See other Editorial Articles
Title: Come to no-planer heaven with me....
Source:
wah.... the Internet of course ;-)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 3, 2010
Author: moi
Post Date: 2010-09-03 20:59:35 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: Look at, the facts, chicken, shit
Views: 1245
Comments: 87
I'm a no-planer now. It's easy and it's simple. You can do it too. Just look at the evidence. Do you have any idea what this does to an ego like mine? It's scary. Think about it.... No planes hit any of the WTC. Either the videos were faked or (shudder) they're holograms. WTF does that mean then? What did hit them then? If anything? So I have once again successfully distanced myself from some of my associates and society as a whole. Great. Just what I needed. /s It's lonely here. People look at you like, "Okey-dokey, dude" Trust me, don't just lay that on someone without warming them up somehow first. Introduce yourself or something. On the upside, it's like graduating to the next level. Like being promoted. To master kook. lol No, but seriously it's where the great minds must go. Lest they dwindle and stagnate and spin their tires in the lower plane realm. The glorious truth beckons ye. It calls your name like a maid in the mist. Like an angel when your sleeping it summons your higher self to transcend the 3d world and join us, the intellectual elite... So anyway, yeah..... no planes. It's a fact. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Poster Comment: OMG, my first editorial! First one I remember anyway... lol
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-18) not displayed.
.
.
.
#19. To: X-15 (#6)
(Edited)
We're in the Matrix. Actually, proof that we're not, is that if we were, it'd be like the Holodeck -- everyone would use it to have sex all the time.
"Society is, always has been and always will be a structure for the exploitation and oppression of the majority through systems of political force dictated by an élite, enforced by thugs, uniformed or not, and upheld by a willful ignorance and stupidity on the part of the very majority whom the system oppresses." -- Richard K. Morgan
Occasionally, one has a moment of clarity. This is icing on the cake: I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. - Roman Moroni
this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.
To each his or her own. That plane had plenty of kinetic energy built up to go right through whatever it hit. Try pushing your hand thru a board and you won't get very far. But hit it hard and it breaks. Same principle. I dont see how a plane hit the pentagon either. This is why they won't release the footage of the hit, and why the tapes were confiscated so soon after. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files I've listened to preachers I've listened to fools I've watched all the dropouts Who make their own rules One person conditioned to rule and control The media sells it and you live the role ~Ozzy Osbourne: Crazy Train
The scam is falling apart. No wreckage at the Pentagon or in PA.
" "The face of evil is always the face of total need." William S Burroughs
If planes did not hit the WTC and the Pentagon, and that crash site in Pennsylvania, then (1) what happened to the planes that took off that morning that were reported as hijacked? and (2) what happened to all their passengers? Some of those passengers had children and other relatives, some were very important in business. None of them has been heard from since Sept. 11th, none has reappeared.
one can only speculate about what isn't there. you have to go by the evidence that IS there. here's a video to view that i believe is very compelling on the Pentagon. 9/11 Where is the Plane, Flight 77
Bottom of the Atlantic best guess.
a comprehensive site: www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm question: why don't they want us to see the many films immediately confiscated by the government from the cameras in and around the Pentagon that day?
A most inconvenient question, my sweet. Most inconvenient, indeed.
We've been fed a pack of lies. But we here, know this already. Please, please, wake up the sheep that you know.
You're a Diamond Dak - shining in the firmament of the sky.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Just a wild assed guess: They don't support the official story and show stuff they don't want us to see.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Where's your physics calculations to explain the nosecone plowing intact through not just one wall of steel beams that were very close together but two?
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Where's your physics calculations to explain the nosecone plowing intact through not just one wall of steel beams that were very close together but two? Their is something else to consider using PSUSAs logic. Sure you can break a vertical bored if you hit it hard and fast but what about a flat bored? The alleged plane did not just magically sheer through vertical steel columns but also through the concrete steel mesh that made up the floors. It's alot tougher to break a flat bored.
That would entail risk of discovery from oil and debris surfacing. My best guesses are the black market, extraordinary rendition programs, or broken down and disposed of in hazardous waste dumps, such as Area 51 has: Bush Orders Area 51 May Keep Its Secrets There is evidence that AA11 and AA77 didn't even exist as 9/11 flights.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Sure you can break a vertical bored if you hit it hard and fast but what about a flat bored? The alleged plane did not just magically sheer through vertical steel columns but also through the concrete steel mesh that made up the floors. It's alot tougher to break a flat bored. Sounds Anti-Kinetic.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thanks for sayin' and also for the apfn info. Here's a link to a radio interview of Killtown on the 'Final Round' show - Discussing No-Planes @ WTC theory ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
That's out there also. But the passenger manifests show that many passengers on the (alleged) flights have gone missing...and with zero muslims on any of those flights. The cover is getting uncovered. Until I see something better, I'm sticking with the Bottom of the Atlantic demise of those flights.
it's an interesting and entertaining conversation. i will say that.
Ricky, listen to Killtown on the Final Round show, linked in Grey's post and let me know what you think.
Wasting your time? And mine as well, possibly.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" OK, I will listen when I have time. :)
God is always good!
What? You have seen TWO aviation crashes?????
"Satan / Cheney in "08" No planes Tom. Think about it.
The coup de gras.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" The coup de gras. This vid rocks
Think about it. OK I have. Do I understand that the video feed of the day of the planes (that were not actually there) was photoshopped to cover the nukes that were set to blow?
"Satan / Cheney in "08" Great to see you here pro no planes.
Basically. Something like that.
Thanks for the kind response.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" You're most welcome of course. Just to clarify, the explosions simultaneous with the faked plane crashes were not likely nukes. The ones that vaporized the elevator shafts and disintegrated the mass of the twin towers were very likely nukes imo.
1. Setting The Record Straight On Mini-Nukes 2. Elias Davidsson: 9/11, International Law, and No Proof of Muslim Hijackers
I was just listening to James Fetzer talking about this: OK, I found some time, listened to the whole show. :) Killtown's argument is good, but there are two very big problems with his argument of no planes hitting the towers and all the videos of the planes hitting the towers being faked. 1st big problem: 2nd big problem: God is always good!
Good point. Doesn't take away from the fact that all the videos of planes hitting the wtc were faked. So why were they faked? Why are there no real videos or pictures of planes hitting the wtc?
There are, you just think they are all faked because some of them are. I hope you can agree with me that the videos of the collapse of WTC 7 are the biggest smoking guns of 9/11 and watching one of them is the easiest and fastest way that will make many stop and say, "wait a minute, how the heck did that happen?" You get them to question the official story just a tad, then the dam breaks open and they come to realize 9/11 was an inside job.
God is always good!
I agree that videos of the collapse of WTC are the biggest smoking guns. WTC 7 more obviously than the others because it's so old school CD style. Show me a video of the plane hitting that wasn't faked.
Comments (60 - 87) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe hologram/cloaking-device theory is bunk. What does that leave you??
#20. To: wudidiz (#0)
#21. To: GreyLmist, wudidiz, PSUSA (#15)
#22. To: christine (#21)
#23. To: PSUSA, 4 (#22)
#24. To: Original_Intent (#16)
Or his Pacifier.
#25. To: wudidiz (#0)
#26. To: Shoonra (#25)
#27. To: Shoonra, 4 (#25)
None of them has been heard from since Sept. 11th, none has reappeared.
#28. To: Shoonra (#25)
#29. To: christine, 4 (#28)
why don't they want us to see the many films immediately confiscated by the government from the cameras in and around the Pentagon that day?
#30. To: All (#29)
#31. To: All (#30)
#32. To: Dakmar (#24)
#33. To: christine, Shoonra, Lod, all (#28)
question: why don't they want us to see the many films immediately confiscated by the government from the cameras in and around the Pentagon that day?
#34. To: PSUSA (#22)
That plane had plenty of kinetic energy built up to go right through whatever it hit. Try pushing your hand thru a board and you won't get very far. But hit it hard and it breaks. Same principle.
#35. To: GreyLmist (#34)
That plane had plenty of kinetic energy built up to go right through whatever it hit. Try pushing your hand thru a board and you won't get very far. But hit it hard and it breaks. Same principle.
#36. To: Lod (#27)
(Edited)
Bottom of the Atlantic best guess.
Text of President Bush's 2002 directive exempting Area 51 from requirements to disclose information on hazardous waste disposal.
usgovinfo.about.com/blpdarea51. ht m
#37. To: titorite (#35)
Their is something else to consider using PSUSAs logic.
#38. To: christine (#21)
(Edited)
this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.
48:56 - 1 year ago
Aired: January 16, 2009 Host: 'SoulReal' (This is an edited version. The original show was 2+ hours.)
#39. To: GreyLmist, 4 (#36)
There is evidence that AA11 and AA77 didn't even exist as 9/11 flights.
#40. To: GreyLmist (#38)
Killtown on the 'Final Round' show - Discussing No-Planes @ WTC theory
#41. To: Rickyj (#38)
#42. To: X-15 (#6)
The hologram/cloaking-device theory is bunk. What does that leave you??
#43. To: christine (#41)
#44. To: X-15 (#14)
I've seen two in person and it took a few minutes for my mind to process the instant death I saw in front of me.
#45. To: tom007 (#42)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#46. To: titorite (#17)
Our hologram technology is not capable yet... If it was it would be on battle fields scary the hell out out folks in the middle east with 100 foot jinn... hell the Israeli might use it on the Palestinians just to be sadistic. So no..Holograms are not there yet...
#47. To: tom007, titorite (#46)
Our hologram technology is not capable yet... If it was it would be on battle fields scary the hell out out folks in the middle east with 100 foot jinn... hell the Israeli might use it on the Palestinians just to be sadistic. So no..Holograms are not there yet...
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#48. To: GreyLmist, christine, Lod, *9-11* (#15)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#49. To: wudidiz (#45)
No planes Tom.
#50. To: randge, titorite (#20)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#51. To: tom007 (#49)
Do I understand that the video feed of the day of the planes (that were not actually there) was photoshopped to cover the nukes that were set to blow?
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#52. To: wudidiz (#51)
#53. To: tom007 (#52)
#54. To: tom007, Max, Original_Intent, christine, Lod, All (#53)
#55. To: GreyLmist, Lod, christine (#36)
There is evidence that AA11 and AA77 didn't even exist as 9/11 flights.
#56. To: christine (#41)
After the first plane hit WTC 1 there were thousands of NYC residents, workers, and tourists, who always have cameras with them, taking photographs and recording videos of WTC 1 burning from all directions surrounding the towers. Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it. But no one has ever posted such a video on the Internet. It would be virtually impossible for the perpetrators of 9/11 to control ALL the videos that would be taken that day. Some would have made their way into the public domain and then there would be proof that they faked the planes hitting the buildings. They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.
If they were going to fake the videos of planes hitting the towers to make sure there were no mistakes, then why did they not also fake the videos of the collapses of both the towers and WTC 7 to make it appear they were not controlled demolitions? Most see the video of the collapse of WTC 7 as the smoking gun of 9/11, myself included, so why did they not fake that video too if they wanted to get away with 9/11? It makes no sense that they would risk faking some of the videos which could show them all to be liars and not fake the videos which also show them to be responsible for 9/11 through basic physics, which unfortunately most Americans lack knowledge of.
#57. To: RickyJ, christine (#56)
Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it.
#58. To: wudidiz (#57)
Why are there no real videos or pictures of planes hitting the wtc?
#59. To: RickyJ (#58)
.
.
.