use Real Planes?
Source:
YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpkqomUc7Xs&feature=related
Published: Jun 5, 2008
Author: Posted by WelcomeToKilltown
Post Date: 2010-09-01 05:34:12 by GreyLmist
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 9/11, CGI, No Planes
Views: 2144
Comments: 37
Poster Comment: WelcomeToKilltown | June 05, 2008 The military talked about using TV fakery since 1995. Digitally altering live TV broadcasts has been feasible since 1998. Since 2000, the media has been warning the public about the news and military using TV fakery. See also: "Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC" ___________ Excerpt from the recommended article linked above, "Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC": they would still run the risk of not being able to pull the Twin Towers and WTC 7 if any of the two planes didn't crash the exact way they needed them to crash (i.e. penetrate all the way through so they blow up in the insides of both buildings) and that is something the perps could not afford to chance since collapsing the WTC 1, 2, and 7 was arguably the cornerstones of their diabolical plan. ___________ FAQ Comment at YouTube site and reply: agat0r here's my question: After the first tower was struck, didn't we have about a billion video recorders turned onŒ79; to record the second plane striking the building? They can't ALL BE FAKES, can they? WelcomeToKilltown We've only found about 44 videos of the 2nd hit. Far cryŒ79; from a 'billion.' ___________________ I differ with the posted video on the extent of Military complicity in the hoax.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/...
1 year ago
1 year ago
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: GreyLmist (#0)
(Edited)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
I completely agree with this statement....after all Project Bluebeam is a reality. But I just don't believe that the technology is advenced enough at this point to be able to fool the 1000's of eyewitnesses.
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
Hi everybody. Matt here. First post, a link to all the plane videos: http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html I put this site together as an investigation into TV fakery. I even tried to explain the engine debris with a cannon theory: http://s1.zetaboards.com/pumpitout/topic/1930887/1 Hope that helps.
I disagree. However, I bet the perps were more comfortable with remote control technology than they were with all the variables in a no plane attack.
hi matt, welcome. your site has been showing a message that the bandwidth was exceeded for the past 3 days. glad to see it's back up. i'm looking forward to your participation here.
Welcome.
Always good to see you posting here, Bill. It wish you'd visit more often.
"No Planes"! Get your "No Planes" here! Get 'em while they're hot!
btw, nice job on the video compilations.
note to self.
.
What's wrong with this picture? Welcome, Baghdad_Bob! We are going to have a lot of fun!
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
No damage to the building. The plane entered the building like a hot knife cutting through butter. Problem is, it's not a hot knife and the building isn't butter.
.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
Edit: Here's a bigger one... "Because big jets were there, then people must have seen them - because people saw them, that proves they were there."
Hello.... Hello.... Hello.... Hello.... Hello.... Hello.... Hello....
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
Echoes pt 3 - David Gilmour and Rick Wright
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Hi Matt. Welcome.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_ hit.html I put this site together as an investigation into TV fakery. I even tried to explain the engine debris with a cannon theory: http://s1.zetaboards.c om/pumpitout/topic/1930887/1 Hope that helps. Hello, Matt. Thanks for joining us here. :) Greatly helpful site you put together and interesting cannon theory. I activated the links so they are easier for readers to access. I especially appreciated your research on the "Smoke & Mirrors" video at your site, which wasn't aired on 9/11 or near that date but seems to have been created for a more dark effect -- maybe to "sell" the Iraq War. Edit to reword: I'm not clear if the 2003 PBS documentary, "New York Center of the World", that it was in ever appeared on Public or national TV outside of Detroit or it didn't. Would like to hear more on that if there's anything else you've learned about it. 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors (short version) - 4 min. Elpiper | June 02, 2008 A shorter version of my 10-minute video "Smoke & Mirrors" (watch?v=SS0dNaseISM) exposing the method used by the media to fake the plume of smoke seen on some of the 9/11 footage. The particular clip analyzed in this video was found on the 9/11 website terrorize.dk (now gone) back in early 2004 and has not been altered by the video-maker in any way. 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors - long version, 10 min. Elpiper | May 31, 2008 Exposing the method used by the media to fake the plume of smoke seen on some of the 9/11 footage. The particular clip analyzed in this video was found on the 9/11 website terrorize.dk (now gone) back in early 2004 and has not been altered by the video-maker in any way. ______________ 911CTV Analysis @ YouTube: RE: 9/11 TV Fakery Smoke and Mirrors by elpiper 911CTV | March 25, 2009 The smoke is real... The editing was done long after 9/11, people! NOT 9/11 TV FAKERY, but video fakery... It was done to get a clip of the 2nd plane for a documentary.... The Detroit Public TV shot (which comes from the 2003 PBS documentary "New York Center of the World") was a crop of the CBS 9:22 am shot. The terrorize.dk mirrored smoke fake is the same crop, its left edge matching with the line in the smoke where the repeating smoke starts and the picture was widened. Yet this crop was from that same angle shown 17 minutes earlier on CBS... when the last part of the plane approach is shown. _______________ Excerpt from analysis @ http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html#CBS-3, for: 8. CBS-3 See "RE: 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors by Elpiper" for a study of a similar fake of unknown origin, also made available at terrorize.dk (see 3rd photo at left). These two examples of video editing are not examples of a conspiracy within the mass media - "9/11 TV fakery" - because the video wasn't part of a TV broadcast until the PBS documentary aired 2 years later. The camera location: General Motors Building, aka FAO Schwartz, E 58th St at Madison Ave... 215 meters tall on ground elevated at 48 feet above sea level Lat 40.763595 Lon -73.972781 (Thanks, YougeneDebs)
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Alternate path for the 911closeup.com article: WHY THEY DIDN'T USE PLANES Recommending this article there also: What Witnesses? And this one from '02, also by Gerard Holmgren, "Did F77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined." at: http://bogusstory.com/con fl ictingwitnesses.html
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Theory of Ghostplane [my note: CGI FX - How it's done] Lets create a fake plane! [my note: looks like same video, different title and poster] ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Really good to have you on board.
Thank you, wud. Same to you. :) Does this seem like more Russians in the area than might ordinarily be expected? It does to me: From your post at #11: How NOT to Fake Plane Crash Videos - TinaCart1 - Russian pilot @ 3:15- 3:29 From 4um thread: Find the Hidden Debris Pile 9/11 Ground Zero Footage - @ 2:57 Russian-speaking Ground Zero searcher
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Maybe, not sure why there would or would not be except that the Russians couldn't be tracked down later to interview. I like this video here: It just gets weirder and weirder....
Found some interesting info on the Russian pilot at Matt's 911conspiracy.tv site [scroll down a bit when at the page for it linked below] and more at the YouTube site linked for YougeneDebs' research on the Russian's pics [suggest turning volume way down there -- almost off]. http://www.911conspiracy.tv /2 nd_hit.html#FOX5 - Excerpt from 10. FOX5: Similar to the WNYW FOX5 LIVE shot, a speedy object flies at the same level as 175, but from the North, just after the impact. Research has shown this vehicle to be the Russian photographer/pilot in a Cessna 172SP, who captured the impact (not the plane) on film while flying down the Hudson. ____________ 2 short excerpts from Russian photographer/pilot in a Cessna 172SP: See the Loose Change Forums thread where Yuri is named as the photographer. [my note: Yury Faktorovich] To investigate speeds and distances involved in Yuri's flight, see the study by YougeneDebs. Plus, here are Debs's coordinates for the flying Russian: "High above, near the Hoboken PATH Station 40d 44m 03.67s N, 74d 01m 21.75s W. Altitude of Yury's Cessna is about 750 feet." __________ Short excerpt from the pulldown description notes at YougeneDebs' study of "THE RUSSIAN PIX! Part Three", bolded by me: Given that the maximum speed of ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
#2. To: GreyLmist (#0)
The military talked about using TV fakery since 1995. Digitally altering live TV broadcasts has been feasible since 1998. Since 2000, the media has been warning the public about the news and military using TV fakery.
#3. To: All (#2)
#4. To: Bill D Berger (#2)
But I just don't believe that the technology is advenced enough at this point to be able to fool the 1000's of eyewitnesses.
#5. To: 911conspiracyTV (#3)
#6. To: 911conspiracyTV (#3)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#7. To: Bill D Berger (#2)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#8. To: GreyLmist, *9-11* (#0)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#9. To: 911conspiracyTV (#3)
#10. To: GreyLmist (#0)
the most factual thing ever posted by buckeroo
I have no freaking' clue. buckeroo posted on 2010-07-24 21:33:00 ET
#11. To: GreyLmist, christine, 911conspiracyTV, *9-11*, All (#8)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#12. To: All (#11)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#13. To: 911conspiracyTV (#3)
I put this site together as an investigation into TV fakery.
#14. To: wudidiz (#12)
#15. To: 911conspiracyTV, All (#3)
#16. To: Eric Stratton (#14)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#17. To: Eric Stratton (#15)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#18. To: wudidiz (#17)
#19. To: wudidiz (#16)
#20. To: wudidiz (#16)
#21. To: Eric Stratton (#19)
No damage to the building. The plane entered the building like a hot knife cutting through butter. Problem is, it's not a hot knife and the building isn't butter.
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#22. To: Eric Stratton, GreyLmist, 911conspiracyTV, Original_Intent, FormerLurker, all (#20)
(Edited)
Do you know where that "no exit wound" pic is too?
Note: no f***in hole...
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#23. To: christine, Original_Intent, HOUNDDAWG, noone222, gengis gandhi, Itistoolate, *9-11*, All (#22)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#24. To: All (#23)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#25. To: All, *9-11* (#24)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#26. To: wudidiz (#25)
#27. To: wudidiz (#25)
Hello.... Hello.... Hello.... Hello.... Hello
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sslDnId25w0
#28. To: 911conspiracyTV (#3)
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#29. To: 911conspiracyTV (#3)
(Edited)
Hi everybody. Matt here. First post, a link to all the plane videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=DkzfKRe0gbc
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=SS0dNaseISM
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=YVAzASfZmiU
#30. To: wudidiz (#23)
WHY THEY DIDN'T USE PLANES
http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=71
http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=84
#31. To: wudidiz (#21)
(Edited)
No damage to the building. The plane entered the building like a hot knife cutting through butter. Problem is, it's not a hot knife and the building isn't butter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=QNXmgF2yAEc&feature=fvw
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=ibtV8yITqa4&feature=related
#32. To: GreyLmist (#31)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#33. To: wudidiz (#32)
Really good to have you on board.
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=gmjjK2MYKDg&feature=related
#34. To: GreyLmist (#33)
Does this seem like more Russians in the area than might ordinarily be expected? It does to me:
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#35. To: All (#34)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#36. To: wudidiz, 911conspiracyTV (#34)
(Edited)
a Cessna 172SP is 145mph and a
tailwind of 15mph for the stretch
down the Hudson River, Yury flew
at 160mph for Pic2 through Pic10.
#37. To: GreyLmist (#31)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest