[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: God did not create the universe, says Hawking
Source: Reuters
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 2, 2010
Author: Reuters
Post Date: 2010-09-02 21:17:00 by Flintlock
Keywords: ODIN!!!, Hey-Sus, AL-LA, Big Guy On A Throne With A Bea
Views: 9656
Comments: 141

LONDON (Reuters) – God did not create the universe and the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics, the eminent British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking argues in a new book.

In "The Grand Design," co-authored with U.S. physicist Leonard Mlodinow, Hawking says a new series of theories made a creator of the universe redundant, according to the Times newspaper which published extracts on Thursday.

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist," Hawking writes.

"It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."

Hawking, 68, who won global recognition with his 1988 book "A Brief History of Time," an account of the origins of the universe, is renowned for his work on black holes, cosmology and quantum gravity.

Since 1974, the scientist has worked on marrying the two cornerstones of modern physics -- Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, which concerns gravity and large-scale phenomena, and quantum theory, which covers subatomic particles.

His latest comments suggest he has broken away from previous views he has expressed on religion. Previously, he wrote that the laws of physics meant it was simply not necessary to believe that God had intervened in the Big Bang.

He wrote in A Brief History ... "If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason -- for then we should know the mind of God."

In his latest book, he said the 1992 discovery of a planet orbiting another star other than the Sun helped deconstruct the view of the father of physics Isaac Newton that the universe could not have arisen out of chaos but was created by God.

"That makes the coincidences of our planetary conditions -- the single Sun, the lucky combination of Earth-Sun distance and solar mass, far less remarkable, and far less compelling evidence that the Earth was carefully designed just to please us human beings," he writes.

Hawking, who is only able to speak through a computer-generated voice synthesizer, has a neuro muscular dystrophy that has progressed over the years and left him almost completely paralyzed.

He began suffering the disease in his early 20s but went on to establish himself as one of the world's leading scientific authorities, and has also made guest appearances in "Star Trek" and the cartoons "Futurama" and "The Simpsons."

Last year he announced he was stepping down as Cambridge University's Lucasian Professor of Mathematics, a position once held by Newton and one he had held since 1979.

"The Grand Design" is due to go on sale next week.

(Editing by Steve Addison)


Poster Comment:

But, But, BUT!!! What about Hey-Sus?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-54) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#55. To: Pinguinite, gengis gandhi, Original_Intent, all (#17)

Is Hawking saying there is no God or just that God didn't necessarily create the Universe.

God could be the Creator of the laws that facilitate the creation of the Universe.


Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?

wudidiz  posted on  2010-09-02   22:41:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Pinguinite (#52)

Can't prove a negative.

Yes you can. Quite easily.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   22:43:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Put SG on full privilege, Stone. After all I told Fredo he could come back.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-09-02   22:44:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: abraxas (#53)

Care for me means not hostile to me. If you want to come and just attack me and not contribute. You are not welcome. You can still sign up and I wont stop you. But you will not receive a welcome.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   22:44:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Jethro Tull (#57)

He doesn't want to join up. If he does all he has to do is ask. Or just go sign up. Here is a little secret. Even people who don't put a valid email address. They all get elevated to full status.

To be honest I don't know a lot of Sams positions. Except his fuck stone position.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   22:46:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: Jethro Tull (#57)

I think someone killed the real Fred and took his account.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   22:47:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: A K A Stone (#58)

Care for me means not hostile to me.

Stone, Fredo calls you a loon, an asshole and a s'bag. Banning SG while permitting those insults is absurd.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-09-02   22:47:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#23)

The Bible says that those who don't believe in God are fools. I believe the Bible.

I'm pretty sure Hawking is an agnostic, not an athiest. Athiests don't believe in God. Agnostics aren't sure one way or the other. But that probably still qualifies as a fool by your definition, and the Bible's.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-09-02   22:47:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: wudidiz (#55)

Is Hawking saying there is no God or just that God didn't necessarily create the Universe.

He says, "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist," Hawking writes.

Basically, he is saying that God isn't the reason for creation. Hence, he would then be demoted from Creator status. So, spontaneous is meant to supercede God.........but I think God could be spontaneous. : )

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-02   22:48:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: gengis gandhi, (#47)

(((ping)))

WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)

Flintlock  posted on  2010-09-02   22:49:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Jethro Tull (#61)

lol I never banned SG.

Fred is more like an interloper then a welcome guest right now.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   22:49:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: buckeroo (#27)

Are you saying, Hawking is a living GOD?

Uh..... did I say that??

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-09-02   22:49:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: abraxas (#18)

i think a high IQ in many cases is overrated. EQ is much more important in terms of relationship success. i know a number of high IQers who possess little common sense and with low sociability.

christine  posted on  2010-09-02   22:49:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: A K A Stone, Samuel Gray (#59)

I don't know a lot of Sams positions. Except his fuck stone position.

In your dreams, JizzBelly.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2010-09-02   22:53:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Flintlock (#0)

But, But, BUT!!! What about Hey-Sus?

Hawking Said It, I Believe It And That Settles It!

(bumper sticker we'd like to see)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2010-09-02   22:53:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Pinguinite (#66)

Uh..... did I say that??

In a sense. Hawking is a mere mortal strapped on the planet in a wheelchair. And despite his pathetic wheelchair condition, he can't sanction how the universe was or is or shall be created no matter how intelligent he may appear... and this goes for ALL of us.

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-09-02   22:53:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: buckeroo (#51) (Edited)

I am sure the women on 4um want to learn how you connived Mud to lay with you?

uh...no, we don't. i don't even want that visual in my head.

christine  posted on  2010-09-02   22:54:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: A K A Stone (#58)

Care for me means not hostile to me.

Nah, I don't want to come over, especially not if you are going to withhold the coveted welcome mat. If there is no tipper tape parade or cute little balloons and some cheering for me upon arrival, I shall not sign up. Beyond that, I can't promise to be good and contribute and not "attack" (whatever that means. lol

You come over here and are hostile to posters on a regular basis. Does that mean that you don't shit in your own nest, but hold and purge on Christine's instead?

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-02   22:55:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: christine (#71)

i don't even want that visual image in my head.

Ever see Deliverance?

"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-09-02   22:57:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: christine (#67)

I agree with each and every word on that post. : )

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-02   22:57:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Pinguinite (#62)

The terms 'atheist' and 'agnostic' often get interchanged. In truth, the position most fitting a scientist worth their three stripes and hood is that of agnostic, which simply means 'without knowledge', or colloquially, 'we don't know.'

Even Richard Dawkins says there's "almost certainly" no god, not because there is any doubt of the matter on his part, but because a scientist should always allow room for new knowledge or discoveries that might illuminate or fortify an argument previously thought impossible or even absurd.

What Hawking has said here is nothing new. Pierre-Simon Laplace built a working model of the universe and wrote a massive treatise on physics and mathematics, both of which he submitted to Napoleon for review. When Napoleon inquired as to the absence of god from the works, Laplace is said to have replied: "I had no need of that hypothesis" or "I did not need to make that assumption in order for it to work." Some translations even have it as "Sire, because it worked well enough without him."

Do not multiply entities unnecessarily.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2010-09-02   22:58:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: buckeroo (#73)

yes, good film, but that scene was disturbing to say the least.

christine  posted on  2010-09-02   22:59:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: James Deffenbach (#39)

Now this Hawkings guy would have you believe that he is brilliant and knows everything worth knowing.

That doesn't seem to be his character as I gathered it. I read his "A Brief History of Time" some years ago and it's already well outdated. He wrote that book before it was discovered (if it's true) that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. I remember distinctly his mentioning that if the big bang expanded at a rate the smallest fraction of speed less than what it was, gravity would have caused a recontraction. That is not accepted by any cosmosogist since it was discovered (?) that the universe expansion is accelerating in defiance of gravity, not slowing down.

So he was wrong before and it's well documented. I've no reason to think him dishonest. Wrong is always possible, but that's not a crime.

But you can take all his knowledge and add it to that of the rest of mankind and it would not equal that of the Creator. His thoughts are far above ours, even those of the man who said God wasn't necessary.

Agreed. But I don't think he's saying God is "not necessary" in the sense that we would be here today whether or not God is real. I think he's saying that God is not the only possible explanation for the creation of the universe which is different.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-09-02   23:04:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: christine (#67)

Uuuhhhggg.........here is a cas in point:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is ALLEGED to have an IQ of 180.

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-02   23:04:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Pinguinite (#77)

he's saying that God is not the only possible explanation for the creation of the universe which is different.

And that is why he not only looks like a retard but his mind is that of one.

Also, his book was out of date when it came out. It was always lacking.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   23:08:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Samuel Gray (#75)

Pierre-Simon Laplace built a working model of the universe...

Cripes, I wonder where he found the space to do that. That must've been one hell of a shop.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2010-09-02   23:09:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Christine, Jethro Tull, critter (#80)

Tell Tull to reactivate my account at 4um. I've been banned for months now and I want to chat with my old buddy critter.

I won't beg to be let back on. My banning was a travesty and I think even you know that.

I'll check my 4um account tomorrow. Thanks big shot, I know you've got the pull.

"Lets [sic] rent a room." ~ Tull to Rotara

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-09-02 23:04:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   23:15:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Now imagine that everything in the universe came from, not that grain of sand, but something smaller but not something smaller, rather something that did not exist. If gravity, a physical property, where so great as to keep all non existent matter held together, then what was it that caused gravity to be overwhelmed with such force as to allow the Big Bang to occur.

That's an excellent question, Stone, and I don't think anyone, including Hawking, is claiming to know the answer. Right now cosmologists think they have things figured out back to a few fractions of a second after the bang occurred. Knowing what happened at the instant of it is still beyond theory, much less what made it happen.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-09-02   23:17:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: abraxas (#78)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is ALLEGED to have an IQ of 180.

Wow that sure blows aka mallethead's 175 out of the water.

Dopey ol' Hawking's on the bottom of the totem pole.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2010-09-02   23:19:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: christine (#76)

yes, good film, but that scene was disturbing to say the least.

Depicting female rape is lurid entertainment. "It's essential to the story line!" we're told.

Depicting male rape oughta be against the law because as we macho sumbitches learned from DELIVERANCE there's nothing stimulating about it.

"Boy, yew shore gotta purty mouth!"

Ugh.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2010-09-02   23:22:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Esso (#83)

I think the "chosen" get graded on a curve of at least 50 points not allotted to the goy.........or they get the answers sent via God fax prior to taking the test. : )

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-02   23:23:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: A K A Stone, Christine (#81)

I don't know what Fred did, but I do miss seeing baldy around here. Please reconsider his banning.


Waiting too late to oppose tyranny has always led to bloodshed.
Cheap Bulk .223 ammo cases battle packs south african

Critter  posted on  2010-09-02   23:24:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Pinguinite (#82)

, much less what made it happen.

Or if it happened.

Also just to make it double clear. That wasn't my question. I agree it was a good question. But it came from the comments on a thread about this article at the source as found on my page.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   23:27:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: wudidiz (#55)

Is Hawking saying there is no God or just that God didn't necessarily create the Universe.

He's saying that a divine creator is not the only explanation we have for the creation of the universe. It's much like coming across a pile of stones on a path. You may suspect it placed there by a person, but there may be non-human explanations for the pile as well. That is Hawking's position on the universe creation.

He has never said definitively that God doesn't exist, so far as I know.

God could be the Creator of the laws that facilitate the creation of the Universe.

I agree 100%, but I think Hawking's says that the "multiverse" may have millions of big bangs, each with a unique, random set of laws like gravity, physics, chemistry, quantum laws, speed of light, etc, and the vast majority of them just failed. But the one we're in just happened to have the right recipe of laws for everything to co-exist in a stable state and for life to arise.

I should repeat again the program I saw of his not too long ago was a bit depressing. For me, something about it just wasn't right.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-09-02   23:27:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Critter (#86)

Hey critter I think you are ok too. Even if we do scrap at times.

Genuinely hope your tire business is doing good for you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2010-09-02   23:28:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: A K A Stone (#89)

It's going well beyond my wildest expectations. Thanks.

You're not too bad either... for a rapture monkey. :p


Waiting too late to oppose tyranny has always led to bloodshed.
Cheap Bulk .223 ammo cases battle packs south african

Critter  posted on  2010-09-02   23:30:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: abraxas (#8)

His IQ is 160........perhaps you should refrain from betting.

Which test exactly?

My IQ is kinda high. I'd be interested in hearing which scale he was measured against.

If I were born nearly helpless but sharp as a tack, I'd have a grudge as well. That grudge would transcend intellect, at least in cases like his. Our intellect does not rise above our sense of justice.

"The more artificial taboos and restrictions there are in the world, the more the people are impoverished.... The more that laws and regulations are given prominence, the more thieves and robbers there will be." - Lao Tzu, 6th century BC

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-02   23:30:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: SonOfLiberty (#91)

He wasn't born helpless. His disease didn't appear until around the time he started his doctoral program, which he almost quit, thinking he had only a short time to live.

Samuel Gray  posted on  2010-09-02   23:31:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: christine (#67)

i think a high IQ in many cases is overrated. EQ is much more important in terms of relationship success. i know a number of high IQers who possess little common sense and with low sociability.

I think attempts to map the complexities of the human brain on a one-dimensional tape-measure like scale is really a primitive way of measuring it.

Every mind can excel in a multitude of ways. IQ, EQ... I'm sure there's a bunch of other Q's that can be created.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-09-02   23:32:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: SonOfLiberty (#91)

Which test exactly?

The scores I noted are from the MENSA testing, which is geared toward spacial relations to a great extent.

However, in regards to Hawkins he has never actually stated a score and the score is alleged based on analysis of his intellect.

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-02   23:35:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: abraxas (#94)

The scores I noted are from the MENSA testing, which is geared toward spacial relations to a great extent.

Thank you.

However, in regards to Hawkins he has never actually stated a score and the score is alleged based on analysis of his intellect.

I wonder about that sometimes. But ocasionally more than anything. Again, thanks for the answers.

"The more artificial taboos and restrictions there are in the world, the more the people are impoverished.... The more that laws and regulations are given prominence, the more thieves and robbers there will be." - Lao Tzu, 6th century BC

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-02   23:40:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (96 - 141) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]