[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution

Disaster Relief (INSIDER) Tells Why FEMA Won't Let Citizens Help.

The $212 Billion Dollar Food ingredient poisoning your Brain

"Last Election EVER" - Elon Musk vs Mark Cuban: Billionaires BATTLE Over Dangers If Trump Loses 2024


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Come to no-planer heaven with me....
Source: wah.... the Internet of course ;-)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 3, 2010
Author: moi
Post Date: 2010-09-03 20:59:35 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: Look at, the facts, chicken, shit
Views: 1530
Comments: 87

I'm a no-planer now. It's easy and it's simple. You can do it too. Just look at the evidence.

Do you have any idea what this does to an ego like mine?

It's scary.

Think about it....

No planes hit any of the WTC. Either the videos were faked or (shudder) they're holograms.

WTF does that mean then?

What did hit them then? If anything?

So I have once again successfully distanced myself from some of my associates and society as a whole.

Great. Just what I needed. /s

It's lonely here. People look at you like, "Okey-dokey, dude"

Trust me, don't just lay that on someone without warming them up somehow first.

Introduce yourself or something.

On the upside, it's like graduating to the next level. Like being promoted.

To master kook.

lol

No, but seriously it's where the great minds must go. Lest they dwindle and stagnate and spin their tires in the lower plane realm.

The glorious truth beckons ye. It calls your name like a maid in the mist.

Like an angel when your sleeping it summons your higher self to transcend the 3d world and join us, the intellectual elite...

So anyway, yeah..... no planes. It's a fact.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


Poster Comment:

OMG, my first editorial! First one I remember anyway... lol Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 73.

#15. To: wudidiz (#0)

And a mighty fine editorial it was, too! :)

Kinda reminds me of that old Talking Heads song, "Once in a Lifetime" that goes, "How did I get here?" lol

On a high-hote, I saw that a No Planes poster won Best Answer recently at Yahoo! Answers, with close to 50% of the votes.

I don't know why there is hostility and division among some 9/11 TV Fakery and No Planes researchers. Am trying to go by the merits of the work rather than the politics of the contributers. Other than a couple of abrasive words, I think the video below is a helpful intro to the No Planes perspective. This is part of the description about it at LiveVideo.com, which has some buffering problems on my computer and can't be posted here without running automatically so will post the YouTube version for it instead:

the rabbit hole: an explanation of the basics of no plane theory, this is a bare bones examination, for people who have no idea how people could get to this theory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkvC1SCsIcY

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-03   23:16:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: GreyLmist, wudidiz, PSUSA (#15)

this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.

christine  posted on  2010-09-04   11:31:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: christine (#21) (Edited)

this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.

Thanks for sayin' and also for the apfn info. Here's a link to a radio interview of Killtown on the 'Final Round' show - Discussing No-Planes @ WTC theory
48:56 - 1 year ago
Aired: January 16, 2009 Host: 'SoulReal' (This is an edited version. The original show was 2+ hours.)

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-07   18:00:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Rickyj (#38)

Ricky, listen to Killtown on the Final Round show, linked in Grey's post and let me know what you think.

christine  posted on  2010-09-08   1:19:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: christine (#41)

OK, I found some time, listened to the whole show. :)

Killtown's argument is good, but there are two very big problems with his argument of no planes hitting the towers and all the videos of the planes hitting the towers being faked.

1st big problem:
After the first plane hit WTC 1 there were thousands of NYC residents, workers, and tourists, who always have cameras with them, taking photographs and recording videos of WTC 1 burning from all directions surrounding the towers. Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it. But no one has ever posted such a video on the Internet. It would be virtually impossible for the perpetrators of 9/11 to control ALL the videos that would be taken that day. Some would have made their way into the public domain and then there would be proof that they faked the planes hitting the buildings. They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.

2nd big problem:
If they were going to fake the videos of planes hitting the towers to make sure there were no mistakes, then why did they not also fake the videos of the collapses of both the towers and WTC 7 to make it appear they were not controlled demolitions? Most see the video of the collapse of WTC 7 as the smoking gun of 9/11, myself included, so why did they not fake that video too if they wanted to get away with 9/11? It makes no sense that they would risk faking some of the videos which could show them all to be liars and not fake the videos which also show them to be responsible for 9/11 through basic physics, which unfortunately most Americans lack knowledge of.

RickyJ  posted on  2010-09-08   2:57:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: RickyJ (#56)

1st big problem: After the first plane hit WTC 1 there were thousands of NYC residents, workers, and tourists, who always have cameras with them, taking photographs and recording videos of WTC 1 burning from all directions surrounding the towers. Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it. But no one has ever posted such a video on the Internet.

The solution to problem one is that you are incorrect. Even the news media has shots of the building blowing up with no plane impact. Something else to consider is your theory of thousands of witnesses who always have their cameras with them. This was 2001 not 2010. People still used pagers back then. And not everyone had a camera in their cell phone. Even so youtube had not been invented yet.

Sooo fast forward to where we are today and we have dozens of videos and stills not hundreds , not thousands, but only dozens.

The majority of which are from the MSM.

The answer to problem 2 is deflection. In a conspiracy this big this long in the making (Remember the first time the tried this they failed because of the human component back in 93) this massive one makes plans to throw out false leads and dead end clues. The people will eventually figure things out. Their is no stopping that. One can only stall. Hence the point of the fake clues.

Their may of also been only a limited time frame... With in the first hour the two buildings of the WTC where done and over. Quick in and out. By mid afternoon the world was watching NY some converging upon. That many eyes on the scene of the incident and things get stickier. The trump card that worked at 9 in the morning doesn't work as well at 5 in the afternoon because of the massive build up of attention... Solution? Fuck it go ahead with the plan as scheduled and use the fuck up as a false lead.

titorite  posted on  2010-09-08   7:30:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: titorite (#61)

Even the news media has shots of the building blowing up with no plane impact.

No they do not. You can say it a million times till you are blue in the face, it is still a lie. Not ONE VIDEO of WTC 2 Side exploding with nothing hitting hit and thousands of eyewitnesses to a plane hitting hit. And many did have camcorders, they were around then and widely used, don't try to tell me they weren't, and still not ONE shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it.

RickyJ  posted on  2010-09-08   16:33:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: RickyJ, titorite (#65)

titorite: Even the news media has shots of the building blowing up with no plane impact.

RickyJ: No they do not. You can say it a million times till you are blue in the face, it is still a lie. Not ONE VIDEO of WTC 2 Side exploding with nothing hitting hit and thousands of eyewitnesses to a plane hitting hit. And many did have camcorders, they were around then and widely used, don't try to tell me they weren't, and still not ONE shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it.

Yes, they do. Forward below to 05:02-06:25, CBS (Viacom) footage.

NO PLANE HIT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=mWcp2rB_i8k

There are less than 50 known amateur films alleged to have been taken on 9/11. That's not "many" among your unsourced claims of "thousands of eyewitnesses to a plane hitting", many with camcorders. Many of those have long been debunked by sources linked for you to review.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-09   19:57:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: GreyLmist (#72)

Why do you insist on lying?

IT DOES NOT SHOW NO PLANE HITTING THE SIDE OF WTC 2 AND THEN IT EXPLODING!

IT DOES NOT EVEN SHOW THE WTC 2 SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PLANE!

You have been shown to be a disinfo agent time and time again.

RickyJ  posted on  2010-09-09   20:11:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 73.

#75. To: RickyJ (#73) (Edited)

Why do you insist on lying?

IT DOES NOT SHOW NO PLANE HITTING THE SIDE OF WTC 2 AND THEN IT EXPLODING!

IT DOES NOT EVEN SHOW THE WTC 2 SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PLANE!

You have been shown to be a disinfo agent time and time again.

No I haven't and I'm not lying. You are in denial of what you don't want to see. The videos below at the referenced times might be better examples. The nose-out news video is as close as you can get to seeing what looks like a plane impacting that side of WTC 2 [Edit to add: "live, as it happened"], then it impossibly travels through the other side of the building [Edit to add: nosecone intact]. All of the other live news videos show the plane image vanishing behind [Edit to reword: the building(s)] before an explosion is seen or no plane and just an explosion. Only the amateur films later show the image of a plane impacting the WTC from the side where the explosion started.

NBC - As It Happened - September 11, 2001 - Part 2 @ 1:45
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=5TZpVyvYod4&feature=related

September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack @ 0:50, 2:25, 4:30
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=1lKZqqSI9-s

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-09 21:52:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: RickyJ (#73)

Why do you insist on lying?

IT DOES NOT SHOW NO PLANE HITTING THE SIDE OF WTC 2 AND THEN IT EXPLODING!

IT DOES NOT EVEN SHOW THE WTC 2 SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PLANE!

You have been shown to be a disinfo agent time and time again.

Gosh really? Just because someone disagrees with you they are a disinfo agent? RickyJ I do not know if you have noticed this or not, but many folks here on this thread disagree with you. Are we all Lying Disinfo agents? Because if that is the case I need to be getting paid. Alas that is not the case.

RickyJ their is an easy way you can prove yourself Right and us Wrong once and for all.

Use Physics. The basic laws of nature.

On the close up shots of the planes you can point out to us where Newtons third law of motion was obeyed show us the blow back.

You can point out to everyone the wake vortex of the plane.(If you do not know what wake vortex is look it up).

You can show us what the max speed of a 767 is at an altitude of under 100 feet according to the plane manufacturers.

Use these little details to correct us. To prove us wrong completely.

If you can.

titorite  posted on  2010-09-09 22:59:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 73.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]