Title: How NOT to Fake Plane Crash Videos - TinaCart1 Source:
Killtown/youtube URL Source:http://N/A Published:Sep 1, 2010 Author:Killtown Post Date:2010-09-01 15:21:40 by Eric Stratton Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:549 Comments:9
The sound of the plane hitting the Tower was obviously not from the camera taking the shot but added by someone recording at a much closer distance. TV is all about show business, including the news, they do stuff like this for dramatization, especially when they are ordered to do so by the their bosses, all the time.
For no plane to have hit WTC 2 there would have to be plenty of witnesses that could testify they saw no plane hit it and there would have been at least ONE video of the building just exploding with nothing hitting it. While this video does show alterations were made, it doesn't mean they were made by the people recording it, it could have easily been made by the TV news crew production technicians.
For no plane to have hit WTC 2 there would have to be plenty of witnesses that could testify they saw no plane hit it and there would have been at least ONE video of the building just exploding with nothing hitting it.
Seems you have ignored all evidence posted about that again and expect nearly 9 years of research to keep returning to square one because you choose to stay there and choose not to believe it. Reminds me of The "nobody-could- have-known" excuse and Iraq: They could have known. And should have known. They chose not to. [Ref: this 4um thread] If you know anything of the USS Liberty Attack, you should realize that who is selected by the media and officials to testify doesn't equate to the Truth. Even so, there are people who testified in news reports that they didn't see or hear a plane and I will post a link to a short video below for you as further evidence of that, as well as no actual plane strike on the building shown -- just assumed to have caused the explosion: