See other Editorial Articles
Title: Come to no-planer heaven with me....
Source:
wah.... the Internet of course ;-)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 3, 2010
Author: moi
Post Date: 2010-09-03 20:59:35 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: Look at, the facts, chicken, shit
Views: 1353
Comments: 87
I'm a no-planer now. It's easy and it's simple. You can do it too. Just look at the evidence. Do you have any idea what this does to an ego like mine? It's scary. Think about it.... No planes hit any of the WTC. Either the videos were faked or (shudder) they're holograms. WTF does that mean then? What did hit them then? If anything? So I have once again successfully distanced myself from some of my associates and society as a whole. Great. Just what I needed. /s It's lonely here. People look at you like, "Okey-dokey, dude" Trust me, don't just lay that on someone without warming them up somehow first. Introduce yourself or something. On the upside, it's like graduating to the next level. Like being promoted. To master kook. lol No, but seriously it's where the great minds must go. Lest they dwindle and stagnate and spin their tires in the lower plane realm. The glorious truth beckons ye. It calls your name like a maid in the mist. Like an angel when your sleeping it summons your higher self to transcend the 3d world and join us, the intellectual elite... So anyway, yeah..... no planes. It's a fact. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Poster Comment: OMG, my first editorial! First one I remember anyway... lol
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-30) not displayed.
.
.
.
#31. To: All (#30)
We've been fed a pack of lies. But we here, know this already. Please, please, wake up the sheep that you know.
You're a Diamond Dak - shining in the firmament of the sky.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Just a wild assed guess: They don't support the official story and show stuff they don't want us to see.
"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Where's your physics calculations to explain the nosecone plowing intact through not just one wall of steel beams that were very close together but two?
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Where's your physics calculations to explain the nosecone plowing intact through not just one wall of steel beams that were very close together but two? Their is something else to consider using PSUSAs logic. Sure you can break a vertical bored if you hit it hard and fast but what about a flat bored? The alleged plane did not just magically sheer through vertical steel columns but also through the concrete steel mesh that made up the floors. It's alot tougher to break a flat bored.
That would entail risk of discovery from oil and debris surfacing. My best guesses are the black market, extraordinary rendition programs, or broken down and disposed of in hazardous waste dumps, such as Area 51 has: Bush Orders Area 51 May Keep Its Secrets There is evidence that AA11 and AA77 didn't even exist as 9/11 flights.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Sure you can break a vertical bored if you hit it hard and fast but what about a flat bored? The alleged plane did not just magically sheer through vertical steel columns but also through the concrete steel mesh that made up the floors. It's alot tougher to break a flat bored. Sounds Anti-Kinetic.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thanks for sayin' and also for the apfn info. Here's a link to a radio interview of Killtown on the 'Final Round' show - Discussing No-Planes @ WTC theory ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
That's out there also. But the passenger manifests show that many passengers on the (alleged) flights have gone missing...and with zero muslims on any of those flights. The cover is getting uncovered. Until I see something better, I'm sticking with the Bottom of the Atlantic demise of those flights.
it's an interesting and entertaining conversation. i will say that.
Ricky, listen to Killtown on the Final Round show, linked in Grey's post and let me know what you think.
Wasting your time? And mine as well, possibly.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" OK, I will listen when I have time. :)
God is always good!
What? You have seen TWO aviation crashes?????
"Satan / Cheney in "08" No planes Tom. Think about it.
The coup de gras.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" The coup de gras. This vid rocks
Think about it. OK I have. Do I understand that the video feed of the day of the planes (that were not actually there) was photoshopped to cover the nukes that were set to blow?
"Satan / Cheney in "08" Great to see you here pro no planes.
Basically. Something like that.
Thanks for the kind response.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" You're most welcome of course. Just to clarify, the explosions simultaneous with the faked plane crashes were not likely nukes. The ones that vaporized the elevator shafts and disintegrated the mass of the twin towers were very likely nukes imo.
1. Setting The Record Straight On Mini-Nukes 2. Elias Davidsson: 9/11, International Law, and No Proof of Muslim Hijackers
I was just listening to James Fetzer talking about this: OK, I found some time, listened to the whole show. :) Killtown's argument is good, but there are two very big problems with his argument of no planes hitting the towers and all the videos of the planes hitting the towers being faked. 1st big problem: 2nd big problem: God is always good!
Good point. Doesn't take away from the fact that all the videos of planes hitting the wtc were faked. So why were they faked? Why are there no real videos or pictures of planes hitting the wtc?
There are, you just think they are all faked because some of them are. I hope you can agree with me that the videos of the collapse of WTC 7 are the biggest smoking guns of 9/11 and watching one of them is the easiest and fastest way that will make many stop and say, "wait a minute, how the heck did that happen?" You get them to question the official story just a tad, then the dam breaks open and they come to realize 9/11 was an inside job.
God is always good!
I agree that videos of the collapse of WTC are the biggest smoking guns. WTC 7 more obviously than the others because it's so old school CD style. Show me a video of the plane hitting that wasn't faked.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
The solution to problem one is that you are incorrect. Even the news media has shots of the building blowing up with no plane impact. Something else to consider is your theory of thousands of witnesses who always have their cameras with them. This was 2001 not 2010. People still used pagers back then. And not everyone had a camera in their cell phone. Even so youtube had not been invented yet. Sooo fast forward to where we are today and we have dozens of videos and stills not hundreds , not thousands, but only dozens. The majority of which are from the MSM. The answer to problem 2 is deflection. In a conspiracy this big this long in the making (Remember the first time the tried this they failed because of the human component back in 93) this massive one makes plans to throw out false leads and dead end clues. The people will eventually figure things out. Their is no stopping that. One can only stall. Hence the point of the fake clues. Their may of also been only a limited time frame... With in the first hour the two buildings of the WTC where done and over. Quick in and out. By mid afternoon the world was watching NY some converging upon. That many eyes on the scene of the incident and things get stickier. The trump card that worked at 9 in the morning doesn't work as well at 5 in the afternoon because of the massive build up of attention... Solution? Fuck it go ahead with the plan as scheduled and use the fuck up as a false lead.
I should have put a coarse language warning next to it I suppose. Ran out of editing time before it occured to me to do that. It does cover quite a bit of issues well, though, I think. Glad you found it interesting too and thanks for recommending it. :)
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Excellent post, titorite. Ricky, I've already posted info for you from the September Clues site on visual control explaining that they only had to jam electronic signals for a few minutes between the supposed plane strikes. That is not new technology -- more like SOP in a warzone and our Military isn't the only one that has that capability. Ref: signals jamming of the USS Liberty in 1967. You should at least ask yourself why the newsclips are from such a long distance until well after the alleged 2nd plane strike. Many supposed witnesses and "amateur photographers" are linked to the media, "visual arts", and the government. Some alleged witnesses could be nothing more than characters fabricated by the press in print. Here is yet another video for you showing some info about several "filmers/witnesses" towards the end at about the 04:30 mark: 2001 a fake odyssey ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Very informative sig line. :)
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
No they do not. You can say it a million times till you are blue in the face, it is still a lie. Not ONE VIDEO of WTC 2 Side exploding with nothing hitting hit and thousands of eyewitnesses to a plane hitting hit. And many did have camcorders, they were around then and widely used, don't try to tell me they weren't, and still not ONE shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it.
God is always good!
Unfortunately, yes. Both were soul-numbing.
__________________________________________________________ The passenger manifest may have been made up of names of deceased people taken from any database. That would account for the "missing" people.
I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant
that's plausible to me. i do remember many NYers who claim to have seen the planes say that they were windowless and didn't appear to look like a commerical jet.
You think this video is fake too?
God is always good!
Thank you. I thought this was interesting: Of course.
Comments (72 - 87) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#32. To: Dakmar (#24)
#33. To: christine, Shoonra, Lod, all (#28)
question: why don't they want us to see the many films immediately confiscated by the government from the cameras in and around the Pentagon that day?
#34. To: PSUSA (#22)
That plane had plenty of kinetic energy built up to go right through whatever it hit. Try pushing your hand thru a board and you won't get very far. But hit it hard and it breaks. Same principle.
#35. To: GreyLmist (#34)
That plane had plenty of kinetic energy built up to go right through whatever it hit. Try pushing your hand thru a board and you won't get very far. But hit it hard and it breaks. Same principle.
#36. To: Lod (#27)
(Edited)
Bottom of the Atlantic best guess.
Text of President Bush's 2002 directive exempting Area 51 from requirements to disclose information on hazardous waste disposal.
usgovinfo.about.com/blpdarea51. ht m
#37. To: titorite (#35)
Their is something else to consider using PSUSAs logic.
#38. To: christine (#21)
(Edited)
this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.
48:56 - 1 year ago
Aired: January 16, 2009 Host: 'SoulReal' (This is an edited version. The original show was 2+ hours.)
#39. To: GreyLmist, 4 (#36)
There is evidence that AA11 and AA77 didn't even exist as 9/11 flights.
#40. To: GreyLmist (#38)
Killtown on the 'Final Round' show - Discussing No-Planes @ WTC theory
#41. To: Rickyj (#38)
#42. To: X-15 (#6)
The hologram/cloaking-device theory is bunk. What does that leave you??
#43. To: christine (#41)
#44. To: X-15 (#14)
I've seen two in person and it took a few minutes for my mind to process the instant death I saw in front of me.
#45. To: tom007 (#42)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#46. To: titorite (#17)
Our hologram technology is not capable yet... If it was it would be on battle fields scary the hell out out folks in the middle east with 100 foot jinn... hell the Israeli might use it on the Palestinians just to be sadistic. So no..Holograms are not there yet...
#47. To: tom007, titorite (#46)
Our hologram technology is not capable yet... If it was it would be on battle fields scary the hell out out folks in the middle east with 100 foot jinn... hell the Israeli might use it on the Palestinians just to be sadistic. So no..Holograms are not there yet...
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#48. To: GreyLmist, christine, Lod, *9-11* (#15)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#49. To: wudidiz (#45)
No planes Tom.
#50. To: randge, titorite (#20)
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#51. To: tom007 (#49)
Do I understand that the video feed of the day of the planes (that were not actually there) was photoshopped to cover the nukes that were set to blow?
Why would an obviously faked video of a plane hitting the WTC be aired on International news? Why wouldn't they just use a real video of the plane?
#52. To: wudidiz (#51)
#53. To: tom007 (#52)
#54. To: tom007, Max, Original_Intent, christine, Lod, All (#53)
#55. To: GreyLmist, Lod, christine (#36)
There is evidence that AA11 and AA77 didn't even exist as 9/11 flights.
#56. To: christine (#41)
After the first plane hit WTC 1 there were thousands of NYC residents, workers, and tourists, who always have cameras with them, taking photographs and recording videos of WTC 1 burning from all directions surrounding the towers. Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it. But no one has ever posted such a video on the Internet. It would be virtually impossible for the perpetrators of 9/11 to control ALL the videos that would be taken that day. Some would have made their way into the public domain and then there would be proof that they faked the planes hitting the buildings. They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.
If they were going to fake the videos of planes hitting the towers to make sure there were no mistakes, then why did they not also fake the videos of the collapses of both the towers and WTC 7 to make it appear they were not controlled demolitions? Most see the video of the collapse of WTC 7 as the smoking gun of 9/11, myself included, so why did they not fake that video too if they wanted to get away with 9/11? It makes no sense that they would risk faking some of the videos which could show them all to be liars and not fake the videos which also show them to be responsible for 9/11 through basic physics, which unfortunately most Americans lack knowledge of.
#57. To: RickyJ, christine (#56)
Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it.
#58. To: wudidiz (#57)
Why are there no real videos or pictures of planes hitting the wtc?
#59. To: RickyJ (#58)
#60. To: wudidiz, GreyLmist, christine, Lod (#48)
#61. To: RickyJ (#56)
1st big problem: After the first plane hit WTC 1 there were thousands of NYC residents, workers, and tourists, who always have cameras with them, taking photographs and recording videos of WTC 1 burning from all directions surrounding the towers. Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it. But no one has ever posted such a video on the Internet.
#62. To: christine (#40)
it's an interesting and entertaining conversation. i will say that.
#63. To: titorite, RickyJ (#61)
(Edited)
06:18 - 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=- 415424133034814785&hl=en&emb=1
#64. To: wudidiz (#53)
#65. To: titorite (#61)
Even the news media has shots of the building blowing up with no plane impact.
#66. To: tom007 (#44)
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?"
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#67. To: Lod (#39)
But the passenger manifests show that many passengers on the (alleged) flights have gone missing...and with zero muslims on any of those flights.
#68. To: RickyJ (#56)
They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.
#69. To: GreyLmist (#63)
#70. To: GreyLmist, Original_Intent (#64)
Very informative sig line. :)
#71. To: RickyJ, GreyLmist (#69)
You think this video is fake too?
.
.
.